Maine
Gap in Maine’s mandated reporter law raises questions about accountability for missed reports • Maine Morning Star
Every year, the Maine Child Death and Serious Injury Review Panel sees multiple instances where unusual injuries in infants go unreported or appropriately acted upon.
While a 2021 report from the panel explored the problem in-depth, it continues to be an issue, as was discussed at the most recent child welfare quarterly update with the Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee.
Maine has a mandated reporter law for situations like this. It requires professionals who are likely to come in contact with infants and other children to alert the appropriate authorities of potential abuse or neglect. However, there are gaps in the law that leave little to be done when those reports aren’t made — whether or not it’s intentional.
Mark Moran, a licensed clinical social worker who chairs the panel, said he suspects cases go unreported because of a lack of awareness that Maine law requires those sorts of injuries to be reported even if abuse isn’t suspected. Often, the missed reports come to light because someone else makes a report later on. For example, an emergency room provider may fail to report an injury that a primary care doctor notices later during a follow up visit.
As the panel’s most recent annual report notes, not every injured infant will end up a victim of abuse, but “every young child with a sentinel injury should receive a careful, multidisciplinary evaluation.”
While Moran said the intention behind the mandated reporter law is not to jump to conclusions and sever parental rights, research shows that children with certain injuries are at risk of more serious injuries or even worse outcomes. So, the goal is to identify those children early enough to prevent potential future harm.
“We’re looking to identify what the problem is, fix the problem and put the family back together,” Moran said.
Maine’s mandated reporter law
Maine’s mandated reporter statute dates back to 1965. As it currently reads, certain professionals — doctors, dentists, teachers, social workers, law enforcement — are required to immediately report known or suspected abuse, neglect or suspicious deaths of children.
When it was first adopted, the law outlined a $100 fine, up to six months in prison or both for failing to report. By 1977, the potential penalty increased to a $500 fine and was changed from a misdemeanor to a civil violation without the chance of prison time, according to a review of the law’s history.
The potential penalty for failing to make a mandated report in today’s law is still a civil violation of up to $500. It reads: “A person who knowingly violates a provision of this chapter commits a civil violation for which a forfeiture of not more than $500 may be adjudged.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
It is not clear how much underreporting is occurring in the state because “if nobody reports it, we don’t know about it,” said state Sen. Tim Nangle (D-Cumberland). The law gives reporters discretion, which may lead one person to report a scenario that another may not. Experts have said that Maine’s definition of neglect is also easily conflated with poverty.
Despite those nuances, there is one aspect of the law that does not leave room for discretion: Mandated reporters are required to report babies with fractures, burns, multiple bruises, poisoning and other severe injuries regardless of whether abuse or neglect is suspected.
This stemmed from a 2013 bill introduced on behalf of then-Gov. Paul LePage that required reporting of such injuries to children under 6 months old or otherwise unable to walk on their own.
The original text of the bill also proposed that any failure to make this sort of report be a Class E crime, which is a misdemeanor. However, that language was removed before the bill was adopted into law. An exception was also added a couple years later for injuries sustained during the delivery of the child.
The gap in the reporter statute
During a recent meeting with the Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee, Moran said he wasn’t aware of the penalty for failing to make a mandated report ever being enforced.
“I wonder why we have the civil penalty if no one’s ever going to be held accountable,” Nangle said during that discussion.
The part of the statute that relies on individual discretion is harder to prosecute, Moran said, because it becomes a question of whether someone intentionally failed to report. Whereas he noted that the section about babies with specific injuries has more opportunities to hold people accountable because there’s no question of discretion.
Moran also pointed out that there isn’t a clear enforcement mechanism. The statute doesn’t say who is responsible for assessing the fine or investigating missed reports.
Had he known about this confusion earlier, Nangle told Maine Morning Star he probably would have introduced legislation this session to direct the Office of the Maine Attorney General to investigate these instances and decide an appropriate recourse.
Moran also said that enforcing the penalty could logically fall to the Attorney General, since that is the prosecutorial entity normally responsible for civil violations.
To punish or to educate? Both.
However, the ambiguity raises a bigger question of how to balance punishment with education. Moran said the panel is more interested in changing people’s behavior than handing out punishments, but it doesn’t have to be one or the other; it could be both.
During the committee meeting, Nangle said he has “no stomach” for people not reporting, but he also told Maine Morning Star that educating mandated reporters is important to achieve the ultimate goal of keeping children safe.
Rather than paying a fine, he said there could be other penalties that require additional education. State law currently requires mandated reporters to complete training every four years.
Moran also said there have been discussions about filing complaints with licensing boards for people who fail to report, but that sort of disciplinary approach doesn’t provide broader education and awareness unless it is publicized.
The Maine Child Death and Serious Injury Review Panel recommended a different approach in its 2023-24 annual report. The panel suggests the Office of Child and Family Services works with the Attorney General’s office to compose a letter that could be sent to mandated reporters as well as their supervisors or legal counsel when the reporter fails to meet the statutory requirements.
As Moran described it, involving legal counsel or someone’s superior could be more effective than a $500 fine. Not only could the person in violation receive more education about what’s expected of them, but leadership could also take the opportunity to refresh other mandated reporters in the organization.
“We have a responsibility to keep our kids safe,” Moran said. “That’s the bottom line. That’s the baseline that we start from as a society.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Maine
Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend
WISCASSET, Maine (WMTW) – A Maine man has been arrested after police say he intentionally set a bed on fire after a dispute with his girlfriend, while they were still in it.
Police responded Monday, March 9, to a report of a fire that had been intentionally set inside a home on Beechnut Hill Road, according to the Wiscasset Police Department.
Investigators say the homeowner, Terry Couture, 41, set the bed on fire following an argument while both he and his girlfriend were in it. Authorities said the fire was extinguished and no serious injuries were reported.
Couture was arrested and charged with attempted murder, arson, aggravated criminal mischief, and domestic violence criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.
The investigation is ongoing.
Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.
Maine
Celebrate Maine Maple Weekend at Williams Family Farm
CLIFTON, Maine (WABI) – Maine Maple Sunday is less than two weeks away, and the Williams Family Farm in Clifton is gearing up for one of the sweetest seasons yet.
A long stretch of frost and snow meant a late start this year, but the first boil of sap has finally run through the evaporator, and maple season is officially underway.
At Williams Family Farm, everything is done by hand:
- Fresh maple syrup, bottled on-site
- Maple sugar, carefully extracted in small batches
- Baked candied pecans, cashews, and more
The Williams family has spent years working with whatever weather sends their way.
Long winters, surprise warmups, and everything in between—they’ve learned how to adapt so community members can enjoy their products.
As co-owner John Williams explains, the key is in the temperature.
“You need to have it warm during the day and still freezing at night, so typically that’s the middle of February,” said Williams. “We have a lot of trees, so we have to start tapping them before the conditions are ideal, so we start tapping way before it’s time for it to run just so we can get them all tapped. If you have ten trees in your backyard, you want to wait until roughly now, the middle of February to now, and when it’s actually running and put them in then because you can put all your taps in, in one day.”
They’re excited to welcome the community during Maine Maple Weekend on March 21 and 22.
They will be boiling up sap, hosting demonstrations, and providing free samples.
Locals can also join them for their third annual pancake breakfast where all proceeds are donated to Holbrook Recreation.
Follow the link to find out their hours for March and more.
Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.
Maine
AI comes with dangers and opportunities. How is Maine responding?
The ad begins with a woman standing in a department store who sort of looks like Gov. Janet Mills, but not quite.
“Introducing the Janet Mills collection, featuring a confusing choice that forces girls to compete against biological males,” the female narrator says over banal instrumental music as the video cuts to “Mills” holding a stopwatch by an outdoor track.
The Mills collection comes “with a no-parent-permission-required estrogen kit,” the narrator continues, as the imposter holds a kit of syringes while patting a boy’s hair, which seems suspiciously stiff. The commercial ends with a real picture of the governor.
As far as ads generated by artificial intelligence go, the one from the National Republican Senatorial Committee is not very convincing. But the commercial serves as a reminder about how the emerging technology is being integrated into political campaigns and other areas of life in Maine.
If state Democratic leaders get their way, AI-generated ads like this won’t be allowed in Maine without a disclaimer.
As AI technology rapidly improves, state policymakers are weighing a variety of measures that could affect how Mainers interact with it. They are taking a two-pronged approach to protect people, especially children, from potential harms — while also preparing for the possible benefits.
The technology comes in the form of virtual personal assistants, internet search results and targeted advertising by businesses. It’s being used by governments for things ranging from traffic signals to budgets and policymaking to facial recognition to surveillance.
Mills said in a written statement that AI could help improve lives, drive economic growth and solve complex problems, but that it must be used in a “prudent, responsible, and ethical manner.”
“As AI becomes more prevalent in our society, its considerable promise must be balanced against harms — known and unforeseen — that can emerge from its widespread use,” she said. “It’s clear we’re only at the beginning of AI’s evolution.”
The governor has proposed $6.7 million in her supplemental budget to begin implementing some of the recommendations of a 21-member task force she created last year to study the issue.
Her proposal, which is being reviewed by lawmakers, would create a statewide AI literacy campaign; fund local and state partnerships to help municipalities use the technology and offer grants to support job training programs to keep Maine’s workforce competitive and productive in AI-enabled workplaces, among other things.
Lawmakers, meanwhile, are considering bills to address potential harms. In a rare bipartisan move, Republicans and Democrats voted unanimously last month in support of a bill (LD 524) making AI-generated child sex abuse material illegal. But that bill must receive about $55,000 before it can be sent to the governor.
They are also considering bills:
- To require political ads in state and local elections to include a disclosure when AI-generated or altered material is used (LD 517).
- To stop human-like chatbots or social AI companions from interacting with children (LD 2162).
- And to regulate how the technology is used in mental health settings (LD 2082).
Last year, lawmakers passed a measure including AI-generated images in the state’s ban on so-called “revenge porn,” and one requiring companies to inform consumers when they’re interacting with an AI assistant. Mills signed both into law.
Other proposals regulating AI use in medical and dental insurance claims and in setting rents died in committees. So did one prohibiting the use of AI in “dynamic pricing,” in which businesses use the technology to offer different real-time prices to different consumers.
Over 1,000 measures focusing on artificial intelligence were debated in state capitols last year, the National Conference of State Legislatures said.
Some states, such as Colorado and California, are taking steps to enact a broad regulatory framework for AI. California has provisions preventing discrimination in the workplace and requiring watermarks on AI content and transparency around data used to produce reports.
But Maine lawmakers are seeking to address potential harms on a case-by-case basis — at least for now.
“I think of it as almost a whack-a-mole type of approach where we are developing legislation that very narrowly addresses specific harms of AI,” said Rep. Amy Kuhn, D-Falmouth, who is taking the lead for House Democrats.
“That sort of overarching regulatory framework just feels a little premature for Maine to me right now. I want to see that work its way through the states and let some other states take a swing before we get in there.”
Republicans, however, are worried about overregulation.

Rep. Jennifer Poirier, R-Skowhegan, said her caucus is focused on protecting children from potential harms associated with AI, but she worries that regulation will never keep up with AI’s evolution.
“You can’t always legislate your way out of everything,” Poirier said. “If you have a minor that has access to AI, and it can be used to harm them in any way, it’s our responsibility as adults to keep them safe. … But we are adults, and we need to use our own common sense.”
A recent poll from Pan Atlantic Research showed widespread concern about AI, with 66% of the 810 Mainers surveyed saying they’re mostly concerned about the potential problems of AI, while 25% were mostly optimistic.
More advanced programs can generate text, analyze reports and create increasingly lifelike images and videos. A recent AI video purporting to show Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt throwing down over the death of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein raised alarm bells in Hollywood over its realism.
Other programs have been used by businesses in ways critics say can be exploitative. Consumer Reports recently published a story about how the online grocery shopping service Instacart used AI to charge certain customers higher prices — up to 23% more — if they were flagged as having higher incomes. Instacart reportedly stopped offering stores this option for “surveillance pricing” after the story was published in December.
A lobbying effort is underway to promote AI regulation in Maine. The “Protect What’s Human” campaign launched a website earlier this year, and a spokesperson said they have invested about $210,000 in ads supporting AI regulations. The commercials are targeting Republicans voters in the Bangor and Portland regions. The group is planning to spend another $110,000 on TV, streaming services, social media and podcasts.
Other proposals passed by the Legislature reflect lawmakers’ attempts to get ahead of the AI issue in indirect ways.
The House and Senate have each recently passed a strict data privacy law that would greatly restrict the amount of data — a person’s location, browsing and shopping histories and biometric information, for example— that companies can collect, store and sell. One of the main arguments was that such data can be used to train AI models. However, the chambers will have to iron out the differences between their two versions of the measure, LD 1822, if it is to become law.
And local residents are beginning to grapple with proposed data centers, which have been controversial in other parts of the county because they consume large amounts of water. This is especially true for centers powering AI.
Lawmakers are considering a bill, LD 307, to create a moratorium on such centers and establish a state council to study and review the impact of building them in Maine.
Construction is underway on a data center in Aroostook County, while another is being proposed in Sanford. Others have been proposed in Wiscasset and Lewiston, but did not move forward.
“This whole world is shifting to computer everything,” Poirier said, “and it’s important that we keep up with the times on that.”
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia6 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia
-
Politics1 week agoMamdani’s response to Trump’s Iran strike sparks conservative backlash: ‘Rooting for the ayatollah’

