Connect with us

Maine

Clients’ families say Maine funeral home director stole their money – and peace of mind

Published

on

Clients’ families say Maine funeral home director stole their money – and peace of mind


William Jipson Jr. with a portrait of himself, left, his father, William Jipson Sr., and his sister Lynette Krapf. Jipson is one of several people who allege that Harold Lee Lamson Jr., a funeral director based out of Lincoln, stole money from a loved one’s mortuary trust. Jipson’s father died in 2022. Ben McCanna/Staff Photographer

Long before he died nearly two years ago, William Jipson Sr. set aside thousands of dollars in a mortuary trust to soften the financial burden that his cremation and burial would put on his children.

The value of the fund had grown to roughly $14,000 by the time he died in December 2022 – more than enough to cover funeral expenses. But after the Lincoln funeral director he hired appeared to keep all of the cash, Jipson’s son and daughter found themselves paying nearly $5,000 out of pocket for a gravestone “after we already paid for it once,” William Jipson Jr. said.

After months of delays and excuses, Jipson’s family hasn’t seen a dime of their money.

Advertisement

“It’s all gone. He’s taken it and spent it, and that’s it,” Jipson said. “(It’s) an awful feeling, knowing that someone wronged you, and your father at the end of life.”

The Jipson family is among a number of Mainers at the center of a criminal case against Harold Lee Lamson Jr., who operates four funeral homes in Penobscot and Washington counties. He is accused of misappropriating thousands of dollars from their loved ones’ mortuary trusts between December 2022 and February of this year – adding undue cost and emotional turmoil to the painful process of grieving and organizing a funeral.

“It’s a big kick in the teeth. Everyone wants to move on with their lives and deal with their losses,” Jipson said. “We went through 12 years of hell trying to care for my father. … And then when he passes, you’ve got to continue dealing with more years of hell.”

At one point, Lamson told Jipson’s sister that he was waiting on the gravestone to be cut and would send the money when he received the final bill. But when she called the memorial company, they told her Lamson had never placed the order, and that “this has happened a few times,” Jipson said.

Lamson is charged with four counts of theft by unauthorized transfer, a felony-level Class C charge. Each count is punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine, and Lamson may be ordered to pay thousands of dollars in restitution.

Advertisement

He first appeared in Penobscot County Superior Court this month but was not required to enter a plea. He will appear before the court again in November.

He also faces losing his state license as a funeral director and is currently under suspension after years of complaints.

Lamson declined to answer questions about the charges when reached by phone Thursday.

PROMISES AFTER PROMISES

Deborah Elms had hoped to bury her mother in Maine, where she spent much of her life before moving to North Carolina in her final years to be closer to Elms.

Advertisement

Joyce Nicholson died there in January. Years earlier, she had set up a mortuary trust. But that company went out of business and transferred responsibility over the trust to Lamson, Elms said.

“Although our family didn’t originally select (Harold) Lamson’s company, we appear to be stuck with him,” Elms wrote in a February letter to police, less than a month after Nicholson’s death.

She said Lamson was completely uninvolved in the funeral. But Elms still lost the nearly $4,000 her mother left behind after he failed to transfer the money to the out-of-state funeral home that handled her mother’s services.

After at least eight calls over more than two weeks, Elms said she spoke to Lamson on Feb. 12, at which time he promised to pay the North Carolina funeral home bill and send her whatever was left in the trust.

The funeral director in North Carolina also reached out to Lamson requesting the money. Lamson replied with an error-ridden email one month after Nicholson’s death, apologizing for the delay and citing “a volume in excess of 200 calls per year” as a factor in the slow response.

Advertisement

“While it was not my intention to wait this long, let alone 30 days, to pay this bill, time has a way of passing much quickly,” he wrote in an email to the North Carolina funeral director that Elms shared with the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. Lamson promised to send a check later that day, “tomorrow at the latest.”

But he never did, Elms said.

Ultimately, she footed the roughly $3,100 bill using money she had set aside for a trip to Maine to bury her mother and son, who died a few months earlier, Elms said. Although she made it to Maine in June, the trip put an unplanned dent in her budget.

Elms said she suffered two stress-induced heart attacks and began having nightmares. She declined to be interviewed over the phone, citing fears that recounting the story could overwhelm her.

“I get all worked up when I think of him and the disrespect he pulled on me and the funeral home here in NC,” Elms wrote in an email.

Advertisement

HOPING FOR RESTITUTION

Both Jipson and Elms said they want restitution and to see Lamson imprisoned. But neither was confident any penalties could make up for the pain they say he caused.

Under Maine law, funeral homes are required to return any money left in certain types of mortuary trusts after funeral expenses have been paid. If a funeral home is unable to render any services, as was the case for Elms, it must return all proceeds from the trust.

There are three categories of mortuary trusts available in Maine: guaranteed service agreements, credit for service agreements and existing life insurance agreements. Only the latter two contain provisions requiring leftover money to be returned.

Though it’s not clear how many Mainers have set up mortuary trusts, as the state Board of Funeral Services does not keep count, they are commonly offered by funeral homes across the state.

Advertisement

Rebekkah Martin, a former funeral home director who spent about 15 years working in the industry, said it’s relatively rare that there are any funds left over after funeral expenses, but federal and state laws provide clear timelines for when those funds must be deposited and returned.

Jipson’s family should have been entitled to the nearly $9,000 left in the trust after the funeral, William Jipson Jr. said. But he’s not optimistic about getting restitution, citing worries that Lamson could file for bankruptcy to avoid paying.

Lamson did attempt to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in March, around the same time legal troubles began to mount, but the case was dismissed in April after Lamson failed to provide all the required documents or follow up on his request, according to federal court records.

According to his bankruptcy application, Lamson owns several vehicles, worth more than $27,000, including a 2008 Cadillac and a 2018 Chrysler, plus an $80,000 investment property in Sedgwick.

YEARS OF POTENTIAL ABUSE

Advertisement

Jipson said he could not understand why Lamson was given direct access to his father’s money without there being another layer of oversight, especially because Lamson had faced earlier disciplinary issues.

“Shouldn’t there have been a little bit of a safeguard in case someone’s going to abuse the money?” Jipson said. “It just seems a little odd to me, but I guess I don’t know the system.”

Complaints against Lamson stretch back decades.

In 2005, the state Board of Funeral Services placed his license on probation for six months after he pleaded guilty to attempted theft by insurance deception, according to state records.

The board suspended Lamson’s license in June after he violated a consent agreement. But until then, he operated funeral homes in Lincoln, Millinocket, East Millinocket and Danforth, according to his company’s website.

Advertisement

Mainers can report possible misconduct by funeral homes to the Board of Funeral Services, said Joan Cohen, deputy commissioner for the Department of Professional and Financial Regulation, which oversees the board. But she said the board is not notified when transfers are requested or executed unless someone makes an official complaint.

Cohen said discipline can depend on the specific mortuary trust agreements made, “but in general they include civil penalties, probation with terms, suspension or revocation.”

She added that Lamson’s suspension was the only one the board has issued so far this year. Suspensions and revocations are relatively rare in Maine: the board did not issue any in 2023, and it only issued one revocation in 2022, and one suspension and revocation in 2021, Cohen said.

Martin, the former funeral home director, said she dealt with Lamson a few times and faced excessive delays when she tried to transfer trusts for her clients.

“I was not the least bit shocked to hear this happened,” Martin said during a phone call Wednesday.

Advertisement

Martin said mortuary trusts are a valuable tool for consumers, but only as long as the funeral home is above board. Prices can be locked in at the formation of the trust, and the money may be easier to access than life insurance payouts, which she said can ease the planning process.

“If you can’t own up to your mistakes, then you shouldn’t be in the business,” she said.



Source link

Maine

‘I could die here’: Photographer recalls Maine wedding stabbing

Published

on

‘I could die here’: Photographer recalls Maine wedding stabbing


A Massachusetts photographer was seriously injured when he was stabbed during a wedding reception last month in Raymond, Maine.

Donald Halsing, 26, was hospitalized for five days after the stabbing on May 23. NBC affiliate News Center Maine reported that 26-year-old Andrew Manderson was arrested and charged with elevated aggravated assault.

Still recovering, Halsing told NBC10 Boston the attack came out of nowhere — one moment, he was snapping photos on the dance floor, while the next, he was searching for help as blood spilled onto his camera.

“I was sitting there in that chair thinking, ‘There’s a real possibility I could die here,’” Halsing said. “Immediately, I put my hand on my chest here to try and stop the bleeding, get some pressure on it, and started yelling for help.”

Advertisement

Halsing was working at the reception at the Kingsley Pine Campgrounds. He took his last photo at 9:01 p.m., minutes before the stabbing.

“One of the wedding guests came up to me and started asking questions about our business,” he said.

Halsing said it was nothing out of the ordinary, and he tried to explain his photography business to the inquiring guest through the pulse of the DJ booth and celebrating guests.

“I thought he was going to reach in his back pocket for his phone, and instead, he didn’t pull out his phone — he pulled out a pocket knife and stabbed me,” he said.

Manderson, who faced a judge days later, is a cousin of the bride.

Advertisement

“There was this look in his eyes that he wasn’t quite all there,” Halsing said.

Halsing’s fiancée, Ashley Wall, was feet away as he struggled to stay awake. She has been his photography partner for eight years since they met at Framingham State University, and she was helping him work the wedding.

“People who were around me, they asked, ‘What can we do to help you? What do you need?’ And I said, ‘Please go check on Ashley. Please go check on my fiancée,’” he recalled.

Halsing spent five days in the hospital suffering from two lacerations to his liver, ultimately developing a blood clot in his left leg. But the road to recovery exceeds his physical wounds as he contemplates his mental state when he resumes photography next year.

“I’m also worried about what lingering effects there might be,” he said. “If we get out on the dance floor and I start remembering what happened, I don’t know how I’m going to react.”

Advertisement

Halsing still doesn’t know why he was attacked.

Manderson was released on $50,000 bail and is due back in court in October.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine’s abrupt plan to cut $400M in construction projects roils the industry

Published

on

Maine’s abrupt plan to cut 0M in construction projects roils the industry


When BDN shines a light, policymakers act. Make a gift to help our reporters keep Maine’s leaders informed. Make a donation now. 

This story will be updated.

The Maine Department of Transportation is moving to slash up to $400 million in projects from its agenda, a shocking and abrupt cutback that is rattling the state’s construction industry at the start of building season.

Roughly $50 million across six pavement projects have already been delayed, according to a memo exclusively obtained by the Bangor Daily News. The agency plans to cut or delay another $150 million in bridge, highway, intersection and multimodal projects later this month. A further $200 million or more in cuts are planned in the next three-year work plan.

Advertisement

Those figures were outlined by Transportation Commissioner Dale Doughty in the May 18 memo to Gov. Janet Mills that has since circulated widely in the transportation sector, which has been getting drip-by-drip details on the wide scope of the cuts over the past three weeks.

It comes at the beginning of the state’s relatively narrow construction season. Companies have hired workers and ordered materials for projects they expected to begin this summer. The severity of the transportation budget problems was not raised to lawmakers during the 2026 legislative session.

Kelly Flagg, executive director of the Associated General Contractors of Maine, called the shortfall “deeply troubling” in a statement.

“We stand ready to work with policymakers, stakeholders, and industry partners to identify both immediate and long-term solutions,” Flagg said. “Maine cannot afford to fall further behind.”

Insiders saw this first.
This story was broken in Maine Politics Insider, the BDN’s daily premium newsletter for the most ardent political news followers. If you are a new BDN subscriber, you can sign up here. Current subscribers can contact our customer service team to upgrade.

The cuts stem from a structural funding gap of at least $130 million in the state’s current work plan, according to Doughty’s memo. Losses are magnified because state money from the gas tax and other revenue sources is matched by federal funds. Lawmakers have long grappled with politically difficult long-term problems with the state’s transportation budget.

Advertisement

A Mills spokesperson said Wednesday morning that the administration was working on a response to questions from the BDN. The department says it needs roughly $240 million more in state capital funding annually to maintain the existing system, and that anything less than $200 million will erode it over time.

Doughty’s memo the only near-term solution is a series of bonds beginning as soon as possible. Lawmakers would have to return to Augusta to authorize that if one is going to appear on the November ballot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Owen McCarthy offers Maine Republicans real change

Published

on

Opinion: Owen McCarthy offers Maine Republicans real change


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Michael Capeci is the former chairman of the Bangor GOP.

Let’s be honest about Maine’s current state.

For many families, the cost of living has become unsustainable. Housing is out of reach for many young people. Energy bills keep rising. Many small businesses are struggling under taxes and regulations that make it harder to grow. Rural hospitals are under strain and despite years of increased state spending, the results are not showing up in people’s daily lives.

Advertisement

Concurrently, Maine continues to lose young workers to other states. That is not a statistic, it is a warning sign.

To me, the question in this Republican primary for governor is not about slogans. It is whether we continue with a political approach that has failed to reverse these trends, or whether we nominate someone with new ideas. I think that someone is Owen McCarthy.

Owen is not a political insider. He is an entrepreneur from Patten, a small town where opportunity is not assumed, it is built. He grew up in a working-class family, became the first in his family to graduate from college graduating from the University of Maine, and founded MedRhythms, a healthcare technology company focused on neurological treatment.

He didn’t just talk about opportunity. He built it. That distinction matters, because Maine’s problem is not a lack of debate it is a lack of results. We have seen the trajectory: higher costs, slower growth, and a steady outmigration of young workers. I believe Owen McCarthy represents a break from that pattern.

His Maine 2040 plan focuses on creating 50,000 new jobs in sectors where Maine has real advantages — maritime and defense, advanced forest products, and life sciences. These are export-driven industries tied directly to Maine’s workforce, geography, and institutions. What sets Owen apart is not only what he proposes, but how he approaches governing.

Advertisement

He prioritizes modernizing permitting so projects do not stall. He supports using technology to reduce costs and increase efficiency. He focuses on making it easier to build, hire, and expand in Maine.

That same practical mindset extends to healthcare. Expanding telehealth, strengthening EMS systems, improving provider flexibility, and shifting toward earlier intervention are not abstract reforms. They are system upgrades designed to improve access while controlling costs.

Maine voters consistently respond to competence. They reward candidates who understand problems and present plans to solve them. I believe they are tired of rhetoric that does not translate into results, and skeptical of politics that prioritizes messaging over execution.

Owen’s approach is grounded in solving the issues that shape daily life — affordability, healthcare access, job creation, and government efficiency. That is not just policy positioning. It is a governing model that speaks directly to voters.

Some will point to his lack of political experience. But I believe Maine’s core problems are not the result of insufficient political experience; they are the result of policies that have failed to deliver measurable improvement. Experience inside a broken system, by itself, is not a solution.

Advertisement

If Republicans want to win, this primary must be taken seriously. From my perspective, it is not about choosing a nominee for governor who can energize the base. It is about selecting someone who can compete in a broader electorate that is frustrated and looking for change.

That requires a candidate who can speak beyond the base, not by abandoning principles, but by demonstrating competence and a credible plan to address Maine’s challenges. I believe Owen McCarthy offers that combination. He represents a shift away from managed decline and toward economic execution.

This is not just another primary. It is a decision about whether Republicans position themselves to win Maine or whether they remain trapped in a cycle of repeating the same strategies and expecting different outcomes.

If Republicans want to compete for Maine’s future, they cannot afford to nominate a candidate who only motivates part of the electorate. They need someone who expands it.

I believe Owen McCarthy is that candidate.

Advertisement

And if the goal is to win Maine, then the choice should be unmistakable



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending