Connect with us

Maine

California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley

Published

on

California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley


Gov. Gavin Newsom of California on Sunday vetoed a bill that would have enacted the nation’s most far-reaching regulations on the booming artificial intelligence industry.

California legislators overwhelmingly passed the bill, called SB 1047, which was seen as a potential blueprint for national AI legislation.

The measure would have made tech companies legally liable for harms caused by AI models. In addition, the bill would have required tech companies to enable a “kill switch” for AI technology in the event the systems were misused or went rogue.

Newsom described the bill as “well-intentioned,” but noted that its requirements would have called for “stringent” regulations that would have been onerous for the state’s leading artificial intelligence companies.

Advertisement

In his veto message, Newsom said the bill focused too much on the biggest and most powerful AI models, saying smaller upstarts could prove to be just as disruptive.

“Smaller, specialized models may emerge as equally or even more dangerous than the models targeted by SB 1047 — at the potential expense of curtailing the very innovation that fuels advancement in favor of the public good,” Newsom wrote.

California Senator Scott Wiener, a co-author of the bill, criticized Newsom’s move, saying the veto is a setback for artificial intelligence accountability.

“This veto leaves us with the troubling reality that companies aiming to create an extremely powerful technology face no binding restrictions from U.S. policymakers, particularly given Congress’s continuing paralysis around regulating the tech industry in any meaningful way,” Wiener wrote on X.

The now-killed bill would have forced the industry to conduct safety tests on massively powerful AI models. Without such requirements, Wiener wrote on Sunday, the industry is left policing itself.

Advertisement

“While the large AI labs have made admirable commitments to monitor and mitigate these risks, the truth is that the voluntary commitments from industry are not enforceable and rarely work out well for the public.”

Many powerful players in Silicon Valley, including venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, OpenAI and trade groups representing Google and Meta, lobbied against the bill, arguing it would slow the development of AI and stifle growth for early-stage companies.

“SB 1047 would threaten that growth, slow the pace of innovation, and lead California’s world-class engineers and entrepreneurs to leave the state in search of greater opportunity elsewhere,” OpenAI’s Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon wrote in a letter sent last month to Wiener.

Other tech leaders, however, backed the bill, including Elon Musk and pioneering AI scientists like Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, who signed a letter urging Newsom to sign it.

“We believe that the most powerful AI models may soon pose severe risks, such as expanded access to biological weapons and cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. It is feasible and appropriate for frontier AI companies to test whether the most powerful AI models can cause severe harms, and for these companies to implement reasonable safeguards against such risks,” wrote Hinton and dozens of former and current employees of leading AI companies.

Advertisement

On Sunday, in his X post, Wiener called the veto a “setback” for “everyone who believes in oversight of massive corporations that are making critical decisions that affect the safety and welfare of the public.”

Other states, like Colorado and Utah, have enacted laws more narrowly tailored to address how AI could perpetuate bias in employment and health-care decisions, as well as other AI-related consumer protection concerns.

Newsom has recently signed other AI bills into law, including one to crack down on the spread of deepfakes during elections. Another protects actors against their likenesses being replicated by AI without their consent.

As billions of dollars pour into the development of AI, and as it permeates more corners of everyday life, lawmakers in Washington still have not proposed a single piece of federal legislation to protect people from its potential harms, nor to provide oversight of its rapid development.

Copyright 2024 NPR

Advertisement





Source link

Maine

Supporters of a Maine voter ID law hand in signatures to force referendum

Published

on

Supporters of a Maine voter ID law hand in signatures to force referendum


AUGUSTA — Organizers of an effort to require Maine voters to show photo identification before filling out their ballots have turned in petitions to send the measure to a citizens’ referendum this fall.

The group behind the effort submitted the petitions Monday and said they contain more than 170,000 signatures, far more than required to force a statewide vote. The Secretary of State’s Office must now review and formally certify the petitions.

Among other things, the proposal would require people to present a photo ID at the polls or when requesting an absentee ballot, unless they have a religious exemption to being photographed.

Voters without a photo ID could cast a provisional ballot, which would be counted if they produce a photo ID within four days of the election. It would also require the secretary of state to provide free state nondriver IDs to people who need them.

Advertisement

Enacting a statewide voter ID requirement has been proposed repeatedly by Republicans in the Maine Legislature in recent years, but has been blocked by Democrats, who have criticized the costs of such a program and warned that the new requirement would create long lines at the polls and effectively discourage voting.

In order for citizen initiatives to get on the ballot, supporters must submit a required number of signatures from registered Maine voters to the secretary of state. That number is equal to 10% of the number of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election, or 67,682 based on the results of the 2022 gubernatorial election.

This story will be updated.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine electricity bills increased again this month

Published

on

Maine electricity bills increased again this month


Central Maine Power Co. customers began paying 7% more in their monthly bills Jan. 1 to help fund $3.3 billion of upgrades to transmission lines, poles and other equipment in New England. Versant Power ratepayers can also expect increases, though smaller, later this year.

Federal regulators are apportioning about $280 million of the region’s costs to Maine’s two major utilities, with the remainder assigned to utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. The costs are divided based on load, or how much electricity each service area uses.

Consumer advocates in the region have criticized the practice of assigning transmission costs to ratepayers, saying upgrades proposed by utilities are often unnecessary, insufficiently regulated and enhance the value of assets for shareholders at the expense of customers.

“The ratepayers are the only wallets in the room,” said Donald M. Kreis, New Hampshire’s consumer advocate who says poles, wires and other components of transmission are overbuilt.

Advertisement

As an example, one energy company proposed rebuilding a 49-mile transmission line in New Hampshire for $384 million, when less than 8% of it needed to be replaced, according to consumer advocates.

Versant said transmission rates are set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “using a preset formula and cover needed investments” in local transmission and regional investments.

“Most of the transmission rate increase is due to Versant paying our share to support regional transmission projects as part of our ISO-New England membership,” it said in an emailed statement.

CMP spokesman Jon Breed said ratepayer-funded spending authorized by FERC “will help reduce outages and protect our system from the threats of extreme weather in Maine.” New England’s transmission is a nearly 9,000-mile system, he said.

How the money in its entirety will eventually be spent is unclear. Eversource Energy, the parent company of utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, has plans for numerous projects, such as a partial line rebuild and other work totaling nearly $80 million in Connecticut, and a $7.4 million rebuild of a substation in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“We’re responsible for maintaining just under half of the regional transmission system in New England and are constantly working to upgrade and modernize the transmission system, making the electric grid more resilient to increasing extreme weather caused by climate change and improving reliability for customers across New England,” Eversource spokeswoman Jamie Ratliff said in an email.

A representative of National Grid, parent company of New England Power Co., which said its revenue requirement is $485.4 million this year, did not respond to an emailed request for information about its projects.

CMP customers who use an average of 550 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month are paying $149.83, up from $139.62 in 2024, according to the Maine Office of the Public Advocate. Versant customers in the Bangor Hydro District who use the same amount of power pay $155.80, up from $148.09, a 5.2% increase, the utility said. Customers in Versant’s Maine Public District in the northern reaches of the state pay $146.37, an increase from $144.35.

Utilities in New England say “revenue requirements” of $3.3 billion are needed for 2025, up more than 16% from last year, according to the New England Power Pool, or NEPOOL, an advisory group of utilities, consumer advocates, consumers and others.  

Together, CMP and Versant account for 8.4% of the revenue needed in the region for the transmission upgrades, as identified by the utilities. In contrast, subsidiaries of Eversource Energy account for nearly 59%, or about $1.9 billion.

Advertisement

Increased rates for consumers are not due solely to transmission costs. Utilities also are collecting more than $254 million, including interest, to compensate for previous under-collecting of revenue based on the difference between cost forecasts and actual costs last year.

Ratiliff said the rate change is “largely the result” of utilities recovering less of their 2023 transmission costs.

Still, the largest driver of higher rates that took effect Wednesday is significant construction by utilities and replacing older transmission equipment, Landry said.

“They figured out they can build stuff and send the bills and everyone has to pay them,” he said.

The transmission costs will overwhelm a slight decline in electricity bills approved by Maine regulators in November. A lower 2025 standard offer rate — the default supply price for most home and small-business customers who don’t buy electricity with competitive energy providers – reflects stable natural gas prices, the main driver of power generation in New England.

Advertisement

Seth Berry, a former state legislator who chaired the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee and is critical of the performance of investor-owned utilities, said scrutiny by state regulators could uncover weaknesses in the argument for transmission upgrades and force utilities to scale back their plans.

The lure of profitability is difficult for utilities to resist and the result, he said, is “a race to a very expensive and overbuilt transmission network.”

Utilities should instead focus on repairing and upgrading “very creaky” distribution systems, he said. The networks of roadside power lines is most vulnerable to storms and potential damage that knocks out power.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)

Published

on

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)


The Pistons have plucked some depth away from the Maine Celtics, agreeing to a two-way deal with Rob Harper Jr. according to a report from ESPN’s Tim Bontemps.

Harper Jr. played for the Celtics in the Summer League and signed an Exhibit 10 deal with the team before being waived at the end of training camp. He earned a bonus after suiting up for the Maine Celtics where he had been a standout in recent weeks. Harper Jr. played the entirely of the G-League Showcase Cup with Maine and had put together a terrific stretch in recent days up North.

Over the past four regular season games, he was averaging 22 points per game off the bench while shooting 42.5 percent from 3-point range, playing alongside JD Davison, Baylor Scheierman, Drew Peterson and Anton Watson in Maine.

The 24-year-old wing went undrafted out of Rutgers in 2022 but played the first two years of his career with the Raptors. He was waived by Toronto after suffering a season-ending injury last December before catching on with the Celtics this summer when he was recovered.

Advertisement

The 6-foot-4 wing still has two years left of two-way eligibility, making him an appealing prospect to Detroit likely after they lost a key guard in Jaden Ivey last week to a season-ending knee injury. The Pistons will need to release one of their two-way players in order to make room to sign Harper Jr. officially.

The Celtics filled all of their own three two-way spots with Davison, Peterson and Watson, so the team had no way of retaining Harper Jr. without offering him a spot on the 15-man roster.

  • BETTING: Check out our MA sports betting guide, where you can learn basic terminology, definitions and how to read odds for those interested in learning how to bet in Massachusetts.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending