Connect with us

Maine

California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley

Published

on

California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley


Gov. Gavin Newsom of California on Sunday vetoed a bill that would have enacted the nation’s most far-reaching regulations on the booming artificial intelligence industry.

California legislators overwhelmingly passed the bill, called SB 1047, which was seen as a potential blueprint for national AI legislation.

The measure would have made tech companies legally liable for harms caused by AI models. In addition, the bill would have required tech companies to enable a “kill switch” for AI technology in the event the systems were misused or went rogue.

Newsom described the bill as “well-intentioned,” but noted that its requirements would have called for “stringent” regulations that would have been onerous for the state’s leading artificial intelligence companies.

Advertisement

In his veto message, Newsom said the bill focused too much on the biggest and most powerful AI models, saying smaller upstarts could prove to be just as disruptive.

“Smaller, specialized models may emerge as equally or even more dangerous than the models targeted by SB 1047 — at the potential expense of curtailing the very innovation that fuels advancement in favor of the public good,” Newsom wrote.

California Senator Scott Wiener, a co-author of the bill, criticized Newsom’s move, saying the veto is a setback for artificial intelligence accountability.

“This veto leaves us with the troubling reality that companies aiming to create an extremely powerful technology face no binding restrictions from U.S. policymakers, particularly given Congress’s continuing paralysis around regulating the tech industry in any meaningful way,” Wiener wrote on X.

The now-killed bill would have forced the industry to conduct safety tests on massively powerful AI models. Without such requirements, Wiener wrote on Sunday, the industry is left policing itself.

Advertisement

“While the large AI labs have made admirable commitments to monitor and mitigate these risks, the truth is that the voluntary commitments from industry are not enforceable and rarely work out well for the public.”

Many powerful players in Silicon Valley, including venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, OpenAI and trade groups representing Google and Meta, lobbied against the bill, arguing it would slow the development of AI and stifle growth for early-stage companies.

“SB 1047 would threaten that growth, slow the pace of innovation, and lead California’s world-class engineers and entrepreneurs to leave the state in search of greater opportunity elsewhere,” OpenAI’s Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon wrote in a letter sent last month to Wiener.

Other tech leaders, however, backed the bill, including Elon Musk and pioneering AI scientists like Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, who signed a letter urging Newsom to sign it.

“We believe that the most powerful AI models may soon pose severe risks, such as expanded access to biological weapons and cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. It is feasible and appropriate for frontier AI companies to test whether the most powerful AI models can cause severe harms, and for these companies to implement reasonable safeguards against such risks,” wrote Hinton and dozens of former and current employees of leading AI companies.

Advertisement

On Sunday, in his X post, Wiener called the veto a “setback” for “everyone who believes in oversight of massive corporations that are making critical decisions that affect the safety and welfare of the public.”

Other states, like Colorado and Utah, have enacted laws more narrowly tailored to address how AI could perpetuate bias in employment and health-care decisions, as well as other AI-related consumer protection concerns.

Newsom has recently signed other AI bills into law, including one to crack down on the spread of deepfakes during elections. Another protects actors against their likenesses being replicated by AI without their consent.

As billions of dollars pour into the development of AI, and as it permeates more corners of everyday life, lawmakers in Washington still have not proposed a single piece of federal legislation to protect people from its potential harms, nor to provide oversight of its rapid development.

Copyright 2024 NPR

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine State Police seek help in 26-year-old disappearance case of Angel “Tony” Torres

Published

on

Maine State Police seek help in 26-year-old disappearance case of Angel “Tony” Torres


SACO, Maine (WGME) — Maine State Police are asking for the public’s help in the investigation of a man’s disappearance that has remained unsolved for 26 years.

Angel “Tony” Torres reportedly went missing in May of 1999, last seen around the area of Saco, Biddeford, and Old Orchard Beach.

Police say foul play is suspected.

On Torres’ 38th birthday in 2016, his family reportedly received a donation that allowed them to offer a $10,000 reward for his whereabouts.

Advertisement

Since then, police say the reward has been bumped up to $20,000 following another donation.

Police are directing anyone with information on Torres’ disappearance to call (207) 624-7076 x9 or use the tip form here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

The tush push is still illegal in Maine high school football 

Published

on

The tush push is still illegal in Maine high school football 


The Philadelphia Eagles will be able to continue their successful short yardage play, known as the “tush push,” after NFL owners rejected a proposal to ban the much-debated maneuver this week.

But don’t expect to see the play taking hold in Maine high school football — at least not legally.

Two Maine high school football rules officials explained to the Bangor Daily News how the tush push, which involves offensive players lining up in the backfield and helping to push the quarterback forward once the ball is snapped, conflicts with a “helping the runner” rule.

“The procedure is, if you start to see it, you blow the play dead,” said Allan Snell from Maine’s association for football officials.

Advertisement

The helping the runner rule applies across the country where state organizations follow the National Federation of State High School Associations football rulebook. The helping the runner rule says that an offensive player can’t push, pull or lift the ballcarier to advance their forward progress.

Ralph Damren, who has been refereeing Maine football games for decades, is also the football rules interpreter for Maine and represents the state at NFHS Football Rules Committee meetings. In that role, he helps referees across the state understand and implement those rules.

“Our stance on the tush push, or whatever you want to call it, is that the forward progress has stopped once the runner’s ability to advance on his own has stopped,” Damren explained. “So we don’t flag it for helping the runner, we just kill the play. And rule that the ball is dead right where it is.”

A particularly aggressive case could be flagged for a five-yard helping the runner penalty, the Maine officials explained, but typically referees would just blow a play dead once they see a player pushing a teammate to advance forward progress.

Different states could have different interpretations of the helping the runner rule and how it applies to a tush-push-like play, Damren said.

Advertisement

Damren said that plays like this could happen either in goal line situations or other short yardage plays.

“You might see it on the goal line, but a lot of times you would see it on a close to a first down situation where his teammates want to push him to gain an extra inch, maybe” Damren said.

The tush push is also sometimes called the “Brotherly Shove” for its association with the Philadelphia Eagles. Snell said it may be popular with some teams in the NFL, but the approach raises some competitive and safety concerns at the high school level. Damren likened the tush push to a rugby scrum.

“Rugby is a very, very risky sport,” Damren added. “And I don’t think we want to turn football into rugby.”

NFHS felt strongly enough about dissuading the tush push in high school football that it made the helping the runner rule an official point of emphasis in 2023.

Advertisement

“Rule changes have been made at higher levels of football allowing offensive teams to pile in behind and directly push the runner. Because of these changes, we are now seeing similar plays at the high school level,” NFHS wrote at the time. “As guardians of the game, it is imperative that all stakeholders work together to remove ‘helping the runner’ from our high school game.”

Damren said coaches have been “very amicable” about officials’ approach to not allowing tush-push-like plays in Maine high school football, and that they “haven’t run into any problems” with it in the last few years.

Bangor High School football coach Dave Morris said he doesn’t really have an opinion on the tush push in the NFL and wasn’t overly familiar with the Eagles’ formation and approach with the play beyond seeing it on TV a few times.

“I think in high school football, if you’re relying on that to get the yardage, then you’re probably not doing what you probably could be doing up front, in terms of blocking and trying to dominate somebody up front,” Morris said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Senator Collins Urges Secretary of Labor to Reverse Halt on Job Corps Enrollment in Maine

Published

on

Senator Collins Urges Secretary of Labor to Reverse Halt on Job Corps Enrollment in Maine


WASHINGTON D.C. (WAGM) – Senator Susan Collins is pressing the Department of Labor for answers after both of the state’s Job Corps centers had their enrollment frozen earlier this year, and now the future of the program is being questioned on Capitol Hill.

The Loring and Penobscot Job Corps centers serve nearly 500 students in Maine each year. Loring alone employs 129 staff, making it one of the largest employers in rural Aroostook County according to Senator Collins. During a Senate Appropriations hearing, Senator Collins challenged the department’s decision to halt enrollment in Maine while proposing the elimination of the entire Job Corps program nationwide.

“Did you consider the potential impact that halting enrollment at the two centers in Maine and then which you did only in the state of Maine and also proposing the elimination of the program on peoples whose life was changed, and I would argue, saved by Job Corps?”

“First and foremost, I want to say at the front end: We agree that this population is somebody we all care about. That is not the essence of what we’re here to talk about, but we do have to discuss the sustainability of Job Corps… It’s a $1.7 billion program with a 38% graduation rate when oftentimes the cost of almost $50,000 per student and to get out about $156,000, we are in the hole now. I would have to come to the Appropriations Committee and ask for more money to just get us back to baseline to have a graduation rate of 32%. So can we do better? I think we can.”

Advertisement

The Department of Labor says no final decisions have been made about closures, but Senator Collins is calling for an immediate reversal of the enrollment freeze in Maine.

The Department of Labor recently released a detailed report analyzing the financial performance and operational costs of the Job Corps Program.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending