Connecticut
Opinion: Energy legislation needs work, but solutions are in sight
When SB 1560, An Act Concerning Connecticut’s Economy, Electricity Affordability and Business Competitiveness and Establishing the Connecticut Energy Procurement Authority and the Green Bond was posted, it raised eyebrows.
It’s not often a comprehensive 80-page energy bill is introduced in a committee other than Energy & Technology.
The bill creates the Connecticut Energy Procurement Authority (CEPA), charged with taking over the buying of electricity, a function performed by our utilities. Also created is a Green Bond fund to pay for parts of electricity bills currently funded by ratepayers.
The complexity of energy markets is daunting, but it’s important to note that there are processes, called dockets, in which all the players get a chance to participate equally. That due process is vital. It minimizes favoring one interest group over another.
SB 1560 needs work in that area. From testimony posted on the CGA’s website, it clear that many of the bill’s proposals caught energy stakeholders off guard.
For example, if you put solar on your house or business, you are compensated for that, just like a power plant. And on really sunny days, unlike a fossil fuel plant, you’re putting 100% clean electricity into the grid. SB 1560 would drastically reduce that compensation for solar, just when grid-helpful solar with battery backup installations are increasing.
Solar vendors testified the change would wipe out the solar industry in Connecticut. The exodus of those businesses, jobs, and tax revenue from the state is in no way a positive. There’s a docket currently underway examining solar compensation. Let’s allow that to play out.
Another change proposes redefining nuclear power as renewable energy. To be clear, this won’t suddenly make spent uranium fuel rods unspent. But it will take funding away from true renewables that are cheaper in the long term.
Ironically, for legislation promoting cost reductions, the solar and nuclear sections will save little, if anything, in the short term, and likely increase costs long term. Similarly, a section to reduce high demand charges to businesses would simply spread that among other ratepayers.
Tasked with electricity procurement, CEPA, according to the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel, is not obligated to follow the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, which means “… both participants appearing before it and ratepayers are not guaranteed due process.” Further, CEPA can accept monetary gifts. It’s worth contemplating how sizable donations might influence CEPA’s politically appointed directors.
CEPA would use bonds to fund some of the combined public benefits programs. This could work if done with care. But as written, there are safeguards that are missing. Concerns raised by OCC’s analysis articulate situations that could require ratepayers to “… cover costs of the new programs in addition to the current costs ratepayers pay for on bills.”
OCC points out they’ve already “… evaluated different potential revisions to our current procurement laws and processes…” in collaboration with the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, the Energy & Technology Committee, and other stakeholders. If legislators elect to go with a CEPA type entity, OCC has recommendations, one of which places it under the auspices of PURA or the Dept of Energy & Environmental Protection. This would continue necessary oversight on behalf of all ratepayers.
Legislators voted SB 1560 out of the Finance, Revenue & Bonding committee, making clear it needs to be improved. They want to prudently address high utility rates. The OCC’s expertise is in understanding how to best put that in play.
Let’s put their guidance to work.
Andy Bauer is a member of the Town of Portland’s Clean Energy Task Force.
Connecticut
Connecticut woman identified as longtime Jeffrey Epstein assistant
NEW CANAAN, CT (WFSB) — Additional un-redacted names came to light from Jeffrey Epstein files this week, revealing that a longtime assistant of the disgraced financier is from Connecticut.
Lesley Groff from New Canaan was Epstein’s executive assistant for almost two decades. Her name appears in the documents more than 130,000 times.
Documents show that she was served a subpoena in 2019 after Epstein’s arrest, but prosecutors declined to charge her.
She also faced multiple lawsuits by victims accusing her of facilitating his crimes. Those were also dropped.
Legal representatives say she has cooperated with the investigation in the past and was never told she was considered a co-conspirator.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
Connecticut
Advocates push Connecticut lawmakers for ‘aid in dying’ legislation
A group of advocates is pushing to make Connecticut the next state to allow the practice of aid-in-dying, also known as medical assistance in dying, but they may already be running out of time this session.
The push comes as New York became the 13th state to allow aid-in-dying after Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill into law late last week.
A coalition called Compassion and Choices has been airing short films around the state, followed by discussions on the topic, in hopes of winning over more support.
Advocate Deltra James is a regular panelist, talking about her experience coaching people preparing for the end of their life as a death doula.
“What I see often is not so much a fear of the act of dying, but it’s a lot of fear around suffering and how they might die,” James said.
She said she sometimes helps healthy people with estate planning, but other clients are looking for support in their final days.
Deltra was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2019 and was initially given just three years to live.
After her diagnosis, she decided to become an advocate for others and discovered being a doula.
She’s among the advocates hoping to see the legislature revisit the issue. Lawmakers have tried and failed several times to allow aid-in-dying before pausing for the last few years.
Sen. Gary Winfield (D-New Haven) supports the idea but isn’t sure the legislature will have enough time.
The co-chair of the Judiciary Committee noted the body will need to take up several judicial nominations. He also expects possible bills on hot-button issues like gun control and immigration.
“The number of days is short, and as much as I’m interested in the issue, I don’t know that we’ll have the actual time for it,” he said.
Some critics remain staunchly opposed.
“It doesn’t speak well for us as a society, we should be respecting life, we should be protecting life,” Connecticut Catholic Public Affairs Conference Executive Director Chris Healy said.
Healy remains opposed on moral grounds, but he raised concerns about Canada’s experience with medical assistance in death.
Health Canada reported just 1,018 deaths in 2016, when it was first legal, but a November report said there were 16,499 deaths in 2024. That accounts for roughly 1 in 20 deaths.
Media reports indicate most of the deaths were for patients with a terminal diagnosis, but some patients cited depression or mental health issues as their reason.
“In the goodness of our hearts, we shouldn’t be turning into this, sort of, cruel culture of death that infects our society today,” Healy said.
James and others note that past proposals in Connecticut have included strict restrictions, such as requiring that someone be a Connecticut resident, at least 21 years old, and have a prognosis of six months or less to live.
James also said people are free to live according to their moral beliefs, but she does not think that should be the basis for laws limiting other people’s choices.
“It’s deeply uncomfortable that somebody else is comfortable with my suffering, or with other people’s suffering,” she said.
Connecticut
West Hartford Restaurant Cited By State Over Loitering, Smoking Violations
WEST HARTFORD, CT — An upscale Mexican eatery in West Hartford was recently fined, and its liquor license was suspended briefly due to violations cited by the state.
The state Department of Consumer Protection’s Liquor Control Commission has suspended the liquor permit for El Santo Mezcal Tequila, located at 970 Farmington Ave. in West Hartford.
The permit, state officials said, will be suspended for one day on March 23.
This action follows a resolution concerning issues identified by the state agency.
The establishment also paid a fine of $1,000 as part of the resolution.
The suspension addresses specific violations of state statutes and regulations.
These include Section 30-90, which pertains to loitering on permit premises.
Additionally, the establishment was cited under Section zzz30-6-A24 (a), which governs the conduct of permit premises and unlawful conduct, specifically referencing smoking.
The Liquor Control Commission is responsible for regulating the sale of alcoholic beverages within the state of Connecticut.
This includes issuing permits, enforcing compliance with state laws and regulations, and investigating alleged violations.
-
Politics1 week agoWhite House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration
-
Alabama6 days agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Politics1 week agoTrump unveils new rendering of sprawling White House ballroom project
-
San Francisco, CA1 week agoExclusive | Super Bowl 2026: Guide to the hottest events, concerts and parties happening in San Francisco
-
Ohio1 week agoOhio town launching treasure hunt for $10K worth of gold, jewelry
-
Culture1 week agoAnnotating the Judge’s Decision in the Case of Liam Conejo Ramos, a 5-Year-Old Detained by ICE
-
Culture1 week agoIs Emily Brontë’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ Actually the Greatest Love Story of All Time?
-
News1 week agoThe Long Goodbye: A California Couple Self-Deports to Mexico