Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: Cutting Metro-North’s New Haven Line service a bad deal for CT

Published

on

Opinion: Cutting Metro-North’s New Haven Line service a bad deal for CT


Metro-North’s New Haven Line provides frequent and reliable transportation between Connecticut and New York. Between 85,000 and 100,000 weekday riders use the New Haven Line, with commuters to New York City collectively bringing around $9.5 billion in earnings back to spend at local Connecticut businesses.

The new state budget, which proposes cutting nearly $40 million from the New Haven line, is deeply concerning. The cut will likely mean reduced and delayed service and crowded trains that will send riders into their cars and onto the highway. This couldn’t be more incongruous with Connecticut’s ambitious transportation and climate goals, and will make the state less competitive.

The Connecticut Department of Transportation says the proposed slash of funds is rooted in low ridership post-pandemic. And it is true that commuting patterns have changed in its wake. But while fewer commuters are taking the train on Mondays and Fridays, ridership overall is still strong — up to about 70% of 2019 levels, and in the first three months of 2023, nearly twice what it was in 2022, according to MTA data.

This is an impressive upward trend. What will it be in 2024? Certainly lower if these budget cuts pass.

Advertisement

Service would drop about 15% starting July 1, impacting both off-peak and peak trains. Peak service would be reduced to 60% of its current levels. If you’ve been on a peak service train between New Haven Union Station and Grand Central Terminal lately, you know there isn’t room for hundreds more riders per train.

Right now, New Haven Line riders only have to wait half an hour between trains, regardless of the time of day, which makes the train an attractive alternative to driving in traffic. But 50 fewer trains per day means waiting much longer. This is a severe problem for riders commuting to work and will likely tip the scales for many commuters away from transit and into their cars. And it’s also inconvenient for all types of riders — those who take the train to school and to visit New York for fun and other activities.

The New Haven Line — Metro-North’s busiest — is a perfect example of bistate connectivity and regional interdependence. The state of Connecticut owns the rails and stations and Metro-North Railroad operates the train service on the New Haven Line in Connecticut. These cuts will put a strain on this relationship and undermine investments the MTA is making to the New Haven Line, like the Penn Station Access project.

At the same time, Connecticut continues to make capital improvements to the line and has called on the MTA to do the same in places like New Rochelle where capital investments are necessary to speed service. It seems that both states need to do a better job cooperating with each other to ensure that New Haven Line riders on both sides of the state line are getting the service they need to ensure robust and reliable transit for our region.

Despite what some clickbait headlines may say, working in the office is not gone forever. Office workers don’t mind being in the office; it is the long commutes and delays they hate. While adjustments may be needed to address changing work patterns, service reductions will hurt our regional economy and make commutes a longer, less comfortable experience.

Advertisement

A better path would be to fully fund the New Haven Line and support investments in building transit-oriented communities, as proposed with Work Live Ride, which is being considered by the legislature this year. Work Live Ride legislation would incentivize and empower towns to create transit-oriented communities along rail and bus routes.

At the end of the day, a state’s budget demonstrates its values. Connecticut is a state that values essential workers, mass transit, regional connectivity and the environment. We need a budget that shows it.

We must plan for the future we want to see in Connecticut. The state must include the full $38 million budget line item for the New Haven Line commuter rail service in this year’s budget. And the MTA and CT DOT should work in tandem to make New Haven Line service as appealing as possible to riders.

The MTA is already looking to shift service in other parts of the system to better reflect changing travel patterns — we need that in Connecticut, too — and a fully funded New Haven Line that serves riders and the state’s economy.

Melissa Kaplan-Macey is vice president of State Programs and Connecticut Director at Regional Plan Association.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

Thousands without power as storms rip through CT

Published

on

Thousands without power as storms rip through CT


More than 10,000 customers were without power Saturday evening as thunderstorms rolled through wide swathes of Connecticut.

Eversource, which serves 1,312,610 customers in Connecticut, had 11,584 customers without power as of just before 8 p.m. Saturday. Of the total, 1,850 outages were in Monroe as of that hour.

United Illuminating, which serves 344,849 customers in 17 Connecticut town, had 1,009 customers without power at 8 p.m. Most of the outages were in New Haven, Milford, Orange and Woodbridge.

CT’s extreme heat is landing people in hospital. Don’t just drink water on hot days, doctor says

Advertisement

Amid abysmal heat in Connecticut this week weather forecasters had predicted days of intermittent rain.

Here’s why so much of the US is broiling this week.

The National Weather Service, which now says the current heat advisory is through 8 p.m. Sunday, also forecasts periodic thunder storms for this weekend. The heat wave, accompanied by high humidity, has made it feel like 95 to 105 degrees or even hotter most of this week. This prolonged period of intense heat began on Monday and will persist until Sunday, with the most intense heat hitting the last few days.

Weather delay halts third round of Travelers Championship with Kim, Bhatia tied for lead



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

CT DOT updates $20M replacement of highway bridge destroyed in fiery crash

Published

on

CT DOT updates $20M replacement of highway bridge destroyed in fiery crash


The Connecticut Department of Transportation, or DOT, has provided an update on the Fairfield Avenue Bridge replacement over Interstate 95 in Norwalk, according to a statement.

The bridge had previously been demolished following a fiery crash on May 2.

With the design finished on June 1, workers have recently begun removing the damaged center of the bridge pier on June 18, according to the DOT. Workers have also begun repairing the concrete abutments that will support the future bridge.

“This project is moving forward at incredible speed thanks to the hard work and dedication of the CTDOT and Yonkers crews who have remained in constant communication over the last several weeks. Thanks to continued strong collaboration, we remain optimistic of meeting our goals to have this bridge fully reopened next spring,” said Connecticut Department of Transportation Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto.

Advertisement

Woman in critical condition after being found in CT parking lot with life-threatening injuries

The total cost for the bridge replacement is estimated at $15 million, per a statement. The total project is expected to be approximately $20 million, with the federal government expected to cover up to 80% of the costs for the entire project.

I-95 overpass in Connecticut scorched during a fuel truck inferno demolished

Cameras will be installed to allow for viewing of the I-95 area construction process as well, according to the DOT.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Kevin Rennie: Connecticut Bar Association is familiar with silence at crucial moments

Published

on

Kevin Rennie: Connecticut Bar Association is familiar with silence at crucial moments


Watch your mouth. That was the message from the Connecticut Bar Association’s three top leaders to the organization’s thousands of members, of which I’m one. The June 13 statement was prompted by perpetually aggrieved Donald Trump supporters hurling abuse at prosecutors, jurors and Judge Juan Merchan after the former president’s conviction this month on 34 counts of violating New York law through a 2016 hush money scheme.

The CBA officers, Maggie Castinado, James T. Shearin and Emily A. Gianquinto, condemned but did not name public officials who issued statements calling the trial a sham, hoax, and rigged; abused Judge Merchan as corrupt and unethical; and claimed the jury was partisan and in the bag for guilty verdicts from the start.

The statement excoriated social media posts seeking to breach the confidentiality of the jurors’ identity. What it did not allege is that any Connecticut lawyers were participating in these assaults on the rule of law. Near its conclusion, the trio’s homily got to the point. “It is up to us, as lawyers,” they wrote, “to defend the courts and our judges. As individuals, and as an Association, we cannot let the charged political climate in which we live dismantle the third branch of government. To remain silent renders us complicit in that effort.”

And then U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, a lawyer, had to go and spoil it all three days later by unleashing the same type of hyperbole. He called the Supreme Court “brazenly corrupt and brazenly political” on CNN. Murphy added that Justice Clarence Thomas is “just a grift,” while Justice Samuel Alito is an open political partisan.

Advertisement

As of Friday, the civility umpires at the CBA had issued no statement chiding Murphy.

The CBA is familiar with silence at crucial moments. Six years ago, a mob of antisemites targeted the renomination of Judge Jane Emons to the Superior Court. Judge Emons was the target of appalling rhetoric. The CBA released no thunderbolts as the House of Representatives refused to vote on her renomination, forcing her off the bench.

A few years ago, I wrote about Alice Bruno, a Connecticut judge who failed to show up for work for two years while continuing to receive her salary and benefits. Emails showed plenty of people knew that Judge Bruno had been missing in action, but they remained silent. Bruno’s fate was decided in a secret proceeding when she was granted a disability pension that currently pays her more than $5,000 every two weeks. She worked, often erratically, as a Superior Court judge for only four years before she stopped showing up in 2019.

Before becoming a judge, Bruno did an 18-month stint as executive director of the Connecticut Bar Association. It remained silent throughout the Bruno saga, which undermined the public’s confidence in the judiciary.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal published a sensational investigation into the appalling saga of a federal bankruptcy judge and his personal relationship with lawyer Elizabeth Freeman, who had been his law partner and clerk in Houston. One of the nation’s biggest law firms, Kirkland & Ellis, brought in Freeman to work with it on cases before her boyfriend, Judge David R. Jones.

Advertisement

An anonymous letter lit the fuse on exposing the shocking conflicts at work in the nation’s busiest bankruptcy court. Michael Van Deelan, a small investor in a firm that filed for bankruptcy in the Houston court, believed he had not been treated fairly in the shakeout of the company. Van Deelan received a copy of the letter and filed it with the court in an attempt to have Jones disqualified from his case. Van Deelan’s motion was denied and the letter was sealed from public view, the Journal reported.

Van Deelan discovered through an internet search that Jones and Freeman owned a house together since 2017. Plenty of lawyers appear to have known that the two were engaged in a romantic relationship. To expose it would have ended a sweet arrangement that was a bonanza for the firms and their bankruptcy clients who brought Freeman in on their cases.

No one said a word. Only Van Deelan, a 74-year-old retired math teacher, brought justice where corruption ruled. It took an Appellate Court judge only a week to find probable cause by Jones for failing to disclose his relationship with Freeman. He resigned.

It requires no courage for bar association leaders to condemn those discreditable officials who donned red ties and made pilgrimages to New York to stand outside the courthouse to mewl and whine that the justice system was targeting the loathsome demagogue, Donald Trump.

To shine a searing light when something goes wrong in the judicial branch of government when no one is paying attention— that’s what protects the integrity of the system.

Advertisement

Kevin Rennie can be reached at kfrennie@yahoo.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending