Connect with us

Connecticut

Legacy Admission Ban Passes In Maryland, Falters In Connecticut

Published

on

Legacy Admission Ban Passes In Maryland, Falters In Connecticut


Legislation that would ban colleges from giving an advantage to the relatives of alumni has met very different fates in two states recently.

Last month Maryland enacted a legacy admission ban that applies to both public and private colleges. But in Connecticut, the House converted an earlier bill with a similar prohibition into one that would require colleges only to report data about their use of legacy admissions.

Advertisement

Maryland now becomes the third state to eliminate the practice of legacy preferences, following Colorado which passed its ban in 2021 and Virginia, which did so earlier this year.

Maryland Governor Wes Moore signed HB 4 into law on April 25. It applies to colleges and universities that receive state funds, regardless of whether they are public or private. In addition to prohibiting any admission preference for relatives of an alum, the law, which goes into effect July 1, also bans institutions from giving a similar preference to applicants who are relatives of a donor to the institution.

In Connecticut, a bill that began as a ban against legacy admission preferences was weakened after private institutions such as Yale University and Fairfield University mounted a campaign defending the practice, arguing that the government should not intrude on how colleges and universities establish and apply their admissions standards.

Bowing to those concerns, the Connecticut Senate passed an amended bill this week that mandates colleges either to indicate they don’t consider legacy status in admissions or report various admission/enrollment data, including the percentage of legacy students admitted along with data comparing the academic credentials of legacy admits to those of other students. The bill now moves to the Connecticut House of Representatives for its consideration.

Advertisement

The fairness of legacy preferences has been challenged for years, resulting in several prominent colleges electing to discontinue them. However, the heat has been turned up against the practice ever since last year’s Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard University and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina finding race-conscious admissions to be unconstitutional.

That ruling brought renewed scrutiny to the racial implications of legacy advantages extended to applicants by highly selective institutions. For example, the percentage of the freshmen class admitted at several selective colleges via the legacy route exceeds the percentage of entering freshmen who are Black, according to a recent report, prepared by Education Reform Now. At many of these colleges, three-quarters or more of the legacy applicants receiving acceptances are white.

Results like those prompt an obvious question: If colleges are required to practice race-neutral admissions policies, why should they be able to continue admission practices – like legacy preferences – that appear to discriminate against nonwhite students?

Legacy abolitionists will see these latest two legislative developments as one step forward and one step back.

Maryland’s passage of its new law might give some momentum to other states like Minnesota and Massachusetts that are still considering bans. But the outcome in Connecticut is clearly a setback. It represents a compromise that prevents any real change to the status quo, and it may become a strategy adopted in the future by legacy-preferring colleges to weaken or derail statutory bans in other states.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen

Published

on

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen


CONNECTICUT (WTNH) — Connecticut officials and officials from 35 other states have agreed to a settlement with automakers Hyundai and Kia to come up with a plan to help prevent vehicles from being stolen. 

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong (D) and 35 other states call the settlement, which has been several years in the making, a matter of public safety. The issue concerns the number of Hyundai and Kia vehicles that have been reported stolen and crashes related to these thefts.

The settlement provides up to $4.5 million in restitution for customers whose cars had been stolen.

“This settlement points us back in the right direction to help address some of the underlining issues that have made it easier to steal vehicles,” Meriden Police Chief Roberto Rosado said.

Advertisement

Tong said that groups of young people known as “Kia Boys” were aware that Kia and Hyundai vehicles did not possess modern anti-theft technology, making those brands of vehicles more vulnerable to theft.

One such example is a 2023 incident in which a group of teens reportedly stole and crashed a Hyundai in Waterbury, resulting in the death of a 14-year-old girl. 

“Connecticut State Police have been saying for some time that they needed some assistance, that they needed help in reducing the opportunity for these vehicles to be stolen,” Connecticut Department of Emergency Services Commissioner Ronnell Higgins said.

Several states have attempted to get Hyundai and Kia to alter the way their vehicles are built in the United States, finally coming to an agreement with the two automakers to provide an anti-theft device to protect the vehicles. 

“At some point, they started offering excuses,” Tong said. “You can do just a software update, that will fix it. That didn’t work. We advocated for a recall, they refused. This settlement requires that, for all future vehicles sold in the United States, Hyundai and Kia will install, as part of their standard package, industry engine immobilizer anti-theft technology.”

Advertisement

The technology is linked to the key fob, which means that the car will not start if the smart key is not present.

Connecticut is requiring Kia and Hyundai to provide customers with a free zinc-reinforced engine cylinder protector for vehicles already on the road that are not equipped with the anti-theft technology.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won $50,000

Published

on

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won ,000


There were two $50,000 Powerball winning tickets sold in Connecticut for Monday’s drawing.

The winning numbers were 23-35-59-63-68 and the Powerball was 2.

The Powerplay was X4, but neither ticket had that option.

The tickets matched four white balls and the Powerball.

Advertisement

No information was available on where it was sold.

No one won the jackpot on Monday night, sending it soaring to $1.25 billion for Wednesday’s drawing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action

Published

on

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action


My generation grew up thinking we would be the ones to bring teen smoking to an end. But then came the cotton candy vapes.

They were, and still are, everywhere you look. Back in middle and high school, I remember friends had them in their backpacks and hoodie sleeves, they even used them in the school bathrooms.

This past summer, I witnessed firsthand the real impact it has had. My friends and I took a girls’ trip, and one day, we decided we wanted to blow up a pool floatie. Given that we didn’t have an air pump, the only option was to do it manually. One of my friends, who has vaped regularly for years, couldn’t get more than three breaths in before giving up. She began coughing and ran out of breath. It was funny for a second…until it wasn’t.

This was the moment that made me realize how this epidemic is hurting the people closest to us. 

Advertisement

When e-cigarettes first hit the market, companies claimed that they were safer than smoking real cigarettes and that they would help adults quit smoking, when in reality, they’ve only really done the opposite for young people. Vaping may look harmless because of the fun flavors, names, and colors on the packaging, but the reality of it is way darker. E-cigarette use can lead to cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, and even long term damage to the airways that can make something as simple as inhaling a serious struggle. These devices push harmful chemicals deep into young people’s lungs, disrupting their bodies in ways they’re not even aware of until it’s too late. 

A Yale-led study found that one in four Connecticut high school students and one in 30 middle schoolers had already tried vaping. This may not seem like much at first glance, but the fact of the matter is that a vast majority of adolescents know at least one peer who vapes, at the very minimum. A large portion of the teens from the study preferred sweet and fruity flavors, and many students who had never smoked cigarettes before began experimenting with nicotine through vapes, which demonstrates that flavored e-cigarettes are a gateway, not a solution.

Kiara Salas

 The problem is not just about curiosity. The brain is not finished developing until about age 25. This time is critical in the development of areas like attention, memory, and decision making. The CDC mentions that nicotine exposure during these earlier years of development can impair brain chemistry, having outcomes that linger into adulthood.

Despite this, vape companies continue to sell what seems like nicotine candy to minors, disguised in bright packaging and flavors like “blue razz” or “mango blast.” When you think about it, it makes sense that as soon as companies began seeing a decline in sales, they had to figure out a way to create new products that were trendy, tasted good, and addictive. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending