Connecticut
Advice for parents dealing with school threats
More schools in the state have upped security amid possible threats.
Experts say they have to be taken seriously by law enforcement. But even if they turn out to be unfounded, they can still have an impact.
From North Haven to Wethersfield to New Haven, these were just some of the latest districts dealing with possible safety concerns at schools.
“It does take a toll on our kids. Some students have not known anything other than these kinds of incidents,” Fran Rabinowitz, Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents, said.
This week, there have also been concerning threats or messages at schools in Milford, Meriden and West Haven.
Multiple schools where students might be worried, especially if they already struggle with some anxiety.
“Those are conversations you might want to have in a more open-ended way, asking your young person what their concerns might be, or what their worries might be,” Dr. Laura Saunders, a Hartford HealthCare psychologist, said.
In some cases, the person making the threat is a student and Saunders said it’s important for parents to remind kids about the potential consequences of their actions, especially online.
“Those words do have meaning. And to be very careful what you do and say on social media, because it can come back and be considered a crime,” Saunders said.
The doctor said threats do need to be taken seriously by authorities whose job it is to investigate.
And she suggests – as scary as the situation can be – that parents try not to overreact.
“That as parents, we need to have some measure of trust in our school administrators and in our, you know, police and firefighters that their job is to protect us and so not to just swoop in,” Saunders said.
The consequences of making a threat can be pretty severe. Several students in the state have already been arrested since the beginning of the school year.
Connecticut
Connecticut wins antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation upon New York court ruling
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A massive jury decision in New York this week is sending shockwaves through the entertainment industry, a decision that Connecticut has historically encouraged.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and a coalition of 33 other attorneys general won their lawsuit against Live Nation when the Manhattan court ruled Wednesday that Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, violated federal and state antitrust laws.
The decision from the court is to be met with appeals from Live Nation. One thing is for sure in the rest of the case; it is monumental, and it will be lengthy.
The lawsuits filed by dozens of states accused Live Nation of smothering competition and driving up prices for ticket buyers, resulting in the jury’s decision that Live Nation should be held liable for illegally maintaining monopoly power over the ticket industry.
“The fact that the states went ahead and litigated this case and won before a jury is really a remarkable, historical development,” legal expert Bob Langer said.
If the verdict holds, Langer says Live Nation could be facing strict penalties, including being forced to split from Ticketmaster, which would affect the entire industry.
“Eventually prices will go down, but we are a long, long way from that,” Langer said.
Langer told News 8 that appeals could reach the Supreme Court and take years. One New Haven event venue said it is too early to tell how the case will affect their ticketing practices.
Live Nation insists they are not a monopoly, but a successful company built by excellence and effort. The company said that it can and will appeal any unfavorable rulings.
Those who may be affected most are the buyers.
“We probably are being taken advantage of, but if there are people like me that have a crazy willingness to pay, the prices might increase at the end of the day,” Aaron Abrams, a fan of Peter Cat Recordings Co., said.
“I do see the monopoly, absolutely,” Laura, who buys her tickets off a site for military families, said. “I am very grateful that I don’t have to be a part of that. I will enjoy any ticket and any concert I can go to.”
Overall, music fans have shared a general consensus that they will follow the case, but will still be attending concerts either way.
“I would love to see the prices go back down,” Laura said. “I would love for everyone to have access to different events and concerts and be able to afford it.”
The case against Live Nation comes after the company agreed to a settlement with the federal government, but more than 30 states pressed on with the trial, saying not enough concessions were made by Live Nation.
Connecticut
New Britain cyberattack may have exposed personal information, officials say
Officials in New Britain are still assessing the damage more than two months after a cyberattack hit city systems, potentially exposing some personal information.
A spokesperson for Mayor Bobby Sanchez said recently that there’s no indication of widespread exposure of resident data. However, hackers may have gained access to some sensitive records during the Jan. 28 incident, including names, dates of birth, government-issued identification numbers and financial account and health-related information, according to the city.
Officials have released few details about what occurred, citing the ongoing investigation.
“Investigations of this nature are complex and must be handled carefully to protect the integrity of the review, support any potential law enforcement activity, and ensure accurate information is shared,” said Alisha Rayner, the mayor’s spokesperson.
The city detected the attack after an employee spotted unusual activity on a workstation. Several municipal systems “experienced disruption” during the incident, though an investigation found the “unauthorized activity was more limited in scope,” according to the city.
Cyberattacks on cities and towns have grown more common. Hackers breach or damage computer systems to steal sensitive data or hold systems for ransom — a scenario officials in New Britain faced, according to Evan Allard, the director of the Connecticut Intelligence Center, which is a part of the state Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.
“Any organization that has sensitive or private data that you know they want to keep within their own systems, these ransomware actors are targeting them because it creates a sense of urgency towards paying it back,” Allard said.
New Britain consulted with a team of response experts at Cowbell Resiliency Services to determine the best course of action. It’s unclear whether the city paid a ransom. Responding by email to questions from Connecticut Public, Rayner said the city evaluated multiple response options, including restoring from backups.
“Based on that assessment, including operational impact, recovery timelines, and overall cost considerations, a course of action was taken to resolve the incident as quickly and securely as possible,” Rayner wrote.
Rayner said the financial hit to the city was limited because New Britain carries cybersecurity insurance. It has a $25,000 deductible under the policy, she said.
New Britain is providing credit monitoring and identity protection services to people who were potentially impacted.
While the investigation continues, the Common Council voted to replace New Britain’s existing cybersecurity system. The city executed a three-year contract with Cowbell Resiliency Services that includes round-the-clock security monitoring for a cost of $66,000 per year.
“It’s a full-on platform that is a little bit more enhanced and at a larger cost,” Jonathan Delgadillo, the city’s director of support services, said at a recent meeting. “But again, I think it’s the best thing for the city,”
New Britain Alderman John McNamara said he’s satisfied with the city’s handling of the cyberattack.
“I believe the city is taking appropriate steps and is advising city employees and taxpayers on what’s going on with it,” McNamara said. “I’m looking for additional reports and to take action in terms of anything that has to be improved upon.”
Connecticut
Coventry state rep. files paperwork to run for lt. gov.
HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – A state representative from Coventry has filed paperwork to run for lieutenant governor of Connecticut.
Republican Rep. Timothy Ackert, who represents Connecticut 8th Assembly District, had his paperwork received by state election officials on April 9.
The paperwork showed that he formed a candidate committee called “Ackert for Connecticut.”
As of Wednesday morning, Matthew Corey was the only Republican candidate in the primary for lieutenant governor.
The primary election is Aug. 11, 2026.
The general election is Nov. 3, 2026.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
-
Ohio3 days ago‘Little Rascals’ star Bug Hall arrested in Ohio
-
Georgia1 week agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas7 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Austin, TX1 week agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
Politics2 days agoDem fundraising giant in the hot seat as GOP lawmakers demand answers over dodged subpoena
-
Politics5 days agoTrump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
-
Health1 week agoWoman discovers missing nose ring traveled to her lungs, causing month-long cough
-
San Francisco, CA5 days agoPresident Trump terminates Presidio Trust