Connect with us

Northeast

Christian foster families fight back against Massachusetts transgender mandate

Published

on

Christian foster families fight back against Massachusetts transgender mandate

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Christian foster parents in Massachusetts are challenging a state policy that requires them to affirm and encourage the medical transition of children in their care who identify as transgender or risk losing their foster care licenses.

The lawsuit, filed Sept. 3, names two families — the Jones and the Schrocks — who foster young children and infants. 

Both families say they have either lost or are at risk of losing their licenses because of the policy, which requires foster parents to sign agreements to “promote,” “support” and “affirm” a child’s gender identity or expression.

The Christian families argue that complying with the policy would violate their religious beliefs.

Advertisement

Nick and Audrey Jones, foster parents suing Massachusetts over a gender affirming policy. At right, LGTBQ activists rally in support of transgender people on the steps of New York City Hall Oct. 24, 2018. (Alliance Defending Freedom/Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

COLORADO PLEDGES NOT TO ENFORCE GENDER IDENTITY RULES FOR CHRISTIAN CHILDREN’S CAMP AFTER LAWSUIT

According to the lawsuit, the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families plans to remove the Jones’ 17-month-old foster daughter from their home. The child has lived with them since she was barely 2 months old.

The Schrocks, who have cared for 28 foster children over six years, had their license revoked in June after telling the state they could not comply with the policy.

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the religious liberty legal group representing the families, said the two households previously fostered 35 children and were in good standing before the new requirements.

Advertisement

According to the suit, Massachusetts did not previously require foster families to pledge verbal affirmation of a child’s gender identity. That changed between 2023 and 2024, when the state began requiring families to sign agreements to speak and act in certain ways, including affirming a foster child’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

Two Christian foster families in Massachusetts are at risk of, or have already had their foster care licenses revoked, over a state gender identity policy. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

TEXAS PARENTS SUE HOUSTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR SECRETLY TRANSITIONING THEIR CHILD AGAINST THEIR INSTRUCTIONS

ADF argues the state is infringing on its clients’ First and 14th Amendment rights and is harming children at a time when Massachusetts is facing a foster parent shortage.

“DCF [Department of Children and Families] is even willing to remove young infants and toddlers with no understanding of ‘gender identity’ from loving homes because of their Christian beliefs, creating more trauma for the most vulnerable members of society,” the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

ADF Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse said Massachusetts was prioritizing ideology over children’s needs.

Under a Massachusetts policy, foster families in the state must commit to affirming and encouraging the gender identity and expression of children in their care, according to a new lawsuit. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

DEMOCRATIC STATES SUE TRUMP ADMIN OVER ENDING SEX CHANGE SURGERIES FOR MINORS

“Massachusetts’ foster care system is in crisis: The commonwealth has more than 1,400 children who are waiting to be placed with a loving family. Yet Massachusetts is putting its ideological agenda ahead of the needs of these suffering kids,” Widmalm-Delphonse said in a press release. 

He called the case “particularly egregious” because the state was threatening to remove the child the Jones family is fostering from the “only home she’s ever known.”

Advertisement

The Massachusetts Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Children and Families, named as defendants in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

The families are asking the court to block enforcement of the rule, declare it unconstitutional and cover their legal costs.

Read the full article from Here

Boston, MA

A federal judge in Boston has blocked parts of Trump’s order to limit voting by mail

Published

on

A federal judge in Boston has blocked parts of Trump’s order to limit voting by mail


President Trump holds up an executive order to limit mail-in voting as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick looks on in the White House’s Oval Office in March.

Alex Wong/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Trump’s executive order to limit voting by mail has hit a legal hurdle.

On Thursday, a Boston-based judge blocked parts of the order that, at least so far, has not directly affected mail-in voting for this year’s midterm primary elections.

Advertisement

The legal fight, however, is likely to continue. The order pushes the boundaries of Trump’s authority under the Constitution, which gives state legislatures and Congress — not the U.S. president — the power to set the rules for federal elections.

The Trump administration is expected to appeal the new ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, as a separate appeal of an earlier ruling by another federal judge moves forward in a similar set of lawsuits based in Washington, D.C.

Among other directives, Trump’s order from March calls for the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Postal Service to create lists of adult U.S. citizens or eligible voters in each state. It also calls for USPS, which is independent of a president’s administration, to deliver mail-in ballots only to people on those lists.

In response, USPS has proposed using information from state election officials to create voter lists. Postmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers Wednesday that under the proposal, the Postal Service would not deliver the mail ballots of any states that refuse to turn over their absentee voter lists to the federal government.

For the D.C.-based cases, the judge found in late May that it was too early for an emergency ruling that would block directives that the Trump administration has yet to carry out. Democrats are appealing that judge’s ruling to the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia.

Advertisement

Editor’s note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.

Edited by Benjamin Swasey



Source link

Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Strong storms with a possible tornado threat expected on Thursday in Pittsburgh

Published

on

Strong storms with a possible tornado threat expected on Thursday in Pittsburgh


There’s a threat of tornadoes today as a cold front slowly works its way through our area.  The risk is low, with the Storm Prediction Center putting our chance at 2%. That’s the lowest chance (besides 0) on their daily risk map. We hardly ever reach the 5% threshold. 

The reason for our severe storm chance today is a cold front that will stall on top of us late this afternoon into the evening hours. We should have a couple of hours ahead of the storms with sunny skies that will allow potential energy to build. 

Severe weather outlook for our region – June 25, 2026

Advertisement

KDKA Weather Center


There looks to be just enough shear to mean we can’t rule out a quick spin up or two. Our tornado risk is low.

Looking at the overall severe weather chance, I open up the window for severe weather at around 2 p.m. and keep the window open through midnight. The front will arrive as what we call a short wave, which should arrive along I-80 at 2 p.m., and the line of storms will slowly work its way to the south. 

Storms that fire along the line, though, will be racing east. This means conditions can change rapidly. Any storm cells could have gusty winds and even some small hail. Frequent lightning should be expected with just how fast they’re going to be moving. Downpours should also be expected, but unless we see storms training over the same area, our flood risk looks fairly low today.

While we wait for the storms, the weather is going to be surprisingly comfortable. 

Advertisement

temp-2.png

Conditions in Pittsburgh – June 25, 2026

KDKA Weather Center


I have dew points in the low to moderate range all day long. It’ll be sunny heading into the afternoon. I have highs hitting the low 80s with comfortable weather in place through at least 3 p.m. in Pittsburgh. 

Morning temperatures dipped to the low 60s, with noon temperatures expected to be in the mid 70s.

Similar to today, most of Friday is expected to be dry. There will be another chance for rain on Friday, but rain doesn’t arrive until after 8 p.m. Friday highs should hit the upper 70s. Friday’s rain will stretch into Saturday morning, with rain continuing overnight and most rain ending before sunrise. 

Advertisement

I can’t rule out a scattered shower or two for the rest of the day on Saturday, but it’s looking pretty nice and dry. I have Saturday’s high hitting the low 80s, with highs going up to the mid-80s on Sunday. The area’s first heat wave of 2026 is now expected to arrive on Tuesday. 

I have highs in the 90s from Tuesday next week through at least Friday, with temperatures never dropping below 70° during that time period.

temp-1.png

7-day forecast: June 25, 2026

KDKA Weather Center


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut man charged with murdering Duxbury woman is an

Published

on

Connecticut man charged with murdering Duxbury woman is an


A prosecutor said Cole Werhan, the man charged with murdering a Duxbury, Massachusetts woman inside a Connecticut home, has several open domestic violence cases.

Police say Werhan killed 26-year-old Janina Brooke Murphy inside the Burlington, Connecticut home where she was living. Murphy was found at the bottom of a staircase on March 29, but no charges were filed until Tuesday.

Werhan was arraigned Wednesday in Torrington Superior Court in Connecticut. The judge accepted the prosecution’s request to continue holding Werhan on $5 million bond.

Murphy and Werhan were dating, the woman’s mother said. Beth Murphy told WBZ-TV that a detective said her daughter had wounds “all over her” and police were investigating her death as suspicious.

Advertisement

“It’s just been the worst time of my life as you can imagine,” Beth Murphy said. “He killed my baby.”

In court Wednesday, the prosecutor said Werhan is an “extreme danger to the community.”

Cole Werhan appears in court on June 24, 2026.

CBS Boston

Advertisement


Werhan currently has four domestic violence cases with different victims in each, the prosecutor said.

On June 3, Werhan was arrested in one of those cases. He was able to post the $750,000 bail and was released with an electronic monitoring device. Werhan has not been convicted of any crimes.

One of the alleged victims told police in an interview that he hit her, strangler her, and threatened to kill her multiple times.

His defense attorney argued that the $5 million bond was “simply not affordable,” and asked instead for $1 million bond. The judge sided with the prosecution.

In arguing for lower bond, Werhan’s attorney argued that he has always appeared in court for each of his cases and should not be considered a flight risk.

Advertisement

Werhan is next due to appear in court on June 30.

Brooke Murphy

Janina Brooke Murphy

Family photo


Lindsay Bolduc was a close friend of Murphy’s. Bolduc said Werhan and Murphy met playing video games online, and later moved in together.

“Crazy to think about the pit in my stomach I had. I just knew something was wrong,” Bolduc said.

Advertisement

Bolduc said she doesn’t only want people to remember Murphy as a victim.

“I just want people to remember that Brooke was a person, you know? She was so much more than this. She wasn’t just a victim,” she said.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending