Connect with us

Boston, MA

Three takeaways for Boston from NYC’s congestion pricing scheme – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Three takeaways for Boston from NYC’s congestion pricing scheme – The Boston Globe


Commuting in Boston can be a nightmare. Sometimes you find yourself stuck in hours-long traffic wishing you’d taken the T. Other times you’re waiting for an elusive train that never shows up, wondering why you even gave the T a chance.

But here’s the thing: It doesn’t have to be this bad. Just take a look at New York’s promising attempt to fix its own traffic woes. In January, New York City launched its congestion pricing program, which charges drivers a steep toll to enter Manhattan’s busiest streets. It’s $9 during peak hours, which are 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on the weekends, and $2.25 during off-peak hours.

The program is the first of its kind in the United States, though there are versions of it in cities like Stockholm, London, and Singapore. And it has two primary objectives: First, the cost is meant to discourage people from commuting by car. Second, the revenue it raises is meant to fund public transit improvements that would make the region less car-dependent in the long run.

So far, the program has been largely successful. It has reduced the number of cars on the roads, improved commute times, and even contributed to a drop in traffic-related deaths. The streets in the congestion zone are also receiving fewer traffic noise complaints.

Some lawmakers across the country are taking notice. Here in Massachusetts, Democratic state Senator Brendan Crighton from Lynn, who serves as cochair of the Legislature’s transportation committee, says that schemes like congestion pricing should remain on the table when it comes to addressing the MBTA’s long-term fiscal concerns. (Evidently, the millionaires’ tax that voters passed in 2022 is not enough.)

As lawmakers consider whether this is a good idea for Boston, here are three takeaways from New York’s nearly year-long experiment:

1) There’s still a lot of traffic, but it’s getting better

Advertisement

There’s no way around it: New York will always have traffic jams. The city is home to more than 8 million residents, and the metropolitan area has a population of some 20 million. But since the city launched congestion pricing, the number of cars on the road has dropped.

This past summer, 67,000 fewer cars were entering Lower Manhattan every day compared with historical averages, according to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Other analyses earlier this year also showed a reduction in traffic, with average car speeds increasing by as much as 20 percent during rush hour within the congestion relief zone.

As a result, public transit has also improved. Buses have become more efficient, reliably moving faster. The average bus speed increase doesn’t seem too impressive — about 3.5 percent — but some buses are moving nearly 30 percent faster, and virtually all bus routes that interact with the congestion zone have seen an improvement in speed.

One entrance to congestion relief zone, on Park Avenue in Manhattan, seen in January.KARSTEN MORAN/NYT

2) Congestion pricing is a great source of revenue

New York officials say that the new toll is on track to raise the projected $500 million in its first year — money that in the long run will go toward a multibillion-dollar plan to improve subways, buses, and commuter rail lines and make those modes of transportation more appealing.

Advertisement

Even though there is something to be said about how deeply driving is embedded in American culture, at the end of the day commuters are rational consumers. And if getting from point A to point B is both faster and cheaper on public transit, then a lot of people will go for that option, even if they would otherwise prefer driving.

Morning traffic around South Station on Nov. 21, 2024, during the closure of a big section of the Red Line.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff

3) At first, people hate it. Then they learn to love it.

New York’s plan ran into roadblocks before it officially launched. Just before it was meant to go into effect in June 2024, Governor Kathy Hochul postponed its launch indefinitely. Seven months later, she launched the program, but with a lower toll — $9 instead of the originally planned $15.

Part of the reason for that back and forth was public opposition to congestion pricing. In December 2024, for example, less than a third of New York City voters supported it. But just as was the case with other cities around the world that have tried congestion pricing, the program got more popular after residents got a taste of its benefits. According to a YouGov poll in August, public support and opposition for congestion pricing have almost entirely flipped, with 59 percent of New York City voters supporting keeping the toll in place.

Now, just because something works in New York doesn’t necessarily mean it will work in Boston or elsewhere. New York is America’s largest city — more than 10 times the size of Boston — and its subway system is by far the most expansive in the country. Implementing a costly toll to enter downtown Boston might not be as successful in pushing drivers to use other modes of transportation, because their options are ultimately more limited than the ones available to commuters in and around New York City. (More than that, the Trump administration has openly opposed New York’s congestion pricing and has attempted but so far failed to block it in court, and other cities could face similar scrutiny from the federal government.)

Interstate 93 in Boston on July 3, 2024.Steven Senne/Associated Press

But that doesn’t mean that congestion pricing is not worth trying, even if it takes years to get it done. After all, if Boston wants fewer cars on the road, the first step is to improve public transit. And what’s a better way to do that in the long run than to create a steady daily revenue stream from commuters, whether they’re riding the T or driving their cars? It might be a political risk at first, but the potential reward is too appealing to ignore.


Abdallah Fayyad can be reached at abdallah.fayyad@globe.com. Follow him @abdallah_fayyad.

Advertisement





Source link

Boston, MA

Red Sox rotation contender strikes out four in dominant outing

Published

on

Red Sox rotation contender strikes out four in dominant outing


FORT MYERS, Fla. — Johan Oviedo’s first outing of the spring last week didn’t go great, as the right-hander walked three over 1 2/3 innings in a performance manager Alex Cora described as “erratic.”

His second outing on Monday went much better.



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Monster effort from Neemias Queta helps pave the way for Celtics in win over 76ers – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Monster effort from Neemias Queta helps pave the way for Celtics in win over 76ers – The Boston Globe


Queta has been a revelation for the Celtics this season and helped them improbably surge into second place in the Eastern Conference. But it is unlikely he or his team envisioned nights like Sunday, when he crafted the best game of his career to propel Boston to a 114-98 win over the 76ers at TD Garden, its 11th in 13 games.

The 26-year-old center finished with 27 points and 17 rebounds and received ‘MVP’ chants several times in the fourth quarter.

Advertisement

“I thought he’s had great ownership and responsibility to what it calls for to be a starting center for the Celtics, and he’s got to continue to get better,” Mazzulla said. “He works at it. He cares. So, it’s a credit to him.”

The Celtics, who entered the night averaging 17.1 second-chance points per game, poured in 30 Sunday, with Queta leading the charge. With 76ers center Andre Drummond often playing up and trying to congest the lanes for Boston’s talented ballhandlers, Queta forcefully and quickly found space around the rim.

“We just gave him the ball and trusted him to make the right decision every time, and he was able to get it going,” forward Jaylen Brown said. “He had some nice up-and-unders in the seam and stuff like that that helped propel us to a win.”

Brown added 27 points, 8 rebounds, and 8 assists for Boston.

Tyrese Maxey had 33 points to lead the 76ers, but they did not come easily. The All-Star guard played 43 minutes and made just 12 of 34 shots. Philadelphia was without star center Joel Embiid (oblique).

Advertisement

“He didn’t have a ton of layups, didn’t have a ton of free throws,” Mazzulla said of Maxey. “I thought he obviously missed some good shots, but when you have the ball as much as he did, I thought we did a really good job just being disciplined, defending without fouling, keeping him out of transition.”

The Celtics improved to 40-20, with just 22 games remaining in the regular season. After the game, there was a visible reminder of what could be on the way.

Star forward Jayson Tatum, who could be nearing a return from last May’s Achilles injury, sat at his locker and laughed and joked with team staffers. He also posted the latest clip from the NBC docuseries about his comeback on his social media accounts.

Jayson Tatum, who has yet to play this season, liked what he saw from the Celtics bench.Danielle Parhizkaran/Globe Staff

For now, of course, the Celtics continue to plow forward without him. On Sunday, Boston quickly wiped away an early 10-point deficit behind Queta. He registered five offensive rebounds in the opening period, and flashed an unusual amount of offensive creativity during his dominant second quarter.

During one stretch, he danced through the lane for a basket, converted a putback, then dazzled the crowd by trailing a fast break, taking a pass from Brown, and converting an acrobatic scoop shot that gave Boston a 40-35 lead.

Advertisement

“We don’t want him to get too carried away with some of those,” Brown said, smiling. “But he was converting them tonight and it looked good.”

Queta reminded everyone that much of his value comes from his defensive work when he swatted a Kelly Oubre Jr. shot out of bounds, and he received a rare standing ovation when he checked out moments later.

Neemias Queta’s performance put a smile on Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla.Danielle Parhizkaran/Globe Staff

Finally, after a well-executed two-for-one opportunity, Brown found Baylor Scheierman, who played with a splint on his broken left thumb, in the right corner; he hit a buzzer-beating 3-pointer that gave Boston a 62-50 lead at the break. Scheierman gave a high thumbs-up with his bandaged digit.

The Celtics led by 16 early in the third quarter, but the 76ers continued to push back. Three-pointers in the final minute by Quentin Grimes and Maxey made it 89-83 at the start of the fourth.

The 76ers trailed by 6 with four minutes left in the fourth quarter but missed their next five shots, any one of which could have put real pressure on Boston.

With 2:56 left, Queta converted a layup as he was fouled, stretching the lead back to 105-97. He received ‘MVP’ chants for the second time in the quarter when he went to the foul line. Then, with 1:56 left, he put an exclamation point on his memorable night by grabbing yet another offensive rebound and throwing down a two-handed dunk that made it 109-98.

Advertisement

“I thought Neemi matched and exceeded the [76ers] physicality,” Mazzulla said.

Jaylen Brown has become the leader of the Celtics while Tatum has been away. Will Tatum returning cause locker-room drama?

Adam Himmelsbach can be reached at adam.himmelsbach@globe.com. Follow him @adamhimmelsbach.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Bruins Believe They ‘Didn’t Do Enough’ In Loss To Flyers | NESN

Published

on

Bruins Believe They ‘Didn’t Do Enough’ In Loss To Flyers | NESN


The Boston Bruins suffered a 3-1 road loss to the Philadelphia Flyers on Saturday.

Boston entered the game in points in eight-straight games, as the Bruins are competing for a playoff spot. However, Boston’s offense struggled on Saturday, as the Bruins scored just once on Dan Vladar, and head coach Marco Sturm felt like the team didn’t do enough to create more scoring chances.

“(Vladar) played really good, he kind of made those saves he needed to,” Sturm said as seen on NESN’s postgame coverage on Saturday. “We just didn’t do enough of a good job being around him or being front of him.”

Although Sturm didn’t like Boston’s play, Vladar still made some key stops when the game was close. 

Advertisement

Bruins forward Morgan Geekie had multiple chances and was frustrated that he couldn’t score on any of them.

“Just one of those nights,” Geekie said. “Their goalie played well. Couldn’t quite put it in the spot I wanted to a couple times and Dan made a couple great plays.”

Boston’s lone goal came from Charlie McAvoy, while Jeremy Swayman made 14 saves on 16 shots, as Philadelphia added an empty-netter to secure the win.

With the loss, the Bruins fell to 33-21-5 and are holding onto the final Wild Card spot. Boston will return to the ice at home on Tuesday against the Pittsburgh Penguins.

More NHL: Charlie McAvoy’s Mother Reveals His Immediate Reaction To Team USA’s Gold Medal Win

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending