Connect with us

Boston, MA

Three takeaways for Boston from NYC’s congestion pricing scheme – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Three takeaways for Boston from NYC’s congestion pricing scheme – The Boston Globe


Commuting in Boston can be a nightmare. Sometimes you find yourself stuck in hours-long traffic wishing you’d taken the T. Other times you’re waiting for an elusive train that never shows up, wondering why you even gave the T a chance.

But here’s the thing: It doesn’t have to be this bad. Just take a look at New York’s promising attempt to fix its own traffic woes. In January, New York City launched its congestion pricing program, which charges drivers a steep toll to enter Manhattan’s busiest streets. It’s $9 during peak hours, which are 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on the weekends, and $2.25 during off-peak hours.

The program is the first of its kind in the United States, though there are versions of it in cities like Stockholm, London, and Singapore. And it has two primary objectives: First, the cost is meant to discourage people from commuting by car. Second, the revenue it raises is meant to fund public transit improvements that would make the region less car-dependent in the long run.

So far, the program has been largely successful. It has reduced the number of cars on the roads, improved commute times, and even contributed to a drop in traffic-related deaths. The streets in the congestion zone are also receiving fewer traffic noise complaints.

Some lawmakers across the country are taking notice. Here in Massachusetts, Democratic state Senator Brendan Crighton from Lynn, who serves as cochair of the Legislature’s transportation committee, says that schemes like congestion pricing should remain on the table when it comes to addressing the MBTA’s long-term fiscal concerns. (Evidently, the millionaires’ tax that voters passed in 2022 is not enough.)

As lawmakers consider whether this is a good idea for Boston, here are three takeaways from New York’s nearly year-long experiment:

1) There’s still a lot of traffic, but it’s getting better

Advertisement

There’s no way around it: New York will always have traffic jams. The city is home to more than 8 million residents, and the metropolitan area has a population of some 20 million. But since the city launched congestion pricing, the number of cars on the road has dropped.

This past summer, 67,000 fewer cars were entering Lower Manhattan every day compared with historical averages, according to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Other analyses earlier this year also showed a reduction in traffic, with average car speeds increasing by as much as 20 percent during rush hour within the congestion relief zone.

As a result, public transit has also improved. Buses have become more efficient, reliably moving faster. The average bus speed increase doesn’t seem too impressive — about 3.5 percent — but some buses are moving nearly 30 percent faster, and virtually all bus routes that interact with the congestion zone have seen an improvement in speed.

One entrance to congestion relief zone, on Park Avenue in Manhattan, seen in January.KARSTEN MORAN/NYT

2) Congestion pricing is a great source of revenue

New York officials say that the new toll is on track to raise the projected $500 million in its first year — money that in the long run will go toward a multibillion-dollar plan to improve subways, buses, and commuter rail lines and make those modes of transportation more appealing.

Advertisement

Even though there is something to be said about how deeply driving is embedded in American culture, at the end of the day commuters are rational consumers. And if getting from point A to point B is both faster and cheaper on public transit, then a lot of people will go for that option, even if they would otherwise prefer driving.

Morning traffic around South Station on Nov. 21, 2024, during the closure of a big section of the Red Line.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff

3) At first, people hate it. Then they learn to love it.

New York’s plan ran into roadblocks before it officially launched. Just before it was meant to go into effect in June 2024, Governor Kathy Hochul postponed its launch indefinitely. Seven months later, she launched the program, but with a lower toll — $9 instead of the originally planned $15.

Part of the reason for that back and forth was public opposition to congestion pricing. In December 2024, for example, less than a third of New York City voters supported it. But just as was the case with other cities around the world that have tried congestion pricing, the program got more popular after residents got a taste of its benefits. According to a YouGov poll in August, public support and opposition for congestion pricing have almost entirely flipped, with 59 percent of New York City voters supporting keeping the toll in place.

Now, just because something works in New York doesn’t necessarily mean it will work in Boston or elsewhere. New York is America’s largest city — more than 10 times the size of Boston — and its subway system is by far the most expansive in the country. Implementing a costly toll to enter downtown Boston might not be as successful in pushing drivers to use other modes of transportation, because their options are ultimately more limited than the ones available to commuters in and around New York City. (More than that, the Trump administration has openly opposed New York’s congestion pricing and has attempted but so far failed to block it in court, and other cities could face similar scrutiny from the federal government.)

Interstate 93 in Boston on July 3, 2024.Steven Senne/Associated Press

But that doesn’t mean that congestion pricing is not worth trying, even if it takes years to get it done. After all, if Boston wants fewer cars on the road, the first step is to improve public transit. And what’s a better way to do that in the long run than to create a steady daily revenue stream from commuters, whether they’re riding the T or driving their cars? It might be a political risk at first, but the potential reward is too appealing to ignore.


Abdallah Fayyad can be reached at abdallah.fayyad@globe.com. Follow him @abdallah_fayyad.

Advertisement





Source link

Boston, MA

GBH Daily: Come sail away

Published

on

GBH Daily: Come sail away


This is a web edition of GBH Daily, a weekday newsletter bringing you local stories you can trust so you can stay informed without feeling overwhelmed.

Sign up here!

🥵Very hot, with highs around 97 degrees. Sunset is at 8:19 p.m.

Advertisement

GBH’s Dan Murphy captured Abby Evangelista and her corgi, Rocko, at Sail250 this weekend. “Rocko gets dressed up for lots of occasions … sometimes just to go to the store, and he does so great with meeting people,” Evangelista said. Keep reading for more photos from the tall ships. 

A year ago today firefighters were extinguishing flames at the Gabriel House, an assisted living facility in Fall River. Ten people died in the fire, a tragedy for their loved ones and a scary moment for about 18,000 people who live in assisted living facilities across the state.

Now state officials have created new regulations for fire safety in assisted living facilities, going into effect later this month. Fire departments will inspect these facilities once a year, and facilities will need to submit emergency plans and train their workers on what to do in case of a fire.

GBH’s Craig LeMoult found that neither the new regulations nor state or federal fire codes address checking sprinkler systems. Some of the sprinklers at the Gabriel House weren’t working the night of the fire, including the ones in the room where it started.

“Had the sprinklers functioned properly, we’re not having this conversation right now. It is maybe a single fatality fire, but certainly not more than that,” Fall River fire chief Jeffrey Bacon told LeMoult. “The good news is that some of the sprinklers did function. And had they not, we would be here talking about 20, 30, 40 victims.” You can read the full story here.

Advertisement

Four Things to Know

1. Colleagues and friends are remembering Louisa Gag, a Boston transportation planner killed last week when a truck driver hit her as she rode her bike near the Roxbury Crossing MBTA stop. Gag grew up in Roslindale and worked for the city on expanding the BlueBikes bike-share program. Before that, she worked for the LivableStreets Alliance, co-authoring a plan to help cities stop traffic deaths. You can see her talk about her work in this 2019 video.

“In moments like these, there is a tendency to reduce the person to the way they died and to their activism,” said Stacy Thompson, a former executive director of LivableStreets. “While we may know Louisa as a deep champion of the city and a close advocate, she’s also a Boston Latin [School] kid. She’s also, like, the most infectious, hilarious person you’ve ever met. She’s also a daughter. It’s so important to us right now for her life to not be reduced to how she stopped living.”

2. More than 4,000 nurses are back at work at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. They went on a one-day strike last week, and hospital administrators kept them from returning to their jobs for another five days. The Massachusetts Nurses Association and Brigham management have been negotiating a contract for seven months, going back and forth over wages, health insurance premiums and staffing levels.

“It’s exciting, but also frightening,” said Christine Forgeron, a cardiac nurse at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “I don’t know what to expect when we go back to our patients. What happens next, because we still don’t have a contract,is the most unsettling part.”

3. Michael Walsh, a Republican candidate for state attorney general, will be on the primary ballot in September despite what Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Karp called “substantial evidence in the record of voter fraud.” The case began when Adam Roof, executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, submitted a complaint accusing a signature gatherer Walsh’s campaign hired of either falsifying or not meeting state requirements for 1,021 of the 10,677 signatures they submitted. Candidates for statewide office need 10,000 signatures to get onto the ballot.

Advertisement

Karp said that there was indeed evidence that the signatures came not from voters themselves but from a list of registered voters the state’s Republican party gave the signature gatherer. But the case fell on a technicality: state law required Roof, the Democratic party official, to submit his complaint by certified mail, and he did not do so. The state’s highest court still has to decide what will happen to Anne Manning Martin, a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor who used the same signature gatherer.

4. Residents of towns around the Quabbin Reservoir flooded into the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority meeting last week to ask for a better deal. The Quabbin supplies clean drinking water for dozens of cities and towns in the eastern part of the state. Right now, the state requires towns like Shrewsbury, Belchertown, Orange and Pelham to keep their development in check to keep the Quabbin clean. Though those towns get some money in return, local officials said it’s not enough to cover their costs.

“We are protecting this watershed by foregoing any type of economic development, which is a cornerstone of providing the basics of education [and] public safety,” said state Rep. Aaron Saunders, of Belchertown. “It’s time for a change, and not an incremental one.”

Tall ships sail into Boston

The Colombian vessel ARC Gloria passes spectators watching from Castle Island on Saturday, July 11 in Boston.


Dan Murphy / GBH News

Advertisement

Tomorrow is the last full day of Sail Boston, the city’s tall ships celebration. The ships will leave our harbor Thursday morning. GBH photographer Dan Murphy was there over the weekend to capture the Parade of Sail.

People in white sailor's uniforms waving towards camera on white sailing ship flying Chilean flag

Chilean sailors aboard the Esmerelda wave to spectators on Castle Island during the Meet Boston Parade of Sail on Saturday, July 11 in Boston.


Dan Murphy / GBH News

Advertisement

The Esmeralda, a ship from Chile, sailed by Castle Island.

Woman in navy shirt and black baseball cap points to ship out of frame for child in white pinstripe shirt sitting on her shoulders

Carolyn Gustine points out a ship to her son, Patrick Gustine, during the Meet Boston Parade of Sail on Saturday, July 11 at Castle Island in Boston.


Dan Murphy / GBH News

Carolyn Gustine carried her son, Patrick, on her shoulders.

Advertisement

You can see the full photo essay here. 

Dig deeper: 

Spectators line Cape Cod Canal to see tall ships make their way to Sail250 in Boston

The World Cup transformed Greater Boston. Will it last?

Department of Agricultural Resources celebrates Ice Cream Trail program

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston man charged after allegedly assaulting Burger King employee, punching customer

Published

on

Boston man charged after allegedly assaulting Burger King employee, punching customer


Local News

The customer, who was evaluated for “visible lacerations to the forehead,” was punched three times while being called racial slurs, prosecutors say.

A Burger King sign in Erie, Pa.
AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File

A Boston man is facing charges after he allegedly lunged at a Burger King employee, punched a customer, and then resisted arrest at a nearby MBTA station in East Boston, authorities announced Monday afternoon. 

Patrick Donovan, 59, was charged July 1 with one count of assault and battery causing injury on an over 60 or disabled person, assault and battery, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, assault, and vandalism, Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden’s office said in a press release. 

Advertisement

The charges stem from an incident shortly before 10 p.m. on June 30, when Boston police responded to a disturbance call from Burger King at 1 Maverick Square, Hayden’s office said.

A Burger King employee told officers that, after ordering his food and receiving it, Donovan yelled that he no longer wanted it and smacked a napkin holder off the counter. He then allegedly lunged at an employee and grabbed her by the arm, prosecutors said. 

Donovan subsequently shoved a customer from behind and allegedly punched him in the face three times while calling him racial slurs, the DA’s office said. 

Emergency medical services evaluated the customer for “visible lacerations to the forehead,” but the victim declined additional treatment, authorities said. 

Donovan fled the restaurant following the assaults, and officers tracked him to the nearby MBTA Maverick Station, prosecutors said. 

Advertisement

“While officers tried to detain Donovan inside the station, he swung at them with a closed fist but did not make contact,” Hayden’s office said, noting that Donovan made racial slurs towards the officers. “Donovan was placed into custody after a brief struggle.” 

During his arraignment in the East Boston division of the Boston Municipal Court, Donovan pleaded not guilty and was released on personal recognizance. Court records show he was also ordered to stay away from Maverick Square and Burger King. 

He is scheduled to return to court Aug. 7 for a pre-trial hearing, prosecutors said. 

Officers obtained security footage of both assaults. Authorities said the incident remains under investigation and could result in further charges. 

“Our workers deserve to be safe in their workplaces and our consumers deserve to be safe in their shopping or dining places, without exception,” Hayden said in a statement. “Beyond that, none of our citizens or first responders should be subjected to racial slurs. These appalling words have no place in Suffolk County or anywhere else in our society.” 

Advertisement

Attorney information for Donovan was not immediately available Monday afternoon.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Rideshare driver charged in Logan airport passenger assault to appear in court

Published

on

Rideshare driver charged in Logan airport passenger assault to appear in court


A rideshare driver suspected of assaulting a passenger at Boston Logan International Airport on Friday is scheduled to be arraigned on Monday.

Leonard Bacon, 23, was found in Lowell, where he lives, and taken into custody on Sunday, Massachusetts State Police said. He’s charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury.

It wasn’t immediately clear if Bacon, who’s due to face the charge in East Boston District Court, had an attorney who could speak for him.

Police didn’t share more details on what Bacon is accused of doing. They’ve previously said that the rideshare passenger entered Terminal C just before 5:30 a.m. and reported that they had been physically assaulted by their driver prior to being dropped off.

Advertisement

After the passenger got out of the vehicle, the rideshare driver left the scene, according to police, who alerted area law enforcement agencies to look out for the suspect. The victim was taken to a Boston-area hospital with non-life-threatening injuries, police added.

Police are looking for a rideshare driver who was reported to have assaulted a passenger right before drop-off at Boston’s Logan airport.

In a statement, Uber said they’ve checked in with the rider and removed the driver’s access to their rideshare platform.

“We are horrified by this reported violence,” a representative for the company said in a statement, adding, “Our specialized team has been in touch with law enforcement, and we will continue to do whatever we can to support their investigation.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending