Connect with us

Boston, MA

4 questions with Mayor Wu on changing Boston’s streets

Published

on

4 questions with Mayor Wu on changing Boston’s streets


Native

“I do not see vehicles because the enemy. I see visitors and wasted time because the enemy. Air pollution is the enemy.”

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, seen using her bike to work from her dwelling with a bunch of fellow Roslindale residents. David L. Ryan / The Boston Globe

For the file: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu is just not a member of the NUMTOT Fb group.

For these studying that final sentence and questioning what precisely the acronym stands for, it’s fairly a mouthful: New Urbanist Memes for Transit-Oriented Teenagers.

Advertisement

And what precisely does that imply?

City Dictionary is fairly succinct: “The acronym is often used to consult with any younger individual that appreciates public transit in addition to city improvement, whereas preventing gentrification.”

The net group boasts over 226,000 members who put up severe — and, because the title implies, not-so-serious — takes on a spread of metropolis planning and transportation points — the sort of subjects that has fashioned the spine of Wu’s progressive political popularity.

  • Some Orange Line avenue adjustments to be made everlasting, says Mayor Wu

  • Boston launches forestry division to take care of metropolis’s city forest and plant new timber

“I’m technically not within the Fb group,” Wu says after fun. “However I, in spirit, positively establish (as a NUMTOT).”

Advertisement

That doubtless comes as no shock.

The 37-year-old millennial mayor is among the T’s fiercest advocates and amongst its most vocal challengers. She’s additionally attracted critics for her assist of lease stabilization insurance policies.

Within the mayor’s workplace, she’s expanded town’s fare-free bus program (which she helped provoke) and has pursued her imaginative and prescient for a Inexperienced New Deal for Boston, starting, partly, with a inexperienced overhaul of Boston Public Faculties buildings.

There’s extra, however that’s a brief model of a hard-to-whittle-down checklist.

On Tuesday, that checklist received a bit longer as Wu introduced town will preserve a variety of avenue adjustments rolled out through the 30-day shutdown of the MBTA’s Orange Line that ended Monday. The adjustments have been initially aimed toward mitigating the closure’s influence on commuters.

Advertisement

Right here to remain are a brand new Chinatown MBTA SL4 bus cease, a pop-up bike lane on Columbus Avenue that may stay open till December (and presumably then change into everlasting), a precedence bus and bike lane on Huntington Avenue from Brigham Circle to Gainsborough Road, Copley Sq.-area bus lanes, and extra Bluebikes docks.

Moreover, a stretch of Boylston Road between Amory and Lamartine streets will proceed to be a one-way avenue, and parking adjustments within the South Finish will stick round to offer higher curbside administration. Jamaica Plain pavement marking and signage have additionally been improved for enhanced visitors security and administration.

“We’ve been in a nerve-racking interval about transportation during the last 30 days with the Orange Line shut down,” Wu mentioned in an interview on Wednesday afternoon. “However the fact is that the Higher Boston area had been going by way of a fairly nerve-racking transportation expertise lengthy earlier than that.”

Reached by cellphone, Wu spoke in regards to the decision-making course of behind the adjustments, what she realized about Boston’s transit system through the shutdown, and the influence 5 % fewer vehicles on town’s streets might have on lowering visitors congestion.

Right here’s what she mentioned:

Advertisement

Editor’s observe: This interview has been edited for size and readability.

1. Boston.com: The folks of Boston have, sort of, gotten used to a few of these adjustments during the last 30 days. However are you able to inform me just a little bit extra about how town selected these adjustments particularly, like, out of the opposite ones that you possibly can have stored? What knowledge or methodologies are driving a few of these selections?

Wu: We’ve been in a nerve-racking interval about transportation during the last 30 days with the Orange Line shut down.

However the fact is that the Higher Boston area had been going by way of a fairly nerve-racking transportation expertise lengthy earlier than that. The pandemic modified lots of people’s commuting patterns — in some instances briefly and in some instances long term. However previous to the pandemic, Boston had the worst rush hour congestion anyplace within the nation. And we’re already beginning to see the return of visitors and enhance in commute occasions that impacts folks’s livelihoods and salaries, in addition to their psychological well being and time we get to spend with our household and associates.

So this can be a core concern on how we are able to develop sustainably and equitably as a metropolis, with transportation as a key piece of what’s accessible to residents all throughout our area: jobs, housing, schooling, and all of the alternatives that we’re making an attempt to create.

Advertisement

The Orange Line scenario was sudden, however our groups labored extremely laborious to organize and plan and assist the MBTA in order that the above-ground (bus) shuttling operation might run as easily as doable whereas the MBTA was upgrading tracks and indicators and stations underground.

Within the course of, we drew on data and knowledge that we already had in some instances from a few of our totally different streets pilots, like Copley Join (town’s pilot program that closed some streets within the sq. for public programing this summer season) and different data that the Boston Visitors Administration Heart has at all times been gathering and taking a look at.

So, our hope all through the 30-day interval was to not solely handle a nerve-racking scenario, however to measure, be taught, and enhance each single day throughout that interval with an eye fixed in the direction of maintaining lasting influence wherever doable. And so a number of of those bus lanes and bike lanes characterize tasks that town had hoped to get completed in some unspecified time in the future anyway, or tackle spots which can be notably congested and harmful in terms of visitors and vehicles. So we now have an excellent quantity of knowledge collected throughout this 30-day interval and earlier than to establish the place it really works very effectively for visitors move and pedestrian security and transit entry to maintain these adjustments.

2. You talked about Copley Join so perhaps you sort of answered this query already, however you’re making three bus lanes everlasting in Copley Sq.. Clearly we’ve seen bus-only lanes arising in several neighborhoods lately, however you recognize perhaps … not as on the similar (slower) price that we’ve seen in additional of the central, downtown areas like these ones might be.

What’s the important thing to creating positive that bus lanes in these busier areas work effectively? Downtown and Again Bay are filled with slim, tiny streets. Is there a steadiness that you must attain in deciding find out how to handle visitors and ensure it’s not a burden on these busier areas?

Advertisement

Boston is a historic, dense metropolis, and as we develop, the capability to maneuver folks on our streets is among the limiting elements. We’re already at or nearing capability of our streets in lots of instances, and to make sure that we are able to create housing so folks can afford to remain and stay in Boston and add jobs to the realm, proceed seeing alternatives in our development sectors and in academic alternatives throughout town, we now have to be considering in another way in some instances about find out how to transfer much more folks on the identical public house that’s out there on our roadways.

Bus lanes and bike lanes and different infrastructure are solely pretty much as good as they’re clear and used that approach. I imply, I’ve been in a lot a scenario the place you must go round a parked supply truck in a motorcycle lane, which could be fairly harmful, or see a parked automotive within the devoted bus lane on my morning journey in on the bus from Forest Hills.

And so, design selections and enforcement sources to make it possible for these are actual lanes is vital. And having linked connectivity between totally different choices in order that it’s not only for a brief stretch that you simply skilled a smoother journey, however you possibly can truly get to your vacation spot.

3. What’s one thing you realized in regards to the metropolis’s transit system — you recognize, not simply the MBTA itself however the ecosystem at giant, if you’ll, — through the Orange Line shutdown interval?

What’s one factor that I realized? That we are able to, in reality, transfer shortly and do massive issues once we select to.

Advertisement

There was all of two weeks to prepare for a large enterprise, and our groups had each day, typically hourly, coordination with the MBTA. It actually takes that stage of partnership and collaboration to suit all of the items collectively. You’ll be able to’t separate our subway system from buses and visitors and the Metropolis of Boston from our companion cities throughout the area.

So all of those items depend on one another. However once we all get on the identical web page, we are able to see fairly massive enhancements, fairly quick.

4. This Boston Herald editorial mentioned just lately that you simply see vehicles as “the enemy.” It simply received me considering: What are your critics not understanding about your imaginative and prescient for town’s transit system? Possibly folks see a few of this modification as too quick for them to deal with. Is there a response to that?

I don’t see vehicles because the enemy. I see visitors and wasted time because the enemy. Air pollution is the enemy.

Look, I’m in a multigenerational family. I’ve two younger children. I understand how that our streets are at present designed. We get within the automotive to go locations as effectively. And so, it’s not an all or nothing proposition to say we have to make adjustments in order that our entire system and the numerous ways in which folks get round all match collectively.

Advertisement

Eliminating visitors is an pressing concern. It’s choking the expansion of our financial system. It’s making our housing market extra strained. It’s affecting so many features of individuals’s day-to-day lives. It’s depressing to be caught in visitors to get to work, and that makes it more durable for firms to find right here or for younger folks to attach with the internship alternatives and social actions and sources that we’re making an attempt to create for everybody all throughout town.

It doesn’t take that a lot to make a distinction. I believe when there have been research (that recommend), and even when The Boston Globe did their Highlight collection on visitors within the area, seeing even a 5 % discount within the variety of vehicles on the highway opens up the house … that’s the distinction between gridlock and (having) visitors that may move easily.

Not everybody goes to have the ability to or need to (not) be behind their autos instantly. But when we are able to make that 5 % distinction, that’s life altering for people who find themselves making selections about the place to stay, what jobs they will take, what group they really feel linked to.

And so, we are able to both select to kick the can down the highway and pay for it, with even higher value down the highway, or as we’ve seen with why we wanted to even have an MBTA shutdown to start with, we are able to begin now and roll up our sleeves to actually deal with our public areas, together with roadways, as an area that ought to be serving the frequent good.

Materials from earlier Boston.com stories was used on this report.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Boston Celtics core should be remembered fondly after shakeup|Souichi Terada

Published

on

Boston Celtics core should be remembered fondly after shakeup|Souichi Terada


NEW YORK — The sting of this Celtics season is going to last a while, and not just because they were embarrassed by the Knicks in Game 6 to end their season. Jayson Tatum’s ruptured right Achilles tendon casts question marks on the organization going forward. Considering the C’s were already set for a transformational offseason, there’s a lot of uncertainty going forward.

But, for now, Celtics fans should reflect back on this two-year group. They were special. They accomplished their goal by winning the 2024 NBA title. They’re already immortalized for that. And, when looking back at this core, they should be remembered fondly and in a positive light.

Yes, there were frustrating moments. This probably isn’t even a conversation — at least for now — if the Celtics didn’t blow Games 1 and 2 to the Knicks. Old bad habits kicked in and the C’s didn’t look like reigning champions. That slimmed their margin for error, then once Tatum went down, this series was going to be difficult to win. Ultimately, the Celtics couldn’t accomplish their lofty goal of going back-to-back.

Most importantly, appreciate what this group did: They maximized their talent. That doesn’t always happen. There was no bickering or moaning about touches, playing time or whatever. Plenty of NBA teams are fractured because of individualistic motives. That’s part of being in the league. C’s fans are familiar with that when a promising 2018-19 season ended in a dud, also during the second round.

Advertisement

There was none of that drama over the past two seasons — that should be appreciated, too. This group realized the opportunity in front of them with a loaded roster, so all they did was work toward getting better. All you can do in this league is to put yourself in a position to win, and the Celtics did that for two seasons.

“I just love playing with the guys that we have in that locker room,” Derrick White said. “Just a great group of guys that compete at a high level. Off the court, we just had a lot of fun. And I think that’s just what I’ll probably the most proud of: is just being able to say that I put on a Boston Celtics uniform with some amazing group of people.”

The Celtics weren’t perfect. They lost in the second round to a Knicks team that executed when it mattered, and for that, the C’s only have themselves to blame. Then their injury luck turned for the worst as Tatum going down like he did also took an emotional toll. But the Knicks deserved to win since that’s what they did, taking four out of six games against the heavily-favored Celtics.

So, the Celtics will process how this season went over the next few days ahead of the offseason. Then the front office will inevitably get to work, whether that’s the draft, free agency, trades or whatever tool they can muster to upgrade the roster. There will likely be departures to key guys since that’s how the salary cap works. But this group was special — Banner No. 18 is proof of that.

“I told the guys in the locker room, one of the honors of my life was to be able to coach this group of guys,” C’s coach Joe Mazzulla said. “So you go down the list, every one of these guys is a champion, a warrior and they’ve done a lot of great things in this league. And it’s an honor to be able to share the locker room with them and be next to them on the court and be in the arena with them. So, I’m grateful for that.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Insider: Boston Bruins have interviewed ‘about 15 guys’ for coaching vacancy

Published

on

Insider: Boston Bruins have interviewed ‘about 15 guys’ for coaching vacancy


It sounds like Don Sweeney and Cam Neely are doing their diligence as they search for the next coach of the Bruins.

On SportsNet’s “32 Thoughts” podcast, NHL insider Elliotte Friedman said the buzz around the league is that just about everybody has been on Boston’s radar.

“I’ve heard they’ve interviewed about 15 guys,” Friedman said. “I asked someone, ‘Who do you think Boston has interviewed?’ The response was, ‘Who haven’t they interviewed?’”

Friedman then shared the names of some of the candidates.

Advertisement

“(Marco) Strum,” Friedman said. “I assume (Jay) Leach. I think (Jeff) Halpern and (Jeff) Blashill. I think they’re also in on Mitch Love. Joe Sacco. But I think there’s more and more.”

Interim coach Sacco and Bruins assistant Leach are obvious interview candidates, while some of the other names are interesting, too.

Sturm, Boston’s hero in the 2010 Winter Classic, has been a Kings assistant since 2018. Halpern has won a pair of Stanley Cups as a Lightning assistant, while Blashill spent seven seasons coaching the Red Wings (2015-22) before his dismissal. Love is a Capitals assistant who is also rumored to be on Pittsburgh’s radar.

When Sweeney spoke after the NHL Draft lottery earlier this month, he was pleased with the feedback he’d been getting from candidates.

“This is an exciting opportunity for coaches to be interviewing for this position, and that’s the indication that they would be very excited about maybe being the head coach of the Boston Bruins,” Sweeney said. “That’s the first and foremost thing that’s come across, happy to be part of the selection of being interviewed, and more fortunate they are.

Advertisement

“I think they’re starting to gather information on the roster and the players that we have in place. And, first question people ask in terms of how healthy we’re going to be and the return to that full health so that players, that they expect impact (from) will be back to do what they do. But the overriding excitement as we are to turn a page and come to the decision that we’ve got the right guy in place.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Receiver of troubled Boston nursing home defends hire of disgraced ex-senator Dianne Wilkerson

Published

on

Receiver of troubled Boston nursing home defends hire of disgraced ex-senator Dianne Wilkerson


A court-appointed receiver of a financially-strapped Boston nursing home defended his hire of disgraced ex-senator Dianne Wilkerson, after “allegations of nepotism and self-dealing” were lodged against her in Superior Court last month.

In a post-hearing order, Suffolk Superior Court Judge Christopher Belezos, who is overseeing hearings regarding the receivership of Roxbury’s Edgar P. Benjamin Healthcare Center, raised “significant concerns” about the considerable pay Wilkerson testified that she was making at a facility on the brink of bankruptcy.

“On April 16, the court heard testimony from several witnesses regarding allegations of nepotism and self-dealing by a member of the receivership’s team,” Belezos wrote in the April 22 order. “The subject of such allegations, Ms. Wilkerson offered, under pains of penalties of perjury, testimony that she is an employee of the EPBHC, receiving full benefits, being paid at a rate of $82 per hour, working an average of 90 hours per week.

“If such testimony is accurate, it raises significant concerns as to the rate of remuneration being paid to Ms. Wilkerson by an institution in receivership with a projected 2025 loss in the area of $4.4 million,” the judge added.

Advertisement

Wilkerson, an ex-state senator whose political career ended after she was busted by the feds for taking a bribe, is executive assistant to Joseph Feaster, the court-appointed receiver of the troubled nursing home.

She was present for a hearing held Thursday in Superior Court, but didn’t take part in the day’s proceedings, and deferred comment to Feaster.

Speaking with reporters after a roughly half-hour hearing, Feaster defended his decision to hire Wilkerson and her compensation, in the wake of last month’s mismanagement allegations. He described Wilkerson as “talented” and said she was thoroughly vetted before being added to the facility’s receivership team.

“Donald Trump has a past, and he’s president of the United States,” Feaster said when asked about Wilkerson’s checkered past. “She served her time. She doesn’t have a CORI. She has nothing which would preclude her from working, and so that has to be the determinant.

“So that was looked at, because I certainly am not going to have any situation which would be problematic for the organization or for me,” he said. “She’s employable and she’s talented.”

Advertisement

Wilkerson resigned from the state Senate in 2008 and spent more than two years in jail after agreeing to plead guilty to charges tied to a federal corruption bust. She was infamously shown stuffing $1,000 in cash bribes into her bra in a photo that was released by the feds.

Feaster said Wilkerson didn’t perjure herself on the stand last month, when she testified about her compensation. He said there was a “misinterpretation” about his assistant’s testimony, when she said she works 90 hours a week, when in fact, she gets paid on a bi-weekly basis for a total of 80 hours.

“I think that she was saying I work more hours than what I get paid for, and what we wanted to confirm is that … she only gets paid for bi-weekly, 80 hours,” Feaster said.

Wilkerson told the Herald last month that it’s true that she makes $82 an hour and works 90 hours a week, but “no one asked me a third question.”

“How many hours do I actually get paid for? And the answer to that question is 40. That’s all,” she said at the time.

Advertisement

Feaster also said he saw Wilkerson’s hourly rate as reasonable, given that he makes $450 an hour as the facility’s receiver.

Benjamin Healthcare, which has roughly 80 patients, was placed into receivership last April to avoid the facility’s closure and allow it to begin a financial turnaround. Wilkerson was hired as Feaster’s executive assistant upon his appointment as receiver at that time.

This week’s hearing centered around the facility’s finances, whether receivership should be continued and what the court-appointed team’s contingency plan was if a buyer doesn’t materialize from the bid process.

In a May 14 court filing from Feaster, the “receiver informed the court” at the April 16 hearing “that the most viable path forward for the facility to continue operating would be through soliciting proposals for third party owner/operator.”

Belezos, the judge, pressed for a breakdown of the facility’s financial information from the receivership team, and set a deadline for May 29.

Advertisement

A lawyer for Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office, which represents state agencies like the Department of Health, said the state wants to keep the Roxbury facility open, rather than move forward with a closure and transfer of patients.

To try to recover funds, Feaster is pursuing a civil lawsuit that has been filed against the facility’s former administrator, Tony Francis, who ran the Benjamin before he was appointed as receiver, Commonwealth Beacon reported.

The lawsuit alleges that Francis “siphoned” more than $3 million in funds from the facility, per a prior court filing from Feaster.

The matter returns to court on June 28.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending