Connect with us

News

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Published

on

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A friend sent a meme to a group chat last week that, like many internet memes before it, managed to implant itself deep into my brain and capture an idea in a way that more sophisticated, expansive prose does not always manage. Somewhat ironically, the meme was about the ills of the internet. 

“People in 1999 using the internet as an escape from reality,” the text read, over an often-used image from a TV series of a face looking out of a car window. Below it was another face looking out of a different car window overlaid with the text: “People in 2026 using reality as an escape from the internet.” 

Oof. So simple, yet so spot on. With AI-generated slop — sorry, content — now having overtaken human-generated words and images online, with social media use appearing to have peaked and with “dumb phones” being touted as this year’s status symbol, it does feel as if the tide is beginning to turn towards the general de-enshittification of life. 

Advertisement

And what could be a better way to resist the ever-swelling stream of mediocrity and nonsense on the internet, and to stick it to the avaricious behemoths of the “attention economy”, than to pick up a work of fiction (ideally not purchased on one of these behemoths’ platforms), with no goal other than sheer pleasure and the enrichment of our lives? But while the tide might have started to turn, we don’t seem to have quite got there yet on the reading front, if we are on our way there at all.

Two-fifths of Britons said last year that they had not read a single book in the previous 12 months, according to YouGov. And, as has been noted many times before on both sides of the Atlantic, it is men who are reading the least — just 53 per cent had read any book over the previous year, compared with 66 per cent of women — both in overall numbers and specifically when it comes to fiction.

Yet pointing this out, and lamenting the “disappearance of literary men”, has become somewhat contentious. A much-discussed Vox article last year asked: “Are men’s reading habits truly a national crisis?” suggesting that they were not and pointing out that women only read an average of seven minutes more fiction per day than men (while failing to note that this itself represents almost 60 per cent more reading time).

Meanwhile an UnHerd op-ed last year argued that “the literary man is not dead”, positing that there exists a subculture of male literature enthusiasts keeping the archetype alive and claiming that “podcasts are the new salons”. 

That’s all well and good, but the truth is that there is a gender gap between men and women when it comes to reading and engaging specifically with fiction, and it’s growing.

Advertisement

According to a 2022 survey by the US National Endowment for the Arts, 27.7 per cent of men had read a short story or novel over the previous year, down from 35.1 per cent a decade earlier. Women’s fiction-reading habits declined too, but more slowly and from a higher base: 54.6 per cent to 46.9 per cent, meaning that while women out-read men by 55 per cent in 2012 when it came to fiction, they did so by almost 70 per cent in 2022.

The divide is already apparent in young adulthood, and it has widened too: data from 2025 showed girls in England took an A-Level in English literature at an almost four-times-higher rate than boys, with that gap having grown from a rate of about three times higher just eight years earlier.

So the next question is: should we care and, if so, why? Those who argue that yes, we should, tend to give a few reasons. They point out that reading fiction fosters critical thinking, empathy and improves “emotional vocabulary”. They argue that novels often contain heroic figures and strong, virtuous representations of masculinity that can inspire and motivate modern men. They cite Andrew Tate, the titan of male toxicity, who once said that “reading books is for losers who are afraid to learn from life”, and that “books are a total waste of time”, as an example of whose advice not to follow. 

I agree with all of this — wholeheartedly, I might add. But I’m not sure how many of us, women or men, are picking up books in order to become more virtuous people. Perhaps the more compelling, or at least motivating, reason for reading fiction is simply that it offers a form of pleasure and attention that the modern world is steadily eroding. In a hyper-capitalist culture optimised for skimming and distraction, the ability to sit still with a novel is both subversive and truly gratifying. The real question, then, is why so many men are not picking one up.

jemima.kelly@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court allows California to use new congressional map, giving Democrats a boost

Published

on

Supreme Court allows California to use new congressional map, giving Democrats a boost

The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new congressional map that voters approved, delivering a major victory for Democrats ahead of this year’s midterm elections.

The decision came down in a one-sentence order that provided no explanation or dissents. Republicans had asked the high court to block California’s redrawn district lines, alleging they were racially gerrymandered.

The map, drawn by Democratic lawmakers and passed by voters last November through the Proposition 50 ballot measure, gives the party an opportunity to pick up as many as five House seats as it seeks to win a majority in the chamber this fall.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom was a lead proponent of the redistricting push, branding it as a response to a new map enacted last summer in Texas at President Donald Trump’s urging, which could similarly net Republicans up to five seats.

“Donald Trump said he was ‘entitled’ to five more Congressional seats in Texas. He started this redistricting war. He lost, and he’ll lose again in November,” Newsom wrote on X.

Advertisement
California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed Democratic lawmakers to draw a new congressional map last year.Justin Sullivan / Getty Images file

The California Republican Party, joined by Trump’s Justice Department, sued in federal court to have the new map blocked, alleging that it illegally relied on race.

A federal district court had ruled last month to refuse to block it, concluding that the lines were drawn on a partisan basis, not a racial one as Republicans had argued.

Republicans had asked the Supreme Court to act by Feb. 9. The candidate filing deadline in California is March 6 and the primary is June 2.

Last year, Democrats in Texas made a similar argument to one Republicans made in California when seeking to block the new map in their state from going into effect. Texas Democrats claimed that GOP lawmakers had unlawfully considered race when drawing the state’s new map. A lower court briefly blocked the Texas map before the Supreme Court ruled in December that Texas could implement it for the 2026 elections.

The Texas map, which was pursued at Trump’s urging, sparked an unusually active mid-decade redistricting cycle, with both parties angling for an advantage as they vie for control of the narrowly divided House. Typically, states redraw congressional boundaries at the start of each decade after the new census results.

Advertisement

Newsom had pushed hard for Democrats’ redistricting plan, repeatedly accusing Trump and Republicans of “rigging” the midterm elections with their decision to redraw congressional maps around the country. California Democrats named the bill that authorized the ballot measure special election the Election Rigging Response Act.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Trump Signs Bill to End Partial Government Shutdown

Published

on

Video: Trump Signs Bill to End Partial Government Shutdown

new video loaded: Trump Signs Bill to End Partial Government Shutdown

transcript

transcript

Trump Signs Bill to End Partial Government Shutdown

President Trump signed a spending package on Tuesday that reopened major parts of the government, as well as fund the Department of Homeland Security as negotiations over restrictions on the administration’s immigration crackdown continue.

“I’m thrilled to sign the Consolidated Appropriations Act to immediately reopen the federal government. Thank you.” “Get the (expletive) out of here!”

Advertisement
President Trump signed a spending package on Tuesday that reopened major parts of the government, as well as fund the Department of Homeland Security as negotiations over restrictions on the administration’s immigration crackdown continue.

By Nailah Morgan

February 4, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Video: NASA Delays Artemis II Rocket Launch Until at Least March

Published

on

Video: NASA Delays Artemis II Rocket Launch Until at Least March

new video loaded: NASA Delays Artemis II Rocket Launch Until at Least March

transcript

transcript

NASA Delays Artemis II Rocket Launch Until at Least March

NASA delayed the Artemis II mission on Tuesday after detecting hydrogen leaks. The mission was scheduled to circle the moon with four astronauts.

As we began that pressurization, we did see that the leak within the cavity came up pretty quick. We did a cutoff, which is a normal safing activity for us.

Advertisement
NASA delayed the Artemis II mission on Tuesday after detecting hydrogen leaks. The mission was scheduled to circle the moon with four astronauts.

By Jackeline Luna

February 3, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending