Connect with us

News

Vista and co-investors lose $4bn in Pluralsight restructuring

Published

on

Vista and co-investors lose bn in Pluralsight restructuring

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A group of private credit lenders led by Blue Owl Capital and Ares Management have agreed to take over troubled software company Pluralsight, wiping out $4bn that Vista Equity Partners and other investors had put into the business since they bought it less than four years ago.

The closely watched restructuring is one of the biggest in which the creditors that ultimately took control were also so-called direct lenders — asset managers and funds that provide loans directly to companies.

The deal values Pluralsight at about $900mn, far below the more than $5bn that Vista, its partners and private lenders had invested or lent the business. Vista and its co-investors had sunk roughly $4bn into Pluralsight, while lenders provided it with about $1.7bn of debt financing.

Advertisement

As part of the restructuring the lenders agreed to knock roughly $1.2bn off the $1.7bn of debt and inject fresh cash into the company, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The deal will lead to Vista and the lenders incurring losses after Pluralsight’s business rapidly deteriorated. The negotiations between the two sides broke out into the open earlier this year, sending shockwaves through the broader private credit market.

Vista bought the software education company in 2021 at a time when tech valuations had been buoyed by rock-bottom interest rates. Shortly after the deal closed, Vista bought another business to bolster Pluralsight’s offerings for engineers and programmers focused on cloud computing.

The private equity firm funded both purchases with roughly $1.7bn debt in total provided by private lenders, which also included BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Oaktree, Franklin Templeton’s Benefit Street Partners and Golub Capital.

Vista shuffled some of Pluralsight’s assets around earlier this year in a bid to buy time in the negotiations. But in doing so it riled up the creditors, who believed control of the company should have been handed over earlier.

Advertisement

The $800bn direct lending industry had long been marketed as having stronger lender protections than traditional high-yield bond and leveraged loan markets. Pluralsight tested that thesis, although lenders ultimately were able to take control without some of the fighting usually seen in public markets.

The troubles at the company have also raised questions about the quality of the loans being extended by private credit investors, as well as whether they had been reckless in some of their novel financings — such as a loan based on Pluralsight’s revenue growth instead of profits. Regulated banks are restricted from providing these kinds of loans, which are seen to be excessively risky.

When the US Federal Reserve began raising interest rates a year after the buyout, software valuations began to tumble and debt that had been taken out during the period of near-zero rates became onerous to pay back.

Many of Pluralsight’s biggest clients were also hit, with scores of technology companies laying off staff, or slowing hiring. Customer churn rose and Pluralsight’s revenues began to slide last year.

Oaktree, Ares, Benefit Street, BlackRock, Blue Owl, Goldman, Golub, Pluralsight and Vista declined to comment.

Advertisement

Bloomberg earlier on Thursday reported a deal had been reached.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

Published

on

Video: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

new video loaded: Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

transcript

transcript

Fires Continue to Burn One Week Later in California

The Palisades and Eaton fires, ravaging Los Angeles for more than a week, remain mostly uncontained by firefighters.

“We just had — just had Christmas morning right over here, right in front of that chimney. And this is what’s left.” “I urge, and everybody here urges, you to remain alert as danger has not yet passed. Please follow all evacuation warnings and orders without delay and prioritize your safety.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Wildfires

Continue Reading

News

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Published

on

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

South Korea’s suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested on Wednesday morning following a predawn raid by police and investigators on his fortified hilltop compound.

Yoon’s detention followed a six-hour stand-off between law enforcement officials and members of the president’s security detail. It is the first time in South Korea’s history that a sitting president has been arrested.

The development marks the latest twist in a political crisis that was triggered by his failed attempt to impose martial law last month, and which has shaken confidence in the democratic integrity of Asia’s fourth-largest economy.

Advertisement

Yoon was suspended from his duties after he was impeached by parliament in December following his attempt to impose martial law. The country is currently being led by finance minister Choi Sang-mok as acting president.

The operation on Wednesday, which began shortly after 4am, was the second attempt this month by the CIO to detain Yoon for questioning on insurrection and abuse of office charges.

An initial effort earlier this month was foiled by Yoon’s protection officers following a tense hours-long stand-off at the presidential residence. Yoon had previously refused to comply with investigators and had challenged their authority to bring him in for questioning.

“The rule of law has completely collapsed in this country,” Yoon said in a video statement recorded before his transfer to the headquarters of the country’s Corruption Investigation Office for questioning. “I’ve decided to appear for CIO questioning in order to prevent any bloodshed.”

According to South Korea’s state-owned news agency Yonhap, police and officials from the CIO arrived at the compound early on Wednesday and presented a warrant for Yoon’s arrest but were again initially prevented from entering by the Presidential Security Service.

Advertisement

Yonhap also reported that about 30 lawmakers from Yoon’s conservative People Power party were at the compound and attempting to prevent officials from entering it.

But with hundreds of police gathered outside, some of them equipped with ladders and wire cutters to overcome barricades erected by Yoon’s protection officers, CIO officials were eventually allowed to enter the residence.

Yoon’s lawyers initially attempted to broker a deal whereby he would surrender voluntarily for questioning. But this was not accepted by CIO officials, and he was eventually arrested just after 10.30am and transferred to the investigative agency’s headquarters.

“Yoon’s arrest is the first step towards restoring our constitutional order,” said Park Chan-dae, floor leader of the leftwing opposition Democratic Party of Korea. “It underlines that justice is still alive.”

While Yoon’s powers have been transferred to Choi as acting president, he remains South Korea’s head of state while the country’s Constitutional Court deliberates on whether to approve his impeachment or reinstate him in office.

Advertisement

The court held its first formal hearing into Yoon’s impeachment on Tuesday, but the session was adjourned after four minutes because the suspended president declined to attend, citing concerns for his personal safety.

The efforts by the CIO and police to detain Yoon for questioning relates to a separate, criminal process connected to his failed imposition of martial law. Yoon’s lawyers insist the CIO has no standing to pursue criminal insurrection charges against him.

Continue Reading

News

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Published

on

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Elon Musk speaks as part of a campaign town hall in support of Donald Trump in Folsom, Pa., on Oct. 17, 2024.

Matt Rourke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Matt Rourke/AP

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sued billionaire Elon Musk, saying he failed to disclose his ownership of Twitter stock in a timely manner in early 2022, before buying the social media site.

As a result, the SEC alleges, Musk was able to underpay “by at least $150 million” for shares he bought after he should have disclosed his ownership of more than 5% of Twitter’s shares. Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and later renamed it X.

Musk started amassing Twitter shares in early 2022, and by March of that year, he owned more than 5%. At this point, the complaint says, he was required by law to disclose his ownership, but he failed to do so until April 4, 11 days after the report was due.

Advertisement

Representatives for X and Musk did not immediately return a message for comment.

After Musk signed a deal to acquire Twitter in April 2022, he tried to back out of it, leading the company to sue him to force him to go through with the acquisition.

The has SEC said that starting in April 2022, it authorized an investigation into whether any securities laws were broken in connection with Musk’s purchases of Twitter stock and his statements and SEC filings related to the company.

Before it filed the lawsuit, the SEC went to court in an attempt to compel Musk to testify as part of an investigation into his purchase of Twitter.

The SEC’s current chair, Gary Gensler, plans to step down from his post on Jan. 20 and it is not clear if the new administration will continue the lawsuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending