Connect with us

News

Videos show both sides of US-China aerial encounter — and highlight the risks involved | CNN

Published

on

Videos show both sides of US-China aerial encounter — and highlight the risks involved | CNN

Editor’s Be aware: A model of this story appeared in CNN’s In the meantime in China publication, a three-times-a-week replace exploring what you could know concerning the nation’s rise and the way it impacts the world. Enroll right here.



CNN
 — 

The interception of a United States Air Drive reconnaissance jet by a Chinese language fighter over the South China Sea final month ought to be seen as a possible warning of how simply, and rapidly issues can go terribly unsuitable – elevating the danger of a lethal navy confrontation between the 2 powers, analysts say.

The incident in query occurred on December 21 over the northern a part of the South China Sea in what the US says was worldwide airspace.

Advertisement

Performing what the US navy deemed an “unsafe maneuver,” a Chinese language navy J-11 fighter jet flew inside 20 ft of the nostril of a US RC-135 Rivet Joint, an unarmed reconnaissance aircraft with about 30 folks on board, forcing the US aircraft to take “evasive maneuvers to keep away from a collision,” based on an announcement from the US Indo-Pacific Command issued on December 28.

It launched a video of the incident exhibiting the Chinese language fighter flying to the left of and barely above the four-engine US jet, much like the Boeing 707 airliners of the Nineteen Sixties and ’70s, after which regularly closing nearer to its nostril earlier than transferring away.

The Folks’s Liberation Military’s Southern Theater Command, in a report on China Army On-line, had a distinct interpretation of the encounter, saying it was the US jet that “abruptly modified its flight angle and compelled the Chinese language plane to the left.”

“Such a harmful approaching maneuver severely affected the flight security of the Chinese language navy plane,” it mentioned.

It launched its personal video of the incident, shot from the fighter jet, that appeared to indicate the RC-135 transferring nearer to and behind the fighter.

Advertisement

Aviation and navy specialists contacted by CNN who watched the 2 movies mentioned it appeared the Chinese language jet was firmly within the unsuitable and had no cause to get as shut because it did to the American aircraft.

“The 135 was in worldwide airspace and is a big, sluggish, non-maneuverable plane. It’s the accountability of the approaching smaller, quick, maneuverable plane to remain clear, to not trigger an issue for each plane,” mentioned Peter Layton, a former Royal Australian Air Drive officer, now with the Griffith Asia Institute.

“The intent of the interception was presumably to visually determine the plane and the fighter might have stayed a number of miles away and competed that process. Getting nearer brings no features,” he mentioned.

Robert Hopkins, a retired US Air Drive officer who flew comparable reconnaissance jets, additionally pushed again on the Chinese language interpretation of occasions.

“The (Chinese language) response is to this point divorced from actuality that it’s fictional. An unarmed, airliner-sized plane doesn’t aggressively flip right into a nimble armed fighter,” mentioned Hopkins.

Advertisement

However Hopkins additionally mentioned the US navy risked blowing the incident out of proportion in saying the US jet needed to take “evasive maneuvers,” a time period he described as “overly dramatic.”

“These aren’t any completely different than a driver adjusting her place to keep away from a short lived lane incursion by an adjoining driver,” Hopkins mentioned. “The US response is pure theater and needlessly creates an exaggerated sense of hazard.”

However whereas the incident itself was safely manged by the US pilots, specialists agreed the small distance between the US and Chinese language planes evident within the movies leaves little room for error.

“Flying plane shut to one another at 500 miles per hour with unfriendly intentions is usually unsafe,” mentioned Blake Herzinger, a nonresident fellow and Indo-Pacific protection coverage professional on the American Enterprise Institute.

“At that vary, an surprising maneuver or an tools difficulty could cause a horrible accident in below a second,” Herzinger mentioned.

Advertisement

And Herzinger mentioned the present state of US-China navy relations means accidents might rapidly flip into armed confrontation.

“It’s price remembering that the PLA has successfully wrecked any sort of hotlines or dialogue boards for addressing potential incidents with the US. If an intercept does go unsuitable, there are fewer choices than ever for senior officers to restrict potential escalation,” he mentioned.

Layton identified one other potential hazard that might result in escalation. As seen within the US video, the Chinese language plane is armed with air-to-air missiles.

“The 135 is an unarmed plane. Why does the PLAN take into account it essential to intercept carrying missiles when the intent was to visually determine the plane? Doing that is probably harmful and will result in a serious and tragic incident,” Layton mentioned.

However in an everyday press briefing on Friday, a spokesperson for the Chinese language International Ministry mentioned the incident was simply the newest in a string of US provocations that threaten stability within the area.

Advertisement

“Let me level out that for a very long time, the US has regularly deployed plane and vessels for close-in reconnaissance on China, which poses a critical hazard to China’s nationwide safety,” International Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin mentioned.

The Chinese language Southern Theater Command mentioned the US reconnaissance jet was flying “within the neighborhood of China’s southern shoreline and the Xisha Islands” – identified within the West because the Paracels – the place Beijing has constructed up navy installations.

The US Indo-Pacfic Command mentioned the RC-135 was in worldwide airspace and was “lawfully conducting routine operations.”

China claims virtually the entire huge South China Sea as a part of its territorial waters, together with lots of distant islands and inlets within the disputed physique of water, lots of which Beijing has militarized.

The US doesn’t acknowledge these territorial claims and routinely conducts operations there, together with freedom of navigation operations by means of the South China Sea.

Advertisement

“The US’s provocative and harmful strikes are the foundation explanation for maritime safety points. China urges the US to cease such harmful provocations, and cease deflecting blame on China,” the International Ministry’s Wang mentioned.

However Washington has constantly pointed the finger again at China in these intercepts, which date again many years.

In essentially the most notorious incident in 2001, a Chinese language fighter jet collided with a US reconnaissance aircraft close to Hainan Island within the northern South China Sea, resulting in a serious disaster because the Chinese language pilot was killed and the broken US aircraft barely managed a secure touchdown on Chinese language territory. The US crew was launched after 11 days of intense negotiations.

After a string of incidents final yr involving intercepts of US and allied plane by Chinese language warplanes, US Protection Secretary Lloyd Austin mentioned the PLA’s actions have been escalating and “ought to fear us all.”

Layton mentioned he thinks Beijing might have been making an attempt to impress the US navy final month, and get it on video.

Advertisement

“There was no potential acquire by the fighter flying so shut besides to create an incident – that was handily recorded on a top quality video digital camera the fighter’s crew simply occurred to have and be utilizing. The incident appears very nicely deliberate by the PLAN, if relatively dangerous,” he mentioned.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending