Connect with us

News

US officials identify 3 areas where US may take action soon on Ukraine

Published

on

The pressing discussions underway amongst prime aides to President Joe Biden and between European allies of the US got here as efforts to evacuate civilians from Ukrainian cities had been stymied by Russian shelling and as Ukraine’s President pleaded with the West to do extra.

High US nationwide safety officers mentioned they had been hurriedly searching for methods to additional punish Putin whereas offering assist to the outgunned Ukrainian army.

White Home and different Western officers have made plain over the previous days they anticipate the approaching stretch of the conflict to be its bloodiest as Putin grows pissed off at Russia’s slower-than-expected advances and seeks methods to grind forward.

“I feel we now have to be ready for this to final for a while,” Blinken mentioned. “However simply successful a battle is just not successful the conflict.”

Vice President Kamala Harris individually made temporary feedback in assist of the Ukrainian individuals in remarks from Selma, Alabama, Sunday afternoon, the place she was marking the 57th anniversary of Bloody Sunday.

Harris advised the viewers: “As we speak the eyes of the world are on Ukraine and the courageous people who find themselves combating to guard their nation and their democracy.”

Advertisement

She advised these gathered on the foot of the Edmund Pettus Bridge that the “bravery” of Ukrainian individuals resisting Russia’s invasion “is a reminder that freedom, and democracy, can by no means be taken without any consideration, by any of us.”

Ban on Russian oil imports

Biden, who’s spending the weekend at his residence in Delaware, convened a telephone name Saturday with prime members of his administration to debate a possible ban on Russian oil imports, Blinken mentioned, a step that has been into consideration on the White Home since final final week.

“We at the moment are speaking to our European companions and allies to look in a coordinated manner on the prospect of banning the import of Russian oil, whereas ensuring that there’s a nonetheless an applicable provide of oil on world markets,” Blinken mentioned. “That is a really lively dialogue as we communicate.”

Biden has confronted stress from Democrats and Republicans alike to impose harder restrictions on Russia’s power sector, which may show way more damaging than the financial sanctions utilized by the West up to now.

Advertisement

Russian oil imports to the US comprise a comparatively small share of the nation’s total provide, and so they have been declining sharply in current weeks. There’s little doubt Russia would have the ability to promote these provides to different international locations, together with China, if the US stops shopping for them.

Nonetheless, the step can be important, notably since any sanctions utilized to Russia’s power sector had been as soon as thought-about nearly off the desk given the potential ripples on the worldwide oil market. To this point, the US and Europe have largely prevented main steps that would impression Russian power, although the US did ban the import into Russia of apparatus wanted for oil and fuel extraction.

“It is mindless in anyway to proceed to purchase oil from Russia that they use to fund this conflict and this murderous marketing campaign that their endeavor,” Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida advised Tapper on CNN on Sunday morning.

High Democrats, together with the No. 2 Senate Democrat Dick Durbin of Illinois and Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have additionally voiced assist for a ban on oil imports, and a bipartisan invoice has been launched in Congress that will mandate such a step.

White Home officers at the moment are critically reviewing what a ban may do to home fuel costs, which have hit new highs because the conflict in Ukraine causes oil to spike in value.

In a series of tweets Sunday late afternoon, White Home press secretary Jen Psaki acknowledged that regardless of efforts to scale up home manufacturing of power, “Russia’s actions nonetheless go away our customers weak.”

Psaki outlined a spread of efforts from the Biden administration to extend manufacturing of pure fuel and oil, however conceded that “home manufacturing has not insulated us from the worth volatility of fossil fuels or the whims of those that management them, corresponding to President Putin. Individuals know that.”

“The one solution to shield US over the long run is to turn out to be power unbiased,” she mentioned, reiterating an administration precedence. “That’s the reason the President is so centered on deploying clear power applied sciences that do not require fossil fuels purchased and offered on the worldwide market, which is able to all the time be weak to dangerous actors.”

Advertisement

Council of Financial Advisers Chair Cecilia Rouse advised reporters at a Friday press briefing, “We’re choices that we will take proper now, if we had been to chop the US consumption of Russian power — however what’s actually most necessary is that we keep a gentle provide of worldwide power.”

White Home officers have mentioned Biden is unlikely to take steps concentrating on Russia’s power sector with out express assist from Europe, which is way extra depending on Russian oil and fuel than america. Talking earlier Sunday, European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen mentioned work was underway to cut back that dependence.

“It’s extremely clear that, for us, there’s a sturdy technique now to say we now have to do away with the dependency of fossil fuels from Russia,” she advised Tapper on CNN. “Subsequently, we’re simply discussing within the European Union a strategic strategy, a plan, the way to speed up the funding within the renewables, the way to diversify our power provide.”

Potential conflict crimes

As officers assessment a possible ban on Russian oil, there’s a parallel effort underway to evaluate whether or not the concentrating on of civilians underway in Ukraine would represent a conflict crime.

Advertisement

Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the US ambassador to the United Nations, mentioned Sunday morning the US was “working with our companions to gather and supply data” on potential conflict crimes.

“Any assault on civilians is a conflict crime,” she mentioned on ABC Information. Earlier this week, Biden stopped in need of calling Russia’s actions in Ukraine a conflict crime, although he did say he believed it was “clear” Russia was concentrating on civilians.

Accounts from the bottom in Ukraine, together with by CNN reporters, have discovered civilian areas that had been shelled. Ukraine has claimed hundreds of civilians have been killed, although different estimates — together with from the UN — have are available in decrease.

Ukraine’s embattled President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has described what is occurring in his nation as conflict crimes, and has referred to as for a world tribunal to research. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has made related accusations. The Worldwide Legal Court docket on the Hague has opened an investigation into potential conflict crimes.
Final week, the US Embassy in Kyiv mentioned in a tweet it might be a conflict crime to assault a nuclear energy plant after Russia did simply that. However in a scramble afterward, the State Division advised different embassies to not amplify the message, a sign the administration hasn’t but settled on whether or not to label what’s underway now in Russia a conflict crime.

“We’ve got seen very credible studies of deliberate assaults on civilians, which might represent a conflict crime. We’ve got seen very credible studies about the usage of sure weapons,” Blinken mentioned Sunday on CNN. “And what we’re doing proper now could be documenting all of this, placing all of it collectively, it, and ensuring that, as individuals and the suitable organizations and establishments examine whether or not conflict crimes have been or are being dedicated, that we will assist no matter they’re doing.”

Polish fighter jets

Chatting with American lawmakers nearly on Saturday, Zelensky delivered an impassioned plea for america to step up its help, together with by harder financial sanctions.
He made one other request for the US and NATO to implement a no-fly-zone over Ukraine, which has been roundly rejected due to its potential to pit the US immediately towards Russia.

Wanting that, Zelensky requested for American assist in facilitating the switch of Soviet-era fighter jets from Japanese European nations to Ukraine, the place pilots have been educated to fly them and will use them to regulate the skies.

Advertisement
By Saturday night, US and Polish officers had been in discussions a couple of potential settlement to provide the nation with American F-16 fighter jets in change for Poland sending its Russian-made jets to Ukraine.

“We’re working with Poland as we communicate to see if we will backfill something that they supply to the Ukrainians,” Blinken mentioned Sunday. “However we additionally need to see if we may be useful in ensuring that, no matter they supply to Ukrainians, one thing goes to them to make up for any hole within the safety for Poland which may end result.”

Thomas-Greenfield additionally made clear the US had “not in any manner opposed the Polish authorities offering these jets to Ukraine.”

This story has been up to date with feedback from Vice President Kamala Harris and White Home press secretary Jen Psaki.

CNN’s Donald Judd contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Biden’s family reportedly tell him to stay in presidential race as blame shifts to advisers

Published

on

Biden’s family reportedly tell him to stay in presidential race as blame shifts to advisers

Joe Biden’s family have urged him stay in the race after a disastrous debate performance last week, according to reports in the US media, as senior democrats and donors have expressed exasperation at how his staff prepared him for the event.

The president gathered with his family at Camp David on Sunday, where discussions were reported to include questions over his political future. It came after days of mounting pressure on Biden, after a debate in which his halting performance highlighted his vulnerabilities and invited calls from pundits, media and voters for him to step aside.

During the meeting at Camp David – which included the president’s wife, children and grandchildren – Biden’s family told him he could still show Americans that he is capable of serving another four years, according to the New York Times.

While his family was reportedly aware of how poorly he performed, they also continue to think he’s the best person to beat Donald Trump.

The Associated Press reported that the strongest voices imploring Biden to resist pressure to drop out were his wife, Jill, and his son Hunter, who last month became the first child of a sitting president to be convicted of a felony after a jury found him guilty of lying about illegal drug use when he bought a handgun in 2018.

Advertisement

The Camp David trip had been previously scheduled, in order to accommodate a photoshoot with Annie Leibovitz for the upcoming Democratic National Convention.

The president’s relatives were also said to be critical of the way his closest advisers had prepared him for the debate.

During the debate, a hoarse-sounding Biden delivered a shaky, halting performance in which he stumbled over his words on several occasions and at times was unable to finish sentences. His opponent, Donald Trump, made a series of falsehoods, including claims that he actually won the 2020 election, which Biden failed to refute.

On Sunday, a narrative blaming the rigorous debate prep calendar which saw Biden sequestered at Camp David for six days, began to build.

Joe Biden arrives at Hagerstown airport with his family. Photograph: Evan Vucci/AP

“It is my belief that he was over-coached, over-practiced,” said John Morgan, a Florida-based attorney and major Biden fundraiser.

Advertisement

Critics of Biden’s performance also said that the preparation should have focused on the bigger vision he needs to sell to the country.

“My only request was make sure he’s rested before the debate, but he was exhausted. He was unwell,” one person who said they appealed to Biden’s top aides in the days before, told the Reuters news agency. “What a bad decision to send him out looking sick and exhausted.”

The drumbeat of calls for Biden to step have grown louder since a post-debate CBS poll showed a 10-point jump in the number of Democrats who believe Biden should not be running for president, to 46% from 36% in February.

Biden’s approval rating has been weakening since he took office and concerns about his age and handling of crises both at home and abroad after Thursday are under more scrutiny than ever.

On Sunday, prominent Democrats blanketed the talkshows, conceding that the president’s performance had been subpar, but continued to throw their support behind him.

Advertisement

House of Representatives Democratic leader, Hakeem Jeffries, acknowledged that Biden had suffered a setback, but said this was “nothing more than a setup for a comeback.”

Senator Raphael Warnock, a Georgia democrat and Baptist minister, said there had been “more than a few Sundays when I wish I had preached a better sermon,” relating the experience to Biden’s debate performance.

“But after the sermon was over it was my job to embody the message, to show up for the people that I serve. And that’s what Joe Biden has been doing his entire life,” Warnock said.

Not all Democrats appeared to be in agreement however. Asked on Sunday whether the party was discussing a new 2024 candidate, Maryland congressman Jamie Raskin told MSNBC: “There are very honest and serious and rigorous conversations taking place at every level of our party, because it is a political party and we have differences in point of view.”

“Whether he’s the candidate or someone else is the candidate, he’s going to be the keynote speaker at our convention. He will be the figure that we rally around to move forward,” Raskin said.

Advertisement

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report

Continue Reading

News

Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella — the French far right’s ticket to rule

Published

on

Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella — the French far right’s ticket to rule

The French far-right leader Marine Le Pen and party chief Jordan Bardella wore broad smiles as they pitched their “ticket” to voters with a view to taking power in 2027 — with her as president and him as prime minister. 

Using the original English word, the official unveiling of their duo in January was a new move in the context of French politics, where the president is elected directly and the post holds powerful institutional functions. Prime ministers are named afterwards to run the government and often sacrificed when presidents need to reboot in a crisis.

The announcement in a joint interview underlined how Le Pen had anointed the 28-year-old Bardella as the face of the new, professionalised Rassemblement National (RN) that she had spent more than a decade building. She was betting that her chances of succeeding her longtime rival, the centrist President Emmanuel Macron, were stronger with Bardella at her side. 

Le Pen last week told the Financial Times that she came up with the “ticket” as part of a strategy to prepare the French public to choose the RN. “The more people know us and the more they know precisely what we will do, the more they will be able to turn their backs on the caricatures and fears about us that are stirred up by our adversaries,” she said. 

But now the strength of the bond between Le Pen, aged 55, and her much younger lieutenant could be tested in the political turmoil touched off by Macron’s decision to call snap elections for the National Assembly. The president made the shock move after his centrist alliance was trounced in this month’s European elections where the RN list led by Bardella won 31 per cent of the vote to his 15 per cent. 

Advertisement

In the first leg of the two-round legislative election on Sunday, the anti-immigration, populist RN appeared ascendant once again, setting up the possibility that Bardella could be propelled to the premiership in a matter of weeks. Projections from the pollster Ipsos placed the RN on 34 per cent, putting it on track to win the most seats in parliament and potentially even an outright majority in the final round of voting on July 7.  

The RN has proved adept at appealing to people worried about the cost of living amid inflation, and has tapped into discontent about declining public services while exploiting anger at a lofty president Macron.

Despite the duo’s polished sales pitch, Le Pen and Bardella still have a radical agenda that would roil French society. It includes policies such as slashing immigration, ending birthright citizenship and creating a “national preference” for French citizens on social housing and welfare programmes.

In the Elysée palace, officials have long suggested in private that the pair will turn on each other in a quest for power. They seized on recent polling showing the protégé Bardella had eclipsed the mentor Le Pen in popularity and that more people would greet his accession to the presidency favourably than hers. 

Asked if he could push aside Le Pen to run himself in 2027, Bardella told the FT: “No, no, no. I do not have that ambition.” He has a large portrait of himself and Le Pen hanging in his office and still uses the formal vous to address her, although she has told him he does not have to.

Advertisement

Le Pen added: “The idea that I would be upset that he is more popular in polls than me, on the contrary, I’m delighted . . . I will need a popular prime minister to govern France.” 


In 2011, Le Pen officially took over the movement her father Jean-Marie helped create almost 40 years earlier. But before that, she had come to believe that the party needed to distance itself from the baggage of its founders, including her father and the journalist Pierre Bousquet, who was in the French division of the Waffen-SS during the second world war. 

With historical roots in fascism, the Front National (FN), as the party was originally called, remained on the fringes of French politics because of Jean-Marie. He was convicted in 1990 of hate speech for once likening the Nazi gas chambers to a “detail of history”.

France at the time was still reckoning with the historical legacy of Vichy collaboration with Nazi Germany, making the FN radioactive for most voters. At the age of eight, when Le Pen was growing up as the youngest of three daughters in Paris, a large bomb targeting her father destroyed the family home. No one was hurt, and the crime never solved.

After training as a lawyer, Le Pen practised for around six years before entering the family business: politics. In 2002, Jean-Marie surprisingly made the presidential run off, setting off mass anti-FN protests which led in turn to a crushing victory for the incumbent, Jacques Chirac.

Advertisement

It was then that the daughter set out to change things, according to Louis Aliot, the mayor of Perpignan, who broke with Jean-Marie to side with his daughter, with whom he was formerly in a relationship. “We were both from a younger generation, so we’re not obsessed with the past,” he said. “After the protests against us, we decided that we had to change the FN from the inside.” 

The project to “detoxify” the party became Le Pen’s mission. She changed its name in 2018, a classic marketing strategy to make voters forget the past. She had already ousted her father from the party in 2015, and expunged other radical elements, although critics say traces of its antisemitic, racist past remain. Gradually she shifted the RN’s platform to emphasise cost of living issues and play off the supposed contempt that Parisian elites have for rural areas. 

In Macron, Le Pen had her perfect opponent — a former banker, a product of top French educational institutions and a technocrat who wanted to liberalise the economy and boost the EU.

But in the 2017 presidential election, she lost to him by a wide margin, wounded by a weak debate performance. That defeat propelled her and the RN leadership into a bout of soul-searching. She and her closest cadres sought to rebuild both by boosting her policy expertise on issues from defence to the economy, and training up a new crop of politicians formed at the local level. They came to be known as “generation Marine”. 


Among them was Bardella, who says he first saw Le Pen on stage at a rally when he was 16 years old. She so impressed him that he joined her party the next day, going on to promote it in his hometown of Saint-Denis, a working-class and immigrant area north of Paris where he lived with his mother.

Advertisement

In 2015, he created a group in Saint-Denis called “Banlieues Patriotes” that sought to woo residents of the diverse and disaffected neighbourhoods on the Paris periphery. According to French media, he once handed out flyers that said “Muslims, maybe, but French first”.

His activities put him on Le Pen’s radar. They met at a gathering of young RN activists convened by the party leader at a pizzeria in Nanterre after a local election. She sat next to him and by the end of lunch had asked him to work on her 2017 campaign. “I was a bit intimidated by her given my young age,” he said, but agreed to the job. 

“He seemed a disciplined and articulate young man, who I found very French, with the way he dressed and an elegance,” Le Pen said.  

Le Pen and her team helped craft a narrative around Bardella, emphasising his childhood in social housing with a divorced mother who struggled to make ends meet. He has said his views were shaped by seeing the ravages of drug dealing and crime in his local area and riots that erupted in 2005 after two adolescents died during a police chase.

The actual story was slightly different. Bardella’s father was a small-business owner who sent him to private Catholic schools and gave him a more bourgeois upbringing, according to a biography by Pierre-Stéphane Fort. He did not complete his studies in geography at university and has not held a private-sector job.

Advertisement

Pascal Humeau, a media trainer who worked with Bardella for four years, said the politician was a “pure product of marketing” who followed Le Pen’s line. Humeau helped him adopt a more confident speaking style and start every media appearance with direct eye contact and a strong bonjour. “Who is Jordan Bardella really? We don’t know,” he said.

When Le Pen passed over more senior cadres to put the then 23-year-old at the top of the RN list for European elections in 2019, some warned her it was too risky. He came in first, one point ahead of Macron’s list. 

With Bardella, the RN has won parts of the electorate previously wary of Le Pen, including women, white-collar workers with diplomas and the business community. The biggest influencer in French politics, he has a large TikTok following that has helped attract young voters. He has also focused more on identity politics than Le Pen, declaring recently that there was a “cultural battle” to be fought against Islamism in France.

Will the “ticket” prevail or will it unravel as opponents predict?

“The ticket is very solid,” Bardella told the FT wryly. “It is printed on thick paper that will not tear.” 

Advertisement

leila.abboud@ft.com

Additional reporting by Adrienne Klasa

Continue Reading

News

What we know about the fatal police shooting of a 13-year-old boy in Utica, N.Y

Published

on

What we know about the fatal police shooting of a 13-year-old boy in Utica, N.Y

Police in Utica, N.Y., say an officer fatally shot a 13-year-old boy after a foot chase on Friday evening. Police say officers believed the boy brandished a handgun. Above, vehicles move along Genesee Street after a fresh snowfall, in Utica, N.Y., on Jan. 31, 2017.

Hans Pennink/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Hans Pennink/AP

Grief and anger engulfed the city of Utica, N.Y. after a police officer shot and killed Nyah Mway, a 13-year-old boy, on Friday night.

The Utica Police Department said the fatal shooting occurred amid a foot chase between Mway and three officers. The officers saw what they believed to be a handgun on Mway, according to a statement released by the department on Facebook. Mway, who graduated from middle school just two days earlier, was then tackled to the ground before an officer, later identified by police as Patrick Husnay, discharged his firearm. The weapon on Mway was later determined to be a pellet gun.

Efforts to contact relatives of Mway were unsuccessful, but on a GoFundMe page set up by his family he was remembered as “an outgoing kid who loved to be outside biking and playing.” The family said he was “a good kid” who “has never gotten in trouble with law enforcement before.”

Advertisement

Mway and his family came to the U.S. from Myanmar, also known as Burma, as Karen refugees over eight years ago, according to the GoFundMe page. Over the years, thousands of Karen refugees have settled in Utica to flee ethnic and religious persecution by the Myanmar government.

How the shooting unfolded

On Friday night, police officers patrolled the streets of West Utica to investigate a string of armed robberies in the area. The suspects were described as Asian males who carried a black firearm, police said.

Around 10 p.m., three officers stopped Mway and another 13-year-old boy outside on a street, believing the two boys fit the description of the robbery suspects, police said.

In body-camera footage released by law-enforcement, an officer asks to pat down Mway in search of a possible weapon, and Mway tries to run away. The officers followed.

In a statement, the police said the officers believed Mway was holding and pointing a firearm at the officers. In the body-camera footage, an officer yelled out “Gun!” and tackled Mway to the ground. Soon, all three officers appeared hovering over Mway. Roughly 15 seconds after the chase began, a shot was fired by police.

Advertisement

Screams from onlookers followed. One officer attempted to do chest compressions on Mway. He was later transported to Wynn Hospital where he died from his wounds.

Police said they recovered a replica of a Glock 17 Gen5 handgun with a detachable magazine on scene. It was later determined to be a pellet gun.

Police officers are put on administrative leave with pay

Utica Police identified the officers involved as Husnay, a six-year veteran of the Utica Police Department; Bryce Patterson, a four-year veteran; and Andrew Citriniti, who has been on the force for two-and-a-half years.

Police Chief Mark Williams said all three officers were put on administrative leave with pay.

Advertisement

Utica Police said an internal investigation has been launched. The New York State’s Attorney General’s Office of Special Investigations will also investigate if the shooting violated any state laws.

On Saturday, the Utica police department said in a statement, “Our thoughts are with our officers involved, and the family of the deceased juvenile.”

In a later statement on Saturday night, the department added, “It is our sincerest desire that at the conclusion of these investigations an impartial, fair, and thorough investigation will have been completed, giving answers to any remaining lingering questions.”

Response from the community

At a news conference on Saturday, Utica mayor Michael P. Galime said transparency will be a priority.

“What happened yesterday evening in our community is an event that has become all too familiar and routine, over and over and over again,” he said.

Advertisement

Troves of family, friends and community members attended the conference, expressing their anger, grief and disbelief to the situation.

On Saturday, hundreds also gathered for a vigil in honor of Mway, bringing flowers, balloons and candles.

“We won’t be satisfied until the murderers are put in jail,” said Mway’s older brother, The Daily Sentinel reported.

Continue Reading

Trending