Connect with us

News

UK urged to ban leaded aviation fuel for small planes

Published

on

UK urged to ban leaded aviation fuel for small planes

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Sir Keir Starmer’s government has been urged to follow the US and EU in banning aviation fuel containing lead that is used by small planes across the UK.

MPs and researchers told the Financial Times that ministers should act to phase out production and use of tetraethyl lead (TEL), a compound in aviation gasoline that powers thousands of light, piston-engine aircraft.

Leaded petrol was banned in 1999 because of its effect on human health by the then Labour government, but TEL continues to be made in Britain.

Advertisement

Lead is a toxic metal that impairs the mental development of children and has a devastating impact on almost every organ in the human body. Any level of exposure is capable of having a harmful effect, according to the World Health Organization.

The UK is the only country in the world where TEL is still made. Most advanced economies had banned production of the compound by the early 2000s.

The EU has pledged to ban imports of TEL as of May 1 2025, while in the US the Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions initiative, a public-private partnership between the government, the oil industry and the aviation sector, has a target of 2030 for the complete phaseout of leaded Avgas.

A study by researchers at the University of Kent in 2022 found most piston engine aircraft in the UK used leaded aviation fuel and that there were “370,632 residences within 4km of a general aviation airport at risk from exposure to lead emissions”.

Leaded aviation fuel (AVGAS100LL) contains 0.56 grammes of tetraethyl lead per litre, which is expelled from the engine during an aircraft’s flight.

Advertisement

Ashley Mills, a public health data scientist who led the University of Kent study, said planes using this fuel distributed the toxic metal into the air and soil around airports and called for the UK to phase out leaded Avgas by 2030.

“The lack of adoption [of lead-free fuel] is due to unavailability and pilot perceptions around suitability,” Mills said, citing GAMI’s G100UL, a high-octane lead-free fuel certified by the Federal Aviation Administration, the US aviation regulator. “The main barrier here is political will.”

Lee Crawfurd, research fellow at the Centre for Global Development, a think-tank in Washington DC, said it was “shocking . . . that it’s OK for people to pump out neurotoxins into the air above children’s homes and schools for the sake of a hobby”.

“Banning leaded aviation fuel would be really easy. There can’t be very many better value things we could do for public health, education, and productivity.”

A recommendation to ban the use of TEL in aviation fuels would be made by the UK Health and Safety Executive, the watchdog for work-related safety, under its Reach (registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals) regulation. 

Advertisement

Reach reassessed aviation fluids this year and decided not to recommend curbing the use of TEL. HSE officials said ultimately it was for a minister to make a decision on regulatory action.

They added that strict airworthiness requirements for these aircraft meant alternative fuels would need to undergo extensive testing in order to demonstrate they would be suitable and not lead to catastrophic engine failures.

Siân Berry, Green MP for Brighton Pavilion and a long-term clean air campaigner, said the continued use of lead based fuels was “really worrying as the impact . . . will be concentrated in certain areas”.

“We need to look at all aspects of cleaning up hazards in our air . . . [and] we need to make sure we are not behind the rest of the world in phasing this out,” she added.

Wera Hobhouse, Liberal Democrat MP and the party’s transport spokesperson, said: “Ministers should be looking to legislate to bring an end to the use of leaded fuel on small aircraft. Both the EU and America have already taken these steps and the UK should follow that to minimise any risk it could have to the health of our nation.”

Advertisement

Mills at Kent university said that, from April 2025, the government “should differentiate fuel duty on leaded and unleaded Avgas to incentivise unleaded-capable pilots to switch”. 

Duty on Avgas — which has stood at 38p per litre since January 2021 — should rise every year until 2030, when it should be illegal to sell the leaded fuel in the UK, he added. The Treasury was contacted for comment.

Johann Beckford, senior policy adviser at the Green Alliance, a think-tank, said it was “important to remain in line with the EU and US in terms of the regulations we follow”.

“The time has come for a ban on lead in aviation fuel to support children’s health,” he added. “In the longer term, government needs to support the development of zero emission flight alternatives to cut emissions.”

The Department for Transport said it was “committed to making flying cleaner” and that there were “not enough widely available alternatives to leaded fuels which can be used by all general aviation aircraft”. 

Advertisement

“We are working closely with the industry and the UK Health and Safety Executive to move towards lead-free alternatives as quickly as possible,” it added.

News

America’s bid for energy supremacy is being forged in war

Published

on

America’s bid for energy supremacy is being forged in war

Additional work by Jana Tauschinski

Oil and gas tanker location and destination data are from Kpler. The map shows the latest position for vessels with an active AIS signal on April 19–20, filtered by minimum capacity thresholds: crude tankers of at least 50,000 deadweight tonnage (DWT); oil product tankers of at least 55,000 DWT; oil/chemical tankers of at least 40,000 DWT; LNG carriers of at least 150,000 cubic metres; and LPG carriers of at least 50,000 cubic metres. Net fossil fuel import data by country are based on Ember analysis of the IEA World Energy Balances 2023.

Continue Reading

News

Roommate faces murder charges in deaths of 2 University of South Florida doctoral students

Published

on

Roommate faces murder charges in deaths of 2 University of South Florida doctoral students

A 26-year-old man is facing two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of two University of South Florida doctoral students who went missing last week, local authorities said Saturday. 

The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office in Florida said that evidence presented to the state attorney’s office resulted in the charges against Hisham Abugharbieh, the roommate of Zamil Limon, one of the doctoral students. 

Abugharbieh is accused of premediated murder with a weapon. He was arrested on Friday, the same day Limon was found dead. 

The family of Nahida Bristy, the other doctoral student, told CBS News that police said she is also likely dead. That is based on the volume of blood discovered at Abugharbieh’s residence, which he shared with Limon.

“Police told us she is no longer with us,” Bristy’s brother, Zahid Prato, said early Saturday.

Advertisement

The family was told her body may never be found and police believe she may have been dismembered, according to Prato. 

CBS News has reached out to police for more information.

Authorities said in a statement Saturday they were still searching for Bristy.

Limon’s remains were found on the Howard Franklin Bridge in Tampa Friday morning, Chief Deputy Joseph Maurer with the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office said. His cause of death was pending autopsy results.

Deputies with the sheriff’s office took Abugharbieh into custody on Friday after responding to a domestic violence call at a home in the Lake Forest Community, a neighborhood near USF’s Tampa campus, officials said. He also faces charges of domestic violence and evidence tampering, as well as a charge of failing to report a death to law enforcement.

Advertisement

Limon and Bristy, both 27, had last been seen in the Tampa area on April 16. 

Limon was studying the use of AI in environmental science and was set to present his doctoral thesis this week, his family said. Bristy is studying chemical engineering. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Rubio’s Absence From Iran Talks Highlights Stay-at-Home Role

Published

on

Rubio’s Absence From Iran Talks Highlights Stay-at-Home Role

When President Barack Obama negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran more than a decade ago, his point man was Secretary of State John Kerry. Over 20 months of talks, Mr. Kerry met with his Iranian counterpart on at least 18 different days, often several times per day.

High-level nuclear diplomacy was a natural role for the top U.S. diplomat. Secretaries of state traditionally take the lead on the country’s biggest diplomatic tasks, from arms control treaties to Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

But as President Trump prepares to send a delegation to the latest round of U.S.-Iran talks in Pakistan this weekend, his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, will remain where he often does: at home.

Mr. Rubio did not attend the last U.S. meeting with Iran earlier this month. Nor did he join several meetings held over the past year in Geneva and Doha. Mr. Rubio has also been absent from U.S. delegations abroad working to settle the war in Ukraine and Israel’s war in Gaza. Despite a long period of crisis and war in the region, he has not visited the Middle East since a brief stop in Israel last October.

In recent months, Mr. Rubio — consumed with his second role, as Mr. Trump’s national security adviser — has not traveled much at all.

Advertisement

During the Biden administration, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken made 11 foreign trips from January 2024 to late April 2024, stopping in roughly three dozen cities, according to the State Department. So far this year, Mr. Rubio has visited six foreign cities, including a stop in Milan for the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Mr. Trump has outsourced much of his diplomacy to others, including his friend Steve Witkoff, a wealthy associate from the world of Manhattan real estate, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Mr. Witkoff and Mr. Kushner have spearheaded diplomacy with Israel, Ukraine and Russia, as well as Iran, whose delegation they will meet for the second time this month in Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital.

Mr. Rubio’s distance from the trenches of diplomacy reflects his dual role on Mr. Trump’s national security team. For the past year, he has served as the White House national security adviser even while leading the State Department — the first person to do so since Henry A. Kissinger in the mid-1970s.

The secretary of state runs the State Department, overseeing U.S. diplomats and embassies worldwide, as well as Washington-based policymakers. Working from the White House, the national security adviser coordinates departments and agencies, including the State Department, to develop policy advice for the president.

The twin roles reflect Mr. Rubio’s influence with Mr. Trump, and offer him a way to maintain it. For Mr. Rubio, less time abroad means more time at the side of an impulsive president prone to making critical national security decisions at any moment.

Advertisement

As Mr. Witkoff, Mr. Kushner and Vice President JD Vance met with Iranian officials in Pakistan earlier this month, Mr. Rubio was at Mr. Trump’s side at an Ultimate Fighting Championship event, noted Emma Ashford, an analyst of U.S. diplomacy at the nonpartisan Stimson Center in Washington. “Rubio clearly prefers to stay close to Trump,” Ms. Ashford said.

Mr. Rubio accepted the national security adviser job on an acting basis last May after Mr. Trump reassigned the job’s previous occupant, Michael Waltz. But officials say that Mr. Rubio is expected to keep it indefinitely.

That arrangement is not inherently bad, Ms. Ashford added. And she noted that previous presidents had entrusted major diplomatic tasks to people other than the secretary of state. President Joseph R. Biden Jr. delegated his C.I.A. director, William J. Burns, to handle diplomacy with Russia and cease-fire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, for instance.

But she echoed the complaints by many current and former diplomats that Mr. Rubio seems less like someone performing both jobs than a national security adviser who sometimes shows up at the State Department. “I do think it’s to the detriment of the whole department of State and to America’s ability to conduct diplomacy in general that we effectively have the secretary of state position sitting vacant,” she said.

Tommy Pigott, a State Department spokesman, contested such claims. “Anyone trying to paint Secretary Rubio’s close coordination with the White House and other agencies as a negative could not be more wrong,” he said. “We now have an N.S.C. and State Department that are totally in sync, a goal that has eluded past administrations for decades.”

Advertisement

Mr. Rubio divides his time between the State Department and the White House, often spending time at both in the same day. In an interview with Politico last June, Mr. Rubio said he visited the State Department “almost every day.”

While there, he often meets with visiting dignitaries before returning to the White House. Last week, Mr. Rubio presided over a meeting at the State Department between Lebanese and Israeli officials that set the stage for a cease-fire in Lebanon.

His twin jobs “really do overlap in many cases,” he said. “In many cases you end up being in the same meetings or in the same places; there’s just one less person in there, if you think about it,” Mr. Rubio added. “A lot of people would come to Washington, for example, for meetings, and they’d want to meet with the national security adviser and then meet with me as secretary of state. Now they can do both in one meeting.”

Asked about his travel schedule during a news conference last December, Mr. Rubio said he had less reason to travel abroad because “we have a lot of leaders constantly coming here” to visit Mr. Trump at the White House. Mr. Rubio also joins Mr. Trump’s foreign trips in his capacity as national security adviser.

Many national security veterans call the arrangement unwise, saying that both jobs are extremely demanding and incompatible with one another.

Advertisement

It was not easy even for Mr. Kissinger, who had firmly established himself over more than four years as national security adviser before convincing President Richard M. Nixon to let him take on an additional role as secretary of state in 1973. (In a reversal of Mr. Rubio’s approach, Mr. Kissinger was in constant motion, including a round of Middle East shuttle diplomacy that kept him on the road for 33 straight days.)

“In general, it’s a mistake to combine those roles,” said Matthew Waxman, who held senior roles at the National Security Council, State Department and the Pentagon during the George W. Bush administration.

“That said, it’s not necessarily a bad thing that a dual-hatted Rubio is so offscreen right now,” Mr. Waxman added. “Especially while so much attention is focused on high-wire diplomacy with Iran, someone needs to manage foreign policy around the rest of the world.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending