Connect with us

News

Tribunal says Georgia teacher who read book on gender identity to her fifth grade class should not be fired | CNN

Published

on

Tribunal says Georgia teacher who read book on gender identity to her fifth grade class should not be fired | CNN



CNN
 — 

A three-person tribunal has recommended against the firing of a Georgia teacher who is at risk of being terminated after reading a book about gender identity to her fifth grade class, according to the teacher’s attorney.

The Cobb County School District, which is in the Atlanta area, informed Katherine Rinderle in June that it intended to terminate her employment at Due West Elementary School after she read the book “My Shadow is Purple” to her students, according to a charge letter from the school district reviewed by CNN.

On Monday, a tribunal appointed by the Cobb County Board of Education issued a non-binding rejection of the superintendent’s recommendation to terminate Rinderle, her attorney Craig Goodmark said in a statement.

The school board will review the tribunal’s recommendation at an upcoming meeting and vote on whether to accept, reject or modify its decision, Goodmark said.

Advertisement

“The District appreciates the work of the Tribunal Members and the Hearing Officer,” a board spokesperson said in a statement. “The Board will review the Tribunal’s recommendation and looks forward to returning our entire focus on educating all of our talented students.”

“My Shadow is Purple,” written by Scott Stuart, describes itself as a “heartwarming and inspiring book about being true to yourself.” Publisher Larrikin House says the story “considers gender beyond binary in a vibrant spectrum of colour.”

After reading the book to her class, Rinderle said the principal told her a parent had complained that the book was inappropriate.

The district claims Rinderle violated at least six district policies and administrative rules, which include two polices based on Georgia laws passed last year – one that restricts instruction of “divisive concepts” and another that provides greater transparency to parents and legal guardians regarding what their children are being taught, the charge letter shows.

The Georgia legislation is part of a broader effort by conservative lawmakers in several states to limit how issues like sexual orientation, gender identity and race are taught in schools.

Advertisement

The tribunal ruled Rinderle did not violate board policies on insubordination but said she did violate the other policies.

“I appreciate the tribunal’s consideration of my case and decision not to terminate me,” Rinderle said in a statement following the ruling. “However, I disagree that I’ve violated any policy and that finding remains unjust and punitive.”

She also said the school district never explained to her what “divisive” means.

“The district has never provided adequate guidance on how I am supposed to know what is and what is not allowed in the classroom based on these vague policies. Prioritizing behaviors and attitudes rooted in bigotry and discrimination does not benefit students and undermines the quality of education and the duty of educators,” Rinderle said in her statement.

Rinderle has been on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of her termination decision, Goodmark said previously.

Advertisement

The tribunal – made up of three retired Cobb County educators – heard two days of hearings last week in which parents, district officials and Rinderle herself testified.

Due West Elementary Principal Cissi Kale told the tribunal she believes Rinderle isn’t able to be an effective teacher in the district, despite Rinderle’s history of receiving consistently high performance evaluations.

“I think it would be very hard to coach her going forward on this issue because she hasn’t acknowledged that the book was controversial. So, I can’t be sure that she wouldn’t read another book of the same nature,” Kale said.

Teachers, including Rinderle, are given extensive training on the use of supplemental materials and on what issues are considered controversial, Kale said.

School district assistant superintendent Gretchen Walton also suggested Rinderle should not retain her teaching position.

Advertisement

“Ms. Rinderle’s actions and choices have made it impossible for us to put her back in a classroom with any confidence that we can rely on her good judgment and that these actions won’t recur,” Walton said.

A parent, Susan Oruseibio, testified in support of Rinderle, calling the book “a beautiful story.” Oruseibio said she wants her daughter to learn about diversity and inclusion in school so that she could be prepared for interacting with people from diverse backgrounds.

Rinderle was the last to provide her testimony. She became emotional at times as she insisted she is a dedicated teacher who celebrates her students’ differences.

“Our students come to us with all of their assets,” Rinderle said. “They have diverse backgrounds, experiences, cultures. They have diverse needs, so embracing a whole child is centering all of that in their learning.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read Prosecutors’ Filing on Mar-a-Lago Evidence in Trump Documents Case

Published

on

Read Prosecutors’ Filing on Mar-a-Lago Evidence in Trump Documents Case

Case 9:23-cr-80101-AMC Document 567 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2024 Page 20 of 29
under governing authority. Cf. In re Grand Jury Proc., 142 F.3d 1416, 1428 (11th Cir. 1998) (after
attorney is compelled to provide evidence to grand jury, defendant can seek suppression at trial).
The crime-fraud exception, where it applies, “removes the ‘seal of secrecy’ from attorney-
client communications or work product materials.” Drummond Co., Inc. v. Conrad & Scherer,
LLP, 885 F.3d 1324, 1335 (11th Cir. 2018) (quoting United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 563
(1989)). The proponent of the exception (here, the Government) must make a two-part showing.
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2 F. 4th at 1345. “First, there must be a prima facie showing
that the client was engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct when he sought the advice of counsel,
that he was planning such conduct when he sought the advice of counsel, or that he committed a
crime or fraud subsequent to receiving the benefit of counsel’s advice.” In re Grand Jury
Investigation (Schroeder), 842 F.2d 1223, 1226 (11th Cir. 1987). Second, there must be a showing
that the attorney-client communications “further[ed]” or were “closely related” to “the criminal or
fraudulent activity.” Id. at 1226. This standard applies “in the same way” to attorney work-product
as it does to attorney-client communications. Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie,
17 F.3d 1386, 1422 (11th Cir. 1994). The record here easily satisfies both prongs.
1. The Evidence Readily Establishes a Prima Facie Showing of a Crime
The requirement of a prima facie showing “is satisfied by a showing of evidence that, if
believed by a trier of fact, would establish the elements of some violation that was ongoing or
about to be committed.” In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2 F.4th at 1345 (quotation marks omitted).
The “prime facie showing must only have some foundation in fact.” Id. For example, prior to an
2 The attorney-client privilege attaches to “communications made in confidence by a client
to an attorney for the purposes of securing legal advice or assistance.” In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
2 F.4th at 1345 (quotation marks omitted). The attorney work-product privilege applies to material
obtained or prepared by counsel in the course of carrying out their work in anticipation of litigation.
Drummond Co., Inc. v. Conrad & Scherer, LLP, 885 F.3d 1324, 1334-35 (11th Cir. 2018).
18

Continue Reading

News

US and Saudi Arabia close to defence and civil nuclear deal

Published

on

US and Saudi Arabia close to defence and civil nuclear deal

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

A breakthrough diplomatic deal between Washington and Riyadh is “pretty much there” but a broader pact involving Israel hinges on “a credible path” towards the creation of a Palestinian state, a senior US official has said.

The US had made significant progress in talks with the kingdom over American help on defence and a civilian nuclear programme, the US official said, and the countries had a “near final set” of bilateral agreements in place.

The discussions are part of US efforts to secure a grand bargain that would include Saudi Arabia and Israel normalising their diplomatic relations — but depends on Israel’s willingness to grant concessions to the Palestinians.

Advertisement

The seven-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza must also wind down before a final three-way deal was agreed, US officials and analysts said.

“We now have a near final set of arrangements, which would be the bilateral elements of this deal, and we really believe the Saudi deal is pretty much there,” the senior official said.

“But there are elements of it, including a credible pathway for the Palestinians and also some other elements, that would still have to be completed.”

The official added: “The crisis needs to recede to open up space for this.”

The US comments come just days after national security adviser Jake Sullivan held talks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Riyadh and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

Advertisement

A grand bargain between the three countries had initially appeared doomed after October 7, when Hamas’s deadly attack on Israel sparked Israel’s retaliatory war in Gaza, which has killed more than 35,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, and left hopes for progress on Palestinian statehood — a component of the trilateral deal — in peril.

Netanyahu, who heads the most far-right government in Israel’s history, has repeatedly ruled out any concessions to the Palestinians or towards establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

On Tuesday, the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor announced that he was seeking an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, as well as some leaders of Hamas, for alleged war crimes.

US officials have made clear that any deal also hinges on securing a pause in fighting in Gaza. A focus of Sullivan’s meetings in Israel was getting dormant talks over a ceasefire in exchange for the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas “back on track”, the official said.

Whether Israel expands its offensive on Rafah, the southern Gazan city where more than 1mn people had sought sanctuary, would play a role in the ceasefire talks.

Advertisement

More than 800,000 Palestinians have fled Rafah after Israel launched an offensive on the city this month, despite US opposition to an assault on such a densely populated area. Israel also took over the Gazan side of the Rafah crossing with Egypt, choking off a critical entry point for humanitarian aid into the besieged strip.

“Rafah may play into this, it does change the equation quite a bit and there may be some opportunities for getting the hostage deal back on track,” the senior official said.

US President Joe Biden has paused shipments of 2,000lb bombs and has threatened to withhold them fully if Israel goes ahead on a full-scale invasion of Rafah. After the meetings in Israel, the Biden administration felt that Israel had taken into account many of its concerns, the official said.

“We’re not here to greenlight Israeli military operations,” the senior official said. “It’s fair to say I think the Israelis have updated their plans, they’ve incorporated many of the concerns that we have expressed.”

The US and Israel also had a detailed discussion about how to transition to a stabilisation phase in the fighting and offered its resources to help track down Hamas’s leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, the mastermind behind the October 7 attacks.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

The states where abortion is on the ballot in November : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

The states where abortion is on the ballot in November : Consider This from NPR

A protestor attends a Women’s March rally in Phoenix, Arizona in 2022.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images


A protestor attends a Women’s March rally in Phoenix, Arizona in 2022.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Plenty has happened with abortion access in the nearly two years since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

State laws have been changing constantly, new bans have taken effect, and there have been a slew of lawsuits and ballot measures.

Advertisement

All Things Considered host Mary Louise Kelly sat down with NPR’s reproductive rights correspondent Elissa Nadworny, and Selena Simmons-Duffin, who covers health policy at NPR, to examine the state of abortion.

There are total bans on abortion with very limited exceptions in 14 states. A few more states have six-week bans.

“Florida was the most recent place for this [six-week ban] to take effect. There are states like Nebraska that ban abortion after 12 weeks. In Arizona, it’s 15 weeks. More than half of the states have restrictions. And in those states, the number of abortions has dropped drastically,” Nadworny said.

But despite that trend, the overall number of abortions in the U.S. has actually gone up — due in part to the growing accessibility of telehealth appointments that can provide medication abortions.

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Advertisement

What voters want

When it comes to the ballot, Nadworny says abortion rights has been a winning issue.

“Nationally, polling shows 6 in 10 Americans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, but that can vary by state,” she said. “But since Dobbs, voters in six states have weighed in on constitutional amendments on abortion. Voters chose access to abortion each time.”

Four states — Colorado, Florida, Maryland and South Dakota — will be voting on the right to an abortion in the upcoming elections. Six more states, including Arizona and Missouri, are working to get it on the ballot.

People gather at Utah’s state capitol in 2022 after the leaked draft opinion by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito suggested that the court was poised to overturn Roe v. Wade.

George Frey/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

George Frey/Getty Images

Voters this fall may also be reacting to what they’ve seen when their access to reproductive healthcare becomes limited.

Advertisement

In states with more restrictive bans, like Idaho, dozens of OB-GYNs have left the state, according to one doctor who spoke to NPR. And three maternity wards have closed since the state’s abortion ban took effect. Recruiting problems are widespread for hospitals that are operating in states with abortion bans.

What could change

Simmons-Duffin says that while abortion access is getting rolled back in some states, it is gaining more protections and funding in others. When Roe v. Wade was in place, there were lots of restrictions and regulations about when and how the procedure could be performed.

“Some states like Michigan, Colorado, Minnesota, California and others have made moves to undo some of those regulations,” she said. “They’re getting rid of things like waiting periods and gestational limits,” Simmons-Duffin said.

“They’re allowing more types of providers like nurse practitioners to provide abortions. They’re training more providers on abortions. Some states have stockpiled Mifepristone, one of the medicines that can be used for abortion, in case access is curtailed in the future.”

Simmons-Duffin added that some places, like New York City, have made abortion hubs part of the health department. “So you can call a number and find out where to get an abortion and how to get funding to cover the costs,” she said.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, there are still two major decisions on abortion pending before the Supreme Court that are set to be announced next month:

“Both of these decisions will be coming down in early summer, just a few months before the election. So regardless of what the justices decide, it’s going to catapult abortion back into the headlines at a key time for voters,” Simmons-Duffin added.

For the full discussion on abortion in the U.S., listen to the episode of Consider This by tapping the play button at the top of the page.

Continue Reading

Trending