Connect with us

News

The memoirs of a ‘Forrest Gump’ of banking shine light on an era

Published

on

The memoirs of a ‘Forrest Gump’ of banking shine light on an era

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

In a break during a tense 2009 Citigroup board meeting, one of Wall Street’s more influential figures Robert Rubin approached the firm’s outside investment banking adviser, Scott Bok.

Former US Treasury secretary Rubin, at that time a Citi executive, told Bok he knew his father, mistakenly presuming he was the son of Derek Bok, the esteemed scholar and former president of Harvard University. The origins of the banker’s father were far more humble — a Midwestern high school dropout, he supported his family by installing telephone poles. This start, however, did not hinder an eventful four-decade career on Wall Street recounted in Scott Bok’s memoirs Surviving Wall Street: A Tale of Triumph, Tragedy and Timing set to published next week.

Over that run, he raked in hundreds of millions of dollars in stock and pay (he also bought Greenhill shares at times), eventually accumulating enough stature to become the chair of trustees of an Ivy League university as well as Manhattan’s American Museum of Natural History. 

Advertisement

Relative to the biggest names on Wall Street, Bok makes perhaps a B-list grandee — something that his autobiography candidly acknowledges. Bok told me he likened his professional arc to that of Forrest Gump — maybe not the most important guy in the room but one with at least a front-row seat at several historic moments, propelling him to a position of influence outside Wall Street.

While the book has been in the works since the pandemic, it raises some questions that seem very relevant in 2025 — including whether all the social, political, and cultural might that financiers have accrued in a golden age of US finance has ultimately been a good thing for the rest of America, including people like Bok’s own father. And then whether this era will be shattered by an inward-looking Trump presidency.

I first met Bok 20 years ago when I applied for a job at Greenhill & Co, the merger advisory boutique founded a decade earlier by Robert Greenhill, a pioneering investment banker. Greenhill spent decades at Morgan Stanley and founded his eponymous firm after a stint at Smith Barney, where he had been fired in the mid-1990s by Sandy Weill and replaced by his deputy Jamie Dimon. Greenhill recruited Bok, then in his late 30s and a veteran of corporate law and Morgan Stanley, to lead deals and then increasingly to run the start-up Greenhill & Co.

The firm thrived straightaway both in New York and London, finding that chief executives liked working with smaller firms.

When I met Bok for that interview in 2005, Greenhill had just gone public and a few years later hit a $2bn market capitalisation. It was a heady time, coming ahead of the extended boom in dealmaking around the world just as hedge funds and private equity were proliferating. Innumerable personal fortunes were minted as stock markets, with only a few blips, kept soaring.

Advertisement

The Greenhill executive team repeatedly took money off the table in share sales and dividend proceeds. The Greenhill firm, however, did not fare so well. Several formidable competitor firms formed and Bok failed to keep up. Once-flattering media attention dried up as well. Bok chronicles his various minor clashes with journalists, including me. In 2023, the Japanese bank Mizuho acquired Greenhill for $550mn, much in assumed debt. The per share purchase price of $15 was a far cry from the $90 the firm traded at in the late 2000s.

The Greenhill sale and its lessons about the fragility of financial institutions was intended to be the coda of Bok’s book. But events intervened and provided a gripping conclusion. Bok was drawn into a very public spotlight because of his role as chair of the trustees at the University of Pennsylvania amid the college protests that followed the Hamas terror attack in Israel on October 7, 2023. Bok backed the school’s then president and the institution’s handling of campus affairs though both ultimately resigned under pressure.

Bok offers his first detailed version of those events here — well worth a read and reflection. He also observes that the fracas ultimately degenerated into a fight between the differing agendas of a group of millionaire and billionaire benefactors, even as the university remained an institution with a wide range of students, graduates and research.

Bok, like many among the Wall Street ruling class, owes much of his fortune to riding a wave of money-spinning in the US over the past 40 years. At the end of a top run, Bok has the humility to acknowledge this good luck. A series of high-flying careers are set to wrap up in coming years and I’m curious to see which other Masters of the Universe will be as introspective.

sujeet.indap@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending