Connect with us

News

State media bombard Russians with alternative version of the truth

Published

on

As footage of a whole bunch of lifeless civilians in occupied Ukrainian cities sparked outrage worldwide, Antifake — a brand new present on Russia’s most-watched state TV channel that claims to “differentiate lies from reality” — informed a unique story.

“These pictures are being cynically portrayed as Russian forces’ cruelty,” Alexander Smol, the present’s host, mentioned at the beginning of Tuesday’s broadcast.

The present’s panel dismissed footage of civilians mendacity lifeless within the streets of Bucha, a city near Kyiv, following the withdrawal of Russian troops final week, as being staged. “FAKE” was emblazoned throughout the display in purple. The broadcaster then reduce to scenes mentioned to indicate Russian forces handing out assist to locals.

State media in Russia have gone into overdrive to dismiss claims that its forces have dedicated warfare crimes throughout Ukraine since President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion in February.

Its high TV hosts informed Russian viewers there was “no proof of victims” in Bucha. They accused Ukraine of colluding with western media to stage “provocations” by hiring “poorly skilled actors” to play victims or “cynically amassing our bodies” to dump on the street for the cameras.

Advertisement

The frothy information reveals dedicated to Russia’s model of the warfare have displaced common daytime and primetime leisure programming, broadcasting nearly around the clock for the reason that invasion started. Any data opposite to the federal government view has been successfully banned.

However whereas the Kremlin denies Russian forces have dedicated warfare crimes, its narrative has more and more sought to justify the violence. Commentators on state tv painting Ukraine as being gripped by a collective insanity, depicting anybody hostile to Russian “liberators” as “Nazis” and justifying their efforts to “purify” the nation of Moscow’s enemies.

Ukrainian officers and human rights teams declare that Russian forces have focused native activists, warfare veterans, intellectuals, journalists and even schoolteachers. “This was pre-planned — [Russia] understands [that such people] are the drive that constructed Ukrainian id, and because of this they’re concentrating on them,” mentioned Greg Yudin, head of political philosophy on the Moscow Faculty of Social and Financial Sciences. “This narrative is getting used to information the operations on the bottom.”

Moscow’s effort to smear Ukraine as being run by Nazis dates again to Ukraine’s 2014 Euromaidan revolution, when Viktor Yanukovych, the pro-Russia president, was swept from energy. The Kremlin used what it referred to as a “nationalist coup” in Kyiv to justify its annexation of Crimea shortly afterwards and its assist for Russian-backed separatists within the jap Donbas area.

Advertisement

The claims have little to do with the fact of life in Ukraine, the place President Volodymyr Zelensky, who’s Jewish and misplaced a number of kin within the Holocaust, gained a landslide election victory in 2019. Nonetheless, they play to sturdy emotions in Russia associated to the 27mn Soviet losses of the second world warfare.

Accordingly, Putin has sought to drum up assist for the invasion by calling for Ukraine’s “denazification” and by framing the Donbas warfare, wherein greater than 14,000 died earlier than Russia’s full-blown invasion, as a “genocide” towards Russian audio system.

“Putin mentioned, we’re one individuals. Now it seems {that a} cut up was inevitable and Ukrainians will probably be very hostile to Russians for a few years to return . . . That implies that they’re all Nazis [in the Kremlin’s eyes],” mentioned Andrei Kolesnikov, a senior fellow on the Carnegie Moscow Heart.

“So this nation is the enemy, regardless that this hostile ideology [that Ukrainians] supposedly have is totally made up.”

Some pro-Kremlin commentators in Russia have taken the decision for Ukraine’s “denazification” to conclude that the nation must be successfully destroyed. “Ukraine, as historical past has proven, is unviable as a nationwide state, and makes an attempt to ‘construct’ one logically result in Nazism,” pundit Timofei Sergeitsev wrote in a column for state newswire Ria Novosti on Sunday.

Advertisement

He referred to as for Ukraine to stop to exist as a state, its elite to be “liquidated” and added that “the social swamp which actively and passively helps it should endure the hardships of warfare and digest the expertise as a historic lesson and atonement”.

Timofei Sergeitsev, a Russian media pundit, has referred to as for Ukraine to stop to exist and for its elite to be ‘liquidated’ © Vladimir Gerdo/TASS/Alamy

Although the “denazification” narrative has to date did not stir a well-liked outburst of assist akin to the euphoria that adopted the Crimea annexation, it seems to resonate with many Russians.

As many as 81 per cent of individuals in a survey printed final week by the Levada Heart, Russia’s solely impartial pollster, mentioned they supported the “actions of Russia’s armed forces”, though sociologists have urged scepticism about any measures of public sentiment in Russia, the place all dissent is suppressed.

“There are clearly substantial elements of Russian society that, in the event that they don’t actively wish to see Ukraine destroyed, are at the least keen to simply accept this end result as a result of the state informed them that must be executed,” mentioned Eugene Finkel, an affiliate professor at Johns Hopkins College, who research genocide.

The temper has arisen within the context of Russia’s efficient ban on all impartial sources of data on the warfare. Unbiased media retailers have closed, whereas unusual Russians can withstand 15 years in jail for brand new crimes reminiscent of “discrediting the Russian armed forces” on social media.

Advertisement

“Lots of people who’re towards the warfare are usually not saying something or sharing something important. And that creates the phantasm that everybody is supporting Putin and is behind the warfare,” mentioned Anton Shirikov, a specialist in Russian state media on the College of Wisconsin-Madison.

Zelensky has vowed to press on with peace talks following the alleged Bucha bloodbath and mentioned he remained open to assembly Putin if doing so may assist finish the warfare.

However although Moscow dropped its demand for “denazification” of Ukraine from a draft ceasefire doc final month, some senior Russian officers have begun to echo the eradication rhetoric espoused by Sergeitsev.

On Tuesday, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev wrote on the messaging app Telegram that Ukrainian nationhood, “[that has] ate up anti-Russian poison and all-encompassing lies about its id, is all one large pretend [that] has by no means existed in historical past”. He vowed Russia would “change Ukrainians’ bloody consciousness”, as Putin had ordered.

For all of the allegations of Russian atrocities and the cynicism behind Moscow’s denials, the depth of the rhetoric round Bucha confirmed that Russia’s elite in all probability believed the narrative themselves, Yudin mentioned.

Advertisement

“There’s not a hair of distinction between what these individuals in propaganda are saying and what the individuals round Putin are considering,” he mentioned.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Judge pauses deadlines in Trump classified documents case over immunity questions

Published

on

Judge pauses deadlines in Trump classified documents case over immunity questions

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Greenbrier Farms on June 28 in Chesapeake, Va. The judge in the classified documents case against him has paused some deadlines.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The federal judge overseeing the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump has paused a few deadlines after Trump’s legal team requested a review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.

On Friday, Trump’s legal team presented a filing to the court that said this week’s ruling from the nation’s high court means he has blanket immunity from prosecution for his “official acts.” As part of an effort to have the case dismissed, attorneys for the former president asked Judge Aileen Cannon to rule whether or not the conduct involved was official.

Trump’s legal team had also asked to argue the immunity issue before Cannon between now and early September, which would have effectively delayed all aspects of the case for at least two months.

Advertisement

Cannon’s order issued Saturday does not give a date for any discussion of the immunity issue to be held, but does allow for a short pause related to two deadlines for Trump’s lawyers and one deadline for prosecutors. The order gives federal prosecutors until July 18 to respond to Trump’s request for an extended delay. Trump’s legal team will then be due to reply to the prosecution on July 21.

Trump has argued that his removal of classified documents from the White House and then relocating them to his Florida resort home at Mar-a-Lago constituted an official act — and that the Supreme Court’s ruling should translate to charges brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith being dropped.

In Friday’s court filing, attorneys for Trump also pointed to Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the immunity decision, which questioned Smith’s appointment and authority in the classified documents case. Trump’s team also has sought to have the case dismissed on those grounds, arguing that Smith’s appointment is unconstitutional.

Smith has said the Supreme Court’s decision does not apply to the classified documents case because the documents were taken as Trump was leaving office — and that the former president obstructed FBI investigators from recovering them from Mar-a-Lago once he was no longer president.

Cannon has yet to set a date for a trial in the case. The Trump appointee has been criticized for indefinitely suspending the start date for the trial after announcing she needed more time to examine pretrial motions from the former president’s legal team requesting that the case be dismissed.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Marine Le Pen’s party in talks to join Viktor Orbán’s group in European parliament

Published

on

Marine Le Pen’s party in talks to join Viktor Orbán’s group in European parliament

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

France’s Rassemblement National is in talks to join a new group with Hungary’s Viktor Orbán in the European parliament as far-right parties are jostling to convert their votes into power.

The RN, which is forecast to win the most seats in Sunday’s French legislative elections, will decide whether to ally with the Patriots for Europe group on Monday, three people familiar with the situation told the Financial Times.

Orbán’s Patriots group on Saturday gained its seventh member party, meeting the threshold to form an official faction under the EU parliament’s rules.

Advertisement

If the RN joins with its 30 MEPs, the Patriots are likely to overtake the right-wing European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) to become the third-largest group in parliament.

Vox, the Spanish hard-right party that counts six MEPs, quit ECR for the Patriots on Friday. The Freedom party of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and the Danish People’s party, which have seven MEPs between them, also said they would join the Patriots.

The ECR, dominated by Italian PM Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party, relegated the Renew group built around Emmanuel Macron’s centrists into fourth position last month, but has now dropped to 78 members. Renew has 76 members.

But the proliferation of right-wing groups also means their dreams of a super-merger that would wield significant power in the EU assembly appear to be over.

“Anything that furthers the interests of Patriots in the EU parliament is good for us. Orbán is a fine politician who has the skills to operate at the EU level,” said one RN official.

Advertisement

Zoltán Kóvacs, Orbán’s spokesman, told journalists to “stay alert in the next few days”.

Alternative for Germany leader Alice Weidel, whose MEPs were expelled from the outgoing Identity and Democracy group dominated by the RN, told the FT last week she was also seeking to form a group — potentially based on the remains of ID.

But it remains unclear whether the AfD will manage to secure MEPs from enough countries, given that four parties have now left ID for the Patriots.

Russia is the main dividing line between the Patriots and AfD on the one hand, and the ECR on the other. Meloni is a strong defender of Ukraine, while Orbán, Le Pen and Weidel have traditionally held more pro-Moscow views.

The Hungarian leader met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Friday, causing outcry among EU leaders who said he did not represent them, just after he made a surprise visit to Kyiv on Monday.

Advertisement

On Wednesday the Russian foreign ministry posted on social media what appeared to be a congratulatory message for the RN, featuring a photo of Le Pen celebrating her first-round victory.

“The people of France are seeking a sovereign foreign policy that serves their national interests and a break from the dictate of Washington and Brussels,” said the post. 

Le Pen, who has long tried to counter criticism that she is too pro-Russia, criticised the post on TF1 news on Thursday. “I absolutely do not feel responsible for Russian provocations towards France,” she said, adding it was “a form of interference”.  

However, Orbán said earlier this week he was confident the Patriots group would grow “faster than anyone thinks now” after the second round of the French elections.

“You will see . . . those who promised to join and create a pan-European faction, the third largest, then the second largest. Later we will attempt to be the largest but that won’t be this year.”

Advertisement

He will combine his group’s power in parliament with his country having just taken the six-month rotating presidency of the bloc, which allows his ministers to set the agenda of meetings.

The centre-right European People’s party is the largest in the 720-strong parliament with 188 members, followed by the centre-left Socialists and Democrats, with 136. Party size dictates how many coveted positions such as committee chairs and vice-presidents they get. 

However, MEPs still vote on the positions, and the pro-European majority, including Renew, the Greens and other parties, operates a “cordon sanitaire” to reject any far-right candidates. They also voted to divvy up committee chairmanships based on group size on July 4, before the Patriots are constituted.  

The ECR secured one committee chair and one vice-president during the last term because they came from its more moderate parties.

“No one beyond the cordon sanitaire can chair a committee,” senior Socialist MEP Alex Agius Saliba told the FT. 

Advertisement

But János Bóka, Hungary’s Europe minister, told journalists that there would be “an institutionally and politically strengthened right in the European parliament and in an ideal world, this should be reflected in the distribution of positions”.

Video: Why the far right is surging in Europe | FT Film
Continue Reading

News

Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump's request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

Published

on

Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump's request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Saturday granted former President Donald Trump’s request for further briefing on the issue of presidential immunity in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case and delayed certain deadlines.

Cannon’s order marks the latest fallout from the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision on Monday, which ruled that Trump has immunity from prosecution for some conduct as president in the federal election interference case.

In the order, Cannon afforded special counsel Jack Smith the right, but not the obligation, to file a submission on the use of classified information at trial. At the same time, she paused two upcoming deadlines for Trump and his co-defendants.

Smith’s brief is now due on July 18, and a reply from Trump’s team is due on July 21.

Neither Trump’s lawyers nor the Department of Justice immediately responded to a request for comment Saturday afternoon.

Advertisement

There is no trial date in sight in the classified documents case. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The latest development comes after Trump’s attorneys on Friday asked Cannon to pause court proceedings and consider how the Supreme Court’s ruling affects the case. Trump’s team in February had also filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on immunity grounds.

Saturday’s order also makes Trump’s team busier — at least in the short term — as it attempts to minimize or outright dismiss two of the three other criminal cases pending against him.

Through an order earlier this week, Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump’s criminal hush money trial earlier this year, stayed Trump’s July 11 sentencing hearing to allow for briefing on Trump’s motion to set aside the verdict in that trial.

Trump’s brief, which is expected to focus on evidence involving his official acts admitted during the trial to prove his knowledge and intent, is due on July 11. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s response is due on July 24.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending