Connect with us

News

Judge: Sen. Graham must testify in Georgia election probe

Published

on

Judge: Sen. Graham must testify in Georgia election probe

ATLANTA — A federal choose on Monday mentioned U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham should testify earlier than a particular grand jury in Atlanta that is investigating whether or not then-President Donald Trump and his allies broke any legal guidelines whereas attempting to overturn his slim 2020 basic election loss within the state.

Attorneys for Graham, R-S.C., had argued that his place as a U.S. senator offered him immunity from having to look earlier than the investigative panel and requested the choose to quash his subpoena. However U.S. District Decide Leigh Martin Could wrote in an order Monday that immunities associated to his position as a senator don’t shield him from having to testify. Graham’s subpoena instructs him to look earlier than the particular grand jury on Aug. 23, however he’s anticipated to enchantment the choose’s ruling.

Fulton County District Legal professional Fani Willis opened the investigation final yr, and a particular grand jury with subpoena energy was seated in Could at her request. Final month she filed petitions searching for to compel testimony from seven Trump advisers and associates.

Prosecutors have indicated they wish to ask Graham about telephone calls they are saying he made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his workers within the weeks following Trump’s election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

Graham had argued {that a} provision of the Structure offers absolute safety in opposition to a senator being questioned about legislative acts. However the choose discovered there are “appreciable areas of potential grand jury inquiry” that fall outdoors that provision’s scope. The choose additionally rejected Graham’s argument that the precept of “sovereign immunity” protects a senator from being summoned by a state prosecutor.

Advertisement

Graham additionally argued that Willis, a Democrat, had not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances essential to compel testimony from a high-ranking official. However the choose disagreed, discovering that Willis has proven “extraordinary circumstances and a particular want” for Graham’s testimony on points associated to alleged try and affect or disrupt the election in Georgia.

Could, the choose, final month rejected an analogous try by U.S. Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga., to keep away from testifying earlier than the particular grand jury. Former New York mayor and Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani had argued he could not journey to Atlanta to testify due to well being points, however Fulton County Superior Court docket Decide Robert McBurney, who’s overseeing the particular grand jury, instructed him to look on Wednesday.

A Graham spokesperson, Kevin Bishop, mentioned Monday the senator had no remark however referred to what Graham mentioned when requested in regards to the probe final week. Throughout a information convention in Columbia, S.C., Graham mentioned, “We’ll take this so far as we have to take it” when requested about his efforts to battle his subpoena.

“I used to be chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and needed to vote on certifying an election,” Graham advised reporters. “That is ridiculous. This weaponization of the regulation must cease. So I’ll use the courts. We’ll go so far as we have to go and do no matter must be finished to ensure that individuals like me can do their jobs with out concern of some county prosecutor coming after you.”

In calls made shortly after the 2020 basic election, Graham “questioned Secretary Raffensperger and his workers about reexamining sure absentee ballots solid in Georgia with a view to discover the potential for a extra favorable consequence for former President Donald Trump,” Willis wrote in a petition.

Advertisement

Graham additionally “made reference to allegations of widespread voter fraud within the November 2020 election in Georgia, per public statements made by identified associates of the Trump Marketing campaign,” she wrote.

Republican and Democratic state election officers throughout the nation, courts and even Trump’s lawyer basic discovered there was no proof of any voter fraud enough to have an effect on the result of his 2020 presidential election loss.

———

Related Press author Meg Kinnard in Columbia, S.C., contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read the Texas Governor’s Pardon

Published

on

Read the Texas Governor’s Pardon

PROCLAMATION
BY THE
Governor of the State of Texas
PROCLAMATION No. 2024-0001
DPS #07666731
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME:
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry, TDCJ #02450686, D.O.B. April 24, 1987, was
sentenced in the 147th District Court in Travis County on May 10, 2023, to twenty-
five years in prison for the offense of Murder, Cause No. D-1-DC-21-900007; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has conducted an exhaustive
review of Daniel Scott Perry’s personal history and the facts surrounding his shooting
of Garrett Foster; and
WHEREAS, both the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and
Article I, Section 23, of the Texas Constitution protect the right to keep and bear arms
for, among other things, self-defense; and
WHEREAS, Texas law, consistent with those constitutional guarantees, provides one of
the clearest self-defense protections in the United States; and
WHEREAS, Texas Penal Code § 9.32(a) provides that a person “is justified in using
deadly force against another” when that person “reasonably believes the deadly force
is immediately necessary” to protect a person against another’s use of unlawful deadly
force; and
WHEREAS, Texas Penal Code § 9.32(c) provides that a person who is otherwise
lawfully present at the location where deadly force is used “is not required to retreat
before using deadly force”; and
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2020, Daniel Scott Perry, while driving on a public road in
Austin, slowed his vehicle as he rounded a corner onto Congress Avenue and
encountered a group of protestors obstructing traffic; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry’s car was immediately surrounded by aggressive
protestors who rushed to obstruct, strike, pound, smash, and kick his vehicle; and
WHEREAS, Garrett Foster then approached within 18 inches of Daniel Scott Perry’s
car, confronted him, and brandished a Kalashnikov-style rifle in the low-ready firing
position; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry fired his handgun at Garrett Foster to eliminate a
perceived threat to his safety and called law enforcement less than one minute later to
inform them of the incident; and
WHEREAS, Daniel Scott Perry explained to law enforcement at the time that he used
his weapon because he feared losing his life and has since consistently stated that he
acted in self-defense; and
WHEREAS, Travis County District Attorney José Garza, rather than upholding the self-
defense rights of citizens, has prioritized “reducing access to guns” that citizens may
use to lawfully defend themselves; and
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
1:25 PM O’CLOCK
MAY 16 2024

Continue Reading

News

Live news: US stocks close lower to end multi-day rally

Published

on

Live news: US stocks close lower to end multi-day rally

US stocks retreated from a record high, ending a multi-day rally that had been spurred along this week by signs of easing inflation.

A late-session dip resulted in the benchmark S&P 500 closing 0.2 per cent lower on Thursday. Wall Street’s benchmark had been as much as 0.3 per cent higher in early trading to set a record intraday high.

Consumer staples was the S&P 500’s best-performing sector, as Walmart shares leapt 7 per cent to a record high, while basic materials was the index’s worst-performing group.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 0.3 per cent, ending a three-session winning streak. The small-cap focused Russell 2000 declined 0.6 per cent.

Traders sold Treasuries, pushing the yield on the two-year note up 0.06 percentage points to 4.80 per cent. The yield on the 10-year note rose 0.02 percentage points to 4.38 per cent.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Lawyer for family of slain airman says Florida deputy call shows he went to wrong apartment

Published

on

Lawyer for family of slain airman says Florida deputy call shows he went to wrong apartment

A lawyer for the family of Roger Fortson insisted Thursday that the body camera video from the Florida sheriff’s deputy who killed the Black Air Force senior airman and police radio audio support their assertion that the deputy went to the wrong apartment while responding to a domestic disturbance call that day.

At a news conference, civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump played audio from a police radio in which a dispatcher says that a “fourth party” gave them information about the location of the disturbance.

“Uh, don’t have, uh, any further other than a male and female,” the dispatcher tells officers. “It’s all fourth-party information from the front desk at the leasing office.”

The news conference was held at the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia, and was attended by Fortson’s parents, siblings and other family.

Crump said the radio audio had been condensed to remove communications that were not relevant to the incident at the apartment complex where Fortson was shot six times. NBC News has not listened to an unedited version of the audio.

Advertisement

The Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which is handling the criminal investigation into the shooting, did not immediately return requests for comment about the family’s assertion that the deputy went to the wrong door. The sheriff’s office has not released an incident report or any 911 records. Sheriff Eric Aden has previously said the deputy had not entered the wrong apartment.

Chantemekki Fortson, mother of Roger Fortson, holds a photo of her son during a news conference May 9 in Fort Walton Beach, Fla.Gerald Herbert / AP

Fortson, 23, was shot May 3 in the doorway of his apartment in Fort Walton Beach by a deputy from the sheriff’s office who was responding to an apparent domestic dispute. Fortson’s family and their attorneys have insisted the deputy went to the wrong apartment because Fortson was home alone and on a FaceTime call with his girlfriend at the time of the incident. Crump said Thursday that the two were not raising their voices and had been making plans to see each other that weekend. Crump and Fortson’s family contend his killing was unjustified.

Crump showed two clips from the body camera video of the deputy being led around the apartment complex by a woman. At one point, the deputy asks her, “Which door?” She tells him, “I’m not sure.” The woman also tells the deputy that she heard a disturbance that included a slap two weeks ago and says, “I wasn’t sure where it came from.”

The woman later tells the deputy that he should go to apartment 1401, footage shows. It is unclear who the woman is, but Crump said Thursday that he believes she works in the leasing office of the complex.

When the deputy arrives at the apartment, he first knocks without identifying himself. He then knocks two more times, identifies himself as a member of the sheriff’s office and steps away from the door.

Advertisement

The video shows Fortson answer the door of his apartment with a gun in his right hand that is pointed downward and being shot by the deputy within seconds. After shooting, the deputy shouted for Fortson to drop the gun. Fortson legally owned the firearm, Crump said.

Crump said multiple times Thursday that he believed the deputy had “used excessive force” and had “executed” Fortson.

“As his mother said, they cannot stain his reputation,” Crump said. “But she feels, as long as they continue to say that they went to the right apartment, they’re staining his reputation. Because Roger did not have any domestic disturbance. Roger had no criminal history.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending