Connect with us

News

India’s ‘Lottery King’ emerges as key political donor

Published

on

India’s ‘Lottery King’ emerges as key political donor

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

India’s so-called Lottery King, under investigation for fraud and money laundering, has emerged as one of the biggest political donors in the country, according to data published in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling.

Santiago Martin’s Future Gaming and Hotel Services bought Rs13.68bn ($165mn) worth of electoral bonds between 2019 and 2024, according to data published by the Election Commission of India late on Thursday.

Electoral bonds, one of India’s main legal forms of political contributions from 2019 until they were banned in January, allowed individuals and companies to make anonymous donations to political parties.

Advertisement

The Election Commission uploaded the data on donors and recipients on Thursday in response to an order by the Supreme Court, which struck down the electoral bonds scheme as unconstitutional last month. The data release has shed a rare light on India’s generally opaque funding mechanisms for political parties.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party was the largest recipient of donations under the scheme, according to the data. Several of the largest donors consisted of companies operating in heavily regulated sectors such as construction and mining.

India’s Directorate of Enforcement, which investigates financial crimes, has for several years probed Martin and his business. Last year it seized millions of dollars worth of his assets as part of an investigation into alleged money laundering involving the sale of lottery tickets in the state of Sikkim, where he ran a lottery scheme.

According to a biography on his charitable foundation’s website, Martin’s group runs a “vast marketing network of the buyers and sellers of lotteries”, including in India’s Karnataka, West Bengal, Punjab and Maharashtra states, alongside Sikkim. Martin’s group of companies also has operations in neighbouring Myanmar.

The revelations come just ahead of an expected announcement by the Election Commission on dates for India’s lower-house polls, due to be held by May, in which Modi is seeking to lead the BJP to re-election for a third five-year term.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ordered the State Bank of India, which holds information on the bonds, to hand them over to the commission. The data was published in two separate sheets outlining donors and the parties receiving the bonds, but it did not match the donors to the parties.

Other large donors under the scheme included Megha Engineering and Infrastructure, a Hyderabad-based construction company, mining company Vedanta and telecoms group Bharti Airtel.

Civil society groups had long argued that the bonds represented a legal form of bribery, as they allowed companies and individuals to donate anonymously.

The Supreme Court last month ruled that the electoral bonds scheme violated the right to information and could lead to “quid pro quo” arrangements between donors and parties. Opposition parties argued that the bonds favoured the ruling party because it could access information on who had contributed via the SBI.

The BJP was the largest recipient of donations from electoral bonds at Rs60bn, according to the data, nearly half of the total.

Advertisement

The second-largest beneficiary, the West Bengal-based All India Trinamool Congress, received Rs16bn, while the Indian National Congress, the BJP’s biggest rival, received Rs14bn.

Martin did not respond to a request for comment.

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending