Connect with us

News

Ilhan Omar won her primary after fellow ‘Squad’ members Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman lost. Here’s why.

Published

on

Ilhan Omar won her primary after fellow ‘Squad’ members Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman lost. Here’s why.
play

WASHINGTON – Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., beat back a primary challenger Tuesday in a closely watched race after two of her progressive colleagues lost their own primary bids earlier this year in the face of massive spending from pro-Israel groups.

The Minnesota lawmaker’s victory came after Reps. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., and Cori Bush, D-Mo., all members of the informal group of House lawmakers known as the “Squad,” were booted by more moderate Democrats. Each have been vocal critics of Israel’s actions in Gaza as the Israel-Hamas war rages on, but Omar still entered Tuesday’s race on firmer footing than her fellow lawmakers.

One major factor: United Democracy Project, a super PAC with close ties to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, invested almost $24 million against Bush and Bowman, helping make them the only House Democrats to lose their 2024 primary elections so far.

Advertisement

Israel and the war in Gaza has defined race after race this year as the Democratic Party splits over how to address the conflict. The war has created a rift on the left, as Congress’ progressive members push the Biden administration and other Democratic leaders to come out more forcefully against the bombing campaign in the Gaza strip.

Omar has long voiced concerns over Israel’s policy, being one of the first lawmakers to publicly call for a cease-fire. She also faced significant backlash in April after she suggested while visiting protesters on Columbia University’s campus that some Jewish students supported “genocide.”

But the United Democracy Project didn’t invest in Omar’s race, a shift from her 2022 primary bid.

Back then, former Minneapolis City Council Member Don Samuels, who Omar again faced on Tuesday, lost by just over 2,400 votes. The United Democracy Project spent $350,000 in the days leading up to that election to boost Samuels.

Advertisement

But this year, Omar was on significantly different ground. Police reform dominated her last reelection in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in her home state. Omar was one of the most outspoken lawmakers and didn’t shy away from calling for police reform.

That debate has largely fallen to the wayside this election cycle though, and Omar enjoyed a significant fundraising advantage over Samuels. She also ran a much more active campaign this time around.

“In the last primary, it wasn’t close because we don’t have the support of the people that we represent,” Omar said last week at a rally in Minneapolis. “It was close because we did not remind every single person that there was a primary and they needed to get out and vote.”

But it wasn’t just debates over the Israel-Hamas war that set Omar’s election apart from her fellow “Squad” members this year. She also didn’t have the political baggage that came with Bowman and Bush. While the ousted pair’s vocal criticisms of Israel garnered nationwide attention, they each had their own scandals that dogged their campaigns.

Advertisement

Bowman infamously pulled a fire alarm in the Capitol complex last year during a high-stakes vote to avert a government shutdown. During the vote, Bowman could be seen on security camera footage removing warning signs for a door alarm and then proceeding to pull the alarm.

The New York Democrat claimed it was a mistake and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge for “willfully” or knowingly” triggering the alarm. The Republican-controlled House (on a mostly party-line vote) censured him after the incident. 

Bush is currently under federal investigation over using her campaign funds for security services.  She said she hired her husband as part of her security detail in the face of threats to her personal safety since becoming a lawmaker, but she has maintained she has not used federal funds for her own security. 

The combination of Bowman and Bush’s scandals paired with millions of dollars from pro-Israel groups made their primary contests among the fiercest in the country. United Democracy Project spent $14.5 million against Bowman leading up to his election, which became the most expensive House primary in history. The group also invested over $9 million in Bush’s race. 

Advertisement

The two laid blame at AIPAC for their losses and called out the staggering sums of campaign spending against them in their concession speeches.

“We should be outraged when a super PAC of dark money can spend $20 million to brainwash people into believing something that isn’t true,” Bowman said in June right after he was projected to lose his primary.

Bush was much more upfront in her speech, telling her supporters earlier in August after she lost her race: “AIPAC, I’m coming to tear your kingdom down.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Tracking the Swing States for Harris and Trump

Published

on

Tracking the Swing States for Harris and Trump
Advertisement

The presidential race will most likely come down to voters in 10 states that remain competitive, according to the most recent ratings by the Cook Political Report.

Note: Nebraska and Maine each award two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one to the top vote-getter in each congressional district. Nebraska’s Second District is rated as “Lean Democratic” by Cook Political Report.

Advertisement

There are many combinations of states that could put either Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald J. Trump over the threshold of the 270 electoral votes needed to win.

If both candidates win all of the states in their solid, likely and lean categories, the race would come down to the six tossup states in yellow. Ms. Harris would need 44 electoral votes from the tossup states to win. Mr. Trump would need just 35.

Tossups

State Elec. votes 2020 margin 2024 polling

Michigan

15

Advertisement

D +2.8

Harris +1.5 ›

Pennsylvania

19

D +1.2

Trump +0.1 ›

Wisconsin

Advertisement

10

D +0.6

Harris +1.8 ›

Georgia

16

D +0.2

Advertisement
Not enough polls

Arizona

11

D +0.3

Not enough polls

Nevada

6

Advertisement

D +2.4

Not enough polls

The six states rated as tossups were all won narrowly by Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2020. If the race comes down to these places, Mr. Trump has an advantage in the electoral math. He could win with just two electorally valuable tossup states — Pennsylvania and Georgia — while all of Ms. Harris’s paths to victory include at least three. If Mr. Trump loses Georgia but wins Pennsylvania, Ms. Harris would still need at least three other tossups (in addition to Georgia) to win.

Of course, some of the states currently rated as leaning or likely Democrat or Republican could also come into play.

Lean Democrat

State E.V. 2020

Minnesota

Advertisement

Minn.

10

D +7.1

Nebraska 2nd District

Neb. 2

Advertisement

1

D +6.5

New Hampshire

N.H.

4

Advertisement

D +0.4

Lean Republican

State E.V. 2020

North Carolina

N.C.

16

Advertisement

R +1.3

Likely Democrat

State E.V. 2020

New Mexico

N.M.

5

Advertisement

D +10.8

Virginia

Va.

13

D +10.1

Advertisement

Maine

Maine

2

D +9.1

Likely Republican

Advertisement
State E.V. 2020

Florida

Fla.

30

R +3.4

Maine 2nd District

Advertisement

Me. 2

1

R +7.9

Texas

Texas

Advertisement

40

R +5.6

Note: Nebraska and Maine each award two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one to the top vote-getter in each congressional district. Nebraska’s second district is rated as “Lean Democratic” by Cook Political Report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hedge fund Caxton makes $270mn in market turmoil

Published

on

Hedge fund Caxton makes 0mn in market turmoil

Stay informed with free updates

Hedge fund Caxton Associates has made gains of about $270mn this month, as bets on US government debt and the Japanese yen made it one of the big winners from the recent turmoil in global markets.

The London-based firm made 3.9 per cent in its $4.5bn Macro fund, which is personally managed by chief executive Andrew Law, in the first nine days of August, according to numbers sent to investors and seen by the Financial Times. It also made a gain of 1.1 per cent in its $8.5bn Global fund, according to an investor.

The profits come in a turbulent month for global markets, driven by fears that the US Federal Reserve has been too slow to cut interest rates in response to signs of a slowing economy.

Advertisement

US megacap technology stocks and Japanese equities were among the worst hit in the rout, while the market’s “fear gauge” of volatility hit its highest level since the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. 

Caxton declined to comment.

Caxton, which manages $13.5bn in total assets and is one of the world’s best known macro hedge funds, was helped by a bet that short-dated US Treasuries would outperform longer maturities, according to people familiar with its positioning. These so-called “steepener” trades have performed well in recent weeks as investors have started to price in rapid rate cuts by the Fed.

The firm also profited from a bet on the yen, which rallied strongly against the dollar over the past month as investors who had borrowed the Japanese currency to invest in higher yielding assets quickly unwound those positions.

The gains leave Caxton Macro up 9.9 per cent so far this year, according to the investor update, following gains in July, while the Global fund is up 5.2 per cent.

Advertisement

Kirkoswald Capital, the firm run by Australian hedge fund star Greg Coffey, also made “hundreds of millions” of dollars during the market chaos, the FT reported last week.

Macro funds, which bet on moves in global bonds, currencies and other assets, on average have gained just 0.2 per cent so far this year to Monday, according to an index compiled by data group HFR.

Caxton, which was founded by US billionaire Bruce Kovner in 1983, in its early days used to fly copies of the FT from London to New York, which it claimed gave it an advantage over its rivals.

In 2022 it told investors it would shut its Macro fund to new money, following big gains, to avoid it becoming too large and potentially damping returns.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Japan’s prime minister Fumio Kishida to step down

Published

on

Japan’s prime minister Fumio Kishida to step down

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has said he will step down as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic party in September, ending a three-year premiership and months of speculation over his ability to survive following a political funding scandal and rising living costs.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Kishida said he would not seek re-election at next month’s internal contest for the LDP’s presidency, which in effect grants the holder the position of Japanese prime minister.

“The first and clearest step to show that the LDP is changing is for me to step down,” said Kishida. “I will not be running in the upcoming presidential election.”

Advertisement

The decision follows months of low approval ratings and a political funding scandal that forced Kishida to sack four cabinet ministers last year.

Kishida, 67, came to power in October 2021 with a promise of establishing a “New Capitalism”. But approval ratings for his administration fell well below the 30 per cent level that has felled previous Japanese leaders.

The yen strengthened 0.3 per cent to ¥146.43 per dollar while equities were mixed. The country’s benchmark Topix index edged up 0.5 per cent while the more exporter-oriented Nikkei 225 shed 0.2 per cent.

Kishida’s successor will be Japan’s third prime minister since the late Shinzo Abe, who stepped down in 2020 and was the country’s longest-serving prime minister.

By pulling out of the LDP leadership race, Kishida opens the way for multiple candidates to compete for the position.

Advertisement

Speculation among political analysts has already centred on former trade minister Toshimitsu Motegi and former foreign minister Taro Kono. Kishida told reporters that “it is important to show a new face of the LDP in this leadership race”.

The LDP has not announced when the election will be held, but people close to the ruling party have said it is likely to be around September 20.

Additional reporting by William Sandlund in Hong Kong

Continue Reading

Trending