Connect with us

News

How the investigation of Adnan Syed became a podcast phenomenon

Published

on

How the investigation of Adnan Syed became a podcast phenomenon

Adnan Syed, heart, leaves the Cummings Courthouse in Baltimore on Monday. A decide has ordered the discharge of Syed after overturning his conviction for a 1999 homicide that was chronicled within the hit podcast Serial.

Brian Witte/AP


disguise caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Brian Witte/AP


Adnan Syed, heart, leaves the Cummings Courthouse in Baltimore on Monday. A decide has ordered the discharge of Syed after overturning his conviction for a 1999 homicide that was chronicled within the hit podcast Serial.

Brian Witte/AP

“Adnan’s case was a large number. Is a large number. That is the place we have been after we stopped reporting in 2014,” says Serial host Sarah Koenig in her simple, private model within the new episode titled Adnan Is Out.

Advertisement

In 2014, over the course of 12 episodes, Serial probed the main points of the homicide case of Hae Min Lee, Adnan Syed’s former girlfriend. Lee was discovered strangled to dying in Baltimore’s Leakin Park in 1999.

In 2000, Syed was convicted of murdering Lee when he was 17 years outdated. He spent 23 years in jail. On Monday, in a Baltimore courtroom, a decide dominated to vacate his conviction.

Past the large affect Serial has had on Syed’s case and on exposing the failings within the authorized system, the podcast broke new floor in episodic, audio storytelling.

Created and produced by Koenig and Julie Snyder, Serial was a by-product of This American Life. With some 300 million downloads, the primary season broke podcast data and spawned a cottage trade of true crime podcasts. It gained nearly each main journalism award together with a DuPont and a Peabody, the primary ever awarded to a podcast. Koenig was named one in all Time’s Most Influential Individuals of 2015.

Sarah Koenig along with her award at The 74th Annual Peabody Awards Ceremony at Cipriani Wall Road in New York Metropolis on Might 31, 2015.

Advertisement

Jemal Countess/Getty Pictures


disguise caption

toggle caption

Jemal Countess/Getty Pictures

Advertisement


Sarah Koenig along with her award at The 74th Annual Peabody Awards Ceremony at Cipriani Wall Road in New York Metropolis on Might 31, 2015.

Jemal Countess/Getty Pictures

Barry Scheck, co-director of The Innocence Challenge, discovered about Serial from his youngsters. On the time, podcasting skilled one thing of a generational divide. He believes dogged reporting, a reliance on consultants and propulsive storytelling have been key to its success.

He says the best way Koenig related the viewers with Serial‘s reporting made for compelling listening. “One of many intriguing elements of the Serial podcast is that everyone heard her thought processes out loud,” says Scheck, “and that is a part of the enchantment of it. , we’re all on this collectively making an attempt to suppose, is he harmless? Is he responsible?”

There’s the story after which there’s the dialogue it provoked. Within the case of Serial, they labored in tandem.

Advertisement

The Serial phenomenon was not nearly making an attempt to unravel the crime itself. It was additionally concerning the huge neighborhood devouring every episode after which choosing it aside on-line. Journalists at The Atlantic blogged about it. A spot to debate Serial: The Podcast on Reddit reached greater than 72 million members.

As Christopher Dunn, Authorized Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, marveled in 2015, Serial “unleashed a spirited and wide-ranging civil rights debate on the Web,” he wrote. “Most importantly, the dialogue discussion board Reddit, which is enormously widespread with younger folks, exploded with commentary from tens of hundreds of people that debated and investigated each side of the case, lots of which the podcast had not addressed.”

The concept to delve into Syed’s case originated with Rabia Chaudry, a lawyer and one in all Syed’s mates and supporters. She pitched the thought to Koenig. As Serial unfolded, Chaudry blogged about every episode, sharing her information of the case and airing complaints about the best way she felt producers have been dealing with elements of the story.

Chaudry was additionally struck by how her views have been changing into a part of the narrative. “I noticed that whereas I and others near Adnan have been mired within the trivia of each the case and present, we have been a part of that case and present for the general public. Our interactions on-line have been being mentioned, we have been being judged and assessed, we have been including each leisure and substantive worth to the discourse. We have been additionally characters within the bigger story,” she wrote.

Chaudry went on to write down her ebook and produce a podcast about Syed. She’s additionally an Government Producer on The Case In opposition to Adnan Syed, a four-part HBO documentary sequence.

Advertisement

Whereas Scheck is happy to see the entire different true crime podcasts Serial impressed, he urges warning to anybody who thinks it is simple to do it properly.

“It is one factor to have a podcast and attempt to inform a narrative. It is fairly one other to get into the enterprise of exposing a wrongful conviction,” he says.

Scheck says Serial benefitted from a crew that knew what they did not know.

“What was nice about Serial is that they made no pretense at each flip,” says Scheck. “They have been making an attempt to show to investigators, they have been making an attempt to show to consultants. They have been counting on the viewers for leads. And so they went about it in a really skilled approach.”

“To say it was addictive is an understatement,” Scottish actor Ewan McGregor wrote in Time’s Most Influential Individuals entry for Sarah Koenig. “Out of the blue, investigative journalism turned our interest, our ardour. Individuals have been speaking about it in all places you went. It was a real cultural phenomenon.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Trump to Visit North Carolina and California, With Disaster Aid an Open Question

Published

on

Trump to Visit North Carolina and California, With Disaster Aid an Open Question

President Trump on Friday began his first trip since returning to the White House to storm-ravaged North Carolina and California, which is facing some of the most deadly and destructive blazes in the state’s history.

The trip comes as the president has left the question of additional disaster aid for California unsettled.

Mr. Trump is expected to make his first stop in Asheville, N.C., which had devastating flooding from Hurricane Helene last fall. The president then plans on traveling to the Los Angeles area, where he will observe the damage from wildfires that have killed more than two dozen people, destroyed entire neighborhoods and forced desperate evacuations.

But Mr. Trump has struck very different tones on the likelihood of additional federal aid for each state. While he has expressed support for North Carolina, Mr. Trump has criticized California’s Democratic leaders for the disaster response and threatened to withhold federal aid if they did not make changes to unrelated environmental policies in the state.

“It’s been a horrible thing the way that’s been allowed to fester, and we’re going to get it fixed up,” Mr. Trump told reporters of the previous administration’s disaster recovery effort. “North Carolina’s been treated very badly, so we’re stopping there.”

Advertisement

For the Los Angeles stop, Mr. Trump said he wanted “to take a look at a fire that could have been put out if they let the water flow, but they didn’t let the water flow, and they still haven’t.”

“We’re going to have a very interesting time,” he said.

Presidents have typically visited areas recovering from natural disasters to show personal support and assure community members of federal aid for emergency medical workers and local leaders. Mr. Trump, however, has often used natural disasters as a vehicle to unleash political grievances, threatening to withhold money from political opponents, making false statements about disaster responses by Democrats and promising support for political allies.

During Mr. Trump’s first term, he told aides he wanted to stop money from reaching Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria, claiming that the island’s leadership was corrupt. After wildfires erupted in California in 2018, Mr. Trump said on social media that he had ordered the Federal Emergency Management Agency to “send no more money” unless the state changed its approach to forest management.

Before traveling on Friday, Mr. Trump had already displayed different approaches to California and Republican-led North Carolina.

Advertisement

“We’re going to get that thing straightened out because they’re still suffering from a hurricane from months ago,” Mr. Trump said in a taped interview with Fox News that aired on Wednesday night.

Since the early days of the hurricane response, Mr. Trump has made a number of accusations about the Biden administration’s response to Hurricane Helene that were debunked by the local, state and federal authorities in the disaster areas.

The false statements included claims that FEMA had spent huge sums on housing for migrants and that it had told victims of the storms they would receive only $750. The string of false claims prompted President Joseph R. Biden Jr. to accuse Mr. Trump of spreading “outright lies.”

In the same interview with Fox News, Mr. Trump issued broadsides against Gavin Newsom, California’s Democratic governor — whom the president has called “Newscum” — for his management. He also threatened to withhold disaster aid for wildfires unless the state changed environmental policies that he claimed had prevented enough water from going to Southern California.

“I don’t think we should give California anything until they let water flow down,” Mr. Trump added.

Advertisement

State and fire experts have said those policies have no connection to the fires in the Los Angeles area.

During a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Newsom expressed confidence that the Trump administration would still reimburse California for the disaster-related funds. He added that he planned to be at the airport to greet Mr. Trump, even though he did not know whether he would be invited to accompany the president during his tour of the Los Angeles area.

While Mr. Newsom was left in the dark, Mr. Trump appeared to extend last-minute invitations to Senators Adam B. Schiff and Alex Padilla, Democrats of California, to join him in his visit to the state, days after calling Mr. Schiff “scum” on Inauguration Day.

A spokesperson for Mr. Schiff, with whom Mr. Trump has long had an acrimonious relationship, said on Thursday that the senator would not be able to make the trip because of expected Senate votes on cabinet nominees.

“Senator Schiff greatly appreciates the president’s visit to see the devastation of these wildfires firsthand and the invitation to accompany him,” the spokesperson said in a statement. The statement added that Mr. Schiff would work with Mr. Trump’s team and other officials “to ensure that California gets the aid and support it needs.”

Advertisement

Mr. Padilla will also not join Mr. Trump because of the Senate vote schedule, his spokeswoman said, but he welcomed Mr. Trump’s support “for federal disaster aid to assist the thousands of families and businesses impacted by these devastating fires.”

Annie Karni contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Europe can import disillusioned talent from Trump’s US, says Lagarde

Published

on

Europe can import disillusioned talent from Trump’s US, says Lagarde

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Europe may be able to attract disillusioned “talent” from across the Atlantic following Donald Trump’s election, the European Central Bank president has suggested, as she called on the continent to better recognise its economic strengths. 

Christine Lagarde said Europe needed to get better at keeping its talent and savings at home, adding that the new US administration’s decision to freeze some funding for former president Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act might remove one of the incentives to invest in the US. 

Without making a direct reference to Trump, the French central banker indicated that some US residents might be attracted to Europe in the wake of the US inauguration. 

Advertisement

“We need to keep the talent at home. We need to keep the savings at home. Maybe it is also time to import a few of the talents that would be disenchanted, for one reason or the other, from another side of the sea,” she said.  

Trump’s re-election has led some US citizens and residents to consider leaving the country, with lawyers in the UK reporting an influx of interest from liberal Americans in relocating.

Lagarde’s words came on the closing day of the World Economic Forum in Davos, during which investors and executives highlighted the contrast between the upbeat mood about the US economy and deep pessimism about Europe’s weak growth prospects. 

Speaking alongside Lagarde on a panel, Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock, said he believed that there was too much pessimism in Europe and it was probably time to be investing back into the continent. 

Lagarde said that the EU faced “existential threats” but that this should act as a wake-up call for its leaders to take action to strengthen the bloc.

Advertisement

She said the positive scorecard for the Eurozone included a relatively low overall government deficit at about 3 per cent of GDP, and her “strong confidence” that annual inflation, which was 2.4 per cent in December, was more likely to decline than to reaccelerate.  

Lagarde acknowledged that some executives were “not very upbeat” about European prospects, but she argued the continent could respond to its economic challenges if its leaders “actually get their act together”. 

Among the changes that could benefit Europe are Trump’s decision to suspend the disbursement of some funds under the Inflation Reduction Act, which has served as an important lure for European companies seeking to set up manufacturing projects in the US. 

Andy Marsh, chief executive of Plug Power — a US clean hydrogen developer and parts manufacturer that secured a $1.66bn loan from the Department of Energy Loan Programs Office in the final hours of the Biden administration — warned that a prolonged pause in clean tech funding would force companies to move investments elsewhere.

“We’re going to go where there’s markets,” said Marsh. “If there’s more interest for our products because of policy in Europe and Australia, we’ll spend more time in Europe and Australia. I think that would be the approach most companies would take.”

Advertisement

Despite an expected slowdown in investments in green tech, economists believe the US remains a more attractive destination for investors’ capital than Europe.

“You’ve got a relative growth story in the US, you’ve got subsidised or cheap energy for heavy industry, and you’ve got direct pressures on Europe — and a few other places — from Trump saying that to sell in America, companies will have to produce here,” said Adam Posen, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics think-tank.

“Irrespective of anything, you’re going to have a huge surge of foreign direct investment [in the US] over the next year or two.” 

European politicians in Davos have also been arguing that Trump’s vows to erect trade barriers open an opportunity for the EU to strengthen its ties with other countries around the world. Lagarde said that the Europeans had learnt after the second world war that “you cannot go alone” and they instead needed to sit at the table and co-operate. 

She said: “What is happening outside Is a challenge but also a big opportunity for revisiting and deciding whether or not Europe wants to be a key player,” Lagarde said. “I am contending it has the talent, and it has the means and it has the ambition.”

Advertisement

Fink, despite his optimism that the investment case for Europe had grown, said Europe was a “myth” because the single market was incomplete, including in financial services.

Lagarde disagreed. “Europe is not a myth. It is not a basket case. It’s a fantastic case for transformation.”

Continue Reading

News

The debut of new pandas in D.C. marks the latest chapter in China's 'panda diplomacy'

Published

on

The debut of new pandas in D.C. marks the latest chapter in China's 'panda diplomacy'

The National Zoo’s first giant pandas, Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing, play in their yard in 1974 as onlookers watch.

File/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

File/AP

What’s black, white and back in the nation’s capital? Giant pandas, at last.

Bao Li and Qing Bao, both three years old, are making their public debut at the Smithsonian National Zoological Park (aka the National Zoo) on Friday after months of anticipation and fanfare — including panda-themed pop-up bars, hotel packages and special-edition transit cards.

The pair arrived in D.C. — aboard the fittingly nicknamed “Panda Express” — from China back in October. Since then, they could only be glimpsed occasionally on the zoo’s social media feed (including rolling around in the flurries during a snowstorm earlier this month).

Advertisement

Now, after a requisite quarantine and brief preview period for zoo members, the panda exhibit and its accompanying Giant Panda Cam are back on full display.

“Bao Li and Qing Bao have already won the hearts of our staff and volunteers, and we are excited to welcome panda fans back to the Zoo — the only place in the nation where you can see giant pandas for free — and celebrate the newest chapter of our giant panda breeding and conservation program,” said Brandie Smith, director of the Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute.

Scientists estimate there are fewer than 2,000 giant pandas living in the wild, scattered throughout half a dozen mountainous regions in China. About 420 pandas live in captivity in zoos and reserves, mostly but not exclusively in China.

Advertisement

That’s because, over the last half a century, China has either gifted or loaned its beloved bears to zoos around the world, a practice that’s become known as “panda diplomacy.” In exchange, zoos pay a hefty fee to support panda conservation programs in China.

Under the National Zoo’s agreement, Bao Li and Qing Bao will stay in D.C. until 2034, and any cubs they birth will move to China by age four. The zoo is paying $1 million annually to contribute to projects including restoring giant panda habitat, monitoring wildlife diseases and assessing the impacts of climate change.

In addition to D.C., the San Diego Zoo welcomed two pandas in 2024, while the San Francisco Zoo is anticipating the arrival of a pair this year.

Panda diplomacy is seen as a way for China to not only conserve wildlife but promote goodwill and strengthen diplomatic ties with other countries — bringing a whole new meaning to soft power.

Advertisement

“Many people don’t realize it, but there are actually two Chinese ambassadors in Washington: me and the panda cub at the National Zoo,” Cui Tiankai, China’s then-ambassador to the U.S., wrote in a 2013 Washington Post op-ed.

Here’s a look at the current state of panda diplomacy — and how we got here.

The early years: Panda-monium starts to spread

Ruth Harkness holds Su Lin at her hotel room in New York City.

Ruth Harkness holds Su Lin at her hotel room in New York City. Su Lin was never intended to be a pet, and ended up at a Chicago zoo.

Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Getty Images

The first living giant panda exhibited in the U.S. was named Su Lin. The three-month-old cub was captured and brought over from China in 1936 by American fashion designer and socialite Ruth Harkness, who was inspired to carry out her late husband’s dream.

Su Lin, who was named after Harkness’ Chinese guide’s sister-in-law — he was believed to be female until after his death — ended up at Chicago’s Brookfield Zoo, where he became a star attraction, winning over celebrity admirers including Shirley Temple. He died of pneumonia in 1938, just weeks after Harkness brought back another panda from China — Mei Mei — to join him. Su Lin’s body is still on display at Chicago’s Field Museum.

Advertisement

Foreigners captured and took over a dozen pandas from China over the next decade, according to the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF), whose logo happens to be a panda. By the 1940s, China sought to end the exploitation of its pandas by foreigners, but recognized it had something special to offer its friends.

E. Elena Songster, a history professor at St. Mary’s College of California who authored Panda Nation: The Construction and Conservation of China’s Modern Icon, told WBUR in 2024 that the first time pandas were used “as diplomatic expression” was in 1941.

“Chiang Kai-shek’s wife, Soong Mei-ling, offered a pair of pandas to the United States as an expression of gratitude for our assistance with them in their war of resistance against Japan,” she explained.

The People’s Republic of China continued that practice in the years after it took over in 1949. The U.S. initially didn’t recognize and tried to weaken the communist government, forbade American citizens from visiting the country and encouraged its allies not to have diplomatic relations with China.

China began gifting pandas to its allies, including the Soviet Union and North Korea. It sent its first panda ambassadors, Ping Ping and Qi Qi, to the Soviet Union in 1957 to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the October Revolution, writes Yu Tao, a professor of Chinese Studies at the University of Western Australia.

Advertisement

Between 1957 and 1983, the country sent 24 pandas to foreign countries, including the U.S.

Mid-20th century: Panda diplomacy reaches the U.S. 

First lady Patricia Nixon welcomes China's giant pandas to Washington's National Zoo.

First lady Patricia Nixon welcomes China’s giant pandas to Washington’s National Zoo on April 20, 1972. The tradition of China sending pandas to U.S. zoos has continued ever since.

File/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

File/AP

The U.S. and China began to warm to each other throughout the 1970s, with President Richard Nixon’s landmark 1972 visit signaling the beginning of a policy of engagement.

A pivotal moment came when China gave its first pair of pandas to the U.S., just months after Nixon’s trip.

At a dinner in Beijing, while seated next to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, First Lady Patricia Nixon commented on a box of cigarettes decorated with pandas: “Aren’t they cute? I love them.”

Advertisement

“I’ll give you some,” he replied, according to the Richard Nixon Foundation.

Zhou gifted two giant pandas to the U.S., and the Nixons chose the National Zoo as their home.

Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing arrived in April 1972 and lived at the zoo for the next two decades. They drew millions of visitors until their deaths in 1992 and 1999, and set a new tradition in motion.

“[The gift] made a huge splash because the U.S. was a former enemy state, and so it was a giant gesture of diplomatic friendship,” Songster explains. “And from that moment, [China] saw how warmly welcomed the pandas were and how popular they were and how useful they were for putting a friendly face on China.”

By 1979, the U.S. and China had established full diplomatic relations.

Advertisement

As other countries — including West Germany and Japan — recognized Beijing in the early 1970s, they received pandas of their own. Soon, however, the practice began to look unsustainable.

Turn of the millennium: Gifts turn into loans

National Zoo visitors welcome Tian Tian and Mei Xiang to their new home in December 2000.

National Zoo visitors welcome Tian Tian and Mei Xiang to their new home in December 2000. They returned to China with their cub in late 2023.

Getty Images/Hulton Archive


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Getty Images/Hulton Archive

In the mid-1980s, China stopped giving pandas as gifts over concerns about its ability to maintain the wild population.

“And also at that time, there was a panda starvation scare, because there was a huge bamboo die-off in the pandas’ range,” Songster explained. “And so from that point forward, they started loaning them.”

That shift also embodied “China’s market-orientated economic reforms,” Tao wrote, with bears bringing in some $500,000 to $1 million per year.

Advertisement

While loan periods were initially relatively short, by the 1990s they had grown to at least 10 years, Songster said, proving less stressful for the animals and more conducive to reproduction.

In 1998, the U.S. shifted its acceptance policy to only allow a panda to reside stateside if China devoted more than half of its annual fee to conservation efforts, according to the History Channel.

Today: What pandas can tell us about politics  

Wang Wang the panda chews on a box as South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas and China's Premier Li Qiang listen to a zoo ranger.

Wang Wang the panda chews on a box as South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas and China’s Premier Li Qiang listen to a ranger at Adelaide Zoo in Australia in June 2024 — the first high-level diplomatic outreach by a Chinese leader to Australia since 2017.

Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images AsiaPac


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images AsiaPac

Scholars have noted that China’s panda strategy has evolved over the decades from strategic gift-giving to a financial transaction to, as of recent years, a symbol of trade relationships.

Indeed, many of China’s panda loans have coincided with trade deals. Shortly after the Edinburgh Zoo received two pandas in 2011, Scotland and China signed trade agreements involving salmon and renewable energy technology. The loan of two pandas to Germany in 2017 overlapped with Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s visit to Berlin.

Advertisement

The timing of panda loans has also seemed to reflect the level of tension between China and other nations.

The arrival of two pandas to Malaysia in 2014 — to mark the 40th anniversary of its diplomatic ties with Beijing — was delayed by several months because of disagreements over Malaysia’s handling of the disappearance of Flight MH370 (many of its passengers were Chinese).

In November 2023, the National Zoo sent its three pandas — Tian Tian and Mei Xiang, who had lived there since 2000, and their cub Xiao Qi Ji — back to China, in advance of the expiration of their loan agreement and amidst rising tensions between the two countries.

There was no agreement in place at the time for a new set of pandas to head to D.C., and Atlanta was left as the only zoo in the country housing any pandas.

A week later, however, Xi signaled openness to sending more pandas to the U.S., specifically California. And in May 2024, the official announcement came down: A pair of pandas — Bao Li and Qing Bao — would arrive in the States by the end of the year.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending