Connect with us

News

How the Gunman Who Killed Charlie Kirk Got on Campus and Escaped

Published

on

How the Gunman Who Killed Charlie Kirk Got on Campus and Escaped

Aerial image by Nearmap

Advertisement

The New York Times

Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the killing of the right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, evaded detection for hours before climbing on a roof, where the police say he shot and killed Mr. Kirk during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday. The authorities arrested Mr. Robinson on Thursday night after a 33-hour manhunt.

Advertisement

A New York Times review of videos, a 3-D analysis of the scene and an affidavit released on Friday shed new light on the gunman’s movements in the moments leading up to the shooting and immediately after.

Arrival on campus

Advertisement

Aerial image by Nearmap

The New York Times

Advertisement

Charlie Kirk’s event, which had been scheduled for noon on Wednesday, was free to attend, and there were no visible barriers to access of the Utah Valley University campus that day, according to a Times review of images.

Mr. Robinson arrived on campus in a gray Dodge Challenger at 8:29 a.m. local time, nearly four hours before the shooting, officials said. Security camera footage reviewed by investigators showed the gunman wearing a different set of clothing than what he was seen wearing at the time of the shooting.

Advertisement

It’s unclear what Mr. Robinson did for several hours after arriving on campus. Investigators said they were able to track his movements starting at around 11:50 a.m., when he was captured on video crossing a grassy area into a parking lot next to campus. A video published on Thursday by TMZ showed a person wearing similar clothing to Mr. Robinson’s near where authorities said he was spotted.

Mr. Robinson then walked across the parking lot toward a pedestrian tunnel. Investigators said he paused at the top of the stairs at 11:53 a.m. to pull out his phone, before continuing into the tunnel.

Images released by the F.B.I. show him ascending the stairs of a parking garage adjoining the tunnel.

Advertisement

F.B.I. (left); Bora Erden/The New York Times (right)

Advertisement

Investigators noted that Mr. Robinson was walking with a distinctive gait, with the mobility of his right leg appearing to be restricted. They did not provide information on where Mr. Robinson went immediately after exiting the garage.

Nearing the site of shooting

Advertisement

Aerial image by Nearmap

Advertisement

The New York Times

At 12:02 p.m., according to the authorities, Mr. Robinson was seen walking on the north side of the Losee Center — the building where they say he would later climb to shoot Mr. Kirk. According to the affidavit, he entered the building from the southeast side, then, 13 minutes later, walked up a set of stairs to a walkway abutting the Losee Center.

He climbed over a short wall and crouched behind it, investigators said. He was then seen on video running across the roof — his limp now gone.

Advertisement

The rooftop shooting of Charlie Kirk

Advertisement

Leanne Abraham and Bora Erden/The New York Times

By 12:22 p.m., the gunman was in a prone position on the roof of the Losee Center facing the courtyard, where Mr. Kirk was speaking in front of about 3,000 people.

Advertisement

A 3-D analysis of the shooting site showed no apparent barriers that would have blocked the gunman’s line of sight to Mr. Kirk, who was seated under a tent about 430 feet away.

Advertisement

View from the roof of Losee Center

Advertisement

Junho Lee/The New York Times

Those who attended the event said that security seemed light for an open amphitheater event with a polarizing figure like Mr. Kirk. Only six campus police officers were present, according to Utah Valley University’s chief of police, who added that Mr. Kirk also had a private security team that traveled with him.

For events of this size and scope, security experts recommend a comprehensive plan, working with local and federal law enforcement agencies to put in place security protocols, which could include establishing a perimeter with safety checkpoints and securing problem areas like rooftops.

Advertisement

Mr. Kirk often traveled with a five-person detail, with one guard stationed onstage and others arrayed in front and back, said Greg Shaffer, who had protected Mr. Kirk for seven years. The team worked with the campus police on evacuation and security plans.

A Times analysis of footage from the event showed several people with what appeared to be earpieces facing the crowd minutes before the shooting. These individuals were also seen rushing to Mr. Kirk as soon as he was shot and transporting him to a car.

Advertisement

Image via UVU Review and Logan Topham

Advertisement

It’s unclear how visible the shooter would have been to the security detail on the ground near the tent, according to Times 3-D analysis. The shooter may have been hidden behind a parapet while lying in a prone position on the roof and dressed in dark clothing.

Advertisement

Junho Lee/The New York Times

At 12:23 p.m., the gunman fired a single shot at Mr. Kirk, killing him. As the crowd dispersed, those who appeared to be security personnel quickly surrounded him.

Video also showed two campus police officers rushing in from behind the tent.

Advertisement

Image via UVU Review and Logan Topham

Advertisement

A fast escape

Advertisement

Aerial image by Nearmap

The New York Times

Advertisement

Immediately after the shooting, the gunman made a quick escape.

Video released by officials on Thursday showed him running toward the opposite end of the Losee Center, where he jumped at least 15 feet onto the ground.

He then headed back toward Campus Drive, and according to the authorities, crossed the road into a nearby wooded area. The gun used in the shooting was later recovered here, along with bullet casings engraved with various messages.

Advertisement

The manhunt ended more than 200 miles away, officials said, after a phone call from a family friend of Mr. Robinson, who is being held in the Utah County Jail.

News

How a Beer Hall Keeps Up With a World Cup Crowd

Published

on

The fans see the games, the crowds, the food and the beer. But behind every World Cup watch party is a team working long before kickoff and well after the final whistle. We go behind the scenes at a beer hall in Brooklyn to see what it takes to serve a room full of soccer fans on game day.

Continue Reading

News

With the white nationalist group Patriot Front, what you see is not what you get

Published

on

With the white nationalist group Patriot Front, what you see is not what you get

Members of the group Patriot Front ride the subway as a commuter looks on, in Washington, D.C., on July 4.

Cheney Orr/Reuters


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Cheney Orr/Reuters

The sight of hundreds of masked men roaming the streets of Washington, D.C., on July Fourth weekend, wearing khakis, blue shirts and uniform patches, was chilling to some of the city’s residents.

For many Americans, it was the first they heard about Patriot Front, a white nationalist organization that was born out of the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va. A now-viral Reuters photo prompted reflections on the experience of a lone African American woman who was photographed in a Metro subway car, surrounded by white supremacists.

The planned demonstration of force was timed to bring a fringe group of extremists into public view as the nation marked 250 years of its independence. Indeed, the stunt succeeded in earning the group media coverage across mainstream outlets, amplifying its brand and potential to reach new recruits. On this occasion, the members refrained from engaging in violence and property damage, projecting an image of law-abiding, orderly activism.

Advertisement

But those who are closely familiar with Patriot Front’s history and operations warn: Don’t believe what you see.

“That is not who they are in private,” said Len Kamdang, director of the Criminal Justice Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “Although they were on their best behavior [last] weekend, this is a dangerous group that commits acts of violence all over the country.”

Patriot Front’s history of violence and property damage

Kamdang’s organization sued members of Patriot Front for vandalizing a public mural dedicated to the tennis legend and Black activist Arthur Ashe in Richmond, Va., in 2021. Ashe, who was inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame in 1985, was born in Richmond and his legacy is a continuing source of pride to members of that community.

“A couple of Patriot Front members showed up under cover of night and vandalized the mural,” Kamdang said. “They painted white stencils all over. … They literally tried to whitewash him and they put their symbols of hate all over — their stencils, their slogans. And all the while they were caught on video. And that video leaked using some of the most horrible language that you can imagine.”

In many jurisdictions, law enforcement can seek additional hate crime charges or sentencing enhancements in cases where illegal acts appear to have been motivated by racial bias. But in this case, Kamdang said, Patriot Front members faced no criminal charges and their identities were only revealed when online activists later infiltrated the group and leaked internal records.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Graham Platner makes it official in Maine, submitting paperwork to leave Senate race

Published

on

Graham Platner makes it official in Maine, submitting paperwork to leave Senate race

Now-former Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner speaks at his primary election night event on June 9 in Blue Hill, Maine. Platner officially dropped out of the race July 10 following rape allegations from a former romantic partner that he denies.

CJ Gunther/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

CJ Gunther/Getty Images

Graham Platner, Maine’s Democratic nominee for Senate, is officially out of the race.

The Maine Secretary of State said Platner filed the necessary paperwork to withdraw his candidacy two days after he announced he planned to do so following an accusation of rape by a former romantic partner. Platner denies the allegation.

The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to pick Platner’s replacement.

Advertisement

In his withdrawal notice, Platner said “people are desperate for change” and that’s why they voted “for a new kind of politics” by making him the Democratic nominee. He expressed gratitude for those who supported his campaign and said that he will continue to fight for “the movement we have built together and the future we believe in.”

He ended his notice with a strong statement aligned with the progressive platform.

“F*ck ICE. Free Palestine. Up the Hearts.”

Platner announced his plan to withdraw from the race in an 11-minute video he posted to social media on July 8. He said he had no choice but to suspend his campaign, citing it was no longer viable financially.

Advertisement

“We are going to lose our ability to fundraise. We are going to lose our ability to access voter data. We are going to lose all of the things that any campaign needs on the basic level simply to function,” he said.

Platner added that dropping out was not an admission of guilt. Rather, the decision, he said, is to keep the progressive movement in Maine alive to defeat Republican Sen. Susan Collins in November. Platner blamed the “political establishment” for his downfall and argued the goal was to force him out of the race.

“We built a campaign. We engaged in electoral politics. We motivated people. We banded together. We did it the way that we were told we are supposed to make change and we won. And now they are not going to let us have it. Not if it’s me,” he said.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending