Connect with us

News

House GOP off to wobbly start in bringing up first funding bills

Published

on

House GOP off to wobbly start in bringing up first funding bills

House Republicans are showing small signs of progress as leaders try to wrangle the conference’s various factions together to pass their first batch of federal funding bills this week.

The House cleared a key procedural hurdle Wednesday by voting to begin debate on legislation to fund military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and related agencies for fiscal 2024 — but not without hours of drama as conservatives press for deeper spending cuts.

Hard-line conservative Republicans huddled in Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s (R-Calif.) office for discussions that continued right up until the procedural rule vote. It ultimately passed 217-206, with two Republicans bucking the party and voting “no.”

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the House Freedom Caucus, told reporters while walking into the vote that he would support the rule — despite his previous opposition — citing a supposed agreement to lower overall funding to levels he and other conservatives have been pushing for.

Norman and other conservative have pushed to review all 12 appropriations bills in their final form before voting on individual bills, so they can ensure overall spending levels are low enough.

Advertisement

“I’m voting for the rule, I previously was opposed to it,” Norman said. “They worked the things out with the topline numbers so we’ll vote for the rule.”


Top stories from The Hill


Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.), another member of the conservative group, also said he would vote in favor of the rule “with the commitment” that the party’s funding bills would be set to fiscal 2022 levels.

McCarthy, however, denied that any deal had been reached, telling reporters there was “no new agreement.”

“I’m willing to work on any way we can save money, where we get to 218 … I haven’t talked to Ralph, I mean, there’s no new agreement to anything, we’ve all been working together the whole time through,” he added.

While McCarthy scored a victory on the rule vote, he faces an uphill battle to win passage of the Milcon-VA appropriations bill and another spending measure pertaining to agriculture, rural development, Food and Drug Administration and related agencies programs — both of which are on the schedule for this week.

Advertisement

Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) greets tourists in Statuary Hall of the Capitol after opening up the House for the week on July 25, 2023.

On the latter bill, GOP leadership is staring down a potential problem with moderates over provisions in the bill pertaining to the abortion drug mifepristone. The legislation would nullify a Biden administration rule that allows mifepristone to be sold in retail pharmacies and by mail with prescriptions from a certified health care provider. 

“I have said from the very beginning that I would not support legislation that would ban abortion nationwide,” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a top Democratic target in 2024, said Wednesday morning. “And to me, some of these issues that are being dealt with should be dealt with at the state level, and that’s it. Some states allow it to be mailed, some states don’t. But that should be a decision with the states and the FDA.”

Overall, conservatives have accused leadership of using rescissions, or clawed back funding that was previously allocated, to get to their preferred overall fiscal 2022 levels. 

Conservatives support the proposals to yank back funds from some Democratic priorities that were greenlit in the previous Congress without GOP support. But they have been adamant that the funding should not be repurposed in appropriations bills to allow for spending at higher levels than those set for fiscal 2022. 

Advertisement

“You’re going to hear that we have made rescissions to get down to the number that you heard, the $1.471 [trillion],” Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas) said Tuesday at a press conference held by the House Freedom Caucus, referring to the top line sought by conservatives.

“But then those rescissions are going to be added back later. Watch for it. That should not happen,” he said. “If we go down to the $1.471 [trillion], we stay there.”

Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas)

Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas) addresses reporters during a press conference with members of the House Freedom Caucus July 25, 2023, to discuss the fiscal 2024 appropriations process. (Greg Nash)

GOP appropriators announced earlier this year that they would mark up their funding bills in line with the fiscal 2022 levels, a key ask from some conservatives. But negotiators also proposed more than $100 billion in rescissions, while redirecting the funding toward areas like border security and addressing “threats posed by the People’s Republic of China” and abroad.

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who serves on the appropriations panel, suggested that making such cuts would be tough.

“Then you just drop it on the floor and stomp on it. What else do you do with it?” he told reporters. “You can’t make logical cuts in there.”

Advertisement

Simpson told reporters that he planned to meet with some members of the House Freedom Caucus later Wednesday to discuss some of the funding proposals. “So, that they know what we’ve done, and why we’ve cut certain things — and why we haven’t,” he explained.

Sign up for the latest from The Hill here

Simpson also acknowledged that there’s an understanding that the partisan House-passed bills will likely look much different after negotiations eventually with the Democratic-led Senate.

“It’s not gonna become a law,” he said, adding: “That’s gonna take compromise. That’s the nature of politics.”

The push and pull underscores the difficult balancing act leaders face in getting all 12 funding bills through the House floor with a narrow majority.  

Advertisement

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said on Tuesday that she isn’t anticipating any support from her side of the aisle.

“Why would we?” DeLauro told The Hill, before taking aim at what she called “programmatic cuts” in the GOP-backed bills. “Then they compound that with rescissions. So, they take money from other great programs, and they move it just to cover their tracks.”

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.)

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) speaks to reporters after a closed-door House Democratic Caucus meeting on June 6, 2023.

Some Republicans say they’re watching the process as closely as possible as more chatter emerges around potential amendments, with some making clear they won’t be a rubber stamp for any changes. 

“I’m of the view that when you make an agreement, like we did with the President and the Speaker, that we should live within that spirit,” Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) said Tuesday.

Advertisement

“I’m not an absolute yes or I’m not a ‘stamp yes.’ I’m gonna watch what’s going on, and go from there,” Bacon said. 

Emily Brooks contributed.

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

News

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Published

on

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh, who liberalised the economy and then led the country through a period of strong economic growth, has died.

Singh, 92, was being treated for age-related medical conditions, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi said, as it announced his death on Thursday.

The Oxford university-educated economist set India on a path to becoming a fast-growing economy as finance minister from 1991 to 1996, when he opened up the country to more foreign trade and private investment.

Advertisement

Considered a political lightweight by some in India at that time, Singh was a surprise choice by the Congress party to be prime minister after it won parliamentary elections in 2004.

Alongside a growth rate of almost 7 per cent, Singh’s decade as premier was marred by allegations of widespread corruption against his party’s leaders, although his personal integrity was rarely questioned.

Singh was accused of inaction and opposition parties claimed he was subservient to Congress’s chief at that time, Sonia Gandhi.

Shortly before Congress lost elections to Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party in 2014, Singh said in a speech to parliament that “history would be kinder to me than the contemporary media, or for that matter opposition parties”.

Prime Minister Modi on Thursday described Singh as one of India’s most distinguished leaders, saying he left a “strong imprint on our economic policy over the years” and had “made extensive efforts to improve people’s lives” as premier.

Advertisement

Rahul Gandhi, a senior member of the Congress party, paid tribute to Singh, saying he had lost a “mentor and guide” whose “humility and deep understanding of economics inspired the nation”.

A member of parliament for more than three decades, Singh retired from active politics earlier this year.

The mild-mannered Singh, who belonged to India’s minority Sikh community, was born to a humble family in 1932 in a village in India’s Punjab prior to the country’s independence, which is now part of Pakistan.

Singh rose to become one of India’s most successful economists, serving the government in various capacities, including as head of the country’s central bank in the 1980s.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Border czar Tom Homan says children of illegal immigrants could be put in halfway homes

Published

on

Border czar Tom Homan says children of illegal immigrants could be put in halfway homes

Tom Homan, President-elect Trump’s “border czar,” floated the idea of putting the children of illegal immigrants in halfway homes as part of the incoming administration’s mass deportation plan. 

“As far as U.S. children — children, that’s going to be a difficult situation, because we’re not going to detain your U.S. citizen children, which means, you know, they’re going to be put in a halfway house,” Homan told NewsNation on Thursday, The Hill reported

.CALIFORNIA GOV. NEWSOM’S TEAM CONSIDERING WAYS TO HELP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AHEAD OF SECOND TRUMP ADMIN: REPORT

Incoming Trump ‘border czar’ Tom Homan speaks with Fox News. (Fox News)

“They can — or they can stay at home and wait for the officers to get the travel arrangements and come back to get the family,” he added.

Advertisement

As part of his plan to address the border crisis, Trump has said he plans to deport large numbers of illegal immigrants.

One of the administration’s priorities will be to find the hundreds of thousands of migrant children unaccounted for in the United States.  

MIGRANT CRIME WAVE DURING BIDEN-HARRIS ADMIN UNDER SCRUTINY AMID SERIES OF ASSAULTS, MURDERS: A TIMELINE

“We’re going to ask the American people to take notice: see something, say something and contact us,” Holman told Kellyanne Conway on “Hannity.” “If one phone call out of a thousand saves a child from sex trafficking or forced labor, then that’s one life saved.”

Homan acknowledged it would be a “daunting task,” but “we’re going to give it everything we’ve got.”

Advertisement

During his interview with NewsNation, Homan said giving birth to children born in the U.S. won’t spare illegal immigrants from being deported. 

“Having a U.S. citizen child does not make you immune to our laws, and that’s not the message we want to send to the whole world, that you can have a child and you’re immune to the laws of this country,” Homan said. 

Migrants line up outside a migrant re-ticketing center

Migrants line up outside a migrant re-ticketing center at St. Brigid School on E. 7th St. Friday, Jan. 5, 2024, in Manhattan, New York City. (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

In addition to mass deportations, Trump has threatened to go after birthright citizenship, which automatically grants American citizenship to those born in the country. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Finland probes Russian shadow fleet oil tanker after cable-cutting incident

Published

on

Finland probes Russian shadow fleet oil tanker after cable-cutting incident

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Finnish authorities are investigating an oil tanker that is part of Russia’s shadow fleet over whether it cut an electricity cable between Finland and Estonia.

The Eagle S was stopped by Finnish authorities after the Estlink 2 subsea electricity cable in the Gulf of Finland was disconnected on Wednesday. The tanker, which is registered in the Cook Islands and is carrying oil from Russia to Egypt according to ship tracking data, was seen passing over the cable at the time of the incident.

The aged tanker is part of Russia’s shadow fleet and is the focus of Finland’s investigation, according to people familiar with the probe. The Eagle S is also under investigation over whether it cut three communications cables in the Gulf of Finland, the people added.

Advertisement

The shadow fleet is a group of old and often poorly maintained ships used by Russia to circumvent international sanctions on its oil exports.

The Christmas Day incident appears to be the latest in a series of pipelines and cables being targeted in the Baltic Sea by foreign vessels, sparking fears of deliberate attacks on critical infrastructure between Nato countries.

“We must be able to prevent the risks posed by ships belonging to the Russian shadow fleet,” said Finland’s President Alexander Stubb in a post on X after a meeting with security chiefs on Thursday.

Last year a Chinese container ship, the Newnew Polar Bear, cut a gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia but was not stopped by authorities as it was in international waters.

A Chinese bulk carrier, the Yi Peng 3, last month passed over two data cables between Finland and Germany and Sweden and Lithuania about the times they were severed. It stopped for a month in international waters between Denmark and Sweden.

Advertisement

Chinese investigators finally boarded the ship last week, with Swedish, Danish, German and Finnish representatives present as observers. But Sweden’s foreign minister criticised Beijing for not allowing the lead Swedish investigator to board or to inspect the vessel, which has now left the region.

The Eagle S case is different as the ship voluntarily stopped inside Finnish waters, according to people familiar with the investigation, leaving no question as to jurisdiction. Ownership of the Eagle S is murky but it appears to be the only vessel owned by a Dubai company. Attempts to reach the owner on Thursday were unsuccessful. 

Authorities have not determined the cause of the disconnection of the Estlink 2 cable. Estonia has also said it will not affect its electricity supply. The cable is used to export electricity from Finland, which recently brought its latest nuclear power plant online, to Estonia.

Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the country’s electricity supply would not be affected.

Finnish authorities are keeping an open mind on the latest incident, not least because dozens of poorly maintained vessels in the shadow fleet sail in the Baltic Sea.

Advertisement

Environmental campaigners have issued repeated warnings about the dangers in the region and elsewhere of the dilapidated vessels.

In the Mediterranean, a Russian cargo ship under US sanctions for working with the Russian military sank between Spain and Algeria on Tuesday.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending