Connect with us

News

Historic Nato summit overshadowed by questions about its ageing host

Published

on

Historic Nato summit overshadowed by questions about its ageing host

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Joe Biden’s closest western allies will depart Washington unsure of the US’s commitment to Nato beyond January, after an alliance summit overshadowed by questions about whether the American president can continue his fight for re-election against Donald Trump.

The White House had hoped the 75th anniversary gathering would be a show of alliance unity and resolve against Russia. But the US domestic political turmoil and renewed equivocations from Trump about Washington’s commitments to the alliance’s common security principles contributed to an intense sense of unease.

Much of the talk throughout the week, whether in the cavernous convention centre where leaders gathered, at formal receptions across the US capital or at after-hours gatherings at bars and embassies, centred around how Biden had performed at the summit’s proceedings — and what his future would hold.

Advertisement

On Thursday evening as the summit’s programme was nearing its end, Biden mistakenly referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as Russian President Vladimir Putin. He caught himself quickly, but the gaffe only stoked the tense environment and those in the room gasped.

“Now I want to hand it over to the president of Ukraine who has as much courage as he has determination, ladies and gentleman, President Putin,” Biden said, before quickly adding: “President Putin, he’s going to beat President Putin — President Zelenskyy.” 

Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s prime minister who left the summit on Thursday to meet Trump in Florida, told other leaders at a formal White House dinner on Wednesday that Nato allies who still thought Biden could win “were like people on the Titanic playing violins as the ship went down”, according to people briefed on his private remarks.

Others were quick to dismiss such pessimism. Biden had been “fully present” during the summit, people who witnessed his official interventions said, and did not appear either distracted by the political storm outside the Nato bubble or as fatigued as he did during the debate two weeks ago that scrambled his re-election chances.

“The focus here really has been on the substance,” insisted Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser. “It’s been on what we’re trying to deliver for the defence of the alliance and deliver for Ukraine and deliver in our partnerships with the Indo-Pacific. It hasn’t been about politics.”

Advertisement
At the formal White House dinner on Wednesday night, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, in orange tie, denigrated Biden’s re-election chances © Bloomberg

But his acuity and coherence during the White House dinner on Wednesday night was the main topic of conversation among delegations the next day, underscoring the widespread nervousness among Nato allies as to whether he would be able to continue to campaign — and eventually win.

Dozens of world leaders and their aides collectively held their breath at the opening ceremonies on Tuesday, where Biden surprised outgoing Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg with the US’s highest civilian honour, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

After reading encomiums for Stoltenberg from a teleprompter, Biden then turned to the tall Norwegian to fasten the medal around his neck. One person in the room said attendees could hear a pin drop as the gathered invitees waited to see whether the president could complete the task.

Joe Biden, right, awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg in Washington, July 9 2024
Biden places the Presidential Medal of Freedom around Stoltenberg’s neck © Bloomberg

Other attendees of the opening session on Tuesday said Biden delivered strong remarks once cameras left the room.

“He was robust and energetic in the room today,” said a person present during Wednesday’s closed-door sessions at the summit. “But being able to read prepared remarks from a paper is a low bar for a US president.”

Nato allies have been assiduous in refraining from any public remarks related to Biden’s health for fear of interfering in November’s election or upsetting a critical ally.

Advertisement

But the silence belied the acute nervousness among European allies about the election, given Trump’s stated anti-Nato positions and the importance of US security pledges to European capitals.

During a rally in Florida on Tuesday while Biden was kicking off the summit, Trump criticised the alliance and said he threatened world leaders not meeting their defence commitments that the US may not protect them against future Russian attacks. Article 5 of Nato’s founding North Atlantic Treaty requires allies to consider an attack on any member as an attack on all.

In public, attendees repeatedly batted away questions from reporters about Biden’s mental state or ability to lead.

“I’m not getting distracted,” Finnish foreign minister Elina Valtonen said in an interview with the Financial Times, when asked whether Biden’s challenges were taking away from the historic gathering. “I only worry about things I can influence . . . both Nato and the United States will survive whichever decision.”

Additional reporting by James Politi in Washington

Advertisement

News

Trump claims vandals damaged D.C. Reflecting Pool, and says it will be drained again

Published

on

Trump claims vandals damaged D.C. Reflecting Pool, and says it will be drained again

Visitors watch as National Park Service employees use vacuums to clean the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Saturday, June 20, 2026, in Washington.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Mark Schiefelbein/AP

President Trump has claimed that United States Park Police have made several arrests in connection with what he described as deliberate sabotage of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington D.C., which underwent a multimillion-dollar renovation earlier this year.

“The United States Park Police have arrested multiple individuals for vandalizing our Nations magnificent Reflecting Pool,” Trump wrote on Truth Social late Saturday evening. “These are very serious crimes having to do with the destruction of National Monuments. Years in jail! Work will begin immediately on its repair.”

In a second post on Saturday, Trump described the alleged damage in greater detail, saying more arrests had followed. He provided no evidence for any of his claims about the nature of the damage, and neither the Park Police nor any other law enforcement agency had publicly confirmed any arrests as of the time of publication.

Advertisement

On Friday, Maryland resident and former Olympian David Hearn was arrested and charged with destroying government property. Hearn says he merely reached into the pool to touch one of the already dislodged blue pieces, and denies the charge.

Trump said that the pool would be drained and repaired quickly, and framed the alleged vandalism as an affront to American history. “We met with contractors today, will probably be forced to release and drain much of the water in order to do the necessary repairs,” he wrote. “What these terrible Vandals have done is a true affront to both Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, and should be dealt with accordingly”.

A peeling section of blue coating is seen in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Saturday, June 20, 2026, in Washington.

A peeling section of blue coating is seen in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Saturday, June 20, 2026, in Washington.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Mark Schiefelbein/AP

‘A 250-foot long gash’

Trump described what he said was physical destruction to the pool’s newly renovated lining. “They took some form of knife or blade, and put a 250 foot long gash into the beautiful facade of what took so much work, competence, and money to build and complete,” he wrote Saturday. “They also poured corrosive and destructive chemicals into the Pool.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Newsom declares State of Emergency for Boyle Heights warehouse fire

Published

on

Newsom declares State of Emergency for Boyle Heights warehouse fire

Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency Saturday night as plumes of black smoke continue to rise from the Lineage Logistics warehouse fire, still burning on the 1400 block of South Los Palos Street in Boyle Heights.

The fire started inside a freezer area at the cold storage facility Wednesday afternoon and was initially extinguished before reigniting on Thursday, according to officials.

Newsom’s declaration allows the state to use additional funding for firefighting efforts, public health services and disaster recovery as Los Angeles continues to deal with the emergency.

“California is mobilizing to support Los Angeles as firefighters and emergency personnel continue their work to contain this fire and protect surrounding communities,” Newsom said in a statement Saturday. “While local officials continue to lead this response, the State of California is prepared to help safeguard public health, support emergency operations, and assist impacted residents. We are coordinating closely with our local partners, deploying specialized expertise, and pre-positioning critical supplies so communities have the support they need both now and throughout recovery.”

Although local officials have not asked for additional state resources at this time, Newsom preemptively made the declaration to provide the region with resources as soon as they are needed, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Director Caroline Thomas Jacobs said.

Advertisement

“Cal OES is working side-by-side with the City and County of Los Angeles and our regional partners to ensure they have the resources, information, and support necessary to respond to this incident,” Jacobs said. “The State of Emergency allows us to further streamline coordination efforts and leverage additional state capabilities as needed. Our focus remains on protecting communities and supporting locally led response operations.”

  • Smoke from Boyle Heights warehouse fire continues to blow over downtown Los Angeles 
  • Boyle Heights warehouse fire smoke
  • Crews work a warehouse fire in the Boyle Heights section of Los Angeles on Wednesday, June 17, 2026. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Resources available to Los Angeles following the declaration include:

  • 5.5 million N95 respirator masks available for distribution to impacted communities.
  • Commercial-grade air purifiers available for deployment to evacuation centers, community facilities, and other public spaces.
  • Bottled water and other emergency supplies available through the state’s logistics network.
  • Enhanced air quality monitoring and technical support resources.

Cal OES Fire and Rescue Branch leaders with specialized technical expertise are also available to consult L.A. fire officials on how to deal with the warehouse fire, if necessary. The state provided similar expertise to officials during the chemical tank failure in Garden Grove.

Air quality remains unhealthy in parts of Los Angeles due to the large amount of smoke produced by the fire.

“The warehouse fire has produced significant smoke and particulate matter that may affect air quality in surrounding neighborhoods,” the governor’s office stated. “To support public health monitoring efforts, the California Air Resources Board is coordinating with local and regional partners to ensure access to air quality information and technical expertise. State agencies continue to monitor conditions and stand ready to deploy additional monitoring resources if requested.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

DOJ memo stokes fear among disability advocates of a return to institutionalization

Published

on

DOJ memo stokes fear among disability advocates of a return to institutionalization

The exterior of the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice building is pictured on May 4, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Patrick Semansky/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Patrick Semansky/AP

The Justice Department released a memo this week that quietly calls into question decades of civil rights protections for Americans with disabilities and stirred fear and anger among advocates and families.

The memo, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel, argues that states do not have to provide in-home or community-based care to people with disabilities who need support. These services allow many disabled Americans to continue to live, learn and work at home or in their own communities, among family and friends.

“It is now the position of the United States government that people with disabilities don’t have a right to be part of their communities,” says Alison Barkoff, a health law and policy professor at George Washington University who led disability law and policy efforts during both the Obama and Biden administrations. “I can’t overstate how significant this change in position is.

Advertisement

Without the federal government requiring that states provide these services – to help disabled people integrate into their communities – advocates and legal experts warn that cash-strapped states could cut them and return to what was once common practice: de facto segregation of Americans with disabilities in nursing homes and large institutions.

Pushback from the disability community was swift.

“As America prepares to celebrate 250 years of independence, [this memo] threatens to drag our nation back to a dark and shameful era of ignorance and cruelty,” said the American Association of People with Disabilities. “This interpretation will open the doors for states to revert to warehousing people with disabilities out of sight and out of mind in institutions.”

“This opinion is a direct threat to decades of progress toward community living for people with disabilities,” said Shira Wakschlag of The Arc of the United States, a nonprofit disability advocacy group. “People with disabilities shouldn’t be forced into institutions because a state refuses to provide services in the community.”

The Justice Department did not respond to an NPR request that it explain its position as well as why it is changing course after decades of legal and bipartisan support for community services.

Advertisement

What the law says

This new memo calls into question what legal experts say has been settled law for decades.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending