Connect with us

News

Countries agree historic oceans treaty to protect the high seas | CNN

Published

on

Countries agree historic oceans treaty to protect the high seas | CNN



CNN
 — 

Practically 200 nations have agreed to a legally-binding treaty to guard marine life in worldwide waters, which cowl round half of the planet’s floor, however have lengthy been primarily lawless.

The settlement was signed on Saturday night after two weeks of negotiations on the United Nations headquarters in New York resulted in a mammoth ultimate session of greater than 36 hours – but it surely has been 20 years within the making.

The treaty offers authorized instruments to determine and handle marine protected areas – sanctuaries to guard the ocean’s biodiversity. It additionally covers environmental assessments to guage the potential injury of economic actions, corresponding to deep sea mining, earlier than they begin and a pledge by signatories to share ocean assets.

“This can be a historic day for conservation and an indication that in a divided world, defending nature and other people can overcome geopolitics,” Laura Meller, Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace Nordic, mentioned in a press release.

Advertisement

The excessive seas are typically referred to as the world’s final true wilderness. This enormous stretch of water – all the things that lies 200 nautical miles past nations’ territorial waters – makes up greater than 60% of the world’s oceans by floor space.

These waters present the habitat for a wealth of distinctive species and ecosystems, help world fisheries on which billions of individuals rely and are an important buffer towards the local weather disaster – the ocean has absorbed greater than 90% of the world’s extra warmth during the last a long time.

But they’re additionally extremely susceptible. Local weather change is inflicting ocean temperatures to rise and more and more acidic waters threaten marine life.

Human exercise on the ocean is including strain, together with industrial fishing, delivery, the nascent deep sea mining business and the race to harness the ocean’s “genetic assets” – materials from marine crops and animals to be used in industries corresponding to prescription drugs.

Advertisement

“At the moment, there are not any complete laws for the protections of marine life on this space,” Liz Karan, oceans mission director on the Pew Charitable Trusts, informed CNN.

Guidelines that do exist are piecemeal, fragmented and weakly enforced, which means actions on the excessive seas are sometimes unregulated and insufficiently monitored leaving them susceptible to exploitation.

Just one.2% of worldwide waters are protected, and solely 0.8% are recognized as “extremely protected.”

“There are enormous unmanaged gaps of habitat between the puzzle items. It’s really that dangerous on the market,” Douglas McCauley, professor of ocean science on the College of California Santa Barbara, informed CNN.

The brand new oceans treaty goals to fill these gaps by offering the authorized pressure to create and handle marine protected areas in worldwide waters. Specialists say this shall be important for assembly world biodiversity pledges nations made at COP15, the UN Biodiversity Convention in Montreal in December.

Advertisement

A profitable treaty “will assist us obtain the objective of conserving or defending a minimum of 30% of the worldwide ocean by 2030,” Monica Medina, the US Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and Worldwide Environmental and Scientific Affairs, informed CNN by electronic mail.

The high seas are home to unique species and ecosystems.

The settlement of the oceans treaty marks a course of that began round 20 years in the past.

Again in 2004, the UN arrange an advert hoc group to debate ocean safety. It wasn’t till 2015, that the group adopted a decision to develop a binding oceans treaty and, after years of preparatory talks, negotiations started in earnest in 2018.

“It has been a protracted arc from the primary time the query was raised, to the place we are actually,” Karan mentioned.

Many had hoped that 2022 can be the breakthrough, however talks in August – the second spherical that yr – resulted in failure.

Advertisement

These newest negotiations had been billed as a ultimate probability for the world’s oceans.

There have been factors through the negotiations the place some anxious that settlement would by no means occur, as conflicts threatened to derail talks. “It’s been a little bit of a curler coaster journey,” mentioned Karan.

Main sticking factors included nailing down the processes for creating marine protected areas and making certain prices and advantages had been shared equitably – particularly as many creating nations might not have the know-how or capability to do their very own scientific exploration of the excessive seas.

However after a grueling ultimate session, the talks ended late Saturday evening with an settlement.

“We reward nations for in search of compromises, placing apart variations and delivering a treaty that may allow us to shield the oceans, construct our resilience to local weather change and safeguard the lives and livelihoods of billions of individuals,” Greenpeace’s Meller mentioned.

Advertisement

Nations now should formally undertake and ratify the treaty. Then the work will begin to implement the marine sanctuaries and to try to satisfy the goal of defending 30% of worldwide oceans by 2030. “We’ve half a decade left, and we are able to’t be complacent,” Meller mentioned.

“If we wish the excessive seas to be wholesome for the subsequent century now we have to modernize this method – now. And that is our one, and probably solely, probability to do this. And time is pressing. Local weather change is about to rain down hellfire on our ocean,” McCauley mentioned.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Top UN court orders Israel to halt Rafah offensive

Published

on

Top UN court orders Israel to halt Rafah offensive

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The UN’s top court has ordered Israel to “immediately halt” its military offensive in Rafah, the southern Gazan city that had become a refuge for more than 1mn civilians since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted last year.

Despite intense international pressure to refrain, Israeli forces entered the city earlier this month, with officials insisting the assault was necessary to defeat Hamas, which triggered the war with its October 7 attack on Israel.

However, in an order issued in response to an urgent request brought by South Africa, the International Court of Justice on Friday said conditions in Rafah were “disastrous”, and instructed Israel to stop.

Advertisement

The court also ordered Israel to reopen the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt to allow “unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance”, and to allow investigators into the enclave.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The ICJ has no way of enforcing its orders — Russia continues to flout the court’s 2022 order to suspend its military operations in Ukraine. But Friday’s order adds to intense international pressure on Israel over its war in Gaza, which has fuelled a humanitarian catastrophe in the enclave.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to discuss the order with senior officials on Friday, his office said.

Far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said Israel would not agree to stop the war in Gaza. “Those who demand that the State of Israel stop the war, demand that it decree itself to cease to exist,” he wrote on the social media platform X. “If we lay down our weapons, the enemy will reach the beds of our children and women throughout the country.”

Advertisement

But internationally, the pressure to end the war is growing.

The EU’s chief diplomat said the ICJ’s ruling on Friday would force the bloc to choose between supporting “rule of law [or] . . . Israel”.

“We will have to choose between our support for international institutions and the rule of law, and our support for Israel,” Josep Borrell told a conference in Florence, adding that either choice was “going to be quite difficult”.

“We’ve been clear and consistent on our position on Rafah,” a spokesperson for the White House’s National Security Council told the Financial Times, when asked about the US response to the ICJ ruling. The US has opposed Israel’s full invasion of Rafah without a plan to protect civilians.

A wounded Palestinian boy stands next to a damaged home in Rafah
A wounded Palestinian boy stands next to a damaged home in Rafah following Israeli strikes © AFP/Getty Images

On Monday the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court — which deals with crimes by individuals rather than states — sought arrest warrants for Netanyahu and defence minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders, saying he had “reasonable grounds to believe” they were responsible for alleged war crimes.

On Wednesday, Spain, Norway and Ireland pledged to recognise a Palestinian state next week. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that while Israel had a right to defend itself, its assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 35,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, was putting a two-state solution “in danger”.

Advertisement

Netanyahu dismissed the ICC prosecutor’s move as “a distortion of reality” and insisted Israel would continue its offensive in Gaza — which it launched in response to Hamas’s October 7 attack, during which militants killed 1,200 people, and took another 250 hostage, according to Israeli officials — regardless of international criticism.

Gallant on Thursday said Israel was stepping up its assault on Rafah, and that 1mn civilians had left the city since Israel began its operation there on May 7.

Heavy Israeli air strikes were reported in Rafah in the wake of the ICJ ruling on Friday, according to Palestinian eyewitnesses and social media; Israeli analysts speculated the target was the Hamas brigade commander for the area.

South Africa’s request is part of a case it brought last year alleging Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Israel has vehemently denied the charges, and the ICJ is unlikely to issue a final decision in the case for years.

But the court has twice issued interim orders in the case. In January, it told Israel to comply with international law on genocide, and in March, to ensure more food and humanitarian assistance reached Palestinians in Gaza, warning that famine was “setting in”.

Advertisement

Israel does not recognise the ICC. But it is a member of the ICJ, and as such is meant to implement its orders.

Continue Reading

News

Here are three possible outcomes in the Trump hush money trial : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Here are three possible outcomes in the Trump hush money trial : Consider This from NPR

New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan listens as Emil Bove, a member of former President Donald Trump’s legal team, argues for his client during Sandoval’s hearing.

Jane Rosenberg/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jane Rosenberg/AP


New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan listens as Emil Bove, a member of former President Donald Trump’s legal team, argues for his client during Sandoval’s hearing.

Jane Rosenberg/AP

We bring you a special episode of Trump’s Trials.

Host Scott Detrow speaks with former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman.

Advertisement

Although Litman is convinced the jury will convict Trump in the New York hush money trial, he also gives a rundown of other possible outcomes in the case.

For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

This episode was produced by Tyler Bartlam and edited by Adam Raney and Krishnadev Calamur. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Read the I.C.J. Ruling on Israel’s Rafah Offensive

Published

on

Read the I.C.J. Ruling on Israel’s Rafah Offensive

– 15 -
(a) By thirteen votes to two,
Immediately halt its military offensive, and any other action in the Rafah Governorate, which
may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical
destruction in whole or in part;
IN FAVOUR: President Salam; Judges Abraham, Yusuf, Xue, Bhandari, Iwasawa, Nolte,
Charlesworth, Brant, Gómez Robledo, Cleveland, Aurescu, Tladi;
AGAINST: Vice-President Sebutinde; Judge ad hoc Barak;
(b) By thirteen votes to two,
Maintain open the Rafah crossing for unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic
services and humanitarian assistance;
IN FAVOUR: President Salam; Judges Abraham, Yusuf, Xue, Bhandari, Iwasawa, Nolte,
Charlesworth, Brant, Gómez Robledo, Cleveland, Aurescu, Tladi;
AGAINST: Vice-President Sebutinde; Judge ad hoc Barak;
(c) By thirteen votes to two,
Take effective measures to ensure the unimpeded access to the Gaza Strip of any commission
of inquiry, fact-finding mission or other investigative body mandated by competent organs of the
United Nations to investigate allegations of genocide;
IN FAVOUR: President Salam; Judges Abraham, Yusuf, Xue, Bhandari, Iwasawa, Nolte,
Charlesworth, Brant, Gómez Robledo, Cleveland, Aurescu, Tladi;
AGAINST: Vice-President Sebutinde; Judge ad hoc Barak;
(3) By thirteen votes to two,
Decides that the State of Israel shall submit a report to the Court on all measures taken to give
effect to this Order, within one month as from the date of this Order.
IN FAVOUR: President Salam; Judges Abraham, Yusuf, Xue, Bhandari, Iwasawa, Nolte,
Charlesworth, Brant, Gómez Robledo, Cleveland, Aurescu, Tladi;
AGAINST: Vice-President Sebutinde; Judge ad hoc Barak.

Continue Reading

Trending