Connect with us

News

China and Russia have deep defense sector ties. Putin’s war has not changed that, data show | CNN

Published

on

China and Russia have deep defense sector ties. Putin’s war has not changed that, data show | CNN


Hong Kong
CNN
 — 

Chinese language state-owned protection companies have maintained commerce relationships with sanctioned Russian protection corporations in the course of the previous 12 months, whilst lots of the world’s main economies minimize ties with Moscow and the businesses driving its continued assault on Ukraine.

Customs information reviewed by CNN present key corporations inside each nations’ huge military-industrial complexes have continued their years-long relationships, regardless of the horror Moscow has unleashed in Europe.

Data present that all through 2022, by means of at the very least mid-November, Beijing-based protection contractor Poly Applied sciences despatched at the very least a dozen shipments – together with helicopter components and air-to-ground radio tools – to a state-backed Russian agency sanctioned by the US for its connection to chief Vladimir Putin’s warfare in Ukraine.

Poly Know-how’s long-term commerce accomplice – Ulan Ude Aviation Plant, a purveyor of military-grade helicopters – additionally continued to ship components and several other helicopters to the Beijing-based firm final 12 months, commerce knowledge present.

Advertisement

Many of the helicopter components included within the shipments to Russia have been labeled to be used within the multipurpose Mi-171E helicopter, designed for transport and search and rescue. In accordance with the Stockholm Worldwide Peace Analysis Institute (SIPRI), China started importing this mannequin of chopper from Russia greater than 10 years in the past.

Three shipments from Poly Applied sciences have been labeled as together with merchandise for the operation or service of the Russian-made Mi-171SH, a navy transport helicopter that may be outfitted with weapons and has been utilized in Moscow’s operations in Ukraine.

There isn’t any proof that any of the products exchanged are straight feeding Russia’s warfare.

The customs information got here from two knowledge units. The primary was offered by commerce knowledge agency Import Genius, whose info is collated by secondary sources from official Russian customs and cargo information.

Washington-based suppose tank C4ADS, which collates official customs information aggregated from a number of third-party suppliers, offered the second set.

Advertisement

CNN has not independently verified the information, which can present a partial however not full image of the commerce.

Army and safety consultants say the components despatched from the Chinese language agency to Russia are pretty fundamental tools for Russian-designed plane that might be a part of current contracts and normal enterprise relationships between the businesses.

However final 12 months’s commerce underscores enduring ties between key gamers within the state-backed protection sectors on each side – relationships that had strengthened over the previous decade as Putin and Chinese language chief Xi Jinping developed their strategic alignment.

Specialists say such well-established networks might be leveraged if Beijing have been to supply direct, deadly assist for the Kremlin’s warfare effort.

Western leaders in current weeks have warned China is contemplating that step. Beijing has denied this, derided the warning as a “smear,” and repeatedly defended its “regular” commerce with Russia and rejected what it calls “unilateral” sanctions in opposition to Moscow.

Advertisement

Beijing and Moscow’s navy ties have advanced dramatically for the reason that top of the Chilly Warfare – a interval marked by mutual hostility and ideological divergence.

Whereas some frictions stay, the 2 authoritarian neighbors have grown shut, particularly underneath Putin and Xi, who collectively declared a “no limits” partnership simply weeks earlier than Russia invaded Ukraine.

That features a rising safety relationship.

Following the autumn of the Soviet Union, a strong, however decidedly one-way weapons commerce flourished wherein Russia marketed its superior weaponry to China.

Advertisement

Extra just lately, the speedy modernization of China’s navy has begun to shift that dynamic.

In 2021, Putin boasted that the 2 nations have been “growing collectively sure high-tech forms of weapons,” in keeping with Russian state media, and lauded their joint navy workout routines – which have additionally expanded in scope and geographic vary.

On the frontlines of that relationship are the state-linked navy contractors. These are being built-in into an “an more and more refined provide chain,” in keeping with Alex Gabuev, a senior fellow on the worldwide suppose tank Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace.

Then got here the Ukraine warfare.

Thus far, China has stepped fastidiously round sweeping Western penalties focusing on these supporting Russia – though 10 Chinese language corporations have been hit by US restrictions associated to the warfare.

Advertisement

However a significant query for Western officers is whether or not current protection relationships might be utilized by China to produce deadly assist for the Kremlin’s warfare effort, which is extensively believed to be operating low on ammunition and arms.

Final month CNN reported that US intelligence officers consider the Chinese language authorities is contemplating sending drones and ammunition to Russia.

On March 7, China’s new overseas minister Qin Gang stated that China “has not offered weapons to both facet” of Russia’s warfare, and denounced US considerations within the matter as hypocritical.

Observers of Chinese language overseas affairs say its leaders are properly conscious of the reputational and financial harm whether it is perceived to be backing Moscow militarily – and plenty of are skeptical Beijing would take such a step to help a nuclear-armed Russia right now.

“Russia is shedding this warfare normally phrases … nevertheless it’s not a loss that may result in Putin’s demise and democratization of Russia, so I don’t see causes for China now to do greater than they’re doing,” stated Gabuev.

Advertisement
A Russian military frigate in the harbor of Cape Town last month ahead of 10-day joint maritime drills with China and South Africa.

The products traded between Chinese language and Russian protection companies within the knowledge reviewed by CNN should not the munitions that Russia’s navy is assumed to wish most one 12 months into its Ukraine onslaught. China can also be not alone in persevering with procurement from a Russia at warfare.

When requested by CNN in regards to the shipments from China to sanctioned Russian companies, the Chinese language Ministry of International Affairs stated it was “unaware of the state of affairs,” and that China “stand(s) firmly on the facet of dialogue and peace.”

The Kremlin didn’t reply to a request for remark from CNN.

However on February 27 its spokesman stated Russia noticed “no have to remark additional” on claims that Russia requested China for navy tools which he stated had already been refuted by Beijing.

Poly Applied sciences describes itself on its web site because the core subsidiary of China Poly Group, a number one state-owned enterprise, “completely licensed by the Chinese language central authorities for import/export of protection programs.”

Advertisement

Poly Applied sciences was sanctioned by the US in 2013 underneath guidelines focusing on companies supplying Iran, North Korea and Syria, and once more in January of final 12 months for alleged missile proliferation. China Poly Group didn’t reply to a request for remark.

The corporate’s commerce accomplice Ulan Ude Aviation Plant, a subsidiary of high state-owned producer Russian Helicopters, which makes the extensively used Mi-8/17 sequence helicopters lengthy integral to Russian navy transport, additionally didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Two different key corporations seem within the customs knowledge – China’s AVIC Worldwide Holding, managed by state-owned Aviation Trade Company of China, and Russia’s United Engine Company (UEC), which is a part of state-owned protection large Rostec.

Their commerce concerned Russian-designed jet engine components, lots of which have been labeled for an engine utilized in Chinese language fighter jets.

Shipments from AVIC Worldwide to UEC made by means of July final 12 months have been listed as contractual obligations underneath guarantee, and export information present UEC transport components for a similar engine mannequin to China together with as just lately as December, in keeping with knowledge from Import Genius.

Advertisement

AVIC Worldwide and UEC didn’t reply to requests for remark. The Wall Road Journal beforehand referenced shipments produced from Poly Applied sciences and AVIC Worldwide Holding to Russian companions.

Putin Xi Jinping vpx

Report obtained by CNN exhibits Russia is getting navy assist from China

Washington’s stance is that any firm supplying or working throughout the Russian protection sector dangers being sanctioned.

Advertisement

However China will not be too involved in regards to the transactions proven within the commerce knowledge reviewed by CNN, in keeping with Yun Solar, director of the China Program on the Stimson Heart suppose tank in Washington.

“Such a export needs to be permitted by the federal government. However given the character of those components and the truth that (Poly Applied sciences) has been underneath US sanction since 2013, the federal government might not see the necessity to not approve,” she stated.

Some consultants have raised questions on whether or not aviation components coming from China to Russia – lots of that are labeled as “used” or originating in Russia – might nonetheless be spare components wanted by a Russia at warfare.

Solar stated it was no shock Russia would proceed fulfilling contracts for Chinese language-purchased tools, however warned items going the other way might be “reimported by Russia to produce their warfare attrition.”

It’s additionally unlikely that the total image will ever be revealed.

Advertisement

“Neither China nor Russia needs Western intelligence to concentrate on the depth and breadth of their strategic alignment,” stated Alexander Korolev, a senior lecturer in Politics and Worldwide Relations on the College of New South Wales in Australia.

If China have been to produce deadly assist, Korolev added, “all the pieces can be achieved to cowl this up.”

“And one option to cowl it up is to make it look as if it’s simply part of common, long-term navy technical cooperation – relatively than a response to the warfare.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

As California Burns, ‘Octavia Tried to Tell Us’ Has New Meaning

Published

on

As California Burns, ‘Octavia Tried to Tell Us’ Has New Meaning

This article is also a weekly newsletter. Sign up for Race/Related here.

In the wake of the devastating fires in Los Angeles, many people are referencing the work of the science fiction writer Octavia Butler. Butler, who grew up in Pasadena, was the daughter of a housekeeper and a father who was a shoeshiner. She went on to become the first science fiction writer to win a MacArthur “genius” award. Her book “Parable of the Sower,” published in 1993, paints a picture of a California ravished by the effects of climate change, income inequality, political divisiveness and centers on a young woman struggling to find faith and the community to build a new future.

The phrase “Octavia tried to tell us,” which began to gain momentum in 2020 during the pandemic, has once again resurfaced, in part because Butler studied science and history so deeply. The accuracy with which she read the shifts in America can, at times, seem eerily prophetic. One entry in “Parable of the Sower,” which is structured as a journal, dated on “February 1, 2025” begins, “We had a fire today.” It goes on to describe how the fear of fires plague Robledo, a fictional town that feels much like Altadena, a haven for the Black middle class for more than 50 years, where Butler lived in the late ’90s.

In 2000, Butler wrote a piece for Essence magazine titled, “A Few Rules for Predicting the Future.” She wrote: “Of course, writing novels about the future doesn’t give me any special ability to foretell the future. But it does encourage me to use our past and present behaviors as guides to the kind of world we seem to be creating. The past, for example, is filled with repeating cycles of strength and weakness, wisdom and stupidity, empire and ashes.”

In one of the last interviews before she died in 2006, Butler spoke to Democracy Now!, an independent news organization, about how she’d been worried about how climate could devastate California . “I wrote the two ‘Parable’ books back in the ’90s,” she said, referring to “Parable of the Sower” and her 1998 follow-up, “Parable of the Talents.” These books, she explained, were about what happens when “we don’t trouble to correct some of the problems we are brewing for ourselves right now. Global warming is one of those problems. And I was aware of it back in the ’80s.” She continued: “A lot of people were seeing it as politics, as something very iffy, as something they could ignore because nothing was going to come of it tomorrow.

Advertisement

Lynell George, a writer who lives in Los Angeles and the author of a book on Butler and her creative journey, has spent many years studying Butler’s archives at the Huntington Library in Pasadena. In 2022, we asked George to write about how Butler predicted the world we live in. As so many people are turning to her work during this time of tremendous loss, we wanted to share that story with our readers again.

In her piece, “The Visions of Octavia Butler,” George wrote: “In ‘Parable of the Sower,’ Earth is tipping toward climate disaster: A catastrophic drought has led to social upheaval and violent class wars. Butler, a fervent environmentalist, researched the novel by clipping articles, taking notes and monitoring rain and growth in her Southern California neighborhood. She couldn’t help but wonder, she later wrote, what ‘environmental and economic stupidities’ might lead to. She often called herself a pessimist, but threaded into the bleak landscape of her ‘Parable’ novels are strands of glimmering hope — ribbons of blue at the edges of the fictional fiery skies.”

Invite your friends.
Invite someone to subscribe to the Race/Related newsletter. Or email your thoughts and suggestions to racerelated@nytimes.com.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump’s inauguration to be moved indoors because of ‘bitterly cold’ weather

Published

on

Donald Trump’s inauguration to be moved indoors because of ‘bitterly cold’ weather

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Parts of Donald Trump’s inauguration will be moved inside the US Capitol because of freezing weather that is forecast for Washington on Monday.

It will be the first time since 1985 — when a severe cold snap hit Ronald Reagan’s second inauguration — that a swearing-in ceremony has been moved indoors.

The president-elect announced the revised plans in a Truth Social post on Friday, saying he had ordered the inauguration address, as well as prayers and speeches, to be delivered inside the Capitol Rotunda as Reagan had done four decades ago.

Advertisement

“There is an Arctic blast sweeping the Country. I don’t want to see people hurt, or injured, in any way,” Trump wrote.

“It is dangerous conditions for the tens of thousands of Law Enforcement, First Responders, Police K9s and even horses, and hundreds of thousands of supporters that will be outside for many hours on the 20th.”

The National Weather Service said an “enhanced winter storm threat” was in place for Sunday afternoon and evening, and predicted about 2-4 inches of snow would fall, with a “reasonable worst case” scenario of 4-8 inches.

“Bitterly cold wind chills” were expected Monday to Wednesday, the NWS said on Friday, as it forecast temperatures to be “well below freezing” during this period.

The agency is forecasting a high of about -5C at 11am local time on Monday, when the swearing-in ceremony is due to begin, with a wind-chill of -13C that it warned could result in hypothermia or frostbite without appropriate attire.

Advertisement

Trump said the Capital One Arena — with a capacity of 20,000 — will be opened on Monday for a live viewing of the ceremony, and that he would visit the venue, located about 2km from the Capitol, following his swearing-in.

Other events, including a victory rally at the arena are scheduled for Sunday and inaugural balls set for Monday night, will continue as scheduled, the president-elect said.

Trump encouraged supporters who choose to come to “dress warmly!”

Continue Reading

News

CNN liable for defamation over story on Afghanistan 'black market' rescues

Published

on

CNN liable for defamation over story on Afghanistan 'black market' rescues

Security contractor Zachary Young alleges CNN defamed him in a November 2021 report, shown above, about Afghans’ fears of exorbitant charges from people offering to get them out of the country after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan. CNN says it will defend the report in a trial set to start in a Florida court Monday.

CNN via Internet Archive/Screenshot by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

CNN via Internet Archive/Screenshot by NPR

A Florida jury has found that CNN defamed a security consultant in presenting a story that suggested he was charging “exorbitant prices” to evacuate people desperate to get out of Afghanistan after the U.S. withdrawal in August 2021.

Jurors found the network should pay $5 million to U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young for lost finances and suffering, and said he was eligible for more in punitive damages. The proceedings turned immediately to expert testimony as both sides presented cases over what punitive damages would be appropriate.

Young sat impassively as the jury’s verdict was read aloud in court.

Advertisement

The November 2021 story focused on concerns from Afghans that they faced extraordinary costs in a “black market” to secure safe passage for relatives and friends, especially those who had worked with U.S. agencies and organizations and therefore were fearful of the takeover by the Taliban.

Young was the only security contractor named in the piece, however, and a caption warned he offered “no guarantee of safety or success.”

He was not directly accused of operating in a black market in the television or written versions of the story, but the words did appear in the caption in the TV version of the story.

On the witness stand during the trial, CNN editors defended use of the term “black market,” saying it meant operating in unregulated circumstances, such as the chaos of Kabul at that time; Young’s lawyers noted that dictionaries consistently ascribe illegality to the term.

The jury found CNN liable for defamation per se, meaning it had harmed Young by the very words it chose, and for defamation by implication, that is, it had harmed his reputation by the implications that a reasonable reader or viewer might take from the story.

Advertisement

Young’s lead attorney, Devin Freedman, had argued that CNN willfully damaged Young, costing him millions of dollars and causing irreparable personal harm, and that the network should be punished for it. Toward the very end of his closing arguments, Freedman told the jury they had the rare opportunity to hold the press accountable.

“Media executives around the country are sitting by the phones to see what you do,” Freedman told jurors. “CNN’s executives are waiting in their boardrooms in Georgia to see what you decide. Make the phones ring in Georgia. Send a message.”

After the initial verdict, Judge William S. Henry instructed jurors that they could only find punitive damages against CNN for its actions in the case at hand, not over any other story or issue.

Even so, over the course of the lawsuit, lawyers for Zachary Young acquired internal correspondence showing several editors within CNN held reservations about the solidity of the reporting behind the story.

For example, Fuzz Hogan, a senior director of standards for CNN, acknowledged in testimony under oath that he had approved a “three-quarters true” story. Another editor, Tom Lumley, had said in an internal message that the piece was “80 percent emotion.” On the stand, Lumley said that it still wasn’t his favorite story, but on the grounds of the craft of story-telling involved.

Advertisement

During the trial, CNN’s lawyers had contended the story’s reporting holds up as fair and true under scrutiny. CNN correspondent Alexander Marquardt had presented viewers with a LinkedIn message from Young saying it would cost $75,000 to evacuate a vehicle with five or six passengers from Kabul to Pakistan. Young said he worked with corporate sponsors, including Bloomberg and Audible, rather than individuals.

On the stand, Young acknowledged that he took a 65% profit margin from the fees he charged, and took inquiries from individuals. He also curtly and coarsely brushed off people inquiring about help who could not afford his fees.

Other groups involving U.S. veterans and non-governmental organizations sought to get Afghans out without such profits, as a former major general testifying on Young’s behalf acknowledged. The retired major general, James V. Young Jr. (not related to Zach Young), said he charged donors for the cost.

CNN’s legal team, led by David Axelrod (the lawyer is not related to the Obama White House official and CNN analyst of the same name) had told jurors they should rely on their own “common sense.”

Axelrod had been able to press Young to concede that some of his claims to potential clients were not borne out by facts; Young had not in fact evacuated people from Afghanistan by air. Nor was he in constant contact with journalists, as claimed.

Advertisement

In his closing argument, Freedman presented Young as a swashbuckling former CIA operative to explain his curtness in messages to desperate people trying to help people.

On the witness stand, however, Young emerged as emotionally vulnerable himself, weeping during testimony. He recounted that, after the story ran, he became despondent, depressed, alienated from intimacy with his wife, cut off from friends and family members. HIs attorney cited “deep and lasting wounds” from the piece.

The piece was presented initially on CNN’s The Lead With Jake Tapper, and a fuller written version subsequently posted on CNN’s website. A few months later, shortly after Young’s legal team threatened legal actions, a substitute anchor apologized to Young on the air for use of the term “black market” in the story, and said it did not apply to him.

Freedman, Young’s attorney, called the apology insufficient.

“This is what makes this case historic: punitive damages,” Freedman told jurors. “A media company has to face an American jury with the power to punish. That is not a frequent event. Do you believe that CNN should be punished? Do you believe they should send a message to other media companies to avoid this misconduct?”

Advertisement

This story will be updated after the jury decides on what, if any, punitive damages to award Young.

Continue Reading

Trending