Connect with us

News

China and Russia have deep defense sector ties. Putin’s war has not changed that, data show | CNN

Published

on

China and Russia have deep defense sector ties. Putin’s war has not changed that, data show | CNN


Hong Kong
CNN
 — 

Chinese language state-owned protection companies have maintained commerce relationships with sanctioned Russian protection corporations in the course of the previous 12 months, whilst lots of the world’s main economies minimize ties with Moscow and the businesses driving its continued assault on Ukraine.

Customs information reviewed by CNN present key corporations inside each nations’ huge military-industrial complexes have continued their years-long relationships, regardless of the horror Moscow has unleashed in Europe.

Data present that all through 2022, by means of at the very least mid-November, Beijing-based protection contractor Poly Applied sciences despatched at the very least a dozen shipments – together with helicopter components and air-to-ground radio tools – to a state-backed Russian agency sanctioned by the US for its connection to chief Vladimir Putin’s warfare in Ukraine.

Poly Know-how’s long-term commerce accomplice – Ulan Ude Aviation Plant, a purveyor of military-grade helicopters – additionally continued to ship components and several other helicopters to the Beijing-based firm final 12 months, commerce knowledge present.

Advertisement

Many of the helicopter components included within the shipments to Russia have been labeled to be used within the multipurpose Mi-171E helicopter, designed for transport and search and rescue. In accordance with the Stockholm Worldwide Peace Analysis Institute (SIPRI), China started importing this mannequin of chopper from Russia greater than 10 years in the past.

Three shipments from Poly Applied sciences have been labeled as together with merchandise for the operation or service of the Russian-made Mi-171SH, a navy transport helicopter that may be outfitted with weapons and has been utilized in Moscow’s operations in Ukraine.

There isn’t any proof that any of the products exchanged are straight feeding Russia’s warfare.

The customs information got here from two knowledge units. The primary was offered by commerce knowledge agency Import Genius, whose info is collated by secondary sources from official Russian customs and cargo information.

Washington-based suppose tank C4ADS, which collates official customs information aggregated from a number of third-party suppliers, offered the second set.

Advertisement

CNN has not independently verified the information, which can present a partial however not full image of the commerce.

Army and safety consultants say the components despatched from the Chinese language agency to Russia are pretty fundamental tools for Russian-designed plane that might be a part of current contracts and normal enterprise relationships between the businesses.

However final 12 months’s commerce underscores enduring ties between key gamers within the state-backed protection sectors on each side – relationships that had strengthened over the previous decade as Putin and Chinese language chief Xi Jinping developed their strategic alignment.

Specialists say such well-established networks might be leveraged if Beijing have been to supply direct, deadly assist for the Kremlin’s warfare effort.

Western leaders in current weeks have warned China is contemplating that step. Beijing has denied this, derided the warning as a “smear,” and repeatedly defended its “regular” commerce with Russia and rejected what it calls “unilateral” sanctions in opposition to Moscow.

Advertisement

Beijing and Moscow’s navy ties have advanced dramatically for the reason that top of the Chilly Warfare – a interval marked by mutual hostility and ideological divergence.

Whereas some frictions stay, the 2 authoritarian neighbors have grown shut, particularly underneath Putin and Xi, who collectively declared a “no limits” partnership simply weeks earlier than Russia invaded Ukraine.

That features a rising safety relationship.

Following the autumn of the Soviet Union, a strong, however decidedly one-way weapons commerce flourished wherein Russia marketed its superior weaponry to China.

Advertisement

Extra just lately, the speedy modernization of China’s navy has begun to shift that dynamic.

In 2021, Putin boasted that the 2 nations have been “growing collectively sure high-tech forms of weapons,” in keeping with Russian state media, and lauded their joint navy workout routines – which have additionally expanded in scope and geographic vary.

On the frontlines of that relationship are the state-linked navy contractors. These are being built-in into an “an more and more refined provide chain,” in keeping with Alex Gabuev, a senior fellow on the worldwide suppose tank Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace.

Then got here the Ukraine warfare.

Thus far, China has stepped fastidiously round sweeping Western penalties focusing on these supporting Russia – though 10 Chinese language corporations have been hit by US restrictions associated to the warfare.

Advertisement

However a significant query for Western officers is whether or not current protection relationships might be utilized by China to produce deadly assist for the Kremlin’s warfare effort, which is extensively believed to be operating low on ammunition and arms.

Final month CNN reported that US intelligence officers consider the Chinese language authorities is contemplating sending drones and ammunition to Russia.

On March 7, China’s new overseas minister Qin Gang stated that China “has not offered weapons to both facet” of Russia’s warfare, and denounced US considerations within the matter as hypocritical.

Observers of Chinese language overseas affairs say its leaders are properly conscious of the reputational and financial harm whether it is perceived to be backing Moscow militarily – and plenty of are skeptical Beijing would take such a step to help a nuclear-armed Russia right now.

“Russia is shedding this warfare normally phrases … nevertheless it’s not a loss that may result in Putin’s demise and democratization of Russia, so I don’t see causes for China now to do greater than they’re doing,” stated Gabuev.

Advertisement
A Russian military frigate in the harbor of Cape Town last month ahead of 10-day joint maritime drills with China and South Africa.

The products traded between Chinese language and Russian protection companies within the knowledge reviewed by CNN should not the munitions that Russia’s navy is assumed to wish most one 12 months into its Ukraine onslaught. China can also be not alone in persevering with procurement from a Russia at warfare.

When requested by CNN in regards to the shipments from China to sanctioned Russian companies, the Chinese language Ministry of International Affairs stated it was “unaware of the state of affairs,” and that China “stand(s) firmly on the facet of dialogue and peace.”

The Kremlin didn’t reply to a request for remark from CNN.

However on February 27 its spokesman stated Russia noticed “no have to remark additional” on claims that Russia requested China for navy tools which he stated had already been refuted by Beijing.

Poly Applied sciences describes itself on its web site because the core subsidiary of China Poly Group, a number one state-owned enterprise, “completely licensed by the Chinese language central authorities for import/export of protection programs.”

Advertisement

Poly Applied sciences was sanctioned by the US in 2013 underneath guidelines focusing on companies supplying Iran, North Korea and Syria, and once more in January of final 12 months for alleged missile proliferation. China Poly Group didn’t reply to a request for remark.

The corporate’s commerce accomplice Ulan Ude Aviation Plant, a subsidiary of high state-owned producer Russian Helicopters, which makes the extensively used Mi-8/17 sequence helicopters lengthy integral to Russian navy transport, additionally didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Two different key corporations seem within the customs knowledge – China’s AVIC Worldwide Holding, managed by state-owned Aviation Trade Company of China, and Russia’s United Engine Company (UEC), which is a part of state-owned protection large Rostec.

Their commerce concerned Russian-designed jet engine components, lots of which have been labeled for an engine utilized in Chinese language fighter jets.

Shipments from AVIC Worldwide to UEC made by means of July final 12 months have been listed as contractual obligations underneath guarantee, and export information present UEC transport components for a similar engine mannequin to China together with as just lately as December, in keeping with knowledge from Import Genius.

Advertisement

AVIC Worldwide and UEC didn’t reply to requests for remark. The Wall Road Journal beforehand referenced shipments produced from Poly Applied sciences and AVIC Worldwide Holding to Russian companions.

Putin Xi Jinping vpx

Report obtained by CNN exhibits Russia is getting navy assist from China

Washington’s stance is that any firm supplying or working throughout the Russian protection sector dangers being sanctioned.

Advertisement

However China will not be too involved in regards to the transactions proven within the commerce knowledge reviewed by CNN, in keeping with Yun Solar, director of the China Program on the Stimson Heart suppose tank in Washington.

“Such a export needs to be permitted by the federal government. However given the character of those components and the truth that (Poly Applied sciences) has been underneath US sanction since 2013, the federal government might not see the necessity to not approve,” she stated.

Some consultants have raised questions on whether or not aviation components coming from China to Russia – lots of that are labeled as “used” or originating in Russia – might nonetheless be spare components wanted by a Russia at warfare.

Solar stated it was no shock Russia would proceed fulfilling contracts for Chinese language-purchased tools, however warned items going the other way might be “reimported by Russia to produce their warfare attrition.”

It’s additionally unlikely that the total image will ever be revealed.

Advertisement

“Neither China nor Russia needs Western intelligence to concentrate on the depth and breadth of their strategic alignment,” stated Alexander Korolev, a senior lecturer in Politics and Worldwide Relations on the College of New South Wales in Australia.

If China have been to produce deadly assist, Korolev added, “all the pieces can be achieved to cowl this up.”

“And one option to cowl it up is to make it look as if it’s simply part of common, long-term navy technical cooperation – relatively than a response to the warfare.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

US rejects Hamas response to new Gaza ceasefire proposal

Published

on

US rejects Hamas response to new Gaza ceasefire proposal

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

US envoy Steve Witkoff has rejected Hamas’s response to a fresh ceasefire proposal in the Gaza war as “totally unacceptable”.

Hamas had earlier responded positively to the release of a comparable number of Israeli hostages, but raised “clarifications” regarding the overall deal, according to a diplomat briefed on the talks.

The militant group also insisted that its goal was still to permanently end the war, secure a comprehensive Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, and guarantee increased humanitarian aid flows.

Advertisement

“I received the Hamas response to the United States’ proposal. It is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward,” Witkoff said in a statement.

“Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week.”

Witkoff’s new proposal called for a 60-day pause in the fighting, the release of half the 58 remaining Israeli hostages, 20 of whom are still alive, and “good faith negotiations” over a permanent halt to the war.

The Trump administration indicated this week that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had accepted the terms, although he has consistently rejected ending the fighting before Hamas is completely destroyed.

Netanyahu’s office on Saturday night said that while Israel had accepted the proposal, “Hamas continues to stick to its refusal,” and vowed “to continue operations for the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas.”

Advertisement

The Israel Defense Forces on Saturday confirmed that Hamas’s military chief, Mohammed Sinwar, and several other senior commanders were killed in a May 13 air strike in the city of Khan Younis in south Gaza. According to the IDF, the group was targeted while in a tunnel located below the grounds of the city’s European hospital.

Sinwar took overall command of Hamas’s forces last year, after most of the group’s other top leaders — including his brother, Yahya — were previously killed by Israel.

Also on Saturday, Israel blocked the entry of several Arab foreign ministers to the occupied West Bank, calling it a provocative move aimed at promoting the establishment of a Palestinian state.

The Israeli veto came ahead of a visit on Sunday to Ramallah, the administrative capital of the Palestinian Authority, by a high-level delegation including Prince Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister.

It would have been the first official visit by a senior Saudi official to the territory which was seized by Israel during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Successive US administrations have sought to normalise relations between the kingdom and Israel.

Advertisement

Other members of the delegation included the foreign ministers of Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain — all Arab states that have diplomatic ties with Israel.

An Israeli official said with regard to the refusal to allow the Arab delegation into the West Bank that the Palestinian Authority “intended to host . . . a provocative meeting of foreign ministers from Arab countries to discuss the promotion of the establishment of a Palestinian state . . . [that] would undoubtedly become a terrorist state in the heart of the Land of Israel”.

“Israel will not co-operate with such moves aimed at harming it and its security,” the official added.

International pressure on Israel has intensified in recent weeks, primarily over its renewed offensive in Gaza and the dire humanitarian conditions in the enclave.

Much of the international community views the West Bank, alongside East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, as the basis of a future Palestinian state.

Advertisement

France and Saudi Arabia are set to host a summit in New York next month on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with several western governments, including the UK, considering recognising a Palestinian state.

Jordan’s foreign ministry said that the denial of entry to the delegation was a “blatant violation of Israel’s obligations as the occupying power” in the West Bank and reflected “the extent of the Israeli government’s arrogance, its disregard for international law and its continued illegitimate measures and policies”.

The Palestinian ambassador in Riyadh told Saudi state news television channel Al-Ekhbariya on Friday that the “rare” visit sought to mobilise support for a two-state solution ahead of the conference in New York.

On Thursday the Israeli government announced the creation of 22 new settlements across the West Bank, the biggest expansion in years of an enterprise that many governments consider illegal.

Israeli ministers described the decision as a “decisive response” to Palestinian militancy and a “strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state”.

Advertisement

Nearly 500,000 Jewish Israelis have settled in the West Bank over the past five decades. About 3mn Palestinians live in the territory under Israeli military rule and partial autonomy administered by the Palestinian Authority.

Additional reporting by Ahmed Al Omran in Jeddah and Andrew England in London

Continue Reading

News

'We all are going to die': Sen. Ernst offers bleak response to grilling over Medicaid

Published

on

'We all are going to die': Sen. Ernst offers bleak response to grilling over Medicaid

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, speaks to reporters as she walks to a Senate luncheons at the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 19, 2024.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst faced intense questioning from her constituents during a Friday town hall, eliciting shouts and boos from community members over her support for President Trump’s contentious One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The first speaker offered Ernst a softball question, telling the National Guard veteran that his sole request was for her to be the guest speaker at the American Legion for Memorial Day next year.

But just minutes into the hour-long session in Butler County, Iowa, the tenor quickly shifted. The crowd grew tense and Ernst appeared flip and defensive.

Advertisement

Ernst was repeatedly peppered with questions about the thousand-page bill, with many attendees focusing on proposed cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Ernst defended the bill, arguing that those eliminated from these programs would be people who were not eligible to benefit from them in the first place.

“When you’re arguing about illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits, 1.4 million (people) … they are not eligible so they will be coming off,” Ernst said.

Someone in the crowd shouted in response: “People are going to die.”

“Well, we all are going to die,” Ernst responded. “For heaven’s sakes, folks,” she continued with a smile.

The crowd, which had already grown hostile to Ernst’s tone, erupted in roars of disapproval.

Advertisement

The GOP budget package is a sweeping piece of legislation that would provide massive tax cuts to the wealthy and slash funding for social programs including Medicaid and food assistance.

A version of the bill narrowly passed in the House earlier this month — eking by with a final vote of 215-214.

But the act faces pushback in the Senate over concerns regarding some of the more consequential aspects of the legislation, which include: extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts — with about $3.8 trillion in cuts overall, largely for the nation’s top earners; raising the national debt ceiling by $4 trillion; and costly fees on asylum seekers and those who sponsor unaccompanied minors.

As written, the bill is projected to add trillions to the nation’s debt over the next decade.

The bill is now going through the process of reconciliation — a complicated Senate process that would allow Republicans to avoid a filibuster by Democratic legislators and pass the bill on a simple majority.

Advertisement

Back at the Iowa town hall, Ernst continued to spar with voters over her support for these changes.

In another heated exchange, a man — who identified himself as a Navy veteran and retired school superintendent — grilled Ernst about Trump’s authoritarian style of governing.

“Are you afraid of Trump? Are you corrupt like Trump? Or are you just at the point that you don’t care anymore and that’s why you don’t do anything?,” the man asked to cheers.

Her response set off another round of dissenting yells.

“Obviously I don’t agree because I don’t think our country is being destroyed,” she said as the crowd offered shouts in protest.

Advertisement

After the event, Ernst posted a message to social media, appearing unbothered by the turn of events at the town hall.

Thanks folks for coming out to my town hall in Parkersburg today,” she wrote. “I always enjoy hearing from constituents and sharing my work to cut government red tape for you.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Chinese students shaken by US visa crackdown look for Plan B

Published

on

Chinese students shaken by US visa crackdown look for Plan B

Justin, a Chinese PhD student at an Ivy League university, had always planned to settle in the US but the 25-year-old is abandoning the idea after a crackdown on immigrants and academia and is considering studying elsewhere.

This week, Washington told US embassies to suspend the visa approval process for foreign students pending additional screening of their social media activities.

Marco Rubio, secretary of state, then pledged to “aggressively revoke” Chinese student visas, especially those studying in “critical fields” or linked to the Communist party.

Rubio’s comments are part of measures against foreign academia and students, particularly those from China, that analysts say is eroding America’s reputation there as a safe destination for overseas study and leading many to consider backup plans in other countries.

“If the government sets such a precedent . . . allowing xenophobic sentiments to go unchecked, there will inevitably come a time when large-scale anti-Chinese incidents occur,” said Justin, who requested that only his first name be used.

Advertisement

He added he was considering applying to Oxford and Cambridge universities in the UK as a “Plan B”. “The US is no longer an ideal place for scientific research,” he said.

The number of Chinese students at US universities has fallen sharply since the Covid-19 pandemic, in part because of initiatives including the now-defunct “China Initiative” that targeted alleged espionage in academia during the first Trump administration.

Last year, the Chinese student intake in the US totalled more than 277,000, down 4 per cent from a year earlier and 26 per cent from nearly 373,000 in 2019-20. The total number of international students in the US hit an all-time high last year of 1.1mn. 

The industry is facing structural challenges, said Julian Fisher, co-founder of Venture Education, a Beijing-based market intelligence consultancy.

Not only are mainland Chinese parents becoming more discerning, increasingly opting only for the top-ranked institutions, there is more competition from institutions in Hong Kong and Singapore. China’s demographic decline also meant that the pool of customers was set to fall, he said.

Advertisement

“Perhaps the bigger existential question here is if we have already passed the apex of Chinese students studying overseas,” Fisher said, adding that the Trump administration’s policies could speed up the trend.

Since the latest measures were announced, interest for “study abroad in the US” on Chinese search engine Baidu has dropped to 65 per cent of what it was a year earlier, according to analysis by Venture Education using data from Baidu Index.

Australia appears to be the most popular followed by Singapore and the UK, the analysis suggested.

Frida Cai, head of business development at Ivyray Edu, an education consultancy, said some clients were considering alternatives such as the UK, Hong Kong or Australia. Ivyray Edu advises those applying for a US visa to be cautious about what they post online.

President Donald Trump’s policies have led to a “lack of confidence among parents” in Hong Kong, said Will Kwong, managing director of AAS Education, a consultancy.

Advertisement

“Unless the students have family links in the US, the overall market appetite has dropped significantly,” he said. Kwong was helping students come up with “Plan Bs” that include the UK and Australia.

Interest among Hong Kong students in the US had in any case plummeted in recent months to about one-quarter of pre-pandemic levels, he said, with those interested in technology, AI, aerospace and engineering often avoiding the US.

Beijing has described the US policies as evidence of the “hypocrisy” underlying Washington’s “long-touted claims of freedom and openness”.

“It will only further damage the United States’ international image and national credibility,” the foreign ministry said of Rubio’s threat. 

These comments highlight President Xi Jinping’s efforts to tout China’s authoritarian system as a viable development model for other countries as Beijing seeks to attract more overseas students from the developing world. 

Advertisement

On Chinese social media, students have voiced their anger and confusion.

One student set to begin a masters in design at Harvard this year described how her study visa was initially approved by the US embassy in Beijing last week. The following day she received an email saying it had been refused because Harvard had lost its Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. When a judge blocked the ban, it was later issued.

“Am I worried?” the student, who did not want to be identified, told the Financial Times. “Yes of course. There’s a new policy every other day; it’s quite unpredictable.” For those looking to study overseas next year, she said: “I’d suggest to them to have backup plans.”

Still, at the US embassy in Beijing this week, some students, whose visa interviews had been scheduled before the latest suspension, were cautiously optimistic about going to the US.

One Chinese student who identified himself only as Austin said he was returning to New York University to complete a masters programme in computer engineering. “The resources and the teachers are great at NYU,” Austin said. 

Advertisement

He said, however, that, while in the US, he always carried his passport with him in case immigration officers stopped him on the street. Deportation or visa revocations were always a risk, he said.

“I think more of these things definitely will happen under Trump,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending