Connect with us

News

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN

Published

on

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN



CNN
 — 

The BBC’s weekend soccer protection has been plunged into chaos following its announcement that Gary Lineker would “step again” from presenting, after he turned embroiled in an impartiality row when he criticized British authorities coverage on Twitter.

The broadcaster now faces a boycott from pundits, presenters and even gamers of its flagship soccer present “Match of the Day,” whereas different soccer packages – Soccer Focus and Remaining Rating – and a few radio programming have been pressured off air because of the furore.

Lineker criticized the federal government’s controversial new asylum seeker coverage on Tuesday and was subsequently stepped down from his presenting duties this week for the reason that BBC stated his tweets breached their tips, particularly its dedication to “due impartiality.”

The BBC’s determination has sparked controversy, leaving the group underneath hearth from opposition politicians, the BECTU union who characterize BBC employees, and its former director common Greg Dyke.

Advertisement

“The BBC will solely be capable of convey restricted sport programming this weekend and our schedules might be up to date to mirror that,” a BBC spokesperson stated in a press release Saturday.

“We’re sorry for these adjustments which we acknowledge might be disappointing for BBC sport followers.

“We’re working exhausting to resolve the scenario and hope to take action quickly.”

On Tuesday, Lineker tweeted “Good heavens, that is past terrible” to a video posted on Twitter by the British Dwelling Workplace saying the brand new proposed coverage – an try to cease migrant boats crossing the English Channel from France which has been criticized by the United Nations and different world our bodies.

He added: “There isn’t a large inflow. We take far fewer refugees than different main European nations. That is simply an immeasurably merciless coverage directed on the most susceptible individuals in language that isn’t dissimilar to that utilized by Germany within the 30s, and I’m out of order?”

Advertisement

As Britain’s public broadcaster, the BBC is sure by “due impartiality” – a a lot debated time period which the group defines as holding “energy to account with consistency” whereas not “permitting ourselves for use to marketing campaign to alter public coverage.”

On Friday, the BBC introduced that Lineker would “step again from presenting Match of the Day till we’ve obtained an agreed and clear place on his use of social media,” including that it thought-about his latest social media exercise to breach its tips.

In response, first pundits, then commentators, after which even Premier League groups introduced their intention to boycott the present in help of Lineker.

BBC commentators Steve Wilson, Conor McNamara, Robyn Cowen and Steven Wyeth stated in a joint assertion issued late on Friday that “within the circumstances, we don’t really feel it will be acceptable to participate within the programme.”

Advertisement

Jermain Defoe, a former England striker, introduced Saturday he wouldn’t seem as a pundit on the Sunday present.

“It’s at all times such a privilege to work with BBC MOTD. However tomorrow I’ve taken the choice to face down from my punditry duties. @GaryLineker,” Defoe tweeted.

Defoe’s announcement seems to be the primary signal that the British broadcaster’s Sunday tv programming may also be affected.

In the meantime, the Skilled Footballers’ Affiliation announced on Saturday that “gamers concerned in at this time’s video games won’t be requested to take part in interviews with Match of the Day.”

“The PFA have been talking to members who needed take a collective place and to have the ability to present their help for many who have chosen to not be a part of tonight’s programme,” the assertion added.

Advertisement

“Throughout these conversations we made clear that, as their union, we’d help all members who may face penalties for selecting to not full their broadcast commitments. It is a frequent sense determination that ensures gamers received’t now be put in that place.”

Following his aspect’s 1-0 defeat in opposition to Bournemouth on Saturday, Liverpool supervisor Jurgen Klopp was requested in regards to the BBC subject.

“I can not see any purpose why they might ask anybody to step again for saying that. I’m unsure if that’s a language subject or not,” the German advised reporters.

“If I perceive it proper, then that is about an opinion about human rights and that must be potential to say.

“What I don’t perceive is why everyone goes on Twitter and says one thing. I don’t perceive the social media a part of it however that’s in all probability [because] I’m too outdated for that.”

Advertisement

The BBC’s former director common Greg Dyke stated that the broadcaster has “undermined its personal credibility” by suspending Lineker as a result of it appeared prefer it had “bowed to authorities strain.”

Keir Starmer, chief of the opposition Labour Get together, stated that the BBC had obtained “this one badly incorrect and now they’re very, very uncovered.”

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted: “As a powerful supporter of public service broadcasting, I need to have the ability to defend the BBC. However the determination to take Gary Lineker off air is indefensible. It’s undermining free speech within the face of political strain – & it does at all times appear to be rightwing strain it caves to.”

Opposition Labour Get together deputy chief Angela Rayner additionally lambasted the BBC’s determination in a tweet on Saturday.

“The BBC’s cowardly determination to take Gary Lineker off air is an assault on free speech within the face of political strain from Tory politicians. They need to rethink,” she tweeted.

Advertisement

In the meantime Nadine Dorries, an MP with the governing Conservative social gathering and former Tradition Secretary, welcomed the BBC’s determination, tweeting: “Information that Gary Lineker has been stood down for investigation is welcome and exhibits BBC are critical about impartiality.

“Gary is entitled to his views – free speech is paramount. Numerous non Public Service Broadcasters can accommodate him and his views and he could be higher paid.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Shari Redstone ends talks with Skydance Media over deal to control Paramount

Published

on

Shari Redstone ends talks with Skydance Media over deal to control Paramount

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Shari Redstone has ended talks with Skydance Media over a deal that would have handed control of entertainment empire Paramount from her family to billionaire scion David Ellison.

The decision closes the books on talks with Ellison’s Skydance that have dragged on for months and left the future of Paramount hanging in the balance.

Skydance had offered about $2bn to acquire Redstone’s National Amusements (NAI), and then planned to merge Paramount into Ellison’s company through a stock deal.

Advertisement

Skydance had offered to buy out about half of Paramount’s common shareholders at $15 a share, while also injecting about $1.5bn to help pay off the company’s debt.

NAI on Tuesday said the groups “have not been able to reach mutually acceptable terms” and that it “is grateful to Skydance for their months of work in pursuing this potential transaction”.

A Skydance representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Shares in Paramount closed down 8 per cent at $11.04 on the news, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Redstone’s decision came as a shock to Ellison’s camp, which included private equity backers RedBird and KKR, as the two sides appeared close to a deal in recent weeks.

Paramount’s special committee, which was in charge of representing the interests of all of the media company’s shareholders, including those without voting rights, supported the bid in a non-binding endorsement earlier this month, said people briefed about the matter.

Advertisement

Redstone changed her mind in recent days, in part because Skydance lowered the amount of cash that would have gone to holding company NAI as it increased the payout to other shareholders, said a person close to her.

People close to Redstone added they were baffled by her decision to pull the plug. These people added the Ellison consortium had agreed to “pretty much” everything NAI and Paramount had asked for over multiple months of negotiations.

Redstone is now weighing potential offers from other suitors.

Billionaire Edgar Bronfman Jr, the heir of the Seagram drinks business, has signalled his interest in acquiring NAI for more than $2bn, according to two people familiar with the matter. His bid is backed by private equity group Bain. But that group would require weeks to complete due diligence before making a formal offer, these people cautioned.

Redstone has also received interest from film producer Steven Paul, one person said.

Advertisement

However, one person involved in the discussions said there was no real alternative to Skydance’s at the moment.

NAI controls about 80 per cent of Paramount’s voting rights despite only owning about 10 per cent of the company’s shares. Whoever buys NAI could technically control Paramount without having to buy the entire company, although non-voting shareholders could challenge such a move in the courts.

Continue Reading

News

Virginia NAACP sues school board that restored Confederate names

Published

on

Virginia NAACP sues school board that restored Confederate names

A new lawsuit seeks to prevent Mountain View High School in western Virginia from going back to its former name, Stonewall Jackson High School. The Shenandoah County School Board voted in May to restore the Confederate general’s name to the school.

Google Maps/Screenshot by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Google Maps/Screenshot by NPR

Mountain View High School will soon be known by its former name, Stonewall Jackson High School. The Shenandoah County School Board voted 5-1 to once again honor the Confederate general, whose name was originally attached to the school during the battle over racial segregation.

A new lawsuit seeks to prevent Mountain View High School in western Virginia from going back to its former name, Stonewall Jackson High School. The Shenandoah County School Board voted in May to restore the Confederate general’s name to the school.

Google Maps/Screenshot by NPR

When the Shenandoah County School Board voted last month to revert several school names to honor Confederate leaders like Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee, it created “an unlawful and discriminatory” environment for Black students, according to Virginia’s NAACP chapter — which is now suing to rename the schools.

Plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, include five students who say they don’t want to be forced to glorify or represent historical figures who fought to maintain slavery and white supremacy.

Advertisement

“There’s a cold wind blowing in America and it has especially chilled Shenandoah County,” the Rev. Cozy Bailey, the Virginia NAACP president, said at a news conference Tuesday. The board’s recent decision, he said, echoed the Jim Crow era of injustice and intimidation.

The controversial May 9 decision returned the names of Confederate generals Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Turner Ashby to two local schools. The names had been removed nearly four years earlier, as part of a widespread re-examination of U.S. monuments and landmarks.

“This backward move has received a negative reaction all over the world,” Bailey said, “and the world is watching to see if this variety of the seeds of hate and disenfranchisement will take root and return Shenandoah County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to the days when racial exclusion was the law of the land.”

The schools’ names are steeped in controversy

The Shenandoah school board voted last month to revert Mountain View High School to its former name, Stonewall Jackson High School, and to revert Honey Run Elementary School to Ashby-Lee Elementary School. Both schools are in Quicksburg, Va.

In a contentious board meeting, opponents of the move — including some current students — noted that the 1959 decision to name the schools after Confederate generals came at a time when Virginia’s leaders were fighting to keep the state’s schools racially segregated, despite the Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 decision in the case of Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. By embracing the Confederate names now, they said, the board would brand their county as a haven for backward and racist thinking.

Advertisement

Supporters of undoing the 2020 change said that taking Confederate figures’ names off the schools was a “knee-jerk” reaction to protests of George Floyd’s murder by police. The removal, they said, looked to erase the region’s history and silence its majority. Some also said the change had been adopted after little debate and notice. In the end, the board approved changing back to the Confederate names by a 5-1 vote.

On Tuesday, a student who spoke at the NAACP news conference said that the decision made her feel “unwelcome in a place that I go every day, which should never be the case.”

Officials from the Shenandoah County School Board did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for comment. The board is slated to hold its monthly meeting on Thursday.

Lawsuit calls for a new change

The federal lawsuit seeks to keep the schools’ recent names, Mountain View High School and Honey Run Elementary School, and to prevent any future discriminatory names or symbols.

“Plaintiffs are not seeking damages in this case,” said attorney Ashley Joyner Chavous, of the Covington & Burling law firm, at Tuesday’s news conference. “They are seeking change — in the right direction.”

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, the Virginia NAACP argues that restoring the Confederate names violates four laws: the First and Fourteenth Amendments; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and the Equal Education Opportunities Act.

Another attorney involved in the suit, Marja Plater of the Washington Lawyers’’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, said the Confederate names pose dire problems for students of color.

“A Black high schooler who wants to play on the soccer team must wear the Stonewall Jackson ‘Generals’ uniform,” she said in a statement. “The student must honor a Confederate leader who fought to keep Black people in chains as slaves. Exposing children to this persistent racism and hate harms their self-worth and long-term health.”

Continue Reading

News

EU secures 40mn doses of bird flu vaccine as cases rise

Published

on

EU secures 40mn doses of bird flu vaccine as cases rise

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The European Commission has signed a deal for more than 40mn doses of a vaccine against bird flu for 15 countries across the continent, as member states grapple with a rise in cases of the respiratory virus.

The EU’s executive arm announced the contract on Tuesday, procuring up to 665,000 vaccine doses — which can be adapted to any bird flu strain — from Australia-based manufacturer CSL Seqirus. The deal includes a provision for a further 40mn vaccines over the next four years.

The deal comes as governments monitor an increase in bird flu cases in animals after 10 US states reported outbreaks in cattle in recent months, with three cases in humans following exposure to dairy cows.

Advertisement

Last week, the World Health Organization reported that a farmworker in Mexico had died after contracting the H5N2 variant, a strain that had previously not been detected in humans but has been reported in Mexican poultry. There have been no recorded cases of human-to-human transmission of the virus.

The outbreaks have increased concerns over the safety of dairy and meat products. Strains of the virus have been detected in US milk, although pasteurisation kills the pathogen. The tissue of one dairy cow was also reported to be infected but meat from the animal did not enter food supply chains, the US agriculture department said last month.

Stella Kyriakides, European commissioner for health and food safety, said: “While the threat of avian influenza to the general population remains low, we need to protect people at higher risk, such as poultry and farm workers or certain veterinarians.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Monitoring by the EU reference laboratory for avian influenza shows there have been 522 outbreaks of bird flu detected in wild and captive birds in 27 countries since the start of the year.

Advertisement

According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the risk of transmission from animals to humans is considered low in Europe. A commission spokesperson said on Tuesday there were “no reported active cases” in EU citizens.

The doses will go to people most exposed to the virus, including farm workers and veterinarians, with the first shipment heading to Finland. Outbreaks of bird flu in the Nordic country’s mink farms last year raised concerns of transmission to humans.

“This agreement will help in Europe’s resolve to maintain robust preparedness and rapid response capabilities for this potential threat,” said Raja Rajaram, head of global medical strategy at CSL Seqirus.

The jabs are being made in CSL Seqirus factories in the Netherlands and England using egg-based manufacturing, a traditional method for developing vaccines.

The US has a stockpile of flu vaccines from GSK, Sanofi and CSL Seqirus that can provide immunity against bird flu. It is considering funding a late-stage trial of Moderna’s mRNA-based avian flu vaccine, which could be scaled up more quickly.

Advertisement

UK drugmaker GSK and German biotech CureVac are also jointly developing an mRNA-based avian flu vaccine in early trials.

The European Commission did not immediately respond when asked if it was pursuing a similar deal.

Continue Reading

Trending