Wisconsin
Wisconsin’s wildfire season is beginning fast, with risk above normal
Wisconsin’s wildfire season is starting fast and early across the state after a warm, dry winter.
A March wildfire outlook report from the National Interagency Fire Center, or NIFC, shows that the majority of Wisconsin — virtually all of it except a small slice of the southeastern part of the state that includes Milwaukee — is in “above normal” potential for wildfires through March and April.
And with winter not delivering heavy snowfall or temperatures needed to sustain snowpack throughout the state, it has meant that the state is seeing far more fires than usual by this time of year. The state Department of Natural Resources responds to and tracks wildfires in the state and in 2024 there’s been 196 fires across 361.43 acres, as of March 12.
Across the last 10 years, there’s typically 16 fires across 16.24 acres by that date. And, in the last week, there’s been 50 fires alone, the department announced March 12.
“We are significantly ahead of that and most of that is due to the lack of snow,” said Marc Sass, a state Department of Natural Resources cooperative area forest ranger in southeast Wisconsin. “Basically, there is no area of the state with snow … we’re at least one month ahead of where we typically are.”
Sass said it’s the first time in his 10 years at the agency that he’s noticed the lack of snow throughout the entire state. The lack of snow means that fuel, like dead grasses or other plants, are ready to burn earlier than usual and before the plants grow back in the spring.
The NIFC report says that the Eastern Area of the nation, which includes Wisconsin and the Great Lakes region, is facing heightened risk due to long-term drought, a lack of precipitation throughout February and the lack of snowpack.
“Exposed fine fuels and tall grasses that were not compressed under snow have become available to burn,” the report reads. “Hot, dry, windy events and persistently strong winds will be a big determinant in both the potential for increased and significant fire activity during the outlook period.”
The report says that Wisconsin chould be at a normal fire risk by May.
Wildfire season comes early, all at once
In Wisconsin, almost the entire state has entered wildfire season at once this year.
In most years, Sass said the state has what is effectively a rolling start. As the southern half of Wisconsin thaws and enters fire season by late February or early March, the upper half is usually not in conditions for it until April. In 2024, the state Department of Natural Resources has battled fires as far north as Douglas and Ashland counties.
“It limits how much we can shift our resources,” Sass said of the wide range of fires. “Typically, when the southern areas are snow-free and we’re having fires and actively suppressing fires … we often bring northern (help) down.”
The bright side, as the NIFC report notes, is that areas could see an early green up, when grasses return after the winter, and lead to a fire season ending earlier.
Steve Marien, a fire meteorologist at NIFC, said that while the potential is higher than typical, it doesn’t necessarily mean there will be rampant fires or particularly large ones this year. That still depends on day-to-day weather patterns, like high winds or heat, which could influence whether fires begin and their size.
However, he said that a possible issue is the potential for numerous small fires, which can put stress on fire departments spread thin.
Another factor is the state’s ongoing drought from last year, said Steve Vavrus, Wisconsin’s state climatologist and the assistant director at the University of Wisconsin Madison’s Center for Climatic Research.
About 68 percent of Wisconsin is in a drought, according to the latest data from the United States Drought Monitor. With 18.5 percent in a “severe drought” or a level two out of four.
“The concern right now, is that we’re in a drought still from last year. In fact, the drought conditions have worsened quietly in the last few weeks,” Vavrus said. “If we get a few more of the really unseasonably warm days that we had (earlier this month) … there’s legitimate concerns surrounding the higher risk of fire in Wisconsin and elsewhere.”
Historically Wisconsin is not ripe for large wildfires compared to other states, especially those in western parts of the country, Vavrus said. However, warm and dry conditions have caused issues here too.
In 2021, wildfires in Wisconsin prompted a state of emergency in the state. Last April, dry soil and temperatures in the 80s led to wildfires in the state and he pointed to another fire near the Necedah Wildlife Refuge in central Wisconsin in 2020.
Wisconsin’s heightened fire concern comes as other parts of the country have experienced massive blazes and worries simmer in Canada. In Nebraska, a massive fire burned over 71,000 acres and an ongoing wildfire in the panhandle of Texas is the biggest in history for that state.
On Monday the local National Weather Service issued a statement warning of elevated fire weather conditions in southern Wisconsin and cautioned people burning to take caution, due to the chance it could quickly spread. In worse conditions, the organization will issue a red flag warning and parts of neighboring states like Illinois and Minnesota have issued them in the last week.
The Canadian province of Alberta’s government declared a 10-day early start to its 2024 wildfire season, due to a warm temperature and lack of precipitation.
Last year, wildfires in Canada affected Wisconsin due to heavy smoke drifting to the United States. This year, there’s potential for wildfires to be an issue there again. National outlets like the New York Times have noted that some fires from last year, dubbed zombie fires, are still smoldering in Canada.
“Snowpack like in south central Canada is below normal up there too. So that’s problematic. Is it going to be as bad as last year? A lot of those starts are lightning starts from storms, it’s all dependent on if they get ignitions,” the fire meteorologist Marien said.
El Nino, climate change having an impact
A major factor in this year’s early start to wildfire season is the El Nino effect occurring and leading to the warmest winter on record. It typically reduces snowfall totals in Wisconsin.
El Nino can often mean a wetter season, with precipitation up two inches on average, according to the National Weather Service. However, this year, that was not borne out.
The organization reported that precipitation was down in both Milwaukee and Madison. In Milwaukee, the area typically sees 37.1 inches of snowfall, but that was down 17.6 inches this winter.
Knowing this year was going to be an El Nino year, the DNR has been on alert for this year’s fire season, Sass said.
“When we come through an El Nino winter, we expect more fires than we would in typical winter seasons,” he said.
Even if El Nino had brought an increase in rain, which is some help, the loss of snowpack has more of an impact.
Snowmelt can help stave off fire conditions across lengthy periods of time, as it melts on sunny days, refreezes overnight and repeats until it’s gone, whereas rain will soak into the ground in a day or two, Sass said.
“Every single day that it’s melting, it releases to keep that fuel wetter,” he said.
Climate change in Wisconsin is playing a role as well, as data shows that the state is becoming warmer and wetter over time, said state climatologist Vavrus.
The warmth is contributing to a faster transition between winter to summer, particularly when paired with El Nino this year. It can also melt snowpack faster.
“Both of those things can speed up the initiation of wildfire season here,” he said. “You think about a snowy cold March, we’re not going to worry about wildfires.”
After winters like the most recent and more anomalous weather overall, Vavrus said the public is starting to be more aware of climate change’s impacts in the state.
“It means it’s something we cannot ignore anymore and it’s going to become harder and harder to ignore,” Vavrus said.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for March 19, 2026
Manuel Franco claims his $768 million Powerball jackpot
Manuel Franco, 24, of West Allis was revealed Tuesday as the winner of the $768.4 million Powerball jackpot.
Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at March 19, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Pick 3 numbers from March 19 drawing
Midday: 5-7-6
Evening: 7-9-6
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 19 drawing
Midday: 0-7-4-3
Evening: 1-5-7-1
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning All or Nothing numbers from March 19 drawing
Midday: 01-05-06-08-10-13-15-17-18-19-21
Evening: 02-04-09-11-13-14-16-17-18-20-22
Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Badger 5 numbers from March 19 drawing
07-14-22-27-30
Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning SuperCash numbers from March 19 drawing
05-20-24-31-33-38, Doubler: N
Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
- Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
- Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
- Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.
Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?
No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.
When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
- Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **
WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Wisconsin
High Point vs. Wisconsin – First round NCAA tournament extended highlights
Men’s Basketball
March 19, 2026
High Point vs. Wisconsin – First round NCAA tournament extended highlights
March 19, 2026
Watch the highlights from No. 12 High Point and No. 5 Wisconsin’s matchup in the first round of the 2026 men’s NCAA tournament.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin lawmakers look to join the ranks of states allowing online sports betting
MADISON (AP) — As sports fans wager billions of dollars on the NCAA basketball tournaments, Wisconsin lawmakers are taking a shot at an expanded sports betting plan that could bank big bucks for the state in the future.
A measure given final approval Tuesday would let the state’s tribal gambling sites start offering online sports betting to people anywhere in Wisconsin. But the bill is contingent on the signature of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, which is no sure bet. And it wouldn’t take effect until after the state negotiates new deals with American Indian tribes who would run the sports betting — long after the current basketball tournaments wrap up.
Here’s how Wisconsin and other states are approaching sports betting:
Sports betting is booming in states
Legal sports betting has spread from one state — Nevada — to 39 states and Washington, D.C., since the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door in 2018. If Evers signs off on the expansion, Wisconsin would become the 32nd state to allow online sports wagering, which is how most people place bets.
Across the U.S., state-regulated sportsbooks handled nearly $167 billion of bets last year, generating revenues of nearly $17 billion after winnings were paid out to customers, according to the American Gaming Association. That marked an almost 23% increase over the previous year.
Gambling in Wisconsin goes through tribes
Gambling is legal in Wisconsin only on tribal lands under exclusive contracts between tribes and the state. Sports bets currently can be placed only at certain tribal casinos, and online sports betting is illegal.
Under the Wisconsin tribal compacts, a percentage of the money tribes earn through that gambling is returned to the state. In 2024, the tribes paid the state just over $66 million from revenue generated at casinos.
Wisconsin proposes to follow the Florida model
Under the Wisconsin legislation, online sports betting would be allowed only if the infrastructure to manage the bets, such as computer servers, is located on tribal lands in the state. That approach, known as the “hub-and-spoke” model, already is used in Florida.
Supporters of the measure include several Wisconsin tribes and the Milwaukee Brewers. They contend people currently are placing bets using offshore sportsbooks or prediction markets or crossing into other states where it’s legal, including neighboring Illinois.
Republican Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said he opposes online gambling, but people are already doing it and “I would rather make sure that Wisconsinites have some sort of control over that.”
The legislation has drawn opposition from the Sports Betting Alliance, which represents FanDuel, DraftKings, bet365, BetMGM and Fanatics. They argue it wouldn’t make financial sense for them to partner with Wisconsin tribes, because federal law requires 60% of gambling revenues must go back to the tribes. They would prefer a state constitutional amendment opening sports betting to all operators.
“It is simply not economically feasible for a commercial operator to hand over 60% or more of its revenue to an in-state gaming entity, just for the right to operate in the state,” Sports Betting Alliance representative Damon Stewart said in submitted testimony opposing the bill.
Governor’s support is unclear
Wisconsin’s measure has divided Republicans since it was introduced last year. It took 12 Democrats joining with nine Republicans to pass the bill in the Senate. The Assembly, also controlled by Republicans, passed it on a voice vote without debate last month.
It now heads to Evers, who initially said he would sign it as long as it was passed in consultation with — and the support of — the state’s tribes. Evers has since raised concerns, noting last month that not all of the state’s 11 tribes are registered as in support. Evers’ spokesperson Britt Cudaback did not return a message seeking comment Tuesday.
Revenues from sports bets can take a while to start flowing
If Evers signs the legislation, Wisconsin residents may still have to wait to place bets through smartphones and computers. It often takes months to launch new sports betting programs.
North Carolina’s governor signed legislation in June 2023 to expand sports betting from three tribal casinos to online platforms. But online betting did not begin until March 2024.
Missouri voters narrowly approved sports wagering in November 2024. But it didn’t launch until last December. And the state has yet to reap a big windfall. Through the first two months, Missouri sportsbooks handled $928 million of bets, but that resulted in just $659,000 in state taxes.
Some states look to squeeze more out of sports bets
Since adopting sports betting, some states already have revamped their laws to try to take a bigger share of the money. Taxes have been raised or restructured in Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee and Washington, D.C. And Colorado and Virginia have pared back the tax deductions they originally allowed.
Illinois has taken multiple bites, most recently adding fees of 25-50 cents on every sports bet that gets placed. And Chicago began charging an additional 10.25% tax on sports betting revenues on Jan. 1.
Louisiana raised is sports betting taxes last year to help fund college athletics. The new law directs one-quarter of the tax revenue from online sports wagering to be split among public universities with Division I football programs and be used “for the benefit of student athletes.”
Collegiate prop bets face push back
Sports betting often involves more than just guessing which team will win. Some of the most popular bets focus on player performance, like how many points a particular athlete will score. Those proposition bets also have been at the center of recent scandals, with players alleged to have rigged their performance.
The NCAA in 2023 began encouraging states to adopt restrictions on bets involving college athletes. Since then, Louisiana, Maryland, Ohio and Vermont have joined the ranks of states banning individual prop bets on college athletes.
More than a dozen states place no limits on collegiate prop bets while nearly an equal number prohibit all such bets. Other states fall somewhere in between, including some that allow prop bets on collegiate athletes only for games that don’t involve their home-state schools.
___
Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Missouri.
-
Oklahoma6 days agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Detroit, MI1 day agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Nebraska1 week agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
-
Georgia4 days agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts community colleges to launch apprenticeship degree programs – The Boston Globe
-
Alaska5 days agoPolice looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
-
Colorado1 week ago‘It’s Not a Penalty’: Bednar Rips Officials For MacKinnon Ejection | Colorado Hockey Now
-
Southwest1 week agoTalarico reportedly knew Colbert interview wouldn’t air on TV before he left to film it