Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Rapids Ocean Spray workers will hold union vote in February. How does it work?

Published

on

Wisconsin Rapids Ocean Spray workers will hold union vote in February. How does it work?



About 16 union members and representatives and Ocean Spray workers from other locations held a rally Wednesday to support the Wisconsin Rapids employees.

WISCONSIN RAPIDS – Workers at Ocean Spray are attempting to unionize in Wisconsin Rapids.

According to a release from the local chapter of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 95 workers at Ocean Spray in Wisconsin Rapids have petitioned with the National Labor Relations Board to unionize, and employees will vote Feb. 1 and 2.

On Wednesday afternoon, a group of about 16 union members, representatives and Ocean Spray workers from other locations held a rally outside the Ocean Spray plant on Industrial Street, showing support for employees as they entered and left the facility for their shift change. Most vehicles slowed, and drivers gave a wave or rolled down their windows to chat or take a packet of information.

Advertisement

Dillon Gorman, the business manager for IBEW 965, said he’s organized and attended rallies all over the state at various companies, each time staying the required distance from the property, but offering to share more information with workers about what their options are as they leave or arrive at work. These days, it’s easier to share information about unions, health care options, election information and more, as they can also easily share that online on the IBEW website.

Gorman said they organized the rally in Wisconsin Rapids because workers at the Ocean Spray plant had reached out to the union for more information after they said the company recently changed some working conditions and benefit structures. On Wednesday, workers came from all over the state, including Eau Claire, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Beaver Dam and Janesville to show support.

Mike Stark, a shop chairman at the Ocean Spray in Kenosha, said he heard about some communication issues at the Wisconsin Rapids location, and he wanted to show his support. He’s not part of the same IBEW union, but he said he thought it was important to show support to the workers and be around to answer any questions they may have about unions and how they work.

Mike Oettel also works for Ocean Spray in Kenosha and is the president of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 66. He said it was important to show solidarity and that everybody has a voice and vote in the decision.

Advertisement

“If you’re being treated unfairly, there’s always another option,” he said.

The pros and cons of unionizing

Gorman said unionizing gives workers a legal voice at the table, and it’s important to have workers directly from the facility at that table because they best understand the work and their interests. Workers who choose to organize are exercising their rights provided by the National Labor Relations Act and have the opportunity to bargain for fair pay, benefits and working conditions, Gorman said.

Kim Moon, the international lead organizer for IBEW in Wisconsin, said union membership has increased throughout Wisconsin recently, and the concept has become more popular as it gives workers a voice in what’s happening where they work.

Moon said workers are usually nervous ahead of union votes, however, because they’re apprehensive about retaliation or other consequences from members of company management who encourage employees to vote against unionizing (although retaliation for unionizing is illegal).

Advertisement

While union membership has increased in Wisconsin, a recent USA TODAY article reports union membership remained at a historic low last year at 10%. The report named labor laws unfavorable to unions and an increase in union suppression tactics by corporations.

According to another USA TODAY report from last September, the overall rate of union membership dropped in half from 20.1% in 1983 to 10.1% in 2022. According to the same report, more than 24 states have passed “Right to Work” laws, making it more difficult for workers to unionize.

A 2018 article from USA TODAY said those who don’t support unions often argue the groups are money-making schemes, collecting mandatory fees from members and non-members alike, and unions are used as ways to advance political agendas.

What does the unionization process look like?

Gorman said the workers will know soon after the February election if the vote passed or not. The NLRB will be on site those days, and the group sometimes tallies the ballots the same day. The company and union have the right to choose observers for the election, he said.

Advertisement

If the workers vote to unionize, the work will begin to select a negotiating committee who will work along with an IBEW representative to present proposals and bargain with Ocean Spray. Once they come to an agreement, the workers will vote to approve a final contract.

Bob Stone, the international representative for IBEW’s Sixth District, said the process often starts out contentious between workers and management, but in his experience in other situations, most unions and companies eventually see a mutually beneficial arrangement. Union negotiations have come a long way since the 1970s, he said, and the unions and companies have been able to work professionally and find solutions together. In some cases, unions and companies have been able to collaborate on new programs like apprenticeships, as well, he said.

There’s never a perfect solution that fits every situation, however. Stone said there are unions and union leaders that act poorly, just as there are companies and managers that do. Success comes when both parties come together to find a solution that works.

There are options if the group votes to unionize and negotiations do not go well. According to the National Labor Relations Board, a union group in Massachusetts filed an allegation against Ocean Spray in May 2012, saying the company was refusing to bargain and acting in bad faith. The complaint was withdrawn that August.

What is IBEW and who does it serve?

Gorman said Henry Miller originally started the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers in the late 1800s to focus on safety. Since starting the union, it has grown to represent a wider industry of electrical and manufacturing work, he said.

Advertisement

According to the local chapter’s website, the local union 965 was chartered in 1937 and covers south central and central Wisconsin. The union originally represented workers in the utility industry, but it has since grown to represent workers in utility, cooperative, manufacturing and professional industries.

Gorman said the Ocean Spray facility has 24/7 shift operations with 12-hour shifts, and it employs workers in maintenance, operations and delivery positions. The local IBEW 965 serves a variety of industries and includes facilities with 24/7 shift operations with maintenance, operations and delivery positions.

While all unions were formed to a specific industry, Gorman said all union contracts provide the same opportunity at the bargaining table, regardless of industry.

Who would be covered by a union at Ocean Spray?

According the IBEW release, if this group unionizes, it will be the fourth Ocean Spray plant to do so., The plant in Kenosha is represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and plants in Markham, Washington, and Middleboro, Massachusetts, are represented by the Teamsters Union.

Advertisement

According to Ocean Spray’s website, its network includes nine processing and bottling facilities in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Wisconsin, along with Canada and Chile.

Gorman said Ocean Spray has about 30 salaried management positions and 95 employees in Wisconsin Rapids who would be represented by the union.

If approved, the union would represent all full-time and regular part-time production, maintenance and warehouse employees, including apprentices, control technicians, truck drivers and leads employed at 3130 Industrial St. It would exclude all other employees, quality control employees, office clerical employees, professional employees, managers, guards and supervisors, Gorman said.

More about unions: Here’s why the US labor movement is so popular but union membership is dwindling

Contact Caitlin at cshuda@gannett.com or follow her on Twitter @CaitlinShuda.

Advertisement





Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics

Published

on

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics




AP
 — 

A jury found a Wisconsin judge – accused of helping an undocumented immigrant dodge federal authorities – guilty of obstruction Thursday, marking a victory for President Donald Trump as he continues his sweeping immigration crackdown across the country.

Federal prosecutors charged Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan with obstruction, a felony, and concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, in April. The jury acquitted her on the concealment count, but she still faces up to five years in prison on the obstruction count.

The jury returned the verdicts after deliberating for six hours. Dugan faces up to five years in prison when she’s sentenced, but no date had been set as of late Thursday evening.

Advertisement

Dugan and her attorneys left the courtroom Thursday, ducked into a side conference room and closed the door without speaking to reporters. Steve Biskupic, her lead attorney, later told reporters that he was disappointed with the ruling and didn’t understand how the jury could have reached a split verdict since the elements of both charges were virtually the same.

US Attorney Brad Schimel denied the case was political and urged people to accept the verdict peacefully. He said courthouse arrests are safer because people are screened for weapons and it isn’t unfair for law enforcement to arrest wanted people in courthouses.

“Some have sought to make this about a larger political battle,” Schimel said. “While this case is serious for all involved, it is ultimately about a single day, a single bad day, in a public courthouse. The defendant is certainly not evil. Nor is she a martyr for some greater cause.”

According to court filings that include an FBI affidavit and a federal grand jury indictment, immigration authorities traveled to the Milwaukee County courthouse on April 18 after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Dugan learned that agents were in the corridor outside her courtroom waiting for Flores-Ruiz. She left the courtroom to confront them, falsely telling that their administrative warrant for Flores-Ruiz wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest him and directing them to go to the chief judge’s office.

Advertisement

While the agents were gone, she addressed Flores-Ruiz’s case off the record, told his attorney that he could attend his next hearing via Zoom and led Flores-Ruiz and the attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. The US Department of Homeland Security announced in November he had been deported.

The case inflamed tensions over Trump’s immigration crackdown, with his administration branding Dugan an activist judge and Democrats countering that the administration was trying to make an example of Dugan to blunt judicial opposition to the operation.

Prosecutors worked during Dugan’s trial to show that she directed agents to the chief judge’s office to create an opening for Flores-Ruiz to escape.

Prosecutors also played audio recordings from her courtroom in which she can be heard telling her court reporter that she’d take “the heat” for leading Flores-Ruiz out the back.

Her attorneys countered that she was trying to follow courthouse protocols that called for court employees to report any immigration agents to their supervisors and she didn’t intentionally try to obstruct the arrest team.

Advertisement

This story has been updated with additional details.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin students can soon use Pell Grants to enroll in short-term programs

Published

on

Wisconsin students can soon use Pell Grants to enroll in short-term programs


Wisconsin students enrolled in short-term, workforce training programs will soon be able to use federal grants to pay their tuition.

Millions of low-income students rely on Pell Grants to pay for college, including more than 70,000 in Wisconsin. The awards have long been limited to courses that span a minimum of 15 weeks or 600 “clock hours.”

The Trump administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” signed into law this summer will extend Pell Grant eligiblity to include short-term nondegree programs as short as eight weeks beginning July 1, 2026. The expansion is the largest in decades, making programs previously paid out of pocket – from truck drivers to machinists to nursing assistants – more affordable to students.

These types of programs are mostly offered by community and technical colleges, which have long lobbied for the change. They are studying their programs and deciding which need adjustments ahead of the eligibility expansion.

Advertisement

“Opening up financial aid and making financial aid policy more flexible and relevant to how folks are accessing workplace today, I think it has the potential to be really exciting,” said Wisconsin Technical College System President Layla Merrifield. “How do we bundle these skills? How do we construct these programs and get students a credential that’s very relevant to their field that could potentially provide a great on-ramp to a further credential later on?”

Some education policy experts have reservations about the financial aid expansion and whether it will deliver for students. There’s concern about online training programs and for-profit institutions, some of which have a pattern of predatory practices and poor graduation outcomes. Research also shows short-term programs lead to less upward mobility and lower long-term earnings for students than associate or bachelor’s degrees.

“There is a big risk here,” said Wesley Whistle, the higher education project director at New America, a left-leaning think tank. “An eight-week program is really easy to crank out lots of people. You could have a lot of low-quality programs that don’t lead to much. Students could waste their time, exhaust their Pell eligibility and be left without the right skills to succeed in the workforce. That’s my worry.”

Short implementation timeline, outcome requirements among Workforce Pell challenges

Advocates say the proposed regulations approved Dec. 12 by the federal education department include accountability measures to prevent programs from taking advantage of students and wasting taxpayer money.

Advertisement

The programs must be run by an accredited institution of higher education, and be offered for more than one year before being approved. States must track outcomes, requiring programs meet a 70% completion and job-placement rate, and demonstrate they lead to in-demand, high-wage jobs.

The law includes no additional funding for states to take on the new role of approving individual programs, a worry of Whistle’s.

The tight timeline is also a concern to him. States could quickly throw together an approval process and never again look at it. Whistle advocated for states to start with a pilot approach and reassess in the coming years. He also suggested they creatively leverage state funding to target specific programs that serve high workforce needs.

“This could actually be a moment where we have laboratories for democracy,” Whistle said. “To see what works and what doesn’t.” 

Merrifield said technical colleges are working closely with the state Department of Workforce Development on program approvals. She said she’d love to see the expansion in place for fall 2026 but it may realistically take a little longer than that.

Advertisement

Wisconsin technical colleges take stock of programs

State technical colleges already have some programs that will qualify for the expanded financial aid. But they are considering which ones to revamp.

Take the certified nursing assistant program, Merrifield offered as an example. Students pursuing their registered nursing degree earn their CNA as part of the program. But some students aren’t in the RN program and are seeking only their CNA.The program is 75 hours, which is not enough to meet the new financial aid criteria.

Do technical colleges keep the program short, meaning students continue paying out of pocket? Or do they overhaul it, add skills that hospitals and medical facilities may be looking for and allow students to qualify for Pell Grants?

“There’s potential to re-examine why is it that we package skills the way that we do,”Merrifield said. “What is it that employers are really loooking for in the marketplace?”

Merrifield said manufacturing and agriculture programs may also be ripe for revamp.

Advertisement

Milwaukee Area Technical College has identified eight technical diploma programs that will qualify for a Pell Grant under the expansion, said Barbara Cannell, the executive dean of academic systems and integrity. The programs include nail technician, office technology assistant, real estate broker associate, truck driver training, IT user support technician and food service assistant.

MATC has a number of other programs, mostly certificates, that are too short to qualify for the expansion, she said. College officials are deciding whether to keep the programs as-is or tweak them to allow students to qualify for Pell Grants.

Both Cannell and Merrifield see the Pell Grant expansion as a way to make work-force training more accessible to nontraditional students.

“This opens the door to populations of students who just never saw themselves in that way before,” Merrifield said.

Kelly Meyerhofer has covered higher education in Wisconsin since 2018. Contact her at kmeyerhofer@gannett.com or 414-223-5168. Follow her on X (Twitter) at @KellyMeyerhofer. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin to receive $750k in multistate Menards settlement

Published

on

Wisconsin to receive 0k in multistate Menards settlement


MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) – A more than $4 million multistate settlement was reached with Menards Wednesday over deceptive rebate advertising and price gouging, Wisconsin officials announced Wednesday.

Attorney General Josh Kaul and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection said the settlement resolves claims that Menards falsely marketed its merchandise credit check program, also known as the Menards’ 11% Rebate Program, and allowed price gouging during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Wisconsin will receive $750,000 in the settlement, according to DATCP.

“Figuring out how much you’ll have to pay to buy something should be straightforward,” Kaul said. “It shouldn’t be an adventure.”

Advertisement

Investigators involved in the multi-state lawsuit, which included Illinois and Minnesota, reviewed several aspects of Menards’ sales practices.

Wisconsin officials said investigators reviewed allegations that Menards’ use of the 11% off rebate program falsely claimed a point-of purchase discount, when the home improvement chain only offered in-store merchandise credit for future use, among other advertising claims.

Officials also investigated price gouging on four-gallon bottles of purified water at two locations in Wisconsin, including in Johnson Creek.

As part of the settlement, Menards will need to follow several advertising and sales practices. The terms, noted by DATCP, are as follows (wording theirs):

  • Not advertising or representing that any program that offers store credit for making purchases at Menards provides consumers with a point-of-purchase discount;
  • Clearly and conspicuously disclosing material limitations of the rebate program and disclosing all applicable terms and conditions of the rebate program in a readily available manner;
  • Investigating whether and to what extent it can offer a process by which consumers can safely and securely submit rebate application forms and receipts online;
  • Investigating whether and to what extent it can offer a process by which consumers can safely and securely redeem their rebate for online purchases;
  • Clearly and conspicuously disclosing that Menards is doing business as Rebates International;
  • Allowing consumers at least one year from the date of purchase to submit a rebate claim;
  • Updating their online rebate tracker with information about the rebate claim within 48 hours of the application being input into Menards’ system;
  • Updating their online rebate tracker with additional information about the rebate, including updates about returns affecting the rebate; and
  • Not engaging in price gouging during a period of abnormal economic disruption.

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending