Connect with us

Wisconsin

Takeaways from No.20 Wisconsin's 86-80 Loss at Illinois

Published

on

Takeaways from No.20 Wisconsin's 86-80 Loss at Illinois


Takeaways from No.20 Wisconsin’s 86-80 Loss at Illinois

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. – Eighty points should be enough to win a Big Ten game in the eyes of University of Wisconsin senior Max Klesmit.

The Badgers have shown they are hard to beat when they play clean basketball. The problem is Wisconsin is beating itself on offense, making winning much harder to come by than in November.

No.20 Wisconsin remains winless in December and the Big Ten, as Illinois extended its dominance over them to nine games with an 86-80 victory.

Advertisement

“If you are able to put 70-plus up in a Big Ten game, that should be far enough,” Klesmit said. “It’s early on still but we got a lot to learn in a little time to do it.”

Turnovers and rebounding have zapped all of Wisconsin’s momentum it built over the first eight games, causing the program’s first three-game losing streak in December since 1990. That team lost a fourth straight when it dropped a double-overtime game at Butler.

UW’s next opponent? The Bulldogs on a neutral court in Indianapolis on Saturday afternoon

“We’ve got a lot of veterans in (the locker room) and a lot of people who have been through this before,” said sophomore Nolan Winter (team-high 15 points). “There’s a lot of leadership in the locker room. I wouldn’t say we were ever down. We’re looking forward to the next game, heads held high, talking through what we need to do better, who needs to be better, and in what areas.

“There’s a lot of leadership and accountability that took place. I think that’s good … We’re working through it.”

Advertisement

Here are my takeaways from the State Farm Center.

Wisconsin Not Playing Physical Enough

One of the key points the Wisconsin staff discussed in the scouting report was that Illinois was a heavy-volume three-point shooting team. The Illini ranked 353rd nationally in team percentage points from two (40.6 percent) but were inconsistent in tracking down misses. That wasn’t the case on Tuesday.

The nation’s 51st offensive rebounding team took advantage of the nation’s 154th defensive rebounding team to the tune of 15 offensive rebounds, leading to 16 second-chance points. It’s been a growing problem for the Badgers, which gave up 13 offensive rebounds to Michigan and 11 on Saturday at Marquette.

Advertisement

“Just not physical enough,” Winter said. “All across the board, from bigs to guards, we’ve got to be way more physical, more attentive, checking a body, and then going to get the ball. Actually, not just kind of checking a body and watching someone else go get it. We’ve got to be a lot better at that moving on.”

Illinois had nine offensive rebounds in the first half but was held to nine points, as Wisconsin was sound defensively in running the Illini off the three-point line and free-throw line.

The Illini’s six offensive rebounds in the second half stung because of the poor timing. UW gave up one in consecutive possessions that pushed a three-point deficit to seven. Illinois had two on two possessions, including one that ended with a tip-in by Tre White with 2:19 to go.

UW had just cut the lead to four off a Winter three-pointer, but that tip-in sparked a 5-0 run that the Badgers couldn’t recover from.

Winter led Wisconsin with seven offensive rebounds and showed flashes of being the mismatch forward they recruited him to be. Winter had eight points on Wisconsin’s first seven possessions of the second half. When he badly missed a three-point attempt, Winter chased down his rebound and finished through contact at the rim.

Advertisement

“He showed flashes of how good of a player he can be,” head coach Greg Gard said.

The three-point play gave the Badgers a 47-46 lead, but the Badgers went over three minutes before making another field goal. UW never got the lead back in part to five of its 12 turnovers coming after taking the lead. Illinois scored 14 points off UW’s mistakes, and in the third straight game, an opponent scored double-digit points off UW’s miscues.

“Turnovers are killing us, just giving them free possessions,” Winter said. “It’s kind of the biggest thing I’ve seen in the past three games. It’s killing us.”

Wisconsin Starters Struggle with Efficiency

Gard looked at Steven Crowl’s stats line and wondered aloud how a 7-foot center could play nearly 19 minutes and not finish with a defensive rebound. On a night where the inability to finish possessions with a defensive rebound was the difference, Crowl was the only one of the nine players who didn’t secure at least one rebound.

The senior was more aggressive than in past games, backing down Illinois center Tomislav Ivisic several times in the low post. Still, Crowl’s problems finishing around the rim continue to plague him. He was 2-for-5 on two-point shots.

Advertisement

“We know what Steve is capable of and we all believe in him,” Winter said. “We just need to see it out of him more often than not. We know what he can do and when he gets going it’s scary for the league. We’re all pushing him to be better. I know Steve and he’s going to play with more aggression. I know he will, and he’s going to be back to his old self.”

Gard thought the ball stuck too much with John Blackwell running the point and John Tonje probing in the first half, not moving the ball within the offense and over-dribbling. Blackwell played only 22 minutes and sat long portions due to foul trouble before ultimately fouling out in the final minute.

“We have to get more out of Blackwell,” Gard said. “We can’t have him sitting on the bench with two fouls.”

Tonje hasn’t been the same since he returned from West Virginia. Tonje is 18-for-50 (36.0 percent) over his last four games, including 8-for-26 in the last two. He also attempted only two free throws, his lowest in seven games.

“Some of that is because we weren’t moving the ball well enough to get him isolated and get some ability to attack,” Gard said of Tonje. “The other part is playing off two feet, things we’ve continually talked about.”

Advertisement

Bench Does The Early Dirty Work

Blackwell didn’t play the final 8:24 because of fouls, Klesmit joined him for the final 7:35, and Crowl finally started making shots before he had to sit the final 2:22. Throw in the fact that Tonje was 2-for-7 with two turnovers, and the Badgers trailing, 39-35, at halftime was largely due to play of their reserves.

Carter Gilmore and Xavier Amos took turns guarding and frustrating Tomislav Ivisic, who didn’t make a shot for the final 15:13 of the half. UW’s duo did more than guard. Gilmore hit his first three shots and was active in the low post.

“I think he’s giving us everything he’s got,” Gard said of Gilmore. “He’s really embraced and flourished in the role he has.”

Amos had five points and a chase-down block on Kasparas Jakucionis in transition. Amos logged 10 minutes in the first half after playing six in each of the last two games but was limited in the second half after Gard thought he tweaked his ankle.

“Xavier is continuing to learn as we go through this difficult stretch,” Gard said.

Advertisement

Jack Janicki hit Crowl for a layup at the left block on a roller and blocked forward Morez Johnson Jr. at the rim with his offhand. Seeing Janicki finish with three points, two rebounds, three assists to no turnovers, Gard said he’s got to get him more minutes.

The bench contributed 15 of its 19 points in the first half while Gard’s starters watched due to fouls.

“I have options. That’s the nice part about having a bench. I can lean into the bench a little bit more, which I did tonight, and I may have to do even more going forward.”

By The Numbers

4.3 – Crowl’s scoring average over the last three games, as the senior is 5-for-18 from the floor.

7 – Missed free throws by Wisconsin, the most in a single game this season. The Badgers’ 66.7 percent shooting from the line was also a season-worst.

Advertisement

9 – Wisconsin hasn’t beat Illinois since February 18, 2019. The Badgers’ average margin of defeat in those nine losses is 8.2 points.

14:42 – The Badgers were in the bonus after just 10 possessions in the second half. Wisconsin missed the front end of the bonus on the seventh and ninth team fouls.

6-to-1 – Assist-to-turnover ratio from Wisconsin’s four reserves.

_________________________________________________

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

Advertisement

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @_Perko_, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook





Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes

Published

on

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes


The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.

Wisconsin vaccine guidance

Local perspective:

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.

The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.

“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Advertisement

Big picture view:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.

The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Advertisement

The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.

HealthWisconsinNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal

Published

on

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.

Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.

Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.

According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.

Advertisement

He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.

Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.

Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.

Follow on

Advertisement

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.

Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy

Published

on

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy


A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.

The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.

Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.

Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.

Advertisement

The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.

But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.

Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.

Advertisement

“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.

Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.

“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.

Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.

Advertisement

“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.

Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.

Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.

“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”

Advertisement

Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.

“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending