Wisconsin
Takeaways from No.20 Wisconsin's 83-74 Win Over Butler
Takeaways from No.20 Wisconsin’s 83-74 Win Over Butler
A hard week of practice was apparently the ticket for the University of Wisconsin to return to the win column.
While not discouraged after three consecutive losses, the Badgers had a spirited week of practices and held themselves and others accountable for not doing the necessary things to win tight ball games against quality competition.
Whatever happened in the days following its loss at Illinois appeared to unlock what was missing since the calendar turned to December. No.20 Wisconsin never trailed in what was essentially a road game, playing complementary and fundamental basketball to register an 83-74 victory over Butler Saturday afternoon.
If Wisconsin plays like this the next few times it steps foot on the Gainbridge Fieldhouse floor, the Badgers will hoist a Big Ten Tournament championship trophy.
Here are my takeaways from Wisconsin’s third neutral site victory of the season.
Crowl, Winter Set the Tone Early
The thought of having two 7-footers in the starting lineup creates a matchup nightmare for Wisconsin’s opponents. It took 11 games, but it finally played out that way with Steven Crowl and Nolan Winter having their way with Butler’s frontcourt.
Wisconsin’s starting frontcourt combined for a season-high 38 points, as Winter’s career-high 20 points and Crowl’s slump-busting 18 points were the big tone-setters. The Badgers scored 40 points in the paint, 24 coming from the hands of Crowl and Winter.
Much of the talk involving Wisconsin the past five days involved the ascension of Winter and the descending play of Crowl. There’s no question that Winter is the future of Wisconsin’s frontcourt, a 7-foot big man who can score off pick-and-rolls, dribble drives to the rim, or spot up three-point shots. While his defense is still being polished, Winter’s offensive skillset and confidence is growing in his first season in the starting lineup.
“(The coaches are) giving me all the confidence in the world to keep shooting, keep attacking, keep doing what I do, just knowing my game,” Winter said. “(I’m) playing more confident just knowing I’m able to do some stuff that I maybe haven’t been doing recently.”
The opposite could have been said of Crowl, a fifth-year forward who had reached double figures in just one of UW’s first 10 games and lacked aggressiveness in both shot selection and rebounding.
Wisconsin’s first nine points came from post touches and started with Crowl. He backed down center Andre Screen and finished with a short floater after creating separation with a spin move. Winter was next after getting a perimeter feed from guard John Tonje, utilizing a pump fake and spin move to finish off the glass against guard Patrick McCaffery.
Tonje drew a three-point play against Telfort on the fourth possession and guard John Blackwell drew a double team in transition on the next trip down the court, allowing him to find an open Winter underneath for the easy lay-in.
Throw in Kamari McGee’s three-pointer when guard Kolby King was late on a screen, a result of Butler sagging in the low post, and the Badgers kicked off the game with a 12-2 run.
“You can’t flip a switch when the game starts,” Crowl said. “These last few practices we’ve really been getting into it and making a concerted effort to be aggressive as a team. I think the big thing is just being coachable, coming in every day, and we’re working our asses off. It paid off tonight.”
Fixing the Ill Wills of the Losing Streak
A theme emerged from Wisconsin’s first three losses of the season, and it centered around carelessness. The Badgers were turning the ball over at a higher-than-usual rate (12.7 per game leading to 13.7 opponent points), giving up too many second-chance rebounds (47 second-chance points on 39 offensive rebounds), and being susceptible to dribble penetration.
Guard Max Klesmit claimed they were all fixable mistakes, but something the team had to go out and show. UW managed to check off all three areas against Butler.
Wisconsin was whistled for a season-low three turnovers, an offensive foul on Xavier Amos in the first half, and bad passes by Klesmit and Tonje. Butler committed only six turnovers, further emphasizing how important limiting miscues were.
In addition to the three turnovers, UW had 19 assists. It was the first time the Badgers achieved that ratio since posting 22 assists with three turnovers in a 78-46 win at Northwestern on January 23, 2011.
“That tells you just the unselfishness and how the ball moved,” head coach Greg Gard said.
Offensive rebounds were a backbreaker against Illinois (15 that led to 16 second-chance points) but not against Butler. One of the best three-point shooting teams in the country, ranking 17th amongst all Division I schools with a 40.1 percent 3-point rate, Butler rebounded just five of its 29 misses that prevented it from getting its offense flowing.
While Pierre Brooks (23) and Patrick McCaffery (16) generated their offense, the Badgers were terrific defensively on leading-scorer Jahmyl Telfort, who was averaging 17.0 points per game, shooting 46.7 percent from the field and 45.7 percent from three, and registering 3.1 assists.
UW held him without a point or an assist in the first half and made him a non-factor at 3-for-10 from the floor, 1-for-5 from three, and only two assists on an eight-point night.
“All the guys that guarded Telfort, that’s a hard matchup because of his size and his ability to put the ball on the floor and is powerful enough around the paint,” Gard said. “They obviously go to him a lot. Nolan did a really good job. His size at seven feet is something I always tell him can be to his advantage. He can play with his length and guard smaller, maybe perceived faster guys. That’s a great experience for him.
“I thought Carter Gilmore was terrific on him, as well. I know we had Tonje on him at times, but it was primarily Winter and Amos had him for a little bit. An old player of his caliber (to go) 3-for-10, that’s a really good night. There weren’t many easy looks for him. We were able to exchange a lot of things … and make sure he couldn’t get down lane lines for the most part.”
Ending the Half with a Flourish
Wisconsin’s offense lagged after Crowl’s layup with 12:48 remaining, going 5-for-17 over an 11-minute, 35-second stretch. Unlike at Illinois, when UW got into the bonus early in the half but never fully took advantage, the Badgers never lost their lead due to going 14-for-14 from the line over a 12-possession stretch late in the half.
UW closed the half with eight points on its last three possessions, again because of Crowl’s aggressiveness. Starting with a catch-and-shoot three to make the score 42-33, Crowl finished off the glass in a simple give-and-go with McGee on a possession that began with UW’s point guard swiping Pierre Brooks.
Klesmit hit only one shot Saturday but his three-pointer beat the game clock to cap a 10-0 run and put the Badgers up 14 going into the locker room. Butler never cut the lead down past five points.
By The Numbers
1.343 – Wisconsin’s points per possession in the first half, as the Badgers shot 45.2 percent in the first half. UW shot 44.4 percent in the second half and finished the game at 1.258 points per possession.
5 – The Badgers had 5 players score in double figures – Winter, Crowl, Klesmit (11), Tonje (11), and Blackwell (10). It’s the second time this season the Badgers have achieved that feat.
5 – In addition to his 10 points, Blackwell had a career-high five assists with zero turnovers. Blackwell has scored in double figures in 10 of 12 games this season.
9.6 – Wisconsin lowered its turnover average to 9.6 turnovers per game. Entering the day, that figure would be tied for the best mark in the Big Ten.
90 – Wisconsin went 25-for-27 from the foul line, the third time this season the Badgers shot at least 90 percent from the line. The last time the Badgers made 25 free throws with 92 percent or better shooting came in a 25-for-26 (96.2 percent) effort in an 82-56 win vs. Michigan State on February 6, 2011.
_________________________________________________
*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den
*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel
*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)
*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @_Perko_, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_
*Like us on Facebook
Wisconsin
What’s the Wisconsin wolf population? DNR issues latest estimate.
Wisconsin had an estimated 1,162 gray wolves in 321 packs in late winter 2026, according to the Department of Natural Resources.
The 2026 population estimate represents a 5% year-over-year decline and is 3% below the 5-year average, a slight fluctuation around a mean that suggest the state’s wolf population has reached its biological carrying capacity, said Lydia Margenau, DNR wildlife research scientist.
The DNR released the information June 25 during a virtual meeting of its Wolf Advisory Committee. Randy Johnson, DNR large carnivore specialist, led the meeting. The full 2026 wolf monitoring report is expected to be posted to the DNR’s website in the coming days, Johnson said.
The statistical confidence levels in the 2026 wolf estimate include a population range from 1,026 to 1,307 and a range in packs from 287 to 359.
The estimate does not include wolves not associated with packs or those that have disbursed out of the state’s core wolf range.
Specific to the five Wisconsin wolf management units, Zone 1 in the far north and northwest had 511 wolves, Zone 2 in the northeast had 273, Zone 3 in the northwest had 126, Zone 4 in the northcentral and northeast had 54 and Zone 5 in the central forest zone had 191. Seven other wolves were not attributed to a zone.
The average pack sizes ranged from a low of 2.54 wolves in Zone 4 to a high of 4.34 in Zone 1.
Pack territories were an average of 54 square miles in Zones 1 through 4 but, similar to past years, 32 square miles in Zone 5, likely due to higher prey density in the central forest area, Margenau said.
The DNR produces an annual report on wolves in the state, partly as a requirement to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The gray wolf in Wisconsin and most other states has been protected under the federal Endangered Species Act since February 2022.
Since 2020 the DNR has used an occupancy model in its work to produce a wolf population estimate. The model uses inputs from wolf tracking surveys conducted by agency staff, volunteers and others as well as data obtained from GPS-collared wolves.
The GPS collar data helps the scientists determine wolf territory sizes and movements. The DNR obtains location information from the collared animals via satellite.
As of June 2026 there were 45 active GPS collars on wolves in Wisconsin, according to DNR research scientist Danielle Deming, including 15 deployed this year.
For the winter 2025-26 wolf monitoring period, 503 carnivore tracking surveys were conducted across 17,771 miles of roads, according to the DNR. Ninety-seven percent of the blocks received at least three surveys, the minimum recommended.
The work is done in winter when the wolf population is near or at its annual low and when the animals are easiest to track.
Wolf populations typically double after pups are born in spring then drop over the rest of the year due to various sources of mortality, according to wolf researchers.
The gray wolf was native to Wisconsin but after decades of persecution, including poisoning and bounties, the species was considered extirpated from the state by 1960.
Increased protections, including the 1973 Endangered Species Act, helped the carnivore expand from a residual population in northern Minnesota and recolonize Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
The Badger State’s wolf population was estimated at 25 in 1980, 34 in 1990, 248 in 2000, 704 in 2010 and 1,034 in 2020, according to DNR reports.
As seen in the recent data, the wolf population has leveled off over the last decade or so as the animals have filled the most suitable habitat in the state, according to biologists.
The slight declines in recent years could be due to mild winter conditions which favor white-tailed deer but are tougher on wolves, Margenau said.
Researchers with the Voyageurs Wolf Project also documented a recent decline in the wolf population it studies in northern Minnesota in its most recent report.
Wisconsin has held four wolf hunting and trapping seasons in the modern era, in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2021.
But no wolf hunting or trapping has occurred since February 2021 due to a successful in-state lawsuit by wolf advocates in October 2021 and a federal district judge’s decision in February 2022 that returned the wolf in Wisconsin and many other states to protections of the federal Endangered Species Act.
Several attempts are being made to delist the wolf. They include: an appeal of the decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the Pet and Livestock Protection Act, legislation that has passed the U.S. House of Representatives and is in the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works; and a rider attached to the fiscal year 2027 Department of Interior appropriations bill.
Confirmed or probable gray wolf depredations on livestock and other domestic animals in Wisconsin decreased in 2025, as did the amount of compensation paid, but were close to 5-year averages, according to DNR reports.
The compensation dropped from $322,970 in 2024 to $200,864 in 2025.
So far in 2026 in Wisconsin there have been 19 verified wolf conflicts and 15 verified wolf depredations on livestock, down from 32 and 22, respectively, in 2025, Johnson said.
There has never been a wolf attack on a human in modern Wisconsin history, according to the DNR.
For more information, visit the DNR’s Wolves in Wisconsin page at dnr.wi.gov.
Wisconsin
Coveted 2027 recruit Baboucarr Ann commits to Wisconsin basketball
Greg Gard shares most rewarding part of Garding Against Cancer effort
Wisconsin basketball coach Greg Gard said the most rewarding part of his Garding Against Cancer initiative is ‘the people.’
MADISON – Greg Gard and Co. have landed another one of their top recruiting targets in the 2027 class.
Baboucarr Ann, a four-star recruit from Maple Grove, Minnesota, announced his commitment to Wisconsin men’s basketball via social media on June 25.
“Belief. Trust. Development. Family,” Ann said in a tweet. “That’s why I’m a Badger.”
Ann chose the Badgers over scholarship offers from Notre Dame, Iowa State and nearby Minnesota, among other high-major programs. 247 Sports has ranked the 6-foot-5 prospect No. 84 nationally and No. 1 in Minnesota.
He is the third UW commit in the 2027 class, joining Wauwatosa West guard Jalen Brown and 7-foot-1 center Jack Thelen. Brown also is a top-100 recruit in 247 Sports’ rankings.
Ann and Thelen are teammates both at Maple Grove and on the AAU circuit. Brad Davison, UW’s special assistant to the head coach, is a Maple Grove alum and had a key role in Ann’s recruitment.
While the rankings surely will fluctuate as other schools pick up more commitments, the Badgers have 247 Sports’ third-best recruiting class in the country. Iowa State and Illinois are the only higher-rated classes.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for June 24, 2026
Manuel Franco claims his $768 million Powerball jackpot
Manuel Franco, 24, of West Allis was revealed Tuesday as the winner of the $768.4 million Powerball jackpot.
Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at June 24, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from June 24 drawing
13-14-16-21-38, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 2
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 24 drawing
Midday: 1-3-4
Evening: 7-7-3
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 24 drawing
Midday: 4-2-3-3
Evening: 1-5-4-6
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning All or Nothing numbers from June 24 drawing
Midday: 02-07-08-09-12-13-14-16-18-19-20
Evening: 02-03-04-05-09-16-17-18-19-21-22
Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Badger 5 numbers from June 24 drawing
06-22-24-27-31
Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning SuperCash numbers from June 24 drawing
09-17-27-29-31-38, Doubler: N
Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Megabucks numbers from June 24 drawing
01-08-12-24-26-27
Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
- Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
- Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
- Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.
Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?
No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.
When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
- Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **
WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.
-
North Dakota5 minutes agoNorth Dakota composer launches statewide virtual choir project
-
Ohio8 minutes agoUC Bearcats baseball playing Ohio State, Vanderbilt in Nashville in 2027
-
Oklahoma13 minutes agoFour arrested after 30 pounds of meth, dozens of animals seized from Oklahoma City home
-
Oregon20 minutes ago
Oregon Lottery Pick 4 results for June 25
-
Pennsylvania23 minutes agoMeasles detected in two more counties in Pennsylvania as health department recommends early vaccination
-
South-Carolina35 minutes agoA 1776 midnight battle in Laurens County: The Battle of Fort Lindley
-
South Dakota38 minutes ago
SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for June 25, 2026
-
Tennessee43 minutes ago
TN Lottery Cash 3 Morning, Cash 3 Midday winning numbers for June 25, 2026