Wisconsin
Smith: Hunters tallying high marks in Wisconsin’s 2025 deer seasons
Deer hunters in Wisconsin had one of their best seasons in years, according to Department of Natural Resources data.
As of Jan. 27, hunters registered 338,685 white-tailed deer in the 2025-26 Wisconsin hunting seasons.
The preliminary total included 165,614 antlered deer, or bucks, and 173,071 antlerless deer, mostly adult females and fawns.
The total does not include deer taken on agricultural damage tags, the tribal harvest, in the Deer Management Assistance Program, vehicle-killed deer or at Ft. McCoy.
The Jan. 27 data also do not reflect the entire deer hunting year, which in some management units featured late bow seasons through Jan. 31.
Final data will be available in the coming weeks and likely add about 6,000 deer, mostly antlerless taken through the ag damage program, to the total.
But even with some numbers outstanding, the Badger State’s 2025-26 deer seasons are notable in several respects.
The total harvest is on track to be about 4% higher than the previous year and the highest since 2012, when 368,313 deer were registered, according to DNR data.
And remember the 2025-26 deer seasons included a lackluster nine-day gun hunt (the largest portion of the annual deer harvest). The Nov. 22-30, 2025 gun season resulted in 183,094 deer registered, a drop of 4% from the previous year.
A heavy snowstorm hit much of the state late in the nine-day season and likely reduced hunter effort.
But other portions of the 2025-26 Wisconsin deer hunting seasons more than took up the slack.
It started in October when 8,480 deer were registered in the youth hunt (a year-over-year increase of 15%) and picked up again in December with the muzzleloader season with 11,910 deer (48% higher than 2024), four-day December antlerless season with 10,590 deer (28% higher) and holiday antlerless deer hunt with 11,277 deer (47% higher).
Continuing a trend since 2014, the crossbow deer kill of 70,047 (43,006 bucks and 27,041 antlerless) is up 10% from last year.
And the archery (vertical bow) deer harvest actually reversed a long-term trend and increased this season. As of Jan. 27 the total was 41,459 (25,701 bucks and 15,758 antlerless), a 7% year-over-year increase.
“We know it’s not true everywhere, but for good chunks of the state, it’s the good old days (for deer hunters),” said Ryan Haffele, DNR acting deer specialist. “It’s a positive trend, and this year tells us about the depth and breadth of our seasons.”
One of the biggest points in the statewide pile of data is this: the 2025-26 buck kill of 165,614 is 14th highest on record and the most since 2007.
That’s saying something especially since the number of deer hunters has dropped by 116,640 (or 16%) in the last 25 years, according to the DNR.
It’s a continuation of last year, when 13 Wisconsin counties set buck kill records. The DNR will be able to make comparisons of those data from the 2025-26 deer seasons in the coming weeks.
It also bears mentioning this year’s buck harvest occurred in an era when deer hunters are more selective and more apt to pass up a shot at an antlered deer than ever.
Even with those caveats, many still consider buck kill a loose correlate for the deer population.
That association held up for the 2025-26 deer seasons.
The DNR estimated the state herd at 1.82 million deer following the 2024-25 hunting seasons, a slight year-over-year increase and highest on record. The herd has especially swelled in the agricultural zones since 2011 when the Legislature prohibited the Earn-A-Buck regulation and the early antlerless gun season.
Both the southern and central farmland zones had record high deer populations prior to the 2025 season, according to the DNR. And those estimates come at a time when chronic wasting disease is increasing in prevalence and likely causing localized declines in deer numbers in some southern counties, according to the DNR.
The contemporary “tool box” of Wisconsin hunting regulations lacks a device even remotely capable of reaching the antlerless harvest goals in the agricultural zones. The DNR and County Deer Advisory Councils can set the number but the deer kill consistently falls short.
The statewide deer population also got a bump from two consecutive mild winters, which primarily benefitted deer in the northern forest and central forest zones.
Keith McCaffery, 86, of Rhinelander, who spent his 37-year DNR career working on deer and is arguably the most respected deer biologist alive in the Upper Midwest, told me before the 2025 seasons that Wisconsin “hunters this fall could be taking to the field with more deer than anytime in recorded history.”
In addition to being a lifelong Wisconsin deer hunter, McCaffery has been involved in deer population monitoring and management for most of his life, including through the period of highest deer kills. The 2025-26 registration data has only supported his claim about the possible number of deer available to hunters this year.
Of course deer population estimates have margins of error. Biologists stress looking at the trend as opposed to an absolute number. The leading indicators point to a higher deer population in Wisconsin this year.
One can only guess how much higher the deer kill would have been this year if the same number of hunters had gone afield with the same effort, attitudes, access and regulations as they did in 2000 when the record Wisconsin harvest of 615,293 deer was set.
But that’s a good debate topic for the local watering hole or deer camp.
The realities of the 2025-26 seasons are getting entered in the books.
What else made this year stand out? Hunters in the later seasons, especially the muzzleloader, December antlerless and holiday hunts, enjoyed snow on the landscape statewide, said Jeff Pritzl, recently retired DNR deer specialist.
“That hasn’t been true many years,” Pritzl said. “And it also showed hunters were still willing to get out there and work on filling tags late in the year.”
Pritzl pointed to the antlerless deer harvest of 173,071, a 5% year-over-year increase, as another bright spot from this year’s preliminary numbers. And as referenced earlier, the antlerless kill will be slightly higher in the final tally but will still fall short of harvest goals.
My own hunting seasons once again exceeded the expectations of a kid who grew up in southeastern Wisconsin with very few deer.
I saw lots of deer on each outing this year, primarily in Waukesha and Waupaca counties. I registered three, all adult does, and all in keeping with my and the landowners’ goals. I kept two for family consumption and donated one.
I let eight antlered deer pass while waiting for a doe on opening day of the nine-day gun season in Waupaca County.
Most important, my season included making new friends and having new experiences in the field while helping, at least in a modest way, to address extremely high deer numbers in a couple locations.
The final 2025-26 Wisconsin deer hunting statistics will be released in the coming weeks and months. Haffele, the DNR’s acting deer specialist, is planning to give a presentation on the deer harvest data at the Feb. 25 Natural Resources Board meeting in Madison.
If you hunted deer this year, I hope your season was safe and successful. If you care to share your stories or photos with me and potentially other readers in future articles, please email me at psmith@jrn.com.
Wisconsin
Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion
AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing.
How historic NCAA pay settlement will affect college sports
A federal judge approved the terms of a $2.8 billion settlement that will see schools be permitted to pay college athletes through licensing deals.
unbranded – Sport
Let me put my bias, or experience up front. I was a student athlete at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and was fortunate to have one of my sons graduate as a far better student athlete.
I am writing in support of Assembly Bill 1034, which modernizes Wisconsin law to reflect the realities of today’s college athletic landscape, not because of those past “glory days,” but because college athletics has changed more in the past three years than in the previous three decades.
New national rules now see universities sharing millions of dollars annually with student-athletes through revenue sharing and name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities. Other states have responded quickly, updating their laws to ensure they can compete in this new environment.
Making sure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind
The State Assembly, with overwhelming bipartisan support, passed AB 1034, now it’s up to the Wisconsin State Senate to pass this legislation and send it quickly to Gov. Tony Evers to ensure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind.
AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing with peer institutions across the country. In a measured way, the bill would relieve UW-Madison, UW-Milwaukee, and UW-Green Bay of $15 million of debt related to athletic facilities with the expressed purpose that those dollars would instead be used to invest in athletic programs.
This legislation is critical for two inter-connected reasons, competition and economic impact.
At a recent capitol hearing, UW-Madison Director of Athletics Chris McIntosh explained that 80 percent of the entire athletic department budget is generated by the football program. That revenue underwrites the competitive commitment to the other 11 men’s and 12 women’s varsity teams, supporting some 600 student athletes.
The capacity for this to continue is threatened by $20 million in new annual name and likeness costs that impact all NCAA schools. An expense that will continue to rise. In addition, peer institutions in the Big Ten and across the country are committing substantial additional resources to these NIL efforts. In short, without this debt support, the university and its athletes will not only lose an even playing field, they may lose the ability to get on the field.
This threat from the changing nature of NCAA athletics also poses a threat to the economic impact from college athletics. A recent study found that nearly 2 million visitors came to campus events annually, generating more than $750M in statewide economic impact from Wisconsin athletics. Case in point, each home football game produces a $19M economic impact, with 5,600 jobs in the state tied directly or indirectly to the department’s activities.
This bipartisan legislation is not about propping up a single sport. It’s about protecting broad based opportunities for all our student-athletes, some of whom we just watched win a gold medal for the U.S. women’s’ hockey team.
Athletics are often noted as the front door to the university, but I would broaden that opening to the State of Wisconsin. Our public university system success strengthens enrollment, attracts the talent that drives our prosperity, and serves as a sustaining way forward for our economy.
Bill provides measured and responsible investment
As the former head of one of our state’s largest business groups, I have spent much of my career engaged in economic development. I know what generates “return on investment.” AB 1034 provides a measured and responsible investment that will generate a positive impact for Wisconsin taxpayers, citizens, and employers.
NCAA athletics has changed, and Wisconsin must change with it, or sit on the sidelines. So let’s encourage the Wisconsin State Senate to pass AB 1034 and put Wisconsin in position to compete on the field which provides a win for our student athletes and all of us who benefit from a world class university system.
Tim Sheehy is a UW-Madison graduate and former student athlete. Sheehy served as the president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce for more than 30 years where he oversaw economic development and business attraction for the region.
Wisconsin
NE Wisconsin community, politicians react to US airstrikes in Iran
GREEN BAY, Wis. (WBAY) – The United States launched airstrikes in Iran on Wednesday, killing Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and prompting fast reactions from across northeast Wisconsin.
In Appleton, over a dozen of protesters came together at Houdini Plaza, protesting the strikes and calling for peace, and in Green Bay, protesters lined the streets with signs condemning the strikes.
One protester we spoke with said the strikes were not about the nuclear protest, but for a regime change.
“All I could think of is WMDs that got us the last war in the Middle East, and it was just a lot of bunk, and the other thing is he said is he’s trying to overthrow the current regime,” said John Cuff of Appleton.
Area lawmakers are also reacting to the attacks in Iran.
Senator Tammy Baldwin released a statement following President Trump’s announcement of the strikes, saying: “My whole career, I have been steadfast in the belief that doing the hard work of diplomacy is the answer, not war. I believed that when I voted against a war in Iraq and I believe it today. Iran poses a real threat and one we need to take head on, but getting into another endless war is not the answer.
“President Trump illegally bombed Iran, totally disregarding the Constitution, putting American troops in harm’s way, and starting another war in the Middle East with no end in sight. The Constitution is clear: if the President wants to start a war, Congress – elected by the people – needs to sign off on it. The Senate needs to come back immediately to vote on this President’s senseless and illegal bombings– I know where I stand.
“Have we learned nothing from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Doubling down with another open-ended war without realistic goals or a strategy to win is not only foolish, but also recklessly puts Wisconsin’s sons and daughters at risk.
“President Trump pledged to the American people that he would not get involved in another foreign war, and this is yet another broken promise from this President. The President needs to listen to the people he represents: Americans want fewer foreign wars and more focus on them and their everyday struggles.”
Representative Tom Tiffany also released a statement on X, formerly Twitter, saying: “My thoughts are with the brave U.S. forces carrying out these precision strikes and with the safety of American personnel in the region.”
Copyright 2026 WBAY. All rights reserved.
-
World4 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO4 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers