Connect with us

Wisconsin

Committee studying how to manage Wisconsin sandhill cranes

Published

on

Committee studying how to manage Wisconsin sandhill cranes


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A group of legislators, farmers and conservationists studying how to control Wisconsin’s sandhill crane population is set to hold its first meeting next month.

The Joint Legislative Council’s 12-member Study Committee on Sandhill Cranes is set to meet Aug. 1 at the Horicon Marsh State Wildlife Area.

The Joint Legislative Council is made up of the Legislature’s attorneys. The council puts together committees to study issues every even-numbered year with an eye toward recommending legislative changes in the next session.

The sandhill crane committee has been tasked with coming up with ways to manage the state’s sandhill crane population and reduce the crop damage they cause, including seeking federal approval to establish a hunting season.

Advertisement

Tens of thousands of sandhill cranes breed across Wisconsin or migrate through the state each spring and fall, according to the International Crane Foundation. But they feed on germinating corn seeds after spring planting and can cause significant damage to the crop, according to the foundation.

Multiple states, including Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Texas and Wyoming, hold annual sandhill crane hunting seasons, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Wisconsin lawmakers introduced a bill in 2021 establishing a sandhill crane hunt but the measure never got a floor vote. The bill’s chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Paul Tittl, is serving as chair of the study committee.

The International Crane Foundation opposes hunting sandhills largely because they reproduce very slowly and hunters could kill endangered whooping cranes by mistake. The foundation has pushed farmers to treat their seeds with a nontoxic chemical deterrent.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

What channel is Wisconsin vs Iowa on tonight? Time, TV schedule to watch Week 10 game

Published

on

What channel is Wisconsin vs Iowa on tonight? Time, TV schedule to watch Week 10 game


play

After losing to No. 3 Penn State at Camp Randall last weekend, the Wisconsin Badgers (5-3) are one of five teams at 3-2 in the Big Ten Conference. Their opponent Saturday, Iowa (5-3, 3-2), is in the same bunch.

Advertisement

With games left vs. No. 1 Oregon, at Nebraska and vs. Minnesota after the bye week, Saturday’s matchup is an important swing game for the Badgers in league play.

A victory also makes the Badgers bowl-eligible for the 23rd season in a row and the 28th time in 29 seasons.

Watch Wisconsin vs Iowa on Fubo (free trial)

Brendan Sullivan will be making his first start at quarterback at Iowa after replacing Cade McNamara in a 40-14 victory over Northwestern after McNamara went out with a concussion. The Hawkeyes scored 37 consecutive points last week with Sullivan under center.

Here’s how to watch and listen to the game:

Advertisement

What channel is Wisconsin vs Iowa on tonight?

Wisconsin vs. Iowa will broadcast nationally on NBC in Week 10 of the 2024 college football season. Noah Eagle (play-by-play) and Todd Blackledge (analyst) will call the game from Kinnick Stadium. Streaming options for the game include the Peacock app and Fubo, which offers a free trial to new subscribers.

Wisconsin vs Iowa time tonight

  • Date: Saturday, Nov. 2
  • Start Time: 6:30 p.m. CT

The Wisconsin vs. Iowa game starts at 6:30 p.m. from Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City, Iowa.

Wisconsin vs. Iowa predictions, picks, odds

Odds courtesy of BetMGM as of Saturday

Mark Stewart: This has the makings of a great bounce-back game for Wisconsin. The Badgers didn’t play poorly last week but it wasn’t good enough to win. The experience, however, of facing a top-three opponent sets up UW nicely for the rigors of winning on the road. Wisconsin 24, Iowa 20

Advertisement

JR Radcliffe: This feels like a massively important game for quarterback Braedyn Locke, who has struggled to get through a game this year without committing at least one turnover. Is he the future at quarterback for this program? If he is, this would be an opportunity to showcase it, leading Wisconsin in a difficult but winnable road game against a team down their own starting quarterback. The defense already slowed down one powerful rushing opponent (Rutgers), but Iowa is the best in the Big Ten in that department, led by Kaleb Johnson. It’s another close call, but I think Iowa has just a little extra. Iowa 28, Wisconsin 23.

ODDS: Iowa by 2.5

O/U: 41.5

Wisconsin vs Iowa on radio tonight

  • Radio: FM-97.3 and AM 920 in Milwaukee and AM-1310 and FM-101.5 in Madison, plus a statewide network of stations.
  • Matt Lepay (play-by-play), Mark Tauscher (analyst) and Patrick Herb (sideline reporter) will be on the call.

Wisconsin vs Iowa on SiriusXM Radio

  • The Wisconsin broadcast is on Channel 391. The Iowa broadcast is on Channel 85.

Wisconsin football schedule 2024

All times Central

Denotes Big Ten game

  • Aug. 30: vs. Western Michigan, W, 28-14
  • Sept. 7: vs. South Dakota, W, 27-13
  • Sept. 14: vs. Alabama, L, 42-10
  • Sept. 21: Bye
  • Sept. 28: at USC*, L, 38-21
  • Oct. 5: vs. Purdue*, W, 52-6
  • Oct. 12: at Rutgers*, W, 42-7
  • Oct. 19: at Northwestern*, W, 23-3
  • Oct. 26: vs. Penn State*, L, 28-13
  • Nov. 2: at Iowa,* 6:30 p.m.
  • Nov. 9: Bye
  • Nov. 16: vs. Oregon*
  • Nov. 23: at Nebraska*
  • Nov. 29: vs. Minnesota*, 11 a.m.
  • Record: 5-3 (3-2 Big Ten)

Iowa football schedule 2024

All times Central

Denotes Big Ten game

Advertisement
  • Aug. 31: vs. Illinois State, W, 40-0
  • Sept. 7: vs. Iowa State, L, 20-19
  • Sept. 14: vs. Troy, W, 38-21
  • Sept. 21: at Minnesota*, W, 31-14
  • Oct. 5: at Ohio State*, L, 35-7
  • Oct. 12: vs. Washington*, W, 40-16
  • Oct. 19: at Michigan State*, L, 32-20
  • Oct. 26: vs. Northwestern*, W, 40-14
  • Nov. 2: vs. Wisconsin*, 6:30 p.m.
  • Nov. 8: at UCLA*, 8 p.m.
  • Nov. 23: at Maryland*
  • Nov. 29: vs. Nebraska*, 6:30 p.m.
  • Record: 5-3 (3-2 Big Ten)

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

US DOJ sending staff to monitor Wisconsin election Tuesday

Published

on

US DOJ sending staff to monitor Wisconsin election Tuesday


The U.S Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division will post election monitors in four Wisconsin locations Nov. 5. The news comes as Wisconsin’s top elections administrator says local clerks have been preparing for any potential election day problems since 2020.

The DOJ announced Friday it will “monitor compliance with federal voting rights laws” in the cities of Milwaukee, Wausau and the Rusk County Towns of Lawrence and Thornapple during Tuesday’s presidential election.

The DOJ sued the Towns of Lawrence and Thornapple in September, accusing local officials of breaking federal law for not making at least one accessible voting machine available to voters with disabilities during elections in April and May. The Town of Thornapple is currently appealing a preliminary injunction requiring it to bring the accessible voting machine back for the upcoming election.

Stay informed on the latest news

Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.

Advertisement

In Wausau, the Wisconsin Department of Justice has taken over an investigation into whether the city’s mayor broke the law by removing a ballot drop box outside city hall Sept. 22.

Wisconsin’s top elections official says clerks have prepped for potential election day problems since 2020

Also on Friday, Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe said early, in-person absentee voting remains stronger than expected with more 801,000 ballots cast thus far. That represents around a 48 percent increase in early, in-person turnout compared to the same time in 2020.

Wolfe also said slowdowns with the WEC’s computer system that caused delays for clerks trying to print absentee ballot labels have been resolved.

Advertisement

“Also, importantly, the label printing function is not a function that is used on election day. It is only an optional function that’s used during in-person, absentee voting,” Wolfe told reporters at a media briefing.

When asked whether Wisconsin clerks had reported any issues seen in other states, like absentee ballot drop boxes being set on fire or disruptions at early voting sites, Wolfe said they have not.

Wolfe said clerks have been preparing for the upcoming election since 2020. That’s when former President Donald Trump began falsely claiming his loss to President Joe Biden was due to voter fraud, driving up public concerns about election integrity.

“We always hope that a bad day in elections never happens, but if something should occur, I think our local election officials have truly been preparing for those possibilities for the last four years,” Wolfe said. “And they take it very seriously that they want to ensure that their voters can feel safe and secure when they go to vote using whatever method they choose.”

Wisconsin Elections Commission spars over guidance spawned GOP allegations of noncitizens voting 

The elections commission held a meeting after Wolfe’s briefing. Things grew heated between some of the six voting members of the commission during a discussion on clerk guidance tied to Republicans’ recent focus on the potential of noncitizens voting in the presidential election.

Advertisement

While research has found that illegal voting by noncitizens is exceedingly rare, documents prepared by commission staff said they’ve received “many questions from clerks.”

The guidance notes that the state Legislature, which is controlled by Republicans, changed state law in 2016 to allow “Limited Term” and “Non-Domiciled” drivers licenses and ID cards to be used to vote in Wisconsin. Those cards are issued to people who were legal residents but not yet citizens when they applied for the credentials.

The guidance states that clerks or elections inspectors who are notified a person presented a “Limited Term” or “Non-Domiciled” card at a polling place should challenge their eligibility to vote unless they provide citizenship documentation. During a challenge, the prospective voter is placed under oath and asked if they are U.S. Citizen. The the answer is no, a ballot cannot be issued.

Republican Commissioner Bob Spindell, who posed as a false elector during Trump’s 2020 attempts to overturn his loss to Biden, claimed he’s heard that some noncitizen driver’s licenses don’t include the phrase “Limited Term” or “Non-Domiciled.”

He contended that if birth dates and expiration dates on drivers licenses do not match, it could be an indication that the holder is not a citizen. And he asked whether birth dates and expiration dates on licenses could be matched in order to tell if a person was a citizen or not.

Advertisement

“So I was wondering if the (WEC) staff has any more information on that, because this is a question that has been put forth,” Spindell said. “It’s my understanding the Republican Party of Wisconsin has instructed the paid poll workers and also the observers that this is something that needs to be looked at and could possibly be a reason for challenge.”

Democratic Wisconsin Elections Commission Chair Ann Jacobs scoffed at Spindell’s statement and question.

“Are you saying that you’re asking this commission to order poll workers across the state to examine every single driver’s license?” Jacobs said. “That’s the millions of voters who are going to vote on election day that they’re supposed to be analyzing these expiration dates, because you’re telling us it’s possible that one of those identifications could be someone who might not be a citizen?”

Spindell backtracked slightly but said if a poll worker notices inconsistencies there should be commission guidance. “Because I hate to see a whole bunch of challenges.”

Wisconsin Elections Commission Chief Legal Counsel Jim Witecha told members that DOT attorneys told him the only time the situation is referring to would happen is on the “Limited Term” and “Non-Domiciled” cards. 

Advertisement

Democratic Commissioner Mark Thomsen called Spindell’s claims “outrageous.”

“We used this law in 2016 when Donald Trump won, and we used it in every election since, and this hasn’t been an issue,” Thomsen said. “We just heard it’s a non issue. We should not put out anything publicly to any poll worker that what they’ve been doing for years is wrong or that it should be challenged, and especially a few days before the election.”

The GOP focus on alleged non-citizen voting has led to two referendum questions that will appear on ballots Tuesday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Harris narrowly leads Trump in Pennsylvania, Michigan Wisconsin, Marist polls find

Published

on

Harris narrowly leads Trump in Pennsylvania, Michigan Wisconsin, Marist polls find


play

WASHINGTON ― Vice President Kamala Harris holds narrow leads in Pennsylvania, Michigan in Wisconsin four days from the presidential election, according to new polls of the three “blue wall” states released Friday by Marist College that show the Democratic nominee gaining with independent voters.

In Pennsylvania, Harris is ahead of Republican nominee Donald Trump 50%-48% among likely voters, Marist found, and leads Trump 51%-48% in Michigan and 50%-48% in Wisconsin.

Advertisement

The polls − some of the most encouraging surveys for Harris in recent days − were taken Oct. 27 to Oct. 30. Each result is within the polls’ margins of errors of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 3.5 percentage points in Michigan and 3.4 percentage points in Wisconsin.

Harris is buoyed in the polls by independent voters shifting her direction. In Pennsylvania, Harris leads 55%-40% with independents, Marist found, a turnaround after Trump had a 4-point advantage with Pennsylvania’s independent voters in September. Harris leads among independent voters 52%-46% in Michigan and 51%-46% in Wisconsin.

Harris underperforming with Black voters, but gaining with white voters

Reflecting a defining trend of the 2024 election, the polls found large gender gaps, with Harris faring better among women and Trump with men.

Advertisement

In Pennsylvania, Harris is ahead 53%-45% with likely women voters, while Trump leads likely male voters 51%-47%. Harris leads likely Michigan women voters 55%-44% over Trump and likely Wisconsin women voters 55%-43%. Trump is ahead with likely Michigan male voters 52%-46% and likely Wisconsin male voters 53%-44%.

Despite Harris’ polling leads, the vice president is underperforming with Black voters compared to President Joe Biden’s performance in the 2020 election, Marist found.

Advertisement

Harris leads Trump 84%-16% among Black voters in Pennsylvania and 75%-25% among Black voters in Michigan. Biden won support from 92% of Black voters in 2020. Harris has support from 63% of non-white voters in Wisconsin, while Biden had support from 73% in 2020.

Yet Harris is overcoming the lagging numbers with Black voters by doing better than Biden performed with white voters. Trump leads Harris 51%-47% with white voters in Pennsylvania, below the 57% Trump garnered with this group in 2020. Trump leads white voters 51%-48% in Michigan, a narrower margin that his 55%-44% performance four years ago. Trump leads Wisconsin’s white voters 50%-48% after carrying the state’s white voters by 6 points in 2020.

What is the blue wall?

The polls, conducted through a combination of phone interviews, texts and on online, used samples of 1,642 Pennsylvania voters, 1,429 Michigan voters and 1,549 Wisconsin voters.

Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan − each carried by President Joe Biden in 2020 − have voted as a bloc in every presidential election since 1988, with one of the presidential candidates sweeping all three. Trump flipped the three “blue wall” states to the Republican column in 2016 en route to his defeat over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Advertisement

If Harris carries all three “blue wall” states in the Nov. 5 election, then she would likely secure enough electoral votes to win the presidency even if she loses the four other battleground states − North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada. That’s assuming Harris wins Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district, where she is polling ahead, and all other states she is heavily favored to win.

For Trump, a victory in any of the “blue wall” states − particularly Pennsylvania, which has 19 electoral votes, the most of any battleground − would open a path for him to secure the necessary 270 electoral votes by pairing that win with victories in the Sun Belt states, where he is polling stronger.

Reach Joey Garrison on X, formerly Twitter, @joeygarrison.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending