South Dakota
‘Sunshine laws’ help to keep government open — but come with exceptions
Editor’s observe: That is one in a collection of reports tales and editorials from Discussion board Communications in help of open authorities. Sunshine Week, which champions open authorities and celebrates entry to public info, is March 12-18.
FARGO — Valhalla is a country cabin tucked away close to the Needles Freeway within the coronary heart of the Black Hills that serves as a retreat for South Dakota’s governor and her household, mates and friends.
The 1½-story cabin options a big predominant room dominated by an enormous stone fire and supplies snug seating on bison leather-upholstered furnishings on a website overlooking Grace Coolidge Creek.
It’s owned by the state of South Dakota — whose taxpayers have spent $120,000 in upgrades — however the administration of Gov. Kristi Noem received’t disclose the Valhalla visitor listing, which South Dakota Information Watch just lately requested.
On account of the “hidden” visitor listing, it’s unclear if the cabin is getting used for political functions, South Dakota New Watch reported in a
story that appeared within the Mitchell Republic
.
A lawyer for the South Dakota Division of Sport, Fish and Parks, which maintains the property, stated “no such file exists as no listing is maintained” — and in addition asserted that such a listing, if saved, can be exempted underneath South Dakota open information regulation.
In North Dakota, the state’s $8.5 billion Legacy Fund, a monetary reserve that faucets oil and gasoline revenues, has just lately begun investing in ventures contained in the state.
To date, the fund has funneled $62.5 million into fairness investments — however the state funding workplace will solely expose the 5 funds that it has invested in, withholding particulars about how a lot is being invested in every and the way that cash is being put to work within the state.
The explanation for the secrecy, based on the Retirement and Funding Workplace: The investments are
exempted from open information regulation as a result of they contain confidential enterprise info
.
In Minnesota, the Fashionable Montessori Constitution Faculty in Champlin, a northern suburb of Minneapolis, gave discover of a particular assembly final fall. The assembly, based on the discover, was for “preliminary consideration of allegations or costs in opposition to a person topic to the board’s authority.”
The particular assembly entered government session, with the board assembly behind closed doorways. When the assembly reopened to the general public, the board disclosed that it had fired the varsity’s director.
“The Director and public college neighborhood was not knowledgeable, supplied an agenda, nor given an affordable expectation {that a} vote was going to happen primarily based on the content material of the particular assembly discover and former assembly precedent,” Minnesota’s Commissioner of Administration, which interprets the Minnesota Authorities Knowledge Practices Act, stated in a Dec. 8, 2022,
advisory opinion.
The three examples illustrate how open information and open conferences legal guidelines, sometimes called “sunshine legal guidelines,” work to maintain the workings of presidency clear — inside limitations that frustrate journalists attempting to tell the general public.
North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota open information legal guidelines all present that authorities information are presumed to be open to the general public — until exempted, which journalists and advocates say can present loopholes that conceal necessary info.
In North Dakota and Minnesota, media representatives stated the legal guidelines defending open information and open conferences are typically good and rank among the many finest within the nation.
“Typically talking we’re in good condition within the open information, open conferences regulation,” stated Jack McDonald, a lawyer for the North Dakota Newspaper Affiliation. “It’s accepted as proven fact that conferences and information are public. Now we’re preventing over the fringes.”
One rising fringe space: entry to digital messages on laptop computer computer systems, cellphones and different gadgets, which may contain emails, texts, chats or recordings of video teleconferences, he stated.
“I believe the most important problem we’re going through now could be know-how,” McDonald stated. Though the regulation is obvious — digital communications fall underneath open information regulation — the “practicalities” might be tough to type by means of, he stated.
Considerably, North Dakota is without doubt one of the few states that enshrines open information and open conferences regulation within the state structure, McDonald stated.
Chad Koenen, co-owner of Henning Publications and president of the Minnesota Newspaper Affiliation, stated public entry to information and conferences is mostly good.
“As an entire I believe Minnesota is in fairly good condition in our open conferences and open information regulation,” he stated.
Nonetheless, Koenen added, “You want the individuals in energy to really observe the regulation.” Minnesota frequently works to revise its open information and open conferences legal guidelines, stated Koenen, whose firm publishes the Residents Advocate in Henning, New York Mills Dispatch and Frazee-Vergas Discussion board.
Mark Anfinson, a lawyer for the Minnesota Newspaper Affiliation, agrees that sunshine legal guidelines typically are working properly in Minnesota. He additionally agrees that know-how — particularly communications on private gadgets by public officers — poses growing challenges.
“It’s extremely exhausting to detect that form of evasion of the regulation,” Anfinson stated. “There’s no simple approach to do this.”
Reporters overlaying a governmental physique develop robust instincts, and typically are left with the impression that when an necessary difficulty comes up in a public assembly with little or no dialogue, the dialogue already occurred privately, typically in emails or texts, he stated.
One doable partial treatment is to permit public officers to debate points on social media platforms, however require them to make these discussions open to the general public, he stated.
In Minnesota, a typical misperception is that the open conferences regulation requires that metropolis and county commissions in addition to college boards are obligated to permit members of the general public to talk at conferences.
That isn’t the case, Anfinson stated, though many boards do permit public feedback, with restrictions of time or content material. Legislators are contemplating a requirement to permit for public feedback.
Exemptions are the rule in South Dakota
In South Dakota, the listing of exemptions to the open information regulation is each lengthy and, in some instances, broad, permitting officers the power to withhold sure info, stated David Bordewyk, government director of the South Dakota Newspaper Affiliation.
One of many gaping exemptions includes written communications. “There isn’t any authority underneath regulation to compel launch of emails or correspondence,” Bordewyk stated.
One other roadblock is a regulation that retains police investigation reviews secret — even after a case has been determined or dismissed, until an official decides to launch the knowledge or the case goes to courtroom, he stated.
“It’s actually exhausting to get info out of regulation enforcement,” Bordewyk stated.
One notable current exception to the withholding of data from felony investigations got here within the case of former South Dakota Legal professional Normal Jason Ravnsborg, who was impeached and faraway from workplace in 2022 after a automotive he was driving struck and killed a pedestrian strolling alongside a freeway.
Earlier than the legislative impeachment proceedings, Gov. Noem ordered the discharge of investigation information, together with a video recording of Ravnsborg being interviewed by investigators.
“That’s by no means occurred earlier than that I can recall,” stated Bordewyk, who famous the case was high-profile, involving the conduct of a public official and of serious public curiosity. “You don’t see that occuring on the native stage or different statewide instances that I’m accustomed to.”
Charges charged by native governments can even make it tough — or prohibitively costly — to get public info, Bordewyck and others stated.
Minnehaha County, which incorporates Sioux Falls, is contemplating growing its hourly price for dealing with file requests from $15 to $50 — a rise of 233% — as an illustration. Charges can get exorbitantly excessive when attorneys evaluation paperwork, Bordewyk stated.
“That clearly can develop into a barrier,” he stated.
Though journalists routinely use open information and open conferences legal guidelines, individuals shouldn’t neglect that the open authorities legal guidelines are for everybody, Bordewyk stated.
“It’s all in regards to the public’s proper to know,” he stated. “It’s not the media’s proper to know.”
The place to search out details about your state sunshine legal guidelines:
South Dakota
North Dakota tribal leaders see Burgum as ally in Interior, energy role • Alaska Beacon
Mark Fox, chairman of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, called Gov. Doug Burgum’s recent nomination for secretary of the Interior and National Energy Council chair a “match made in heaven” for North Dakota tribes.
President-elect Donald Trump announced his unique plans for Burgum on Friday. In the combined role, Burgum would not only lead the Department of the Interior — which includes the Bureau of Indian Affairs — but also wield power over all federal agencies that regulate energy.
Fox and other North Dakota and South Dakota tribal leaders welcomed the news.
Burgum, who first took office in 2016, is credited with improving North Dakota’s once-tenuous relationship with local tribes.
While in office, Burgum advocated for tax-sharing agreements with Native nations, added a permanent display of all five tribal flags outside the governor’s office and pushed for law enforcement partnerships to improve emergency response times on reservations.
“Governor Burgum understands Indian country and the challenges we face, such as the need for public safety, better tribal education, and economic development in Indian country, among other needs,” David Flute, former chair of the Sisseton Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, said Friday in a statement to the North Dakota Monitor. Flute is now secretary of the South Dakota Department of Tribal Relations.
Burgum will succeed Interior Secretary Deb Haaland of New Mexico, a member of the Pueblo of Laguna and the first Native American Cabinet secretary.
Tribal officials say Burgum could be a crucial ally in Washington.
“I would have been so disappointed had he not been appointed to a Cabinet position,” Fox said Friday.
Brad Hawk, executive director of North Dakota’s Indian Affairs Commission, said Burgum has a unique opportunity to reduce red tape for Native nations.
Hawk said he wasn’t familiar with every aspect of Haaland’s administration, but appreciated her department’s work investigating the history of federal Indian boarding schools and their impact on Native communities.
State Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, D-Mandaree, whose district includes Fort Berthold, recognized Burgum’s progress in establishing meaningful relationships with tribes, but said she worries about Trump administration policies.
“I hope that future Secretary Burgum remembers the trust and relationships that he’s built with North Dakota’s five Tribal Nations,” Finley-DeVille said in a statement. “My hope is that future Secretary Burgum will work collaboratively with tribes to ensure our voices are heard in decision-making processes. Together, we can address critical issues such as sustainable development, cultural preservation, and economic opportunity.”
Finley-DeVille added the Department of the Interior needs to protect tribal sovereignty, honor treaty rights, and ensure that development is conducted responsibly and with the full consultation of all impacted tribal nations.
Fox said Friday he’s hopeful Burgum will use his position in Washington to help create a friendlier regulatory environment for the MHA Nation and other oil-rich tribes. The MHA Nation is based on the Fort Berthold Reservation, home to nearly 3,000 active oil wells.
“We’re able to sit down and talk,” Fox, the MHA Nation chair, said of Burgum earlier this year. “That’s the key.”
Fox noted that in contrast, the MHA Nation has never gotten an audience with Haaland, despite several attempts to speak with her.
This past June, Burgum acknowledged at an event that relations between the state and tribes were at a low point when he took office in 2016. At the time, protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in southern North Dakota were ongoing, involving thousands of demonstrators who flocked to the state to camp in solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in opposition to the pipeline.
Burgum said one of the first things he did as governor was reach out to Dave Archambault, chair of Standing Rock at the time, and offer to come meet with tribal leaders.
“That’s where we were starting from: with a commitment to each other to listen to each other,” Burgum said during this year’s Strengthening Government to Government conference, an annual event started under his leadership that brings together state and tribal leaders.
U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said he thinks Burgum’s experience working with North Dakota tribal leaders makes him a good fit for leading Interior. He characterized the current BIA as unresponsive and bureaucratic.
“Doug has done more for Indian relations in North Dakota than any governor in my lifetime, for sure, and maybe ever,” Cramer said.
Michael Achterling contributed to this report.
North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected]. Follow North Dakota Monitor on Facebook and X.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
South Dakota
Judge dismisses a lawsuit over South Dakota abortion-rights measure that voters rejected
A South Dakota judge dismissed a lawsuit that an anti-abortion group filed in June targeting an abortion rights measure that voters rejected this month.
In an order dated Friday, Circuit Court Judge John Pekas granted Life Defense Fund’s motion to dismiss its lawsuit against Dakotans for Health, the measure group.
In a statement, Life Defense Fund co-chair Leslee Unruh said: “The people have decided, and South Dakotans overwhelmingly rejected this constitutional abortion measure. We have won in the court of public opinion, and South Dakotans clearly saw the abortion lobby’s deception.”
Dakotans for Health co-founder Rick Weiland said he had expected the lawsuit to be dismissed.
“The Life Defense Fund’s accusations were part of a broader, failed effort to keep Amendment G off the ballot and silence the voices of South Dakota voters,” Weiland said in a statement. “But make no mistake — this dismissal is just one battle in a much larger war over the future of direct democracy in South Dakota.”
Life Defense Fund’s lawsuit had challenged petitions that got the measure on the ballot, saying they contained invalid signatures and circulators committed fraud and various wrongdoing. The anti-abortion group sought to invalidate the ballot initiative and bar the measure group and its workers from doing ballot-measure work for four years.
The judge initially dismissed the lawsuit in July, but the state Supreme Court sent it back to him in August. In September, an apparent misunderstanding between attorneys and the court regarding scheduling of the trial pushed the case back until after the election.
Even before the measure made the ballot in May, South Dakota’s Republican-led Legislature cemented its formal opposition and passed a law allowing people to withdraw their petition signatures.
A South Dakota law that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 outlaws abortion and makes it a felony to perform one except to save the life of the mother.
South Dakota was one of three states where abortion rights measures failed this month. The others were Florida and Nebraska. Voters in six other states passed such measures.
___
Dura reported from Bismarck, North Dakota.
South Dakota
Cluff’s 14 help South Dakota State down Mount Marty 89-41
google-site-verification: google9919194f75dd62c5.html
-
News1 week ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Technology1 week ago
The next Nintendo Direct is all about Super Nintendo World’s Donkey Kong Country
-
Business6 days ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health6 days ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business3 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Politics1 week ago
Editorial: Abortion was on ballots across the country in this election. The results are encouraging
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics2 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'