South Dakota

South Dakota sticking to 5-day workweeks despite major companies looking for 6 days

Published

6 months ago

May 11, 2024

South Dakota sticking to 5-day workweeks despite major companies looking for 6 days

RAPID CITY, S.D. (KEVN) – Last month Samsung decided to mandate a six-day work week for its top executives, due to much controversy. So how are people in Rapid City feeling about this suggestion?

According to a survey done by Resume Builder, 1 in 10 business leaders say their company plans to institute a six-day workweek in 2025. Not only that but 1 in 6 think full-time employees should work more than 40 hours per week. But is this really what the future workforce will look like?

“Where is this coming from in the age where we’re looking to work less days. In fact, a third of the U.S. companies are looking at a four-day workweek right now. This is not the direction we need to be going in and I can confidently say that in my several decades of being a recruiter and a head hunter and job search coach, I have never met anybody telling me they were looking for a position to work more days,” Chief Career Adviser at Resume Builder Stacie Haller said.

This sentiment seems to hold here in South Dakota. In a statement, South Dakota Department of Labor Secretary Marcia Hultman said, “I have not heard of employers requiring a six-day work week in South Dakota. Doing so would seem counter-intuitive in meeting employees’ wants and needs.” Manager Brian Cavanaugh at Roy’s Westside Auto Body in Rapid City says the five-day work week is the most optimal for his company.

“For us, a five-day workweek and we are open from seven to five, Monday through Friday, so those are ten-hour days. We feel that works for us very well. Now we do believe that work and family life is important as well so when somebody comes into work we want to get the most out of them as we possibly can and we want them to feel good about what they’re in a day-to-day here at the shop,” Cavanaugh said.

Haller and Cavanaugh expressed the importance of work-life balance and believe the five-day workweek will continue to be the norm.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Source link

Click to comment

South Dakota

Saluki Football falls to No. 3 South Dakota State

Published

46 mins ago

November 17, 2024

Press Room

State

Zip Code

Country

Source link

South Dakota

South Dakota Tops North Dakota 42-36

Published

8 hours ago

November 17, 2024

Press Room

(AP) — Aidan Bouman threw three touchdown passes, Charles Pierre Jr. and Travis Theis both ran for more than 100 yards and a touchdown and South Dakota held on to beat North Dakota 42-36 on Saturday.

Theis, who had 150 yards on 16 carries, scored on an 8-yard run early in the fourth quarter to make it 35-21. Then Pierre, who had 173 yards on 15 carries, broke loose for a 76-yard touchdown to stretch the lead to three touchdowns with 9:35 to play.

Simon Romfo scored on a 7-yard run and then found Bo Belquist for a 3-yard touchdown pass and threw a 2-point conversion with 23 seconds left.

But the Coyotes (8-2, 6-1 Missouri Valley Football Conference), the No. 5 team in the FCS coaches poll, recovered the onside kick to set up a showdown with top-ranked North Dakota State next week.

Sawyer Seidl scored on a 51-yard run to give North Dakota a 7-0 lead after one quarter. Romfo threw short touchdown passes to Nick Kupfer and Quincy Vaughn and Bouman matched that, hitting Carter Bell and Quaron Adams, but the Fighting Hawks (5-6, 2-5) led 21-17 at the break.

South Dakota took the lead on a 53-yard Bouman-to-Pierre connection four plays into the second half.

Bouman was 15 of 21 for 190 yards as the Coyotes had 512 total yards. Romfo was 20 of 30 for 180 as North Dakota finished with 322 yards.

Source link

South Dakota

Landowners prepared for more pipeline struggles, hope for new ordinances

Published

16 hours ago

November 17, 2024

Press Room

Landowners prepared for more pipeline struggles, hope for new ordinances

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – On Friday, the North Dakota Public Service Commission unanimously approved a route permit for Summit Carbon Solutions and its CO2 pipeline project.

The pipeline would run through five states, including 18 counties in South Dakota, to transport sequestered carbon dioxide from ethanol plants to an underground storage location west of Bismark, North Dakota.

South Dakota is now one of the last things standing in the way of the project.

Landowners opposing the project like Ed Fischbach are still optimistic that they can prevent the pipeline, but they believe more action is needed to protect South Dakotans.

Fischbach said it wasn’t a surprise that North Dakota approved the permit.

“North Dakota’s laws are unfortunately not as good as ours are,” Fischbach explained. “Their law basically is what we just defeated in the referral. They have that in place up there similar to what RL 21 was.”

Opponents said that Referred Law 21, which South Dakota voters shot down, would have allowed Summit Carbon Solutions to supersede local and county laws and ordinances.

Some landowners pointed out that some counties have been slow to incorporate their own regulatory ordinances, like Turner or McCook Counties.

“I just can’t understand why they wouldn’t want to do that. They have the authority. They have the power,” Fischbach said.

Northern South Dakota Counties like Brown, McPherson and Spink counties have all set a standard for what these ordinances might look like.

Fischbach is proud of the work that was done to provide setbacks to route any potential pipeline project further away from homes schools, hospitals, feedlots and more.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission deemed these ordinances fair and reasonable. Although this reasoning was used by the PUC as part of the reason for denying Summit Carbon Solutions’ permit application, landowners believe more counties need to create these ordinances to better protect residents and their property rights.

“Any county that’s not doing that, I think they’re just not representing their people like they should be,” said Fischbach. “For the citizens of those counties, they just need to go to their county commission meeting and keep speaking out and asking them to step up and do it.”

As for Summit Carbon Solutions, they celebrated their win in North Dakota and now look forward to reapplying for a permit in South Dakota.

They stated that their application would be submitted on November 19, which is now just a few days away.

They remain hopeful that they can get the project to the finish line and provide economic benefits to the region.

In a press release, they said, “Summit Carbon Solutions remains committed to working collaboratively with affected landowners and communities as the project progresses toward construction and operations.”

The landowners opposing the pipeline have said that they have had a total of six big victories over Summit Carbon Solutions thus far, including the previous rejections from the South Dakota PUC and the South Dakota Supreme Court.

They believe that the South Dakota PUC will rule in their favor again.

“This has been a three-and-a-half-year struggle from the very beginning,” Fischbach said. “No one ever gave us a chance up against this giant of a company with millions of dollars and we’ve still defeated them just by doing things on the ground and going out directly to people. The frustrating part of this whole fight is that this company doesn’t seem to get the message. I mean, how many times does it take for them to understand that the people of South Dakota are saying no? Our grassroots coalition is energized, we’re not going anywhere and we’re going to stay in the fight until they are gone once and for all.”

Outside of county ordinances and showing up in opposition of Summit Carbon Solutions’ permit application, South Dakotans who oppose the pipeline project are hoping that legislation to change eminent domain laws in South Dakota will be passed in the upcoming session.

Source link