Connect with us

South Dakota

BOBCAT NOTES & QUOTES: A Look at MSU-South Dakota State – Montana State University Athletics

Published

on


Bobcat Football Notes & Quotes
September 6, 2025
South Dakota State 30, Montana State 24 2 OT
 
Post-Game Notes
* Montana State falls to 0-2 for the first time since 2017, when the team also fell at a nationally ranked FBS opponent (No. 24 Washington State) before dropping the Gold Rush game to South Dakota State.
* The Cats are 16-2 in Gold Rush games, with both losses to South Dakota State.
* MSU linebacker Cole Taylor recorded 13 tackles in his first career start.
* South Dakota State blocked a Bobcat punt, the second straight game MSU surrendered a blocked punt.
* After not recording a tackle-for-loss at Oregon, MSU registered eight against the Jackrabbits including four sacks.
* The crowd of 22,117 was a stadium record.
 
Post-Game Quotes
FROM BOBCAT HEAD COACH BRENT VIGEN: “Well, it ultimately comes down to a fourth and one that we don’t get, but to your point, there was so many plays throughout, you know, offense, defense special teams, that didn’t allow us to really ever gain the momentum to create some separation. And I think there were opportunities. We just didn’t get it done, and I know a fair amount of credit certainly would go to South Dakota State. You know, obviously two good programs and it comes down to down to that, but within the game, you know, too many things that we created for ourselves, needing to get ourselves an opportunity to open up any kind of lead at any point.”
 
On the Bobcat defense: “After that first drive, I thought we really settled in after that, and put in some horrible situations. Field position would have certainly leaned their way based on our turnovers where that occurred. I think the punt game for a while certainly got tipped their direction. But I think our defense definitely grew tonight. I think we felt like we matched up well. We limited their run game, I think made it generally hard for Mason to do what he wanted to back there, and got ourself in overtime… So, yeah, I really, I think our defense grew and did a lot of things that put us in position to be where we needed to be. But ultimately, it wasn’t enough.”
 
On MSU’s offense: “I think offensively, that’s a really good defense we just saw. I think you could look at third down. I think our first down production was all over the map. You know, far too many times, we were behind the chains as far as our second downs go, and then we ended up in far too many third downs that were complicated. You know, you get that opportunity with them jumping off sides to get to a fourth and one, we’ve got to be able to be able to make that yard. You know, I would obviously want to run that ball every time, and obviously the run that we did didn’t get it done. I knew I knew we were short based on the spot, but, yeah, to get them to jump off sides, and we really should have made the play on the pass in the end zone, you know, so long, long list of what it could’ve, should’ve, would’ve in this game. And I would guess if we end up on the other side, Dan, Coach Jackson, probably says the same thing. You know, we each have turnovers, we get punts blocked, it was a lot of things in that game. I really appreciate our crowd, our crowd was in it, and really, really made it hard for them, and they obviously got the opportunity to work through it.
 
On the big special teams plays: “Well that’s two weeks in a row we get a punt blocked. It’s going to be hard to win football games the way we want to with those type of plays, and to then get one ourselves, you could say it balances, but we can’t get a punt blocked two weeks in a row. You know, I thought Colby (Frokjer) settled and made some big punts down the stretch. And we put that kid in too many positions to have to punt in my opinion, but ultimately, you know, their punter, I thought I had a heck of a game. He made a difference, and Colby struggled, but then he made some big plays down the stretch, and you know, you just feel like this is a battle of punt teams to some degree. But we got to figure out how we can protect the punt and how we can get a punt off, for sure.”
 
On the lack of downfield opportunities: “Well, I think there’s a stretch where we got pressure. I think Justin, maybe feeling that a little too much, I know before the half, maybe in particular. So then his clock speeds up a little bit and I know there’s going to be some opportunities that we maybe had some guys running wide open. We weren’t able to get that ball downfield, and it’s a combination, it always is, it isn’t just the quarterback.
 
“Looking at rushing numbers, Justin scrambling around was probably our best offense, and that’s an element of the passing game when they cover and they drop out, but ultimately, from just a pure efficiency (standpoint) in our consistency in the passing game, it wasn’t good enough tonight.
 
Comparing this loss to the NDSU loss in 2023: “Yeah, I know, a big difference. That ended our season. That’s the huge difference. I know both games ended and in that end zone. But ultimately, you know, this is still very early in this campaign, and I’m certain there’s a lot of positives that we can take away to put ourselves in that position, and I know there’s a lot of negatives that ultimately landed us in that position too. So that’s our two losses since I’ve been here at home and it’s not a good feeling.”
 
On Dane Steel and Cole Taylor getting their first starts: “Dane’s a competitor. I know that. I mean, the play he made it in the first overtime, even, that wasn’t a simple play. We’re going to get everything we can to get out of Dane. And you know, Cole, he’s a seasoned vet now. I think obviously he got thrown into it last week and he prepared all week to be the starter, and I think he’s a guy that’s taken a pretty big leap thinking back to the beginning of spring ball.”
 
“Whether it was us or them offensively, when you get behind the chains and we both have defensive lines that can create some issues, that piece was huge. I think we had our fair share of lost plays on our side and they did as well. And it’s two good teams that want to run the football, two teams that want to stop the run. So when that happens, you throw it a little bit more, then you get in situations where you’re having to throw the ball a little bit more than you might want to, and that’s challenging unto itself. So, I look and they were one for 13 on third down. I mean, you should win a game when that’s the way it is on the other side. But then we were 5 of 15.”
 
How do help the team bounce back from this loss? “Well, all you can do is go back to work. I know there’s another opportunity next week. I said early in the week that this wasn’t going to make us or break us, but it was an important game to gauge where we’re at. And I thought we played really hard. But when it comes down to just pure level of execution, it wasn’t good enough to win. So I think we’ve got a committed outfit. I think we’ve got a competitive outfit. I still think we have an outfit that’s figuring some things out and I thought we prepared the right way this week. Obviously, it didn’t play out exactly the way we wanted it to, but we’re two games in. We lost to a really good team last week, and we lost to a really good team today. And there’s going to be plenty of opportunities in front of this team.”
 
On the final play call: “Well, Julius had been running really hard. I know they brought an extra lineman in, you know, I’d like to think we can gain a yard there, I guess. I’ll just leave it at that. It’s easy to call the play after we ran it. We didn’t get the yard, so it didn’t work.”
 
 
FROM MSU DEFENSIVE END HUNTER PARSONS: On how he feels after the loss: “It really sucks, you know? We fought hard all game. I mean, we prepared for this moment, we felt like we were ready for the moment. And it just didn’t go our way, so we got to get back in the film room, correct our mistakes.”
 
On MSU’s pass rush success: “Definitely just our hard work. We’re very intentional with how we work. We played our ass off tonight. And yeah, I felt like the D line really controlled that game, but there’s a lot of mistakes, too. Like I said, we’ve got to come in on tomorrow and Monday and fix those mistakes, get in the film room.”
 
FROM MSU RUNNING BACK JULIUS DAVIS: On the final play: “Just trying to get the first down. didn’t get the first down. So I’ve got to get the first down. You want to be elite, you’ve got to get the first time.”
 
#GoCatsGo
 



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota native lived near Iranian missile & drone attacks

Published

on

South Dakota native lived near Iranian missile & drone attacks


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

KELOLAND.com is provided by Nexstar Media Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

KELOLAND.com is provided by Nexstar Media Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Water hampers growth near Sioux Falls but solution near

Published

on

Water hampers growth near Sioux Falls but solution near


The existing water treatment plant for the Minnehaha Community Water Corp. on June 9, 2026, south of Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Bart Pfankuch

Content Director
605-937-9398
bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org

Advertisement

DELL RAPIDS, S.D. – Scott Buss can only imagine what this town north of Sioux Falls might have looked like – and how many jobs and taxes would have been generated – if there wasn’t a local shortage of available water.

Buss, executive director of the Minnehaha Community Water Corp., sat in the conference room of the rural water system based in Dell Rapids recently and ticked off the industrial and agricultural projects turned away due to a lack of water.

After hitting its limit on how much water it can provide a few years ago, the rural system has had to turn away proposed projects valued at hundreds of millions of dollars that offered an untold number of new jobs, he said.

The rejected projects include the Agropur Cheese plant that eventually opened in Lake Norden. A few proposed hog farms and dairy expansions in northern Minnehaha County were also stalled, Buss said.

Advertisement

Get South Dakota news and information in a free email on weekdays. Cancel any time.

Subscribe

Advertisement

Other proposals, most of which never came to fruition in South Dakota, included the $1.5 billion Gevo corn-based jet fuel plant, the $5oo million Wholestone Farms hog processing plant and a data center that at some point all eyed the Dell Rapids area for development.

“All the water rights are spoken for between Dell Rapids and Sioux Falls, so there was no more water to be had in Minnehaha County,” Buss told News Watch in an interview in June. “With all the (residential) development that was coming in, we realized that our well capacity and our treatment capacity was limiting our ability to take on new high water-use customers.”

Scott Buss is pictured in his office
Scott Buss on June 9, 2026, who manages the Minnehaha Community Water Corp. near Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Buss and the nonprofit corporation’s board of directors aren’t waiting around to potentially miss out on more opportunities.

In a unique arrangement, the corporation is partnering with the neighboring Big Sioux Community Water System to the north on a $170 million expansion project called Shared Resources. The expansion, started three years ago, will use new wells into the Big Sioux Aquifer to generate 8 million gallons of water more per day starting this fall.

“It’s going to be a huge and great benefit for Big Sioux and Minnehaha water,” said Jodi Johanson, director of the Big Sioux system based in Egan. “This project is going to make sure that down the road we have enough water for the future.”

2 systems get stronger together

The Minnehaha water corporation is still able to bring on new residential and retail customers who consume part of the 9.2 million gallons of treated water it can provide on a daily basis.

Advertisement

The system was formed by a group of farmers and landowners in the 1970s but sought a reliable way of providing more and cleaner water to residents of Minnehaha County outside of Sioux Falls who relied exclusively on individual wells. The system started with about 1,200 customers but has grown to more than 5,500 now in seven cities, mostly north of the Sioux Falls metro area.

Given the limits on water from the aquifer, and balancing the water needs of consistent housing and retail growth in northern Minnehaha County, the water system had to say no to developments that request 1 million or more gallons of water per day, Buss said. A million gallons per day is equivalent to the water consumption of about 4,300 homes, he said.

Billions needed to keep South Dakota taps flowing

South Dakota water systems will increasingly turn to the Missouri River to provide water for future population, agricultural and industrial growth. But plans will require billions of dollars and decades of construction to keep taps flowing freely.

As with other rural water systems in South Dakota, the aquifers the systems rely on for their water are either running low or are legally tapped out, or both.

In the case of Minnehaha water corporation, the Big Sioux River Aquifer has gotten drier, but state law is also preventing it from taking more water from the aquifer.

Advertisement

In 1996, the state Water Management Board allocated water rights, or withdrawal limits, to systems that take groundwater from the aquifer, Buss said.

Those limits have now been reached, meaning that Minnehaha water cannot take any more than the 7 million gallons per day it is drawing now.

The system also receives about 2 million gallons per day from the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System, making its daily maximum capacity of about 9.2 million gallons per day, which it sometimes reaches, especially during spring planting season or hot summer months.

The aquifer under the Big Sioux River in Dell Rapids
The aquifer under the Big Sioux River, shown here in Dell Rapids, S.D., on June 9, 2026, is the source of fresh water for much of eastern South Dakota. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Directly to the north, the Big Sioux Community Water System produces up to 2 million gallons per day for about 2,400 customers in Moody and Lake counties as well as some in Brookings County and in western Minnesota, Johanson said.

The system still has room within its water rights to draw more water, making it an attractive partner for Minnehaha water.

Though Big Sioux Community Water System has not turned away any large projects, it needs more water to serve a boom in residential growth in the region, Johanson said.

Advertisement

In the area around Lake Madison, near Madison, developers are considering projects that could someday bring 500 new homes and a new nine-hole golf course, she said.

Support solutions-focused storytelling. Help South Dakota News Watch tell stories that identify and share solutions to the state’s biggest challenges.

Donate

Advertisement

The system also serves a number of dairies that use significant water and provides water to the Dakota Ethanol plant in Wentworth, which is undergoing an expansion. Farmers in the region are also using greater quantities of water to deliver chemicals onto their land, Johanson said.

“This is our first expansion,” she said. “We’re looking forward and we’re trying to find the solution before we face a problem.”

Federal government and customers pay the way

The biggest Shared Resources ticket item is a new $80 million water treatment plant that is nearly completed on 240th Street a few miles north of Dell Rapids.

A 20-inch pipeline from the plant to the east will end at a 1.5 million gallon water tower, and a 24-inch pipeline to the west will terminate at a ground-level storage tank with a 4 million gallon capacity.

Advertisement

Six new wells will draw the water, and the storage tanks will provide both pressure and the ability to adapt to changing demands without service interruption, Buss said.

A new $80 million water treatment plant under construction on June 9, 2026, north of Dell Rapids
A new $80 million water treatment plant under construction on June 9, 2026, north of Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

As with most modern water projects, the costs will be shared by government and end users. The systems are funding the project with $49 million in grants from the Biden-era American Rescue Plan Act and $121 million in low-interest loans from South Dakota’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.

The two systems are sharing the cost of the project loans commensurate with how much water they will receive, meaning Minnehaha will pay 65% of the costs for its 5 million gallons per day while Big Sioux will kick in 35% for its 3 million gallons more per day.

Minnehaha water is assuming $87 million in new debt and Big Sioux will take on $42 million in new debt, Buss said.

The average residential consumer in both systems that uses about 7,000 gallons per month will see their bill rise to $135 a month, roughly double the cost in 2020.

“It’s a big project, and it’s a good example of how two systems can work together to have some economies of scale,” Buss said.

Ratepayers will see a significant increase in their monthly water bills. The average residential consumer in both systems that uses about 7,000 gallons per month will see their bill rise to $135 a month, roughly double the cost in 2020, Buss said.

Advertisement

A big project, but even more water needed

But both systems view the Shared Resources project as a temporary fix and both are looking toward proposed projects that will tap the Missouri River for more water in the future.

Buss said his system has applied for 10 million gallons more water per day from Lewis & Clark, which has two expansion efforts planned.

Minnehaha water has simultaneously applied to receive 10 million gallons per day from the proposed Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System, a potentially $10 billion project to carry Missouri River water to more than 50 communities and organizations across eastern South Dakota and parts of Minnesota and Iowa.

A 1.5 million gallon water tower under construction June, 9, 2026, near Dell Rapids, S.D.
A 1.5 million gallon water tower under construction June, 9, 2026, near Dell Rapids, S.D., as part of the Shared Resources expansion effort by two rural water systems. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

The dual application effort is to make sure Minnehaha water can rely on taking in more water from at least one of the two systems as they come online, Buss said.

Johanson said Big Sioux has also signed on to accept water from Dakota Mainstem, even if it takes 20 to 40 years for the water to begin flowing.

To ensure that steady supply of high-quality drinking water, four major projects are in progress to take more water from the Missouri River – including WEB Water in the northeast, Lewis & Clark and the proposed Dakota Mainstem in the southeast as well as the proposed Western Dakota Regional Water System in western South Dakota and the Black Hills.

Advertisement
A map for the Shared Resources water project shows the proposed watermain lines.

The projects are part of a wide-scale increase in water service capacity now underway in South Dakota, where water managers of several systems are implementing plans to serve the state for the next 40 to 50 years.

Regional rural water systems such as Minnehaha and Big Sioux are critical components of those projects because they provide water to communities and individual customers at the end of the delivery system.

Alicia Deschepper, zoning administrator for Moody County, said the water system expansions should allow for more growth to occur in Moody and Minnehaha counties, which are seeing new single-family housing developed at a rapid rate.

“I think it will be a great thing for our county and hopefully enable us to bring in more bigger businesses as well as more homes,” Deschepper said.

South Dakota News Watch is an independent nonprofit. Read, donate and subscribe for free at sdnewswatch.orgContact content director Bart Pfankuch: 605-937-9398/bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

One child dead following Hughes County fatal crash

Published

on

One child dead following Hughes County fatal crash


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The South Dakota Department of Public Safety said a nine-year-old girl from Waterloo, Iowa, is dead following a fatal Hughes County crash on Saturday.

This crash happened on Saturday, July 4, near the Spring Creek Recreation Area about 15 miles northwest of Pierre.

Preliminary crash information suggests a utility vehicle driven by a 37-year-old Iowa man was driving south on Spring Creek Drive. He attempted to turn around and rolled the vehicle.

A 16-year-old boy was also in the vehicle and was hurt, while the driver was not hurt.

Advertisement

The South Dakota Highway Patrol is investigating the crash.

Copyright 2026 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending