Connect with us

South Dakota

2025 FCS Playoffs: Second-Round Preview & Predictions

Published

on

2025 FCS Playoffs: Second-Round Preview & Predictions


The 2025 FCS Playoffs continue this weekend. As we do every week, we preview the biggest games of the weekend and make our official predictions.

Let’s take a look at all eight second-round games.

2025 Prediction Record: 150-46
2022-24 Record: 382-122

Advertisement

Illinois State at No. 1 North Dakota State

Kickoff: Noon CT (ESPN+)

Advertisement

In the first matchup this season, North Dakota State scored 15 unanswered points in the fourth quarter in a road win over Illinois State. Now, the Redbirds face the tough task of traveling to Fargo, where NDSU is 38-1 inside the Fargodome in the postseason. The Bison have also won 14 straight games in this series, holding a 16-2 overall record.

Illinois State found some early success with the downhill rushing attack in the last game, but can the Redbirds do it this weekend? Victor Dawson leads the team with 811 rushing yards, while Wenkers Wright has added another 591 yards and five touchdowns. The Bison have held opponents to only 3.0 yards per carry, keeping all but one team under 150 rushing yards this season.

The real strength of this NDSU defense is the secondary, which ranks No. 2 nationally in passing defense (140 YPG Allowed). The Bison have forced 14 interceptions while allowing only five passing touchdowns. It’s a matchup to watch against quarterback Tommy Rittenhouse and two talented wide receivers in Daniel Sobkowicz and Luke Mailander, who have combined for over 1,200 yards and 15 touchdowns.

On the other side, Illinois State is going to have to find a way to slow down quarterback Cole Payton. He’s been playing at an elite level, completing 74% of his passes for 2,618 yards, 15 touchdowns, and only four interceptions. In the first game, Payton’s legs really hurt the Redbirds in key moments. Nobody is better at making something out of chaos than Payton, who has rushed for 791 yards and 13 touchdowns.

Advertisement

The Redbirds made this a very competitive game earlier this season, but I don’t love the matchup here. Illinois State has been prone to giving up explosive plays, which is a recipe for disaster. Give me Cole Payton and a stout NDSU defense to be the difference. I like the Bison to win this comfortably.

Prediction: North Dakota State (38-10)

Advertisement

Yale at No. 2 Montana State

Kickoff: 1 pm CT (ESPN+)

Advertisement

Yale had one of the greatest comebacks in FCS Playoff history last week, overcoming a 42-14 deficit to stun Youngstown State in the first round. Now, the Bulldogs get to test themselves against one of the hottest teams in FCS football. Montana State has won 10 consecutive games, including ranked wins over UC Davis and Montana in the Brawl of the Wild.

Yale’s offensive game plan is to establish the run and set up the deep ball for quarterback Dante Reno. Everything starts with running back Joshua Pitsenberger, who leads the Bulldogs with 1,447 yards and 18 touchdowns. Reno is going to need his best game of the season. He’s completed 65% of his passes for 2,300 yards, 20 touchdowns, and eight interceptions. Limiting turnovers and staying on schedule will be extremely important if the Bulldogs are going to stay in this game.

For the Bobcats, the rushing attack will be equally important, but the x-factor over the past few games has been quarterback Justin Lamson. He’s played at an elite level as the season has progressed, throwing for 2,345 yards, 20 touchdowns, and only two interceptions. He’s added 589 yards and 11 scores with his legs.

The key for Yale will be limiting Montana State’s rushing offense, which is averaging over 233 yards per game. Julius Davis is one of the best physical running backs in the country, leading the Bobcats with 885 yards, while Adam Jones offers another explosive option with 695 yards and 10 touchdowns. The Bulldogs have held five of their past seven opponents under 100 rushing yards, but can they do it against this elite Montana State unit?

Advertisement

One interesting thing to watch will be Yale’s red-zone defense. The Bulldogs lead all playoff teams in red zone TD%, allowing a touchdown on only 37.9% of opponents’ red zone opportunities. The problem? Montana State has one of the most efficient red zone offenses in the FCS, scoring a touchdown on 74.5% of its red zone opportunities.

Advertisement

The x-factors in this game could be Yale’s Abu Kamara and Montana State’s Caden Dowler, who are two of the best safeties in the country. Kamara recorded 70 tackles, six tackles for loss, 3.5 sacks, two interceptions, and 11 pass breakups on his way to Ivy League Defensive Player of the Year honors. Dowler was named the Big Sky Defensive Player of the Year, leading the Bobcats with 78 tackles, 5.5 tackles for loss, four interceptions, and two forced fumbles.

Last week’s win was so impressive for Yale, making me think doubting them in this one is a mistake, but Montana State is a different beast than Youngstown State. I think the Bobcats wear down Yale’s defense with the run, while the defense makes it very difficult for Yale to establish the run consistently. Give me the Bobcats by multiple scores.

Advertisement

Prediction: Montana State (38-14)

No. 12 Villanova at No. 5 Lehigh

Advertisement

Kickoff: 11 am CT (ESPN+)

Villanova made a statement in the first round, demolishing Harvard in a 52-7 blowout win. The Wildcats have won nine consecutive games and now have a chance to upset a future conference rival. Lehigh enters the postseason undefeated, winning 11 of their 12 games by 10 points or more. The Mountain Hawks are looking to reach the quarterfinals for the first time since 2011.

The Wildcats rushed for over 300 yards last weekend against Harvard, but can the Wildcats find the same success against the No. 1 rushing defense in the FCS? Lehigh is holding opponents to 73.7 rushing yards per game and 2.46 yards per carry. Ja’briel Mace has thrived since David Avit’s injury, leading the Wildcats with 688 rushing yards and nine touchdowns, averaging 7.8 yards per carry. Isaiah Ragland has added 653 yards and two scores, taking a bigger role during Avit’s absence.

Advertisement

The success of Lehigh’s defense is tied to the excellent play of linebackers Brycen Edwards and Tyler Ochojski. Edwards leads the team with 83 tackles, nine tackles for loss, and 5.5 sacks, while Ochojski specializes in negative plays, recording 12 tackles for loss and 10 sacks. Villanova’s defense also features an elite linebacker in Shane Hartzell, who leads the Wildcats with 81 tackles, 14 tackles for loss, and seven sacks.

Advertisement

Lehigh’s offense also features an elite rushing attack, averaging 235.3 rushing yards per game, which ranks No. 4 nationally. Luke Yoder is a workhorse, leading the offense with 1,329 yards and 15 touchdowns on 7.1 yards per carry. Jaden Green appeared to be banged up in the final game, but if he’s available, he offers another talented weapon with 811 yards and eight touchdowns.

With both teams focused on stopping the run, this game could come down to which quarterback makes a play to win. Hayden Johnson has improved this season, completing 62% of his passes for 2,349 yards, 18 touchdowns, and six interceptions. He is also a threat outside the pocket, rushing for 426 yards and four scores. Villanova quarterback Pat McQuaide has also elevated his game since transferring in from Nicholls. He’s completed 61.3% of his passes for 2,536 yards, 22 touchdowns, and only two interceptions.

This game should be extremely competitive, but Lehigh has the better defense and more explosive rushing attack, giving them the edge. I also think Johnson’s ability to make plays outside the pocket will be worth watching. I like Lehigh to find a way to get it done at home.

Prediction: Lehigh (28-21)

Advertisement

No. 10 Abilene Christian at No. 7 Stephen F. Austin

Kickoff: 1 pm CT (ESPN+)

In the first matchup, Abilene Christian scored 28 straight points to overcome an early 14-point deficit to defeat Stephen F. Austin. The Wildcats dominated Lamar, 38-20, in the first round last weekend. The Lumberjacks have won 10 consecutive games since that loss to ACU, making this one of the best games of the weekend.

Advertisement

Stephen F. Austin’s defense has been elite this season, holding opponents to 2.4 yards per carry and 6.02 yards per pass attempt. Linebacker Jaydon Southard leads the team with 110 tackles, 10.5 tackles for loss, and 2.5 sacks. The Lumberjacks also feature two elite cornerbacks in Jalen Mayo and Charles Demmings, who have combined for seven interceptions and 12 pass breakups.

Advertisement

Statistically, Abilene Christian’s defense appears to be a step behind SFA’s, but this team seems to reach another level in big games, winning four ranked games this year. The Wildcats also have two of the best linebackers in the country in Rashon Myles Jr. and Will Shaffer, both totaling over 105 tackles this year. Safety Dorian Plumley has had a breakout year, leading the team with five interceptions.

Each offense also features an elite playmaker on the outside. Kylon Harris leads the Lumberjacks with 64 catches for 800 yards and nine scores. Sam Vidlak will look for him early and often. There was a question about who would step up at wide receiver for ACU, which opened the door for a breakout year for Javon Gipson. He’s been on an absolute tear, recording 100 or more yards in three straight games.

Abilene Christian will need a big game from Stone Earle, who has constantly delivered in big games. He’s thrown for 3,079 yards and 22 touchdowns, but turnovers will be something to watch as he has 10 interceptions this season. Earle’s legs can also be dangerous, rushing for 361 yards and 11 scores. On the other side, Sam Vidlak has had an outstanding season, recording 2,090 passing yards, 18 touchdowns, and six interceptions.

Advertisement

This was one of the toughest games to predict this weekend. I’m going to lean towards Abilene Christian because I trust the Wildcats’ rushing attack a bit more, which will be important if they want to escape with a win on the road. Give me Abilene Christian to find a way to win another big game, advancing to the quarterfinals for the first time in program history.

Prediction: Abilene Christian (28-24)

No. 9 Rhode Island at No. 8 UC Davis

Kickoff: 9 pm CT (ESPN2)

Are you a fan of explosive offenses and high-scoring games? If so, this is the game for you. Two of the best quarterbacks will take center stage for the late-night showcase on ESPN2. The Rams advanced after a 27-19 win over Central Connecticut State, while UC Davis sits at 8-3 overall and earned the final Top 8 seed.

Advertisement

Rhode Island’s offense starts with quarterback Devin Farrell, who has thrown for 3,452 yards, 22 touchdowns, and eight interceptions. He’s done an excellent job limiting turnovers, which was an issue at times last season. His connection with wide receiver Marquis Buchanan is dangerous, as they have connected for 1,224 receiving yards and six touchdowns. They have plenty of depth behind Buchanan with Greg Gaines (935 yards) and Aboraa Kwarteng (547 yards).

On the other side, freshman sensation Caden Pinnick has lived up to the hype in his first season as the starting quarterback. He’s completed 70.5% of his passes for 2,527 yards, 24 touchdowns, and eight interceptions. There’s also no shortage of weapons for the Aggies, including Samuel Gbatu Jr., who leads the team with 949 yards and 10 touchdowns. Stacy Dobbins (549 yards) is another weapon, while tight end Ian Simpson is a matchup nightmare at 6-foot-3 and 235 pounds.

I would expect both offenses to find success through the air, which puts a ton of pressure on these rushing attacks. Last week, Rhode Island struggled to establish the run, which gives me some concern against a talented UC Davis defense. The Aggies lost Carter Vargas to injury, which means it’ll be Jordan Fisher as the main workhorse on Saturday night.

It’ll be important for both defenses to get pressure on the opposing quarterback, keeping them out of rhythm and uncomfortable in the pocket. The Rams feature one of the best edge rushers in the FCS in A.J. Pena, who leads the team with 19 tackles for loss and 10 sacks. Harvard transfer Jacob Psyk has been outstanding for UC Davis, posting a team-high 15 tackles for loss and nine sacks.

Advertisement

I expect this to be a high-scoring game with both offenses finding success through the air. I’m going to go with UC Davis winning a one-score game, trusting Pinnick to make some key plays down the stretch to secure the victory.

Prediction: UC Davis (38-31)

Advertisement

North Dakota at No. 4 Tarleton State

Kickoff: Noon CT (ESPN+)

Advertisement

North Dakota hit the road and won a competitive game against No. 13 seed Tennessee State. The final score was 31-6, but it was a 10-6 game entering the fourth quarter. It was an absolute defensive masterclass for the Hawks. As for Tarleton State, the Texans finished 11-1 overall, including an FBS win over Army. Now, the question for the Texans is whether this is a program ready for a deep playoff run.

There’s a misconception that Tarleton State wants to throw the ball around the field, but at the heart of this offense is a need to establish the run. This offense doesn’t run efficiently without a strong run game, making North Dakota’s ability to stop the run the key to this game. The Texans are 11-0 this season when rushing for 130 or more yards; their only loss came in a game in which they had only 93 rushing yards.

North Dakota’s rushing defense has been elite this season, holding opponents to 99.5 yards per game and 2.9 yards per carry. The Hawks have held seven different teams to under 100 rushing yards, including Tennessee Tech last weekend. Linebacker Malachi McNeal is the leader of this defense, leading the team with 83 tackles, six tackles for loss, two sacks, and one interception.

As big as the run game will be, North Dakota’s pass rush will need to be a huge factor on Saturday. An elite pass rush causes a ton of issues for the offensive scheme that Tarleton State wants to run. Lance Rucker has been playing at an All-American level, posting 14 tackles for loss and 10.5 sacks. Also, don’t forget about Kaden Vig, who has added 36 tackles, six tackles for loss, and 5.5 sacks. The Texans rank 5th among playoff teams in pressure rate allowed, making this a very intriguing matchup.

Advertisement

The x-factor for Tarleton State could be Tylan Hines, who was injured in Week 0 but returned for the final two games of the year. He wasted no time making an impact, rushing for 295 yards and three touchdowns. James Paige has also emerged as an option due to injuries, rushing for 520 yards and eight touchdowns after making the move from quarterback.

Advertisement

For North Dakota’s offense, there’s the question of who is going to start at quarterback. Jerry Kaminski left the last game with a concussion, needing to be cleared before tomorrow’s game. If he’s unable to go, last season’s starter Simon Romfo will step into the QB1 role. Regardless of who starts at quarterback, the Hawks cannot afford to turn the ball over against a Tarleton State defense that leads all playoff teams with a 4.8% turnover rate.

Tarleton State’s defense will be tested with a solid downhill rushing attack from North Dakota. Sawyer Seidl leads the Hawks with 879 yards and 11 touchdowns. The return of Gaven Ziebarth was huge last weekend, helping North Dakota close out the game vs TTU. He’s averaging 6.9 yards per carry, making him a potential game-changer this weekend.

The last thing to mention for this game is Tarleton State’s defensive line, which has been a bit overlooked ahead of this weekend. Brandon Tolvert is a force on the interior, posting 44 tackles, 8.5 tackles for loss, and three sacks. On the edge, Yasir Holmes and Angelo Anderson have combined for 23.5 tackles for loss and 15.5 sacks. The Texans need this unit to play its best game of the season, especially against North Dakota’s downhill rushing attack.

Advertisement

I’ll be honest, I struggled locking in my pick for this game, but the uncertainty surrounding Kaminski’s health gives Tarleton State the edge. I expect this to be a one-score game either way, but Victor Gabalis and the Texans’ offense will find a way to escape with a win at home.

Prediction: Tarleton State (27-24)

No. 11 South Dakota at No. 6 Mercer

Kickoff: 11 am CT (ESPN+)

South Dakota advanced to the second round with a win over Drake last weekend. The Coyotes are hot right now, winning seven of their past eight games, including three ranked wins to end the regular season. Mercer secured a Top 8 seed after winning nine consecutive FCS games to end the season. With a win, the Bears would secure their second consecutive appearance in the quarterfinals.

Advertisement

Everything starts with Mercer’s passing attack, which is led by Jerry Rice Award winner Braden Atkinson. The true freshman has completed 68.1% of his passes for 3,448 yards, 34 touchdowns, and seven interceptions. He’s 9-0 against the FCS as a starter, but can he do it on this stage in the FCS Playoffs against a talented South Dakota secondary?

Two key factors have helped Atkinson develop into one of the best quarterbacks in the FCS. The first being a much-improved offensive line, which has allowed only four sacks this season and ranks 2nd among playoff teams in pressure rate allowed. South Dakota has not generated a ton of pressure this year, but can the Coyotes find a way to make the freshman uncomfortable in the pocket?

The other is a surplus of weapons on the outside, including Adjatay Dabbs, who leads the team with 856 yards and eight touchdowns. Brayden Smith has a team-high 58 catches, along with 687 yards and seven touchdowns. We also can’t forget Adonis McDaniel, who has added 639 yards on 48 catches for six touchdowns. This group has to win their one-on-one matchups on the outside this weekend.

For South Dakota, the key to the game is easy… Run the football. L.J. Phillips Jr. is becoming a superstar, rushing for 1,688 yards and 16 touchdowns on 6.4 yards per carry. The run game sets up everything else this offense wants to do over the top. Mercer has been elite against the run, holding eight of its 10 FCS opponents under 100 rushing yards, but the Bears haven’t faced a downhill rushing attack that’s this physical all season.

Advertisement

After a slow start, quarterback Aidan Bouman has found his rhythm and is playing his best football for the Coyotes. He’s completing 61.2% of his passes for 2,404 yards, 22 touchdowns, and six interceptions. Keep an eye on Larenzo Fenner, who is one of the best deep threats in the country. The sophomore is averaging 22.6 yards per reception, which ranks No. 3 nationally. In the past two games, Fenner has recorded 245 receiving yards and six touchdowns.

Advertisement

The Coyotes’ offensive line hasn’t allowed a ton of sacks this year, but entered the playoffs allowing pressure on 35.6% of all dropbacks, ranking 23rd among 24 playoff teams. This is important to note because Mercer leads the country in sacks per game, averaging nearly four. Andrew Zock could be the x-factor this weekend. He leads the Bears with 20 tackles for loss, 11.5 sacks, and 22 QBHs.

This is another interesting game to analyze. On paper, Mercer is not a great matchup for South Dakota, but the Coyotes have been tested all season and are playing their best football when it matters most. I’m going to go with Mercer at home, winning a close game behind another outstanding performance from Atkinson.

Advertisement

Prediction: Mercer (27-20)

No. 14 South Dakota State at No. 3 Montana

Advertisement

Kickoff: 1 pm CT (ESPN+)

We almost never get matchups like this in the second round, making this the most anticipated game in the second round. It truly feels like a potential semifinals matchup. South Dakota State dominated New Hampshire in a 41-3 rout, advancing to the second round. Montana finished the season 11-1 overall, securing the No. 3 overall seed.

It’s nearly impossible to know what version of South Dakota State we see on Saturday night. The Jacks are not the same team we saw win in Bozeman in Week 2, but they certainly aren’t the same team we saw lose to Indiana State. Did Chase Mason’s return unlock the true potential of this team? Or were the Jackrabbits able to take advantage of an overmatched New Hampshire team last week? We’ll find out on Saturday afternoon in Missoula.

Advertisement

Even with Mason’s return, South Dakota State’s rushing attack has been the key over the past two games. After a season of inconsistency, the Jacks have been much more effective on the ground. Julius Loughride appears to be more comfortable, rushing for 1,016 yards and seven touchdowns this season. Freshman Josiah Johnson has assumed a bigger role, rushing for 279 yards and six scores in only seven games.

Advertisement

SDSU’s offensive line has allowed opposing defenses to generate too many negative plays, which could be a problem against this Montana defense. Linebacker Peyton Wing is a player to watch, posting 59 tackles, 6.5 tackles for loss, 3.5 sacks, and three interceptions. Defensive end Hunter Peck has been outstanding this season, recording 6.5 tackles for loss and a team-high 4.5 sacks.

The true x-factor is Montana quarterback Keali’i Ah Yat, who has been really good most of the year, but still has moments of inconsistency. Can the Jackrabbits take advantage of his mistakes? If not, it could be a problem because this offense is too explosive to be shut down for the entire game. Ah Yat has thrown for 3,154 yards, 25 touchdowns, and eight interceptions.

Ah Yat’s surrounding cast can create problems for most defenses in the country. Michael Wortham is the most versatile weapon in the FCS, including leading the Griz with 825 receiving yards and seven touchdowns. Freshman Brooks Davis is another playmaker, posting 611 yards and five touchdowns.

Then there’s Eli Gillman, who might be the best running back in the entire country. He leads the offense with 1,261 rushing yards and 17 touchdowns on 6.6 yards per carry. The Jacks have been solid against the run most of the season, and the potential return of linebacker Chase Van Tol could give this defense an extra boost. If the Griz can establish the run, this game dramatically shifts in their favor.

Advertisement

One matchup that worries me for South Dakota State is that Montana should have an advantage at defensive back. Yes, the raw statistics say Montana allows a ton of passing yards, but the Griz rank Top 30 nationally in defensive pass efficiency. Can SDSU’s wide receivers win those one-on-one matchups on the outside? That could go a long way in determining this game. Kenzel Lawler (2 INTs, 10 PBUs) and Micah Harper (2 INTs, 5 PBUs) are two names to watch on Saturday.

Another game that I’ve gone back and forth on my pick, but I’m going to stick with Montana to find a way to get it done at home. I like the Grizzlies to find some success with Gillman on the ground, while the defense makes one or two stops to seal the game in the 4th quarter.

Prediction: Montana (30-23)

Follow FCS Football Central on social media for ongoing coverage of FCS football, including on XFacebook, and YouTube.



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

Acquitted in beheading case, South Dakota man sues, claiming malicious prosecution

Published

on

Acquitted in beheading case, South Dakota man sues, claiming malicious prosecution


WATERTOWN, S.D. — A man who spent 1,217 days as the only suspect in the 2020 murder and beheading of an Indigenous woman filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court on Thursday, Jan. 8, alleging he was negligently and maliciously prosecuted.

The complaint, filed in the United States District Court of South Dakota Northern Division, on behalf of Jeremiah Peacemaker, 49, names nearly three dozen defendants, including current Watertown Police Chief Timothy Toomey, department officers, South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley, as well as agents from the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation, the city of Watertown, and others.

Peacemaker was

acquitted on March 5, 2024,

Advertisement

of murdering 28-year-old Kendra Rae Owen, an enrolled member of the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate.

Jeremiah Peacemaker, now 45 years old, leaving the courtroom at the Codington County Courthouse in Watertown, South Dakota, on Monday, March 4, 2024.

Patrick Lalley / Sioux Falls Live

Peacemaker argues his rights under the 4th, 5th, 8th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution were intentionally, recklessly and willfully violated, and claims the ordeal has left permanent damage to his reputation, his emotional well-being, his livelihood and his relationships.

Represented by Steven Beardsley, Kate Benson and Scott Bratland, of South Dakota law firms, Peacemaker is seeking compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by a jury at trial.

Advertisement

In the complaint, Peacemaker claims little of Owen’s case was actually investigated: Witnesses were ignored, evidence was ruined, misplaced and lost, and other suspects besides Peacemaker were not investigated.

“Investigators refused to consider the possibility that they had arrested the wrong person,” his complaint states.

Peacemaker told investigators that he met Owen only once, days before her murder, and he was the victim of a beating and a hit-and-run the night before his arrest.

At the time, police thought Peacemaker’s story strange, according to the complaint, and fingered him as the primary suspect hours after Owen’s body was found.

“They wanted to prove that (the) plaintiff made up the story about the assault and hit and run. When they actually did an investigation, what they discovered is that he had told the truth,” the complaint states.

Advertisement

Shortly after Owen’s murder, investigators agreed to trick Peacemaker, according to the complaint. Outwardly, they pretended they were going to investigate the hit and run, but quickly focused on placing Peacemaker at the scene of the murder.

At the police station, Peacemaker alleges he was tricked into giving a DNA sample, and into talking about a woman with pink hair.

Owen had pink hair.

IMG_5346.jpg
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley talks to media after closing arguments in the Jeremiah Peacemaker trial at the Codington County Courthouse in Watertown, South Dakota, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024.

Patrick Lalley / Sioux Falls Live

Advertisement

Eventually, he was read his Miranda Rights. A photograph of Owen’s corpse and her head propped on a mattress was “slapped” in front of him, the complaint stated.

Even though Peacemaker tried to tell investigators that he had only met Owen one time, two days before the hit-and-run, they called him a psychopath and a serial killer.

“He was completely blindsided and stunned,” the complaint stated.

Video evidence later revealed that Peacemaker was telling the truth, according to the complaint — he was seen with Owen buying beer from a nearby bar.

“The plaintiff explained that he was not trying to hook up with her and that she did not make him mad. He was happy to meet her and to have made a new friend,” the complaint stated.

Advertisement

After an entire night of interrogation, Peacemaker was arrested.

Scott Bratland 022824.jpg
Watertown lawyer Scott Bratland at the Condington County Courthouse during the murder trial of Jeremiah Peacemaker on Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2024.

Patrick Lalley / Sioux Falls Live

Nearly three years after Owen’s death, Peacemaker’s defense lawyers returned to the crime scene. While walking around the house, they saw a strange saw on the roof. After reviewing crime scene photographs from 2020, the saw was visible in the same spot, according to the complaint.

“Defendants did not find it because they did not look. It remained on the roof for three years. By the time it was finally collected, the forensic evidence was gone,” the complaint stated, adding that there were reddish-brown stains on the roof under the saw.

Advertisement
Kate Benson 022824.jpg
Watertown, South Dakota, lawyer Kate Benson at the Condington County Courthouse during the murder trial of Jeremiah Peacemaker on Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2024.

Patrick Lalley / Sioux Falls Live

No reasonable investigating officer could have believed there was probable cause to arrest Peacemaker, the complaint stated.

“Because of the quick arrest of Mr. Peacemaker and subsequent press releases, the public was led to believe that this was an open and shut case. Law enforcement officers were hailed as heroes for the quick arrest. The victim’s family had no idea how flawed the case was until they showed up to watch the trial,” the complaint stated.

Kendra Owen, provided by her mother, Jewel DeMarrias.jpg
Kendra Owen, before her murder in 2020.

Contributed / Jewel DeMarrias

Advertisement

Owen, whose Indigenous name according to her obituary was Gakiya Nagun Wiyan or “Hears the Voice in the Distance Woman,” lived a “high-risk lifestyle,” the complaint stated, adding that she had disabilities that impaired her judgment. She had a substance abuse disorder, but she was also independent and a fighter.

Owen’s case worker, Marciella Espinoza, from the Human Service Agency, called her “Mike Tyson” because her initials were “K.O.,” and at times she was involved in fights, both as an assailant and a victim, according to the complaint.

But Owen was much more than that, her mother Jewel DeMarrias told Forum News Service in a brief interview.

She played bowling, basketball and softball in the Special Olympics. She was a churchgoer, DeMarrias said.

Advertisement

“She was an earth angel. She would give you her last penny to help you,” DeMarrias said.

kendra-owen-before-her-death-photograph-provided-by-jewel-demarrias.jpg
Kendra Owen before her murder in 2020.

Contributed / Jewel DeMarrias

Because of her lifestyle, intoxicated people were frequently in her home, according to the complaint. From Jan. 1, 2020, until the day her body was found, she called 911 six times, usually asking for help removing people from her home.

“A quick search of Ms. Owen’s record yielded a ton of potential suspects. The 911 records had the names of individuals who should have been interviewed because they were recently in altercations with Ms. Owens, but they were not,” the complaint stated.

Advertisement

From that suspect list of eight people, some have already died since the trial, according to the complaint.

One possible suspect had had Owen’s keys and threatened to kill her.

A second possible suspect — a woman — tried to hire an undercover FBI agent to commit murder, and when asked what she would do to help with the murder, she offered to cut up the body, according to the complaint.

A third potential suspect, who made the last nine phone calls to Owen, stopped by her house numerous times looking for his jean jacket. Owen was wearing a jean jacket at the time of her death.

A fourth potential suspect once broke Owen’s arm, and a fifth was with Owen when she met Peacemaker. Both these people are now deceased.

Advertisement

The sixth person on the list described by the complaint was described as Owen’s occasional boyfriend.

The seventh was a violent meth user who once gouged out a person’s eye.

And the eighth possible suspect was once married to a woman who assaulted Owen. While in jail, he made a “strange phone call” to Peacemaker, saying that whoever killed Owen was after him.

Cigarette butts found in Owen’s apartment were also not tested until defense attorneys in Peacemaker’s felony trial insisted. When DNA evidence came back, the genetic trail led to a woman named Brianna Lawrence, who spent time in prison for hiring a hit man to kill the father of her children, according to the complaint.

“She planned to assist the hit man by chopping the body into pieces,” the complaint stated, adding that Lawrence was also not interviewed until three years after the murder, a delay that made documentation of Lawrence’s location difficult.

Advertisement

The Watertown Police Department’s failure to properly investigate the case “shocks the conscience,” the complaint stated.

“Key pieces of evidence were recklessly ignored. Evidence proving Mr. Peacemaker was innocent, lost, not collected, not tested and not documented,” the complaint stated. “Investigators were more worried, tiptoeing around each other’s egos, than doing a proper investigation.”

Watertown Police Capt. Ryan Beauchamp — one of the defendants — told Forum News Service that the department could not comment on the lawsuit at this time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota looks to space for high-speed internet access initiative

Published

on

South Dakota looks to space for high-speed internet access initiative


play

It’s expensive to extend fiber-optic cable to the remaining locations in South Dakota that don’t have high-speed internet, so the state is leaning into providers offering service from satellites in space.

Advertisement

The state’s ConnectSD initiative, which began in 2019, had helped bring broadband access to 91% of South Dakota by 2024. A state report noted the remaining 9% would be costly, given the price of bringing miles of fiber to remote areas with few customers. 

The broadband initiative has cost $300 million so far, with funding from federal, state and private sources. Gov. Larry Rhoden announced recently that the state will soon receive another $72 million in federal funding for the effort.

A little more than a third of the new funding will go toward  “Low Earth Orbit Satellite” technologies, like SpaceX’s Starlink, to reach 2,705 of the 7,060 locations in the state targeted for the funds. Most of the other targeted connections will come by way of fiber-optic cable, and 177 will come via signals beamed from cellular towers.

Advertisement

The satellite funding will not be used to pay for individual subscriptions, said a spokesperson for the Governor’s Office of Economic Development. 

“Instead, the award reserves network capacity with the provider so service is available in those locations,” said Bri Vande Pol. “The provider is reimbursed on a per-location basis only when a customer subscribes to the service.”

Vande Pol said the federal funding requires providers to make high-speed internet available to each eligible location for at least 10 years. She said the provider receives 25% of the award upon confirming service is available, and the remaining payments for the reserved network capacity are made quarterly over the 10-year period.

Advertisement

The new federal money comes from the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program, authorized by the 2021 Infrastructure and Jobs Act, passed during the Biden administration.  

“Under the Trump administration’s changes to that program, states are encouraged to use a technology-neutral approach and connect locations in the most efficient way possible,” Vande Pol said. 

“In some of South Dakota’s most remote areas, Low Earth Orbit satellite service is a strong, reliable solution that meets performance standards while allowing us to maximize the reach of available BEAD funding,” she added. 

As of June 2025, South Dakota’s ConnectSD program had used $84.4 million in state general funds, $88.5 million in federal funds and $129.6 million in private investment from broadband providers to connect about 31,000 locations. The state and federal money has mostly been spent on grants to service providers, to help them expand their networks.

Rhoden’s latest proposed budget asks lawmakers to authorize $87 million in federal funding to be spent on broadband in the coming fiscal year. 

Advertisement

Rhoden spokesperson Josie Harms said the $72 million figure announced in a press release represents “the amount that will actually be awarded to the subrecipients.”

“The $87 million amount is the total spending authority, which includes the project costs as well as administrative costs and marketing costs,” she wrote in an email to South Dakota Searchlight.

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota DCI releases details on vehicle death in Wagner, SD

Published

on

South Dakota DCI releases details on vehicle death in Wagner, SD


WAGNER, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation has released details on a homicide that happened on January 10 in Wagner, SD.

A Wagner man has been arrested in connection with a fatal vehicle incident that occurred Saturday night near Wagner, according to SD Attorney General Marty Jackley and Charles Mix County State’s Attorney Steve Cotton.

Darian Wright, 32, of Wagner, has been charged with Vehicular Manslaughter, Driving Under the Influence, and Leaving the Scene of an Accident, with additional charges possible.

Dana Frederick, 29, of Wagner, was found deceased at a residence after a vehicle crash south of Wagner earlier that evening.

Advertisement

The vehicle was allegedly driven by Wright, who, along with a young child, sustained minor injuries in the incident.

The incident remains under investigation by the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation, the South Dakota Highway Patrol, and the Wagner Police Department.

Wright is presumed innocent under the U.S. Constitution until proven guilty.

There is no additional threat to the public.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending