Ohio
You’re Nuts: What do you most want to see Ohio State improve during Improvement Week?
Everybody knows that one of the best parts of being a sports fan is debating and dissecting the most (and least) important questions in the sporting world with your friends. So, we’re bringing that to the pages of LGHL with our favorite head-to-head column: You’re Nuts.
In You’re Nuts, two LGHL staff members will take differing sides of one question and argue their opinions passionately. Then, in the end, it’s up to you to determine who’s right and who’s nuts.
Today’s Question: What do you most want to see Ohio State improve during Improvement Week?
Jami’s Take: Tight End Production
Maybe Matt and I are both nuts this week for focusing on room for improvement when the team is firing on pretty much all cylinders at the moment, offensive line aside.
But here we are, and because the offensive line is the obvious answer, I’m actually not going to take the low-hanging fruit.
In order for this team to reach their potential for greatness, they do need to fix some offensive line issues, but I also believe they have the capacity to look beyond that and dig a little deeper into more granular things, so they can square them away before they face real challenges in earnest.
Beyond the aforementioned O-Line factor, the most glaring issue for me (which, again, is getting nitpicky) is the untapped potential of the tight ends. While the tight ends have been effective as blockers, the Buckeyes haven’t fully figured out what to do with their receiving potential yet (in part because Ohio State doesn’t have to).
There are so many weapons already that it almost feels greedy to ask us to use more of them; plus using our tight ends as large blunt objects helps to fill some of the gap left by the offensive line, but allowing our tight ends to do more than block—particularly in these early games as we try to vary the reps guys are getting—could help some of these guys develop into true threats.
Week Two was an improvement on what we saw against Akron in Week 1—a game in which tight ends Gee Scott Jr., Will Kacmarek, and Jelani Thurman combined for 0 receptions—but clearing a bar of “zero” doesn’t say much.
During the Buckeyes’ routing of Western Michigan in Week 2, the tight end production improved: Gee had one reception, Kacmarek had two, and Patrick Gurd and Bennett Christian each had a catch (Christian’s was a 55-yard touchdown).
Now, low-ish production isn’t particularly new to the Buckeyes, but in the past, they’ve been more effective at using their tight ends holistically than what we’ve seen so far this season.
In particular, there is room for the Buckeyes to do more with their tight ends on the receiving front, which could be especially beneficial when the Buckeyes get into the meat of their season. Tight ends who can do it all have the potential to elevate an offense substantially – and this isn’t news to the Buckeyes, given their success with guys like Cade Stover.
Stover, for example, had 36 receptions for 406 yards in 2022 and 41 receptions for 576 yards in 2023. When you look at the Buckeyes’ current roster of tight ends, a guy like Thurman–who struggles more with the blocking side of things than his current counterparts–could pose a threat as a receiver if we let him really cook.
Kacmarek, for his part, isn’t necessarily going to be putting up bonkers receiving numbers, but he could do more than he’s been given the opportunity to currently. Having Kacmarek pose more of a dual threat could be dangerous for opponents, given his blocking abilities. He has the potential to do some heavy lifting to cover for offensive line deficits (which is admittedly where the Buckeyes need the help more this year), but I truly believe the guy can also help the team move the ball down the field if given the chance.
Albeit at a MAC school, Kacmarek totaled 42 receptions and two touchdowns in his last two seasons combined. These aren’t astonishing numbers by any means, but he has also shown throughout training camp his potential to grow into this role as a Buckeye, and I’d like to see him get more opportunities to pose a more dual threat.
If Ohio State can make better use of these guys on the field, it could be the thing that takes an already-top-caliber team all the way this season.
Matt’s Take: Offensive Line Play
Jami can call it “low-hanging fruit” all she wants, but it would be a dereliction of my journalistic duty if I didn’t call out of the offensive line play when discussing things that need to be improved by the Buckeyes. Admittedly, the hogmollies played better against Western Michigan than they did against Akron, but we know that there is going to be far more challenging opponents down the road, so there has to be improvement.
We came into the season knowing that the offensive line was going to be the biggest question mark for the Buckeyes, and I still contend that Ryan Day and Justin Frye needed to do more in the transfer portal to address this obvious weakness. Yes, they got Seth McLaughlin, and through two games, he has been close to excellent. However, the right side of the line was a question mark in January, and it is still one now.
Obviously missing a two-time first-team All-Big Ten selection like left guard Donovan Jackson for the first two games is going to throw things into a little bit of added chaos, but Austin Siereveld has done an admirable job in Donny’s stead, so the left side isn’t the final point of concern. Against Akron, right tackle Josh Fryar looked a bit at sea, although against Western Michigan, he seemed more at ease. Tegra Tshabola has been serviceable in his first two starts at right guard but hasn’t come out of the gate looking like a sure-fire stud at the spot.
According to Pro Football Focus’ grades — which at this point, I shouldn’t need to tell you to take these with a grain of salt — the Buckeyes have graded out as the 31st best run-blocking team in the FBS, so roughly in the top 25%. However, given that they have played two teams that are graded as No. 125 and 133 (out of 134) in terms of rush defense so far, that might not be as impressive as it otherwise would be. Of course, when there are so few data points to analyze, Ohio State is going to loom large in the grades for both Akron and WMU, but it’s worth noting nonetheless.
The Buckeyes do a bit better on pass-blocking where they are graded as the 22nd-best team in FBS. I would actually say that they have done a pretty good job in pass-blocking. OSU has only allowed two sacks, neither of which were against Will Howard or the starting offensive line. For what it’s worth, Akron is again No. 125 in pressure, while Western Michigan jumps to No. 109.
Here’s the thing, judging solely on the first two weeks of the season, it is a tad nit-picky to criticize the offensive line; they’ve been mostly fine. However, when you compare them to seemingly every other position group, their performance pales in comparison. The wide receivers — highlighted by the immediate ascension of Jeremiah Smith — have been national-tiitle quality. The defensive line — with an added sense of aggression missing in recent years — has been been national-tiitle quality. Even quarterback play — aided by Howard’s decision-making and ability to move in the pocket — has been been national-tiitle quality.
This team needs to have an offensive line that can live up to that standard if they want to finally reach any of the goals that have been avoiding them in the past three seasons. So I hope they did some improving over this past week.
Let us know who you are agreeing with:
Poll
Who has the right answer to today’s question?
-
0%
Jami: Tight End Production
(0 votes)
-
0%
Matt: Offensive Line Play
(0 votes)
0 votes total
Vote Now
Ohio
Unsolved Ohio: Man arrested five years after wife found stabbed to death
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Homicide detectives have made an arrest in connection with the 2020 fatal stabbing of a woman found in a truck on the Southeast Side.
According to court documents, Dominique Edwards was arrested Wednesday and charged in the murder his wife, Infhon’e Edwards, who was found in a pickup truck parked at the Columbus Park Apartments complex in the Milbrook area on Dec. 14, 2020.
A years long investigation placed Infhon’e Edwards and her husband, Dominique Edwards, at the apartment complex the morning of Dec. 11 based on phone records. Video surveillance from the complex showed Infhon’e Edwards pull into a parking space at about 5 a.m. and after about an hour, an unidentified man exited the driver’s side door and walked away from the scene.
Infhon’e’s mother, Rosemarie Dickerson, previously told NBC4 that she recognized the man by his physical appearance, but police had not named any suspect publicly.
“I [recognize] his body build,” Dickerson said. “You couldn’t see his face when he got out, he had a white towel over his face.”
Edwards was stabbed three times on the left side of her chest and twice in her face. Her remains were then placed in the trunk of her Chevrolet Avalanche.
Her body was discovered on Dec. 14, two days after her husband, Dominique, called police to report her missing. For a previous report on this story view the video player above.
Dickerson told NBC4 that Dominique Edwards called her to say that Infhon’e Edwards had not come home the night of Dec. 10 and asked if she had stayed with a friend.
“When I kept calling her phone and there was no answer, it was like it was off,” Dickerson said. “I [told her husband] ‘report her missing’ then I went onto Facebook, and I just asked everybody ‘has anybody seen Infhon’e, we can’t find her.’”
Police noted that interviews with friends and family revealed that the victim “always wore rings on her fingers,” and she was reportedly wearing the jewelry on the night of Dec. 10. But when her body was discovered, she had no jewelry on.
It was eventually discovered that a ring Infhon’e Edwards was wearing on Dec. 10 was later “disposed of” by Dominique Edwards after her death.
An arrest warrant was issued for Dominique Edwards on Nov. 13 and he was arrested Wednesday. A Franklin County Municipal Court judge issued him a $1 million bond on Thursday and scheduled a preliminary hearing for Nov. 26.
Ohio
Ohio State Marching Band performs “Keys to the ‘Shoe” at Rutgers halftime
The Ohio State University Marching Band closed out its final Ohio Stadium halftime show of the 2025 regular season with “Keys to the ‘Shoe,” bringing classical piano favorites to the field.
The halftime show was directed by Dr. Christopher Hoch, Associate Director Phillip A. Day and Assistant Director Josh Reynolds.
The Ohio State marching band’s last show honored veterans during halftime of the UCLA game.
Here’s what songs The Ohio State University Marching Band played
- Rachmaninoff Prelude No. 2
- Shostakovich Piano Concerto No. 2
- Rondo alla Turca
- Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto No. 2
- Moonlight Sonata
- “Baba Yaga / Great Gate of Kiev” from Pictures at an Exhibition
Watch the Ohio State Marching Band perform at halftime during Rutgers game
Ohio State Marching Band: Keys to the ‘Shoe halftime show during Rutgers game
Ohio State Marching Band: Keys to the ‘Shoe halftime show during Rutgers game
Who created the Ohio State Marching Band formation?
- Drill design: Uiliami Fihaki
- Arranger: Michael Klesch
- Percussion: Mark Reynolds
Get more Ohio State football news by listening to our podcasts
Ohio
How to Watch Ohio State vs. Rutgers: Time, TV Channel, Live Stream – November 22, 2025
Data Skrive
At Ohio Stadium on Saturday, Jeremiah Smith and the Ohio State Buckeyes (10-0) play KJ Duff and the Rutgers Scarlet Knights (5-5) in a matchup between a pair of excellent pass-catchers, beginning at 12 p.m. ET. Want to watch this matchup? You can find it on FOX.
Keep up with college football all season on FOX Sports. Learn more about the Ohio State Buckeyes and the Rutgers Scarlet Knights.
How to Watch Ohio State vs. Rutgers
- When: Saturday, November 22, 2025 at 12 p.m. ET
- Location: Ohio Stadium in Columbus, Ohio
- TV Channel: FOX
- Streaming: FOXSports.com, FOX Sports App and FOX One (Try free for 7 days)
Ohio State’s 2025 Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8/30/2025 | vs. Texas | W 14-7 |
| 9/6/2025 | vs. Grambling State | W 70-0 |
| 9/13/2025 | vs. Ohio | W 37-9 |
| 9/27/2025 | at Washington | W 24-6 |
| 10/4/2025 | vs. Minnesota | W 42-3 |
| 10/11/2025 | at Illinois | W 34-16 |
| 10/18/2025 | at Wisconsin | W 34-0 |
| 11/1/2025 | vs. Penn State | W 38-14 |
| 11/8/2025 | at Purdue | W 34-10 |
| 11/15/2025 | vs. UCLA | W 48-10 |
| 11/22/2025 | vs. Rutgers | – |
| 11/29/2025 | at Michigan | – |
Ohio State 2025 Stats & Insights
- Ohio State has been a tough matchup for opposing teams, ranking top-25 in both total offense (25th-best with 441.3 yards per game) and total defense (best with 212.6 yards allowed per game) this year.
- Ohio State has been making things happen on both sides of the ball in the passing game this season, ranking 19th-best in passing (279.5 passing yards per game) and second-best in passing defense (131.2 passing yards allowed per game).
- The Buckeyes have been a handful for opposing teams, as they rank top-25 in both scoring offense (11th-best with 37.5 points per game) and scoring defense (best with 7.5 points allowed per game) this year.
- The Buckeyes rank 61st in rushing yards this season (161.8 rushing yards per game), but they’ve been shining on the defensive side of the ball, ranking second-best in the FBS with 81.4 rushing yards allowed per game.
- Ohio State has been shining on both sides of the ball in terms of third-down efficiency, ranking second-best in third-down conversion rate (56.1%) and fourth-best in third-down percentage allowed (27.6%).
- The Buckeyes rank 33rd in college football with a +4 turnover margin after forcing 10 turnovers (99th in the FBS) while committing six (third in the FBS).
Ohio State 2025 Key Players
| Name | Position | Stats |
|---|---|---|
| Julian Sayin | QB | 2,675 YDS (80.1%) / 25 TD / 4 INT |
| Jeremiah Smith | WR | 69 REC / 902 YDS / 10 TD / 90.2 YPG |
| Carnell Tate | WR | 39 REC / 711 YDS / 7 TD / 79 YPG |
| Bo Jackson | RB | 725 YDS / 3 TD / 80.6 YPG / 6.6 YPC 12 REC / 124 REC YDS / 1 REC TD / 20.7 REC YPG |
| Arvell Reese | LB | 58 TKL / 8 TFL / 6.5 SACK |
| Caden Curry | DL | 39 TKL / 11 TFL / 7 SACK |
| Sonny Styles | LB | 55 TKL / 3 TFL / 1 INT / 1 PD |
| Kayden McDonald | DL | 40 TKL / 6 TFL / 3 SACK |
Rutgers’ 2025 Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8/28/2025 | vs. Ohio | W 34-31 |
| 9/6/2025 | vs. Miami (OH) | W 45-17 |
| 9/13/2025 | vs. Norfolk State | W 60-10 |
| 9/19/2025 | vs. Iowa | L 38-28 |
| 9/27/2025 | at Minnesota | L 31-28 |
| 10/10/2025 | at Washington | L 38-19 |
| 10/18/2025 | vs. Oregon | L 56-10 |
| 10/25/2025 | at Purdue | W 27-24 |
| 11/1/2025 | at Illinois | L 35-13 |
| 11/8/2025 | vs. Maryland | W 35-20 |
| 11/22/2025 | at Ohio State | – |
| 11/29/2025 | vs. Penn State | – |
Rutgers 2025 Stats & Insights
- Rutgers’ defense has been bottom-25 in total defense this season, surrendering 425.5 total yards per game, which ranks 15th-worst. On offense, it ranks 39th with 420.5 total yards per contest.
- Rutgers’ pass offense has been leading the way for the team, as it ranks 22nd-best in the FBS with 277.4 passing yards per contest. In terms of defense, it is giving up 229 passing yards per game, which ranks 86th.
- The Scarlet Knights are posting 29.9 points per game on offense this season (56th-ranked). Meanwhile, they are surrendering 30 points per game (107th-ranked) on defense.
- The Scarlet Knights rank 85th in rushing yards per game (143.1), but they’ve been worse defensively, ranking 12th-worst in the FBS with 196.5 rushing yards conceded per contest.
- Rutgers is generating a 42.6% third-down conversion percentage on offense this season (47th-ranked). Meanwhile, it is giving up a 42% third-down rate (100th-ranked) on defense.
- At +1, the Scarlet Knights have the 62nd-ranked turnover margin in the FBS, with 10 forced turnovers (99th in the FBS) and nine turnovers committed (13th in the FBS).
Rutgers 2025 Key Players
| Name | Position | Stats |
|---|---|---|
| Antwan Raymond | RB | 1,000 YDS / 11 TD / 100 YPG / 5 YPC 15 REC / 163 REC YDS / 1 REC TD / 23.3 REC YPG |
| Athan Kaliakmanis | QB | 2,705 YDS (62.3%) / 17 TD / 7 INT -2 RUSH YDS / 3 RUSH TD / -0.2 RUSH YPG |
| KJ Duff | WR | 53 REC / 923 YDS / 6 TD / 92.3 YPG |
| Ian Strong | WR | 48 REC / 716 YDS / 5 TD / 89.5 YPG |
| Jett Elad | DB | 55 TKL / 2 TFL / 2 INT / 2 PD |
| Dariel Djabome | LB | 45 TKL / 2 TFL / 1 SACK |
| Kaj Sanders | DB | 48 TKL / 0 TFL |
| Cam Miller | DB | 28 TKL / 2 TFL / 1 SACK / 1 INT |
FOX Sports created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox?
Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.
What did you think of this story?
recommended
-
Business7 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
World5 days agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
News6 days agoCourt documents shed light on Indiana shooting that sparked stand-your-ground debate
-
World1 week ago2% of Russian global oil supply affected following Ukrainian attack
-
World6 days agoCalls for answers grow over Canada’s interrogation of Israel critic
-
World6 days agoSinclair Snaps Up 8% Stake in Scripps in Advance of Potential Merger
-
Business5 days ago
Amazon’s Zoox offers free robotaxi rides in San Francisco
-
Politics6 days agoDuckworth fires staffer who claimed to be attorney for detained illegal immigrant with criminal history