Connect with us

Ohio

You’re Nuts: What do you most want to see Ohio State improve during Improvement Week?

Published

on

You’re Nuts: What do you most want to see Ohio State improve during Improvement Week?


Everybody knows that one of the best parts of being a sports fan is debating and dissecting the most (and least) important questions in the sporting world with your friends. So, we’re bringing that to the pages of LGHL with our favorite head-to-head column: You’re Nuts.

In You’re Nuts, two LGHL staff members will take differing sides of one question and argue their opinions passionately. Then, in the end, it’s up to you to determine who’s right and who’s nuts.

Today’s Question: What do you most want to see Ohio State improve during Improvement Week?


Jami’s Take: Tight End Production

Maybe Matt and I are both nuts this week for focusing on room for improvement when the team is firing on pretty much all cylinders at the moment, offensive line aside.

But here we are, and because the offensive line is the obvious answer, I’m actually not going to take the low-hanging fruit.

Advertisement

In order for this team to reach their potential for greatness, they do need to fix some offensive line issues, but I also believe they have the capacity to look beyond that and dig a little deeper into more granular things, so they can square them away before they face real challenges in earnest.

Beyond the aforementioned O-Line factor, the most glaring issue for me (which, again, is getting nitpicky) is the untapped potential of the tight ends. While the tight ends have been effective as blockers, the Buckeyes haven’t fully figured out what to do with their receiving potential yet (in part because Ohio State doesn’t have to).

There are so many weapons already that it almost feels greedy to ask us to use more of them; plus using our tight ends as large blunt objects helps to fill some of the gap left by the offensive line, but allowing our tight ends to do more than block—particularly in these early games as we try to vary the reps guys are getting—could help some of these guys develop into true threats.

Week Two was an improvement on what we saw against Akron in Week 1—a game in which tight ends Gee Scott Jr., Will Kacmarek, and Jelani Thurman combined for 0 receptions—but clearing a bar of “zero” doesn’t say much.

During the Buckeyes’ routing of Western Michigan in Week 2, the tight end production improved: Gee had one reception, Kacmarek had two, and Patrick Gurd and Bennett Christian each had a catch (Christian’s was a 55-yard touchdown).

Advertisement

Now, low-ish production isn’t particularly new to the Buckeyes, but in the past, they’ve been more effective at using their tight ends holistically than what we’ve seen so far this season.

In particular, there is room for the Buckeyes to do more with their tight ends on the receiving front, which could be especially beneficial when the Buckeyes get into the meat of their season. Tight ends who can do it all have the potential to elevate an offense substantially – and this isn’t news to the Buckeyes, given their success with guys like Cade Stover.

Stover, for example, had 36 receptions for 406 yards in 2022 and 41 receptions for 576 yards in 2023. When you look at the Buckeyes’ current roster of tight ends, a guy like Thurman–who struggles more with the blocking side of things than his current counterparts–could pose a threat as a receiver if we let him really cook.

Kacmarek, for his part, isn’t necessarily going to be putting up bonkers receiving numbers, but he could do more than he’s been given the opportunity to currently. Having Kacmarek pose more of a dual threat could be dangerous for opponents, given his blocking abilities. He has the potential to do some heavy lifting to cover for offensive line deficits (which is admittedly where the Buckeyes need the help more this year), but I truly believe the guy can also help the team move the ball down the field if given the chance.

Albeit at a MAC school, Kacmarek totaled 42 receptions and two touchdowns in his last two seasons combined. These aren’t astonishing numbers by any means, but he has also shown throughout training camp his potential to grow into this role as a Buckeye, and I’d like to see him get more opportunities to pose a more dual threat.

Advertisement

If Ohio State can make better use of these guys on the field, it could be the thing that takes an already-top-caliber team all the way this season.


Matt’s Take: Offensive Line Play

Jami can call it “low-hanging fruit” all she wants, but it would be a dereliction of my journalistic duty if I didn’t call out of the offensive line play when discussing things that need to be improved by the Buckeyes. Admittedly, the hogmollies played better against Western Michigan than they did against Akron, but we know that there is going to be far more challenging opponents down the road, so there has to be improvement.

We came into the season knowing that the offensive line was going to be the biggest question mark for the Buckeyes, and I still contend that Ryan Day and Justin Frye needed to do more in the transfer portal to address this obvious weakness. Yes, they got Seth McLaughlin, and through two games, he has been close to excellent. However, the right side of the line was a question mark in January, and it is still one now.

Obviously missing a two-time first-team All-Big Ten selection like left guard Donovan Jackson for the first two games is going to throw things into a little bit of added chaos, but Austin Siereveld has done an admirable job in Donny’s stead, so the left side isn’t the final point of concern. Against Akron, right tackle Josh Fryar looked a bit at sea, although against Western Michigan, he seemed more at ease. Tegra Tshabola has been serviceable in his first two starts at right guard but hasn’t come out of the gate looking like a sure-fire stud at the spot.

According to Pro Football Focus’ grades — which at this point, I shouldn’t need to tell you to take these with a grain of salt — the Buckeyes have graded out as the 31st best run-blocking team in the FBS, so roughly in the top 25%. However, given that they have played two teams that are graded as No. 125 and 133 (out of 134) in terms of rush defense so far, that might not be as impressive as it otherwise would be. Of course, when there are so few data points to analyze, Ohio State is going to loom large in the grades for both Akron and WMU, but it’s worth noting nonetheless.

Advertisement

The Buckeyes do a bit better on pass-blocking where they are graded as the 22nd-best team in FBS. I would actually say that they have done a pretty good job in pass-blocking. OSU has only allowed two sacks, neither of which were against Will Howard or the starting offensive line. For what it’s worth, Akron is again No. 125 in pressure, while Western Michigan jumps to No. 109.

Here’s the thing, judging solely on the first two weeks of the season, it is a tad nit-picky to criticize the offensive line; they’ve been mostly fine. However, when you compare them to seemingly every other position group, their performance pales in comparison. The wide receivers — highlighted by the immediate ascension of Jeremiah Smith — have been national-tiitle quality. The defensive line — with an added sense of aggression missing in recent years — has been been national-tiitle quality. Even quarterback play — aided by Howard’s decision-making and ability to move in the pocket — has been been national-tiitle quality.

This team needs to have an offensive line that can live up to that standard if they want to finally reach any of the goals that have been avoiding them in the past three seasons. So I hope they did some improving over this past week.


Let us know who you are agreeing with:

Poll

Who has the right answer to today’s question?

  • 0%
    Jami: Tight End Production

    (0 votes)

  • 0%
    Matt: Offensive Line Play

    (0 votes)



0 votes total

Vote Now



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Clarence Burley, II, Youngstown, Ohio

Published

on

Clarence Burley, II, Youngstown, Ohio


YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (MyValleyTributes) – Clarence Burley, II, affectionately known as “Lil Man,” entered eternal rest on Thursday, June 5, 2026, at the age of 60, at Summa Health Akron City Hospital in Akron, Ohio.

Born on May 22, 1966, in Youngstown, Ohio, Clarence was the beloved son of Clarence L. Burley and Jacqueline Wilkinson-Burley.

He attended Ursuline High School and graduated with the Class of 1984.

Clarence was a hardworking and dedicated man who spent many years employed at Classic Optical Corporation as a Lens and Frame Specialist. Known for his skill and precision, he was recognized as one of the top lens shapers during his tenure with the company. He also worked for Goodwill Industries, where his exceptional work ethic earned him recognition and awards for outstanding service.

Advertisement

A devoted fan of the Oakland Raiders, Clarence enjoyed football, boxing, roller skating, and bowling. In his younger years, he was also an accomplished swimmer. He loved life and cherished spending time with family and friends. Whether enjoying a cruise vacation, visiting the lake to admire the water, debating sports statistics from A to Z, or simply sharing laughter with loved ones, Clarence brought joy wherever he went.

Known for his impeccable style, Clarence was often dressed to perfection. He was especially proud of his many Cadillacs, but none more than his beloved Cadillac Seville, affectionately known as “the baby caddy.” He could often be found cruising through the city, listening to music and enjoying the ride. His infectious smile, strength, humor, and generous spirit will forever be remembered by those who knew and loved him.

In 1999, Clarence met the love of his life, the former Cathy Winphrie. Their friendship blossomed into a lasting bond, and they were united in holy matrimony in 2015. Together they shared a life filled with love, companionship, and cherished memories.

Clarence leaves to cherish his memory his loving wife, Cathy Burley; his children, Shannie (Meisha) Burley of Atlanta, Georgia; DeShawn Burley (fiancée Ziah) of Warren, Ohio; Eddie W. Matthews; and Montell Cochrane; his beloved grandchildren, Zaira, DeShawn, Jr., Deondra, Audrionna, Eddie, Jr., Quiara, Azel, Anyia, Marquel, Aiden, Adalese, Meadow, and Amatureas; five great-grandchildren; his mother-in-law, Eula Winphrie; brothers-in-law, James (Jamie) Winphrie and Timothy (Kori) Winphrie; sisters-in-law, Regina Winphrie and Azella Burley; niece Helleenia Winphrie; and a host of nieces, nephews, cousins, relatives, and dear friends.

He was preceded in death by his parents, Clarence L. Burley and Jacqueline Wilkinson-Burley; his brother, Wesley Burley; and his grandmother, Carrie Davis.

Advertisement

Though Clarence’s earthly journey has ended, his legacy lives on through the lives he touched, the family he loved, and the countless memories he leaves behind. His strength, perseverance, laughter, and love will continue to inspire all who were blessed to know him.

“To be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord.”2 Corinthians 5:8

A homegoing celebration will be held 10:00 a.m. Saturday June 20, 2026 at Jerusalem Baptist Church , a visitation with the family will be 9:00 – 10:00 a.m. at the Church.

Arrangements have been entrusted to Gregory-Martin Funeral Home. For additional information, please call (330) 743-4098.

To send flowers or plant a memorial tree in memory, please visit our flower store.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Couple charged in animal neglect case enter pleas

Published

on

Couple charged in animal neglect case enter pleas


WARREN, Ohio (WKBN) – A couple that was charged after investigators say they abandoned two dogs and a cat at an apartment in Warren entered guilty pleas in Warren Municipal Court this week.

Courtney Iser pleaded guilty to three counts of abandoning animals and two counts of cruelty to companion animals, and Isaiah Gilbert pleaded guilty to two counts of cruelty to companion animals. Sentencing is set for July 7.

The two were charged in May after the animals were found in unsafe and unhealthy conditions without food or water at an apartment on South Street SE. Police were called to the apartment on reports that the animals had been left without care. Iser was charged first, and Gilbert was charged a short time later.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

How Ohio voter rules have dramatically changed since 2020

Published

on

How Ohio voter rules have dramatically changed since 2020


Since 2020, Republican lawmakers and Ohio election officials have enacted a series of changes that tightened the state’s voting laws and election procedures. Supporters say the changes improve election security and voter confidence. Critics argue they make voting more difficult, despite studies and election officials finding relatively few cases of voter fraud in Ohio and nationwide.

Here’s a rundown of major changes to voting rules and election administration since 2020: 

August 2020

What happened: Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose directed elections officials around the state to limit the number of absentee ballot drop boxes to one location in each county. Local elections officials contending with the COVID-19 pandemic had requested permission to use multiple boxes in different locations. LaRose was sued, and courts criticized the directive but said it was within his power. In 2023, this administrative rule was written into a bill and voted into law by the Ohio legislature. Gov. Mike DeWine signed it, and it took effect in April 2023. It also added requirements for security and surveillance of the drop boxes, which were allowed to remain open 24 hours a day during early voting.

January 2023 – April 2023

What happened: Ohio lawmakers passed the state’s most significant election-law overhaul in years. House Bill 458, passed on Jan. 6, 2023, went into effect that April requiring photo ID for in-person voting. That meant voters could no longer use utility bills, bank statements or government checks as identification or proof of residency.

Advertisement

The bill also: 

  • Eliminated early voting on the Monday before Election Day.
  • Shortened the deadline for requesting absentee ballots.
  • Shortened the period of time during which absentee-ballot voters could fix errors on their ballots
  • Limited the documents new voters could use when registering to an Ohio driver’s license number, an Ohio state ID number, and the last four digits of a Social Security number. 
  • Limited curbside voting to people with a disability who cannot physically enter a polling place.
  • Made it a crime for someone to possess or return another voter’s absentee ballot unless they are an election official, a mail carrier, or a spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, sibling, grandparent, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew or in-law of the voter. This portion of the law was later challenged in federal court by an Ohio woman with a disability. In July 2024, a judge ruled that voters with disabilities had the right to have a trusted person of their choice deliver their ballot.

2024

What happened: Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose ordered voters to only deposit their own ballot in county drop boxes. Family members assisting a relative had to go inside the local board of elections office and complete paperwork or face a possible felony charge.

Signal background

November – December 2025

What happened: Ohio lawmakers voted to require that absentee ballots be received by local elections officials before the polls close on Election Day in order to be counted. In the past, the ballots had to be postmarked by Election Day but could be received later. The law, which took effect in March 2026, also created additional steps for elections officials to verify voter registrations, including looking into registration records that don’t match state or federal databases or were flagged for not matching existing voter data. In some instances, voters who are flagged could be asked to vote by provisional ballot and barred from voting by mail. 

Signal background

January – June 2026

What happened: Using updated rules, Ohio removed hundreds of thousands of inactive voter registrations. Elections officials deemed this routine maintenance. Voting-rights advocates characterized it as a voter purge that included removing voters who appeared to register in other states. Voting rights groups sued to challenge the removals.

June 2026

What happened: Ohio lawmakers voted to require voters to provide photo ID information when voting by mail beginning in 2027. Voters can provide the identification either when requesting an absentee ballot or when returning it. They can still request an absentee ballot with their driver’s license or Ohio state ID number or the last four digits of a Social Security number. Voters who want to hand-deliver their ballots will be able to show elections officials their photo ID in person. The law also requires the secretary of state, the boards of elections, the Registrar of Motor Vehicles and public libraries to provide free copies of voters’ photo IDs. (Gov. Mike DeWine has until June 24 to sign the bill and has repeatedly declined to comment on it since its passage.)

There are some exceptions to the ID law, including:

  • Uniformed military and overseas voters
  • Voters who who do not have photo ID because they have religious objections to being photographed
  • Voters who don’t have an ID or can’t provide one because of a severe medical condition, severe disability, are in jail for an offense that is not a felony, they are immobile and can’t get a photo ID or have a “material obstacle that makes the elector unable to obtain photo ID or a copy of the elector’s photo ID.” (It’s not clear what this means in the law.)

The law also directs the secretary of state to create a secure online portal for registered voters to request absentee ballots. Currently, voters have to fill out a form online or fill out a form they have printed and mail it or hand deliver it to the board of elections in their county. 

What happened: Lawmakers also voted to place a measure before voters to write Ohio’s photo-ID requirement into the state constitution. The amendment would keep recently-passed ID rules intact. But it also would make room for the lawmakers to
change voting requirements at some point in the future – for instance by adding a signature-matching requirement to mail ballots. 

Signal background

This timeline draws on reporting from Signal Ohio’s Andrew Tobias and Signal Cleveland’s Frank W. Lewis and Helen Maynard.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending