Connect with us

Ohio

What you need to know about Ohio State’s roster: 43 thoughts on 43 offensive players

Published

on

What you need to know about Ohio State’s roster: 43 thoughts on 43 offensive players


There are only 10 more weeks until August comes and Ohio State begins preseason camp in hopes of defending its national championship.

With both transfer portal windows closed, the roster is likely set. What should you know about every player? Here are thoughts on Ohio State’s 43 scholarship offensive players. Check back for defense and special teams later this week.

Players are ordered by expected impact in 2025 at each position.

Quarterbacks

Julian Sayin, r-Fr.: The No. 1 quarterback recruit in the 2024 class has been the favorite to win the Buckeyes’ 2025 quarterback job since he left Alabama when Nick Saban retired last year. He was Ohio State’s third-string quarterback as a true freshman and showed some flashes of his arm talent in limited snaps. He was inconsistent in the spring, but his strong spring scrimmage performance vaulted him to a slight lead over Lincoln Kienholz, in my opinion. His arm talent stands out, and he moves around the pocket well, too, which is crucial because he’s only 6 feet 1. The competition is far from over, and he’ll have to work to separate from Kienholz.

Advertisement

Lincoln Kienholz, r-Soph.: Kienholz is the most experienced of the returning quarterbacks — with just 22 career pass attempts — and had a good but inconsistent spring in which he showed off his athleticism. He finished the spring game completing 12 of 18 passes for 158 yards and two touchdowns. The South Dakota native didn’t do enough to win the starting job, but he will be in the two-man race with Sayin when camp begins in August.

Eli Brickhandler, r-Jr.: Ryan Day prefers to have at least four quarterbacks on the roster, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that he added one this spring. Brickhandler, a Houston Christian transfer, committed to the Buckeyes on May 20 and gives the Buckeyes some extra experience, even if he’s totaled only 144 career pass attempts in the FCS. I don’t expect him to come in and compete for the starting job, but he’ll have two years of eligibility left to aid the Buckeyes’ depth.

Tavien St. Clair, Fr.: The five-star, No. 7 prospect in the 2025 class had a stellar first spring after enrolling early from Bellefontaine High School, less than an hour from Columbus. He struggled at times in the spring game, throwing two interceptions, but growing pains are expected for most freshmen. He will have time to grow, as Ohio State shouldn’t need to press him into duty. St. Clair’s future is bright.

Running backs

James Peoples, Soph.: Though Peoples hasn’t had a chance to shine yet — he rushed for 197 yards behind Quinshon Judkins and TreVeyon Henderson as a freshman — many people in the program think the 2024 four-star recruit from Texas is going to be special. He moves well between the tackles and has shown some explosiveness. The 203-pound Peoples should be the starter when the season begins, though carries will be split.

C.J. Donaldson, Sr.: The West Virginia transfer showed some flashes of being an impact player this spring, but it’s hard to really gauge running backs when there’s not as much contact. Still, the 6-foot-2, 237-pounder has a unique frame and experience — 30 touchdowns in three years with the Mountaineers — that should put him in a two-man primary rotation with Peoples.

Advertisement

Bo Jackson, Fr.: Of the freshmen, Jackson seems the most ready to get on the field, which is impressive considering he missed the end of his senior high school season with an injury. He didn’t show a lot in the spring, with most eyes on Donaldson and Peoples, but Jackson looked promising in the spring game. His future is bright.

Sam Williams-Dixon, r-Fr.: Williams-Dixon entered the portal after the season but returned instead of finding another home. He will likely battle Jackson for the third-string running back position, a spot that will include rotational reps and fourth-quarter snaps in lopsided games.

Anthony Rogers, Fr.: Rogers, a four-star former Alabama commit, won’t arrive in Columbus until this summer, but he’s an explosive playmaker who should provide some big-play potential and depth when he’s up to speed in the offense.

Isaiah West, Fr.: The three-star recruit from St. Joe’s Prep in Philadelphia was on campus in the spring but missed most of it due to injury. Running backs coach Carlos Locklyn liked his potential and offered a scholarship last May, early into his first year at Ohio State. We’ll see more from West in the summer.


CJ Donaldson rushed for 2,058 yards in three years at WVU. (Michael C. Johnson / Imagn Images)

Wide receivers

Jeremiah Smith, Soph.: Smith returns as the best receiver in the country — and also arguably the best player at any position. The No. 1 recruit in the Class of 2024 tallied 76 catches for 1,315 yards and 15 touchdowns as a freshman and now has the impossible task of trying to top that debut performance. He has a real chance to make a trip to New York for the Heisman Trophy ceremony, though that could depend on the development of Sayin or Kienholz at quarterback.

Advertisement

Carnell Tate, Jr.: Tate will see even more opportunities with Emeka Egbuka gone. A five-star recruit, Tate has made steady improvement in his two years. He made an immediate impact as a freshman with 18 catches for 264 yards and one touchdown, then stepped in as the third receiver and caught 52 passes for 733 yards and four touchdowns last year. He has first-round NFL talent and will get a chance to show it all this year.

Brandon Inniss, Jr.: It’s finally Inniss’ time. The top-40 recruit had to wait his turn after Egbuka decided to return last season, but he still carved out a role as Ohio State’s fourth receiver. Now, with Egbuka gone, he’s primed to step in as the Buckeyes’ slot receiver. He had 14 catches for 176 yards and one touchdown and returned punts last season, and he gives the Buckeyes another strong route runner.

Mylan Graham, r-Fr.: Graham, a former five-star prospect from Indiana, was the talk of the spring game this year after not arriving in Columbus until last summer. He appeared in four games as a freshman to preserve his redshirt and should get on the field more this year, as he’s competing with Bryson Rodgers and freshman Quincy Porter to take over that fourth receiver spot. A good preseason camp could put him squarely in the rotation.

Bryson Rodgers, R-Soph.: Rodgers is a good example of just how deep Ohio State’s receiving corps is. A four-star, top-400 recruit, he hasn’t been able to break into the rotation in his first two years, as he had just five catches last year. But he’s a strong route runner and has impressed the staff, even if he’ll have to compete at a high level this summer to earn more snaps.

Quincy Porter, Fr.: If any freshman receiver is going to make an immediate impact, Porter is the favorite. The five-star signee had one of the best spring sessions among all Ohio State freshmen, showing off his ability to make contested catches consistently. He’ll have to bring it again in the summer, but when Smith is calling him the next great one, that’s a sign of good things to come.

Advertisement

Phillip Bell, Fr.: A four-star recruit from California, Bell was the No. 275 player in the class and will likely need some time to challenge for playing time in such a deep group.

David Adolph, r-Jr.: Adolph, a local player from Dublin, Ohio, was a walk-on until last August when he was rewarded for his strong offseason with a scholarship. He’s not likely to take the field in major snaps, but he adds some depth to a deep unit and played 114 special teams snaps, per TruMedia.

De’Zie Jones, Fr.: The New Jersey product was another four-star recruit in the Class of 2025 who will use the summer to develop after enrolling in January. He’ll likely be third on the slot receiver depth chart this summer, but he has a lot of talent. His position in the units speaks to the quality of depth at the position.

Bodpegn Miller, Fr.: Miller has good size at 6-4, with excellent athleticism to go with it and impressed the coaching staff at a one-day camp last summer. He arrived at Ohio State as a developmental prospect after playing quarterback and defense in high school. He’s a strong redshirt candidate this year as he develops.

Damarion Witten, r-Fr.: The 6-4, 215-pound Witten was a tight end coming out of high school but spent all of last season at wide receiver. He’s still adjusting to the position but showed good ball skills and an ability to high-point the ball. He has a chance to fight for second-team reps this season.

Advertisement

Tight ends

Max Klare, r-Jr.: The versatile Purdue transfer can play on the line or in the slot and is a mismatch in the passing game. He scored a touchdown in the spring game, and Ohio State is only scratching the surface of what it can do with the potential All-American in the lineup after he led the Boilermakers with 51 catches for 685 yards and four touchdowns last season.

Will Kacmarek, r-Sr.: Kacmarek was in a boot at the end of the spring and missed the spring game, but that injury isn’t expected to keep him out of preseason camp. He will be one of the top two tight ends when he steps on the field.

Bennett Christian, r-Jr.: The Georgia native isn’t one of the flashiest names on the roster, but he does a lot to impress the coaching staff. He had a 55-yard touchdown catch from Sayin against Western Michigan last September.

Jelani Thurman, r-Soph.: One of the most physically impressive players on the roster, Thurman is a massive threat in the passing game at 6-6 and has improved his blocking enough to be on the field for extended snaps. This could be a breakout season for Thurman after he had four catches last season.

Max LeBlanc, r-Fr.: The Canadian native will provide some depth at one of the deepest positions on the roster. He played just 14 snaps but was the lone tight end signee in 2024 and will be able to compete for more time next year.

Advertisement

Nate Roberts, Fr.: The No. 10 tight end in the 2025 class, Roberts showed flashes of a bright future during the spring. There’s a logjam above him on the depth chart, but Ohio State is excited about how he could develop.

Brody Lennon, Fr.: Lennon is the other half of the talented freshman duo with Roberts. The tight end room is deep, though, so he can take time to develop, especially because he did not enroll in time for spring practice.

Offensive linemen

Ethan Onianwa, r-Sr.: One of Ohio State’s biggest moves this offseason was adding Onianwa out of the portal. The Rice transfer was an NFL prospect before he decided to finish his career at Ohio State. He fills a massive void at left tackle after Josh Simmons left for the NFL.

Carson Hinzman, r-Jr.: Hinzman was one of the major glue pieces to Ohio State’s championship run a year ago. With the injuries up front, he was forced to play both guard and center and held his own at both. He’ll go back to center this year with Seth McLaughlin gone and is expected to be one of the strengths of the line.

Luke Montgomery, Jr.: The Ohio native will likely start at left guard this year, where he came into his own during last year’s championship run. Montgomery and Onianwa give the Buckeyes one side of the line they can lock in right now.

Advertisement

Tegra Tshabola, r-Jr.: After splitting time with Austin Siereveld at right guard last year, Tshabola seemed to have control of the role this spring. He’s improved immensely since last spring and could help solidify a strong interior line group.

Austin Siereveld, r-Soph.: Siereveld is a perfect fit for the versatile sixth lineman role, but he appears to be entering the summer as the team’s starting right tackle instead. He played guard last year, so even if he doesn’t win the battle at right tackle, he could swing inside on occasions as well.

Philip Daniels, r-Soph.: The Minnesota transfer might not be locked into the starting lineup going into the summer, but he will battle for the right tackle position against Siereveld. For now, it seems like Siereveld has the upper hand, but Daniels is a more than capable backup.

Josh Padilla, r-Soph.: With McLaughlin gone, Padilla steps up on the depth chart as Ohio State’s backup center. We haven’t seen a lot of Padilla yet, but he could get some opportunities this fall..

Ian Moore, R-Fr.: Moore began the spring as the team’s starting left tackle, but as expected, Onianwa took it over. Ohio State may have brought in someone else this year, but Moore is the favorite to be a starter next season if he continues to develop.

Advertisement

Deontae Armstrong, r-Fr.: The Cleveland native hasn’t made an impact, yet, but the 6-6, 298-pounder remains an important depth piece at an offensive tackle position that lacks depth.

Devontae Armstrong, r-Fr.: Much like his brother, Devontae remains a developmental piece for the Buckeyes down the road. Unlike his brother, Devontae is a guard at Ohio State, but he shares the physical tools at 6-5 and 303 pounds.

Jake Cook, Fr.: Cook, a former Louisville commit, chose the Buckeyes last summer after a camp in Columbus. He got a spring in with the Buckeyes and is in a battle with Armstrong for a backup spot at left guard.

Gabe VanSickle, r-Fr.: The Michigan native and four-star recruit is another depth piece who I’d slot in as the backup right guard for now, so this preseason camp is crucial for him.

Carter Lowe, Fr.: The Toledo native was the big addition to the 2025 class. The four-star prospect and No. 11 tackle in the class, Lowe was a must-get for the Buckeyes and projects to be a starter later in his career.

Advertisement

Jayvon McFadden, Fr.: The Maryland native is in the early developmental stages of his career. He was the top-rated offensive lineman in Maryland but is slotted in as the third-string guard for right now. A good camp could see him push VanSickle and add depth there.

Justin Terry, r-Fr.: Terry is another West Virginia transfer, but unlike Donaldson, he didn’t play a snap last season or this spring. He’ll be a tackle when he debuts in the summer.

(Top photo of James Peoples and Julian Sayin:  Adam Cairns / Columbus Dispatch / USA Today Network)



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Menards to pay 10 states, including Ohio, $4.25 million in rebate settlement

Published

on

Menards to pay 10 states, including Ohio, .25 million in rebate settlement


COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohio is part of a multistate lawsuit settlement against home improvement store Menards.

According to the state Attorney General’s Office, Ohio and nine other states reached the settlement with Menards, a Wisconsin-based home-improvement retail store, over allegations of deceptive rebate advertising.

The 10-state led investigation revealed that Menards would give shoppers the impression that they were getting an immediate discount while shopping through its advertising, when in fact, savings actually came in the form of a rebate or in-store credit.

The investigation raised concerns with Menards’ marketing strategy and sales practices, alleging the following of the company:

Advertisement
  • Advertised 11% off or 11% off everything that suggested an instant price cut, even though customers received only a rebate on future purchases.
  • Listed prices already at an 11% discount, reinforcing the idea that shoppers were getting an in-store discount.
  • Failed to clearly explain the important limits of the rebate program, burying key details in the fine print.
  • Tell customers that Rebates International was a separate company handling rebates, even though it is operated by Menards itself.

The settlement, announced Thursday, included an agreement by Menards that it would, in part, discontinue ads suggesting immediate discounts, clearly explaining the rules, limits, and conditions of its rebate program, and offer customers an easier path towards claiming rebates, both in person and online, among other changes.

In addition, Menards will pay participating states $4.25 million in fees, of which $365,173.05 will go toward the Ohio Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Enforcement Fund.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio State dominate latest power ranking as nine Buckeyes rank inside Top 50 players

Published

on

Ohio State dominate latest power ranking as nine Buckeyes rank inside Top 50 players


The honors continue to roll in for this Ohio State Buckeyes football team.

From young players ready for another College Football Playoff run next season to players hungry for one more run starting December 31 before the NFL Draft, this Ohio State Buckeyes team is loaded with talent headed into their seventh playoffs appearance since the CFP era began in 2014.

Five defensive players and four offensive players headlined a class of extremely talented Buckeyes. Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza took the No. 1 spot to go along with his Heisman and Maxwell honors.

Advertisement

An offensive Ohio State Buckeye took the No. 2 spot right behind Mendoza.

Advertisement

Ohio State Buckeyes linebacker Arvell Reese (8) tackles Michigan Wolverines running back Bryson Kuzdzal (24) during the NCAA football game at Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Mich. on Nov. 29, 2025. Ohio State won 27-9. | Adam Cairns/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Wide receiver Jeremiah Smith takes the No. 2 spot

Advertisement

Jeremiah Smith was ranked behind Mendoza along with his gun-slinging sophomore quarterback. Julian Sayin was the second-highest ranked quarterback on the list at No. 5.

“Smith caught 80 balls for 1,086 yards and 11 touchdowns as a sophomore, but that doesn’t really tell the story…Smith commands double-teams constantly, draws the attention of everyone’s best corner, and has every defensive coordinator he faces scheming to slow him down. And none of it has mattered.”

ESPN’s David Hale

Advertisement

Smith is expected to have one more dominant season with the Buckeyes next season where fans hope to see him paired next to five-star recruit Chris Henry Jr. Senior wide receiver Carnell Tate has been an impressive receiving mate for Smith the past two seasons. Tate caught 48 passes, nine touchdowns, and had 838 yards. He ranked No. 26 in the rankings.

Offensive tackle Austin Siereveld ranked No. 44 as well.

Advertisement

The defense takes over

All five of Ohio State’s defensive players on the list ranked inside the top-22. Junior linebacker Sonny Styles sat at No. 21 to kick things off for the defense. The Buckeyes have had the best defense in college football for the entire season and these are the names that have made it happen. Projected first round NFL Draft Arvell Reese took the No. 16 spot.

“A new set of stars emerged to lead the nation’s No. 1 defense this fall, and Reese was undeniably front and center. He has thrived under new coordinator Matt Patricia, recording 6.5 sacks and 10 tackles for loss from the edge position and finished second on the squad with 62 total tackles…Reese was named Big Ten’s Linebacker of the Year and recorded a sack in six of Ohio State’s first eight games of the season.”

ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg

Advertisement

Defensive linemen Kayden McDonald and Caden Curry ranked at No. 13 and No. 11 respectively. Safety Caleb Downs was the highest ranked defensive Buckeye at No. 7. Downs is a simply a lockdown player who can play corner or safety while still being able to tackle at a high level. If he chooses to declare for the NFL Draft after the season is over, he’ll be slated to go within the top 10 in most mock drafts.

Advertisement

Opposing quarterbacks only targeted downs 20 times for the entire season. Only nine passes were caught on his watch as the primary defender.

“The longest completion he gave up was 17 yards. A 14-yard completion in the second quarter of the Big Ten title game was the first one he’d given up in nearly two months. There is not a more lockdown corner in the country than Downs.”

ESPN’s David Hale

Advertisement

The Ohio State Buckeyes are waiting for the winner of the No. 10 Miami Hurricanes against the No. 7 Texas A&M Aggies in the first round of the College Football Playoffs this Saturday at 12:00pm Eastern on ABC/ESPN.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

From seed to living room: Christmas tree care, myths and Ohio connections

Published

on

From seed to living room: Christmas tree care, myths and Ohio connections


CLEVELAND, Ohio — For many households that do not otherwise keep plants, a cut Christmas tree may be the only one they actively care for all year, watered daily and monitored carefully.

And every December, families arrive at Sugargrove Tree Farm in Ashland, ready to make a once-a-year decision: which tree will carry their lights and ornaments and serve as a backdrop for holiday selfies. I recently spoke Bob Smith, who owns and operates the cut-your-own tree farm, about his tree care advice.

Read all of Susan Brownstein’s columns here.

Smith has a short list of rules for customers once their tree is home, and the most important one is simple.

Advertisement

“Water,” he says. “Always keep it watered. The bottom of the trunk should never be exposed to air.” When a freshly cut tree sits dry for too long, sap seals the cut surface, forming a scab that prevents water uptake.

If a tree has been without water for more than six or seven hours—for example, if you store it in the garage for a few days before bringing it in the house—Smith recommends making a fresh cut before putting it back in water. One to two hours of exposure is usually fine; six or seven hours is not.

Smith was also eager to bust some persistent Christmas tree care myths. Adding Sprite or aspirin to the water doesn’t help, Smith says, and worrying about water temperature is unnecessary. Warm water quickly cools to room temperature anyway.

“Tap water is fine,” he says. “The tree just needs hydration.”

Placement in the house, on the other hand, is important. A hot air register right next to the tree is “really, really bad,” Smith says, and dries it out regardless of how much water is in the stand. Cooler conditions are best.

Advertisement

He has one longstanding customer who sets up her Fraser fir in a three-season room and keeps it there until April, finally taking it out when the daffodils bloom.

Norway spruce has poor needle retention, regardless of how much it is watered.Courtesy Sugargrove Tree Farm

Tree species also plays a major role in how long a tree stays fresh. Norway spruce, while classic in appearance, has inherently poor needle retention and will often drop needles within two weeks, no matter how well it’s cared for. Fir trees perform much better indoors, and among them, the Canaan fir is rapidly gaining in popularity.

From seed to living room: Christmas Tree care, myths, and Ohio connections
Canaan fir was developed for the Christmas tree market in Ohio and is growing in popularity because of its great needle retention.Courtesy Sugargrove Tree Farm

Pronounced “ka-NANE,” the Canaan fir is growing rapidly in popularity as a Christmas tree and has an origin story with deep Ohio roots (pun intended).

The tree takes its name from Canaan Valley in West Virginia, where it was first identified, and its development as a Christmas tree accelerated in the 1950s through work at The Ohio State University. That early research helped establish Canaan fir as a reliable option for growers, combining good needle retention, strong branching, and most importantly for growers like Smith, the ability to grow in clay soils.

From seed to living room: Christmas Tree care, myths, and Ohio connections
Bob Smith of Sugargrove Tree Farm in Ashland prepares a fir seedling for growing.Courtesy Sugargrove Tree Farm

Many landscape plants are propagated from cuttings to ensure genetic consistency, but Smith explained that Canaan fir trees are grown from seed, and Ohio plays a significant role in that process.

Seed orchards near the OSU Agricultural Research and Development Center in Wooster produce Canaan fir seed from the best of the original “mother trees” bred by Dr. Brown’s team. That seed is sent to Weyerhaeuser, a large forestry company based in Washington state, where it is stored, tested for viability, and grown into seedlings by request from tree farms like Sugargrove.

When Smith receives them, the trees are already two years old and about 18 to 20 inches tall. From there, he grows them on for roughly eight more years before they’re ready to sell.

Advertisement

“That’s a decade of work for one tree,” Smith says.

From seed to living room: Christmas Tree care, myths, and Ohio connections
Tree seedlings are planted when they are about two years old and take another eight to 10 years to reach Christmas tree size.Courtesy Sugargrove Tree Farm

That timeline helps explain why growing conditions matter so much. National data and maps of Christmas tree production show that Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon and Washington produce 80 to 90 percent of the trees grown in the U.S., with just a few counties accounting for half the total.

According to Smith, trees grown in North Carolina can reach six feet in five years thanks to its ideal climate and sandy soils, half the time it takes in Ohio’s heavier clay soils.

Sugargrove supplements some of its stock from North Carolina, but Ohio-grown trees remain central to the farm. Smith grows Canaan fir, Fraser fir, Norway spruce and white pine.

(However, the early bird gets the tree; Sugargrove began selling trees on Black Friday and sold out by December 14 this year.)

From seed to living room: Christmas Tree care, myths, and Ohio connections
White pine is a classic tree choice for midcentury decorating styles with tinsel, popcorn, and a string of lights–no heavy ornaments.Courtesy Sugargrove Tree Farm

Each species has tradeoffs. Fraser firs are popular for their shape and sweet scent, though Smith notes they’re less tolerant of stress than Canaan firs. White pine can be a good option for lighter decorating styles.

“Think 1950s,” Smith says, “Popcorn strings, tinsel, and lights,” but no heavy ornaments so as to avoid the Charlie Brown tree effect.

Advertisement

Fragrance can also be a factor in tree choice. Smith jokes that old-fashioned blue spruce (which he no longer sells due to diminishing demand) smells like cat urine to him, but he acknowledges some people associate it strongly with Christmas.

Canaan fir has a citrus-like scent, while Fraser fir has a sweeter scent “that smells like Christmas” to him. Pines do not have much fragrance on their own, but combined with garlands and wreaths, a home can still achieve that treasured holiday smell.

Many families debate whether to get a real or artificial tree, but there are differences even among real trees.

Choosing a Christmas tree from an Ohio tree farm supports land that stays in agricultural production rather than being developed. When a tree from a tree farm is cut, it is replaced with a young tree that absorbs carbon as it grows.

Compared with a natural tree shipped from Oregon or the Pacific Northwest, a locally grown tree avoids thousands of miles of transportation and supports regional agriculture. And if a cut tree is composted after the holidays, its carbon is returned to the soil.

Advertisement

Whether a Christmas tree is the only plant you’ll have all year or just another member of your plant family, the care comes down to: choose a species that fits your home and decorating style, keep it away from heat, and above all, keep it watered.

And if you choose a tree from an Ohio tree farm, you continue a cycle that can begin with an Ohio-grown seed and ends, years later, at the center of a family’s Christmas story.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending