Connect with us

Ohio

What we know about Ohio State’s anti-Israel protests

Published

on

What we know about Ohio State’s anti-Israel protests


play

It’s been a tumultuous week for Ohio State University and colleges around the nation as they grapple with a wave of student protests over schools’ investments in Israel.

Demonstrators across the nation are protesting the civilian toll in Gaza, where more than 34,000 people have died since the Israeli invasion that followed a Hamas-led attack that killed almost 1,200 people in Israel. Students oppose U.S. military aid to Israel and want their schools to stop investing endowment money in companies with Israeli links, USA Today reported.

Advertisement

Here’s what we know about student protests happening in Columbus.

36 arrested at anti-Israel protest Thursday night

Thirty-six people were arrested starting at 10:16 p.m. Thursday night as police surrounded the hundreds-strong protest on the Ohio Union in an effort to break it up. The protest started at 5 p.m. and went for nearly six hours before protestors began to dissipate.

No injuries were reported from the protests or arrests.

Three arrested, including student and faculty member, at anti-Israel protest Thursday afternoon

Earlier in the day Thursday, three people were arrested at a smaller pro-Palestine protest. One of those arrested was an Ohio State staff member, according to OSU spokesperson Ben Johnson.

Ohio State says it legally can’t divest from Israel

After Thursday’s protests, an OSU spokesperson said state law prevents the university from divesting from Israel. Here’s a rundown on the law and the history of divestment in Ohio.

Advertisement

What do OSU’s ‘space rules’ say about protesting?

Ohio State’s policies on the use of its public spaces prohibit overnight events, restrict noise at certain times, and require permission for demonstrations and setting up tents. It’s these policies that Thursday’s protesters are alleged to have violated.

Are university protests going to continue?

As Thursday night’s protest was broken up, protestors shouted at police that they would be back Friday. As of Friday afternoon, protesters had not returned to the Ohio Union, the site of Thursday’s protests.

NHart@dispatch.com

@PartofMyHart

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ohio

Ohioans know what they voted for last November. Yost's legal fights don't change that. • Ohio Capital Journal

Published

on

Ohioans know what they voted for last November. Yost's legal fights don't change that. • Ohio Capital Journal


It was plain what Ohio voters approved last November with Issue 1. An overwhelming majority of Ohioans voted for a reset on abortion rights after relentless government assault on reproductive freedoms under the state’s patriarchal theocratic rule.

The consensus of 57% of the electorate was to enshrine the fundamental right to abortion in the Ohio Constitution.

Issue 1 also explicitly barred the state from directly or indirectly burdening, prohibiting, penalizing or interfering with access to abortion, and discriminating against abortion patients and providers.

It’s right there in the ballot language of the constitutional amendment voters said “yes” to last November. But now, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who issued a legal analysis that largely stood against Issue 1 before it was approved by voters, argues Ohioans didn’t vote for what they did.

Advertisement

For months Yost has been doing his level best to legally obstruct implementation of the newly amended state constitution by maintaining the legitimacy of burdensome and discriminatory pre-Issue 1 abortion restrictions that clearly violate the letter of the law post-Issue 1.

He slow walks every single constitutional challenge to every single Republican statute still on the books that interferes with abortion access by erecting unnecessary government barriers between a woman and her right to an abortion.

Yost had the gall to contend that Ohio voters didn’t pass Issue 1 to block unnecessary government-mandated delays before patients are allowed to obtain abortions, or to eliminate government-mandated information (that is at least irrelevant and at worst distressing) prior to receiving care.

Yes. They. Did.

Yost cannot pick and choose, a la carte, which provision of the voter-mandated abortion rights amendment applies to unconstitutional restrictions that remain in the Ohio Revised Code.

Advertisement

But that’s what he’s trying to do in courtroom arguments to keep burdensome and discriminatory state abortion restrictions in force indefinitely, including the 24-hour waiting period for abortion patients – a medically unwarranted government mandate not applicable to any other medical procedure – plus separate, in-person visits for patients to be schooled in required anti-choice material designed to discourage abortions.

Yost and his fellow Republican theocrats like to intimate that childlike Ohioans who voted for Issue 1 didn’t fully understand what they were doing. The naïve majority who cast their ballots in favor of the amendment simply failed to grasp what it meant to the common sense abortion regulations Republican men had imposed on Ohio women.

Court filings by Yost’s office suggest gullible citizens thought a vote for Issue 1 would just give women the same abortion rights they had under Roe v. Wade. Never mind what the language added to the Ohio Constitution (and read by Issue 1 voters) actually said.

Yost analyzed that text at length last year before the November election in a disingenuous critique ripped by a former Ohio AG and AG candidate as “a biased hit piece that is intended to confuse voters and weaken support for the amendment.”

Yost concluded that all state abortion laws, such as the 24-hour waiting period and state mandated “informed consent” provisions, would likely be erased if the amendment passed. They “would certainly be challenged under Issue 1” and subject to the “exclusive scrutiny test” of the court as to whether or not they “burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against” the right to abortion, reasoned Yost.

Advertisement

The problem is, countered his peers, “no such standard of review exists in law – Yost has created it out of whole cloth to support his arguments.”

Yost was, wrote Marc Dann and Jeff Crossman, “deliberately misleading” with “hyperbolic claims and scare tactics.”

He was also revealing his fealty to partisan extremism over the public interest of truth-telling.

Today, Yost crafts his own textual interpretation of the changes Ohioans mandated in state abortion law and audaciously assumes what voters were thinking when they enshrined the right “to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions” in their constitution. It is obvious he does not respect the will of the people or acknowledge their sovereignty in self-governance.

Yost, ever the media hound, wants to attract attention as a courtroom combatant for the hard right. To that end, he will fight constitutionally protected abortion rights in Ohio with protracted litigation and frivolous appeals to subvert implementation of the law with whatever legal tool he has to keep Ohio women subjugated as second-class citizens.

Advertisement

Yost is fixated on is generating headlines and getting on TV. So he pursues partisan lawsuits with other Republican AGs to exploit MAGA wedge issues, especially concerning transgender equality, and files a slew of Trump-loving, regulatory-hating amicus briefs to the Supreme Court.

Ohio’s chief law enforcement officer waves off Trump’s 88 felony counts in four jurisdictions for charges ranging from “pervasive and destabilizing lies” about election fraud to illegally hoarding classified documents and falsifying business records in a hush money coverup to win the 2016 election. Yost appears guided by selective application of the law when it comes to the accused felon and presumptive presidential nominee of his party.

But Ohio’s AG is misguided if he thinks Ohioans are willing to concede that same selectivity when it comes to their hard-won constitutional right to reproductive freedom. They know what they voted for and so does Yost.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Person falls to death from stands during Ohio State graduation

Published

on

Person falls to death from stands during Ohio State graduation


One person died Sunday in a fall during the graduation ceremony at Ohio State University, the school said.

The incident occurred around noon local time when the person fell from the stands of Ohio Stadium in Columbus.

The identity of the deceased person has not been made public. Both the school and the Franklin County Coroner’s Office have not said whether the person was a student, according to the Columbus Dispatch. It also remains unclear if the fall was unintentional or a deliberate act.

Multiple witnesses told local NBC affiliate WTDN the person who fell was a woman.

Advertisement

The ceremony reportedly continued without interruption as news of the death spread through the crowd. The last of the students and others entering the stadium passed the area where the person fell, which had been quickly cordoned off with yellow tape around where the body was covered.

The death was not remarked upon by any of the ceremony’s speakers.

“We are aware of an incident at the stadium during today’s commencement,” the school said in a statement Sunday night. “An individual fell from the stands. They are deceased. We have no additional details to share at this time. Police and emergency responders are on scene. For anyone affected by today’s incident, we will make counseling and other support resources available.”

The school awarded 12,555 degrees and certificates at the ceremony, according to an unrelated statement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Lawrence County, Ohio to receive $12.7 million in grant money

Published

on

Lawrence County, Ohio to receive $12.7 million in grant money


LAWRENCE COUNTY, Oh. (WSAZ) – Ohio Governor Mike DeWine made an announcement Monday that Lawrence County will receive $12.7 million in grant money, as part of the Appalachian Community Grant Program.

Gov. DeWine says Rome Township will receive $5.2 million which go toward a full-service marina at Lock and Dam 27.

Officials say the marina will house up to 100 boats, a boat house, a floating dock, playground and an outdoor shelter.

The City of Ironton will receive $5.2 million for improvements to the riverfront, including renovations to the Ro-Na Cultural Center on S. 3rd Street.

Advertisement

Burlington and South Point will each receive $1 million for their riverfront parks.

This is a developing story.

Keep checking the WSAZ app for the latest information.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending