Ohio
Transcript: Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio on
The following is a transcript of an interview with Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio, a Republican, on “Face the Nation” that aired on June 30, 2024.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to Ohio Republican senator J.D. Vance. He joins us this morning from Cleveland. And Senator I should say, we’re having some technical issues. So you’re with us on Zoom. Hopefully, our uplink stays solid throughout because I got a lot of questions for you, sir.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Donald Trump had a better night on Thursday during that debate by many measures. But according to our poll, he fell short on at least one of them. Fewer voters thought the former president was truthful compared with President Biden. Mr. Trump falsely claimed states are passing legislation to execute babies. I think you know that killing people is illegal in every state. He falsely claimed that the Speaker of the House at the time turned down 10,000 soldiers that he had offered to keep the peace ahead of January 6, something his own Acting Secretary of Defense testified to Congress did not happen. If he has such a strong platform. Why make false claims?
SEN. VANCE: Well, Margaret, I think the media is running interference on a lot of this stuff. We all know and Nancy Pelosi herself has admitted on camera that she could have requested more National Guard troops, she bears some responsibility for the fact that they weren’t there at the Capitol. We know that a- the multiple Democratic governors and states and even some Democratic senators and congressmen have tried to pass laws that would effectively legalize abortion up until the moment of birth. And most importantly, we know that the media seems totally uninterested, in fact-checking Joe Biden from any of the number of false claims that he made–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — You know, I lost track, sir, I’ve been told the media is on every single side of this and everything’s our fault. But let’s get back to the candidate you’re here to talk about. Chris Miller said 10,000 Troops, he was never ordered by the President to send those to the Capitol that day.
SEN. VANCE: Nancy Pelosi has said on camera, Margaret, that she bears some responsibility for the fact that the National Guard didn’t play a bigger role. But of course, we know the Speaker of the House has an extraordinary amount of influence over the Capitol Police. It’s not in dispute, Margaret and more importantly, Joe Biden said that no troops died on his watch, even though 13 American service members died, thanks to his botched withdrawal from Afghanistan. Joe Biden made multiple statements of falsehood during the debate. And a lot of folks in the media, yes, seemed totally uninterested, in fact, checking him. And the reason Margaret is because Donald Trump just performed so much better. There’s- there was- there was this 24-hour period, where effectively everyone honest that there was an incredible contrast between Donald Trump’s energy and command to the facts, and Joe Biden’s obvious inability to do the job as president. And now of course, we’ve trained this new media cycle where folks are trying to run cover. Look, the American people saw what they saw. Trump can do the job, Biden can’t.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You might not have heard it, but I did raise a lot of those issues to Wes Moore, the Biden surrogate who was on before you. As to where you stand on some of these issues tomorrow at the Supreme Court, it may be a significant day as we get- expected to get that decision on presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. And that’s directly relevant to the federal charges against Donald Trump. As you know, you’re a lawyer. I wonder if you become the Vice President and you’re in a Trump-Vance administration. Do you believe a president could pardon himself for federal crimes?
SEN. VANCE: Well, look, I’m focused on electing Donald Trump as president, whether I’m serving in some other roles serving as the United States Senator, I think the Trump agenda has worked, Margaret. And on this particular question–
MARGARET BRENNAN
— But would you object if the President were to try to do that?
SEN. VANCE: Maragret, we know that the President has to have immunity to do his job. Should Barack Obama be prosecuted for droning American citizens in Yemen? There are so many examples of presidents Democrats and Republicans who would not be able to discharge their duties, if the Supreme Court does not recognize some broad element of presidential discretion. I’m very confident that they’re going to be able to do that. And I’m very confident that the fundamental principle here is the President’s got to be able to do his job in the same way that police officers, judges, prosecutors, enjoy some immunity, that principle has to apply to the president too.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you do believe that a president could pardon himself for federal crimes?
SEN. VANCE: I believe that the President has broad pardon authority, Margaret, but more importantly, I think the President has immunity. It’s not about whether he should pardon himself. It’s about whether he should be prosecuted in the first place for discharging his official duties. So in that way, I sort of reject the premise of the question here. We need to have some recognition that- you know, look, a Democrat wins the presidency, they try to throw the Republican president in jail or a Republican wins the president. They try to throw the Democrat president in jail, that is the pathway to unraveling 250 years of American constitutional tradition and making the president totally unable regardless of party to do their job. That is not a good thing and it’s not something I think any Republican supports.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay. To that point, President Trump on that debate stage on Thursday, suggested that Joe Biden could be criminally prosecuted after he leaves office. It wasn’t clear exactly what crime he was alleging. But he mentioned something about the U.S. border. In a Trump-Vance administration, would your Justice Department prosecute Joe Biden? And if so, for what?
SEN. VANCE: Well, first of all, that would be the responsibility of the Attorney General, Margaret. But Donald Trump did not say that he’s trying to throw his political opponent in jail. That is Joe Biden, who has in fact, already tried to do precisely that. And importantly, what he said is that if you apply the same standard that Joe Biden’s Justice Department has applied, then there are a lot of Democratic officials who could go to prison. He’s making a fundamental argument about constitutional fairness. It’s so extraordinary that people could say that Donald Trump is the one trying to use lawfare against his opponent sometime in the hypothetical future, when the very real president, that’s exactly what Joe Biden is trying to do. This is a danger–
MARGARET BRENNAN: But do you object to the premise?
SEN. VANCE: Right. And I think that what we need to recognize is that applying a consistent standard is what really matters.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you would not want the Justice Department to prosecute Joe Biden for any alleged crimes, correct?
SEN. VANCE: I want people who- Margaret, I want people who commit crimes to face the appropriate response in law. What I do not think is reasonable is for Joe Biden to weaponize his own Justice Department, going after Donald Trump, any number of crimes, some of which have already been thrown out, a number of which I think will be thrown out, including on Monday by the United States court. So the- the problem that I have Margaret is not with which Democrats should prosecute which Republican and vice versa, it’s let’s get out of the prosecuting of people based on their politics. Let- let- let’s let voters decide who the president should be, not judges and prosecutors who are politically motivated.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator, you are, as everyone knows, on this very short list of potential running mates for Donald Trump. So for our viewers at home, you are 40 years old, you’ve been in the Senate for less than two years, you haven’t held elected office before this. If you are selected, alongside a nominee who is 78 years old, you will be a heartbeat from the presidency. What do you think your biggest accomplishment in the Senate has been to date?
SEN. VANCE: Well Margaret, again, I’m not running for vice president, and it’s important for us to remember that Donald Trump has been a very good president, he will be a very good president again. I think in some ways these vice presidential conversations serve to distract from the fact that we have: Donald Trump as president was a success, Joe Biden as president has been a failure. Let’s get back to success. Let’s get back to peace and prosperity. My attitude on the vice [president] thing, Margaret, is look, if he asked me, I want to help them. And of course, I would be very interested in the job. But you asked, what are my accomplishments in the United States Senate, and 18 months, Margaret, we’ve done a lot of good work for our constituents. We’ve got hundreds of millions of dollars to the Great Lakes. We’ve done a lot to help the people of East Palestine deal with a terrible train disaster. And of course, we’ve done a lot of work on making sure that Ohio has gotten defense resources that make not just Ohio but our country stronger. So there’s a lot we can hang our hat on. But I like being a senator. I’m not trying to leave the United States Senate. It’s an honor to serve the people of Ohio. And frankly, if you asked me, that’s where I expect to be in six months. That’s where I expect to be in a few years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, J.D. Vance. We’ll be watching and hopefully we’ll have you back in-studio next time.
Ohio
James Stephen McGuire, Youngstown, Ohio
YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (MyValleyTributes) – James Stephen McGuire, Sr., age 87, passed away peacefully, on Friday morning, June 5, 2026, at the Hospice House.
James was born January 14, 1939, in Youngstown, a son of the late Olin and Sylvia Sipus McGuire.
After attending Youngstown East High School, he enlisted in the US AirForce. Upon his discharge, he was an electrician for the P & LE Railroad and the Youngstown Waste Water Treatment plant. His best job was being a husband and dad. There wasn’t anything he couldn’t fix and enjoyed hunting, fishing and trapping. His wife, the former Gloria Jean Kozak, passed away on February 22, 2015.
He leaves to cherish his memory, his sons, Jim (and former wife Denise) McGuire, Jr. and Darin McGuire and Brett (Fancie, who called him her PaPa), who was Jim’s caregiver since the death of his wife; his sister, Carol Cascarelli; four grandchildren; and three great-grandchildren.
He was preceded in death by his parents; his wife; and brother, Ron.
The family has entrusted Kubina-Yuhasz-Wasko Funeral Home, 5925 Market Street, Boardman, with James’s arrangements, where they will receive friends from 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m., on Monday, June 8, 2026, followed by a service at 1:00 p.m., officiated by Reverend Keith Panning. He will be laid to rest, next to his wife, at Lake Park Cemetery.
Visit www.waskofamily.com to view the obituary and send the family condolences.
To send flowers to the family or plant a tree in memory of James Stephen McGuire, Sr., please visit our floral store.
Ohio
Some felons can now seek restoration of gun rights in Ohio
CINCINNATI (WKRC) – The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that some convicted felons can apply to have their gun rights restored, clarifying how Ohio law works when a single conviction triggers both state and federal firearm prohibitions.
The ruling was 6-1 by the justices, with Justice Jennifer Brunner being the only dissenting opinion.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that some convicted felons can apply to have their gun rights restored, clarifying how Ohio law works when a single conviction triggers both state and federal firearm prohibitions. (WKRC, Provided)
The ruling stems from a case involving an Allen County man, Patrick Heffley, convicted of domestic violence in 2006. That conviction barred him from owning a gun under both federal and state law, which is legally referred to as being under disability.
“A disability is most often created by having a conviction for an offense of violence or the possession or sale of illegal drugs,” said Glaser Law Attorney Angela Glaser. “Federal law has an equivalent disability. So, you could have a disability in state court and federal court.”
When Heffley applied in 2023 for the state to restore his gun rights, the court denied the request because of his federal gun disability.
“The importance of Heffley’s case is that when he went into his county and said, ‘Please relieve me of this disability. I’d like to carry a firearm now.’ The court read the statute in Ohio that allows him to apply for the relief and said, ‘There is language here that says if you are otherwise prohibited by law from carrying a firearm, you are not eligible to seek relief,’” said Glaser. “The state said he is not eligible because that language ‘being otherwise prohibited from carrying a firearm’ applies to the fact that he can’t lawfully carry a firearm under federal law. The trial court agreed and said, ‘You’re not eligible.’ So, Heffley appealed his case to the court of appeals. The court of appeals disagreed.”
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision says that if a single conviction leads to both a state and federal gun disability, Ohio law still allows the person to apply to restore their gun rights. If there were one conviction leading to a state gun disability and a separate conviction leading to a federal gun disability, that would be a different thing for the courts to decide.
Glaser, who works on these types of cases, said the ruling could change how lawyers who represent these felons handle court proceedings on behalf of their clients because this ruling sets a precedent.
“If you’re in a county where your county prosecutor is consistently just telling judges, ‘He’s ineligible,’ and your case becomes a slam dunk loser at that point, then this case certainly changes your practice, because the door has now been opened,” said Glaser.
Glaser said the alternative would have created a legal trap for people seeking relief.
“I think that this was the right decision for Heffley’s case, especially,” said Glaser. “If the Ohio Supreme Court had said that Heffley was not eligible to apply to seek relief, then he would find himself in a catch-22. So, if he has to relieve himself under federal law before asking for relief under state law, this is an extremely difficult procedure.”
Even with the ruling, applications can still be denied by courts.
“I could cite numerous examples of individuals who have very old convictions who own companies and are very successful and are contributing members of society who have been granted relief, and I could cite many examples of people who have applied for relief who have recent convictions, strings of convictions that give judges great pause and concern for giving them the ability to lawfully carry a firearm,” said Glaser. “There are many applications that are denied, and the ones that are granted, in my experience, deserve to be granted.”
State Rep. Dani Isaacsohn, a Democrat who represents the 24th district and the Ohio House minority leader, raised concerns about the public safety impact.
“When we let people who are more likely to use guns to commit violent crimes have access to more weapons, it makes all of us less safe,” said Isaacsohn. “I don’t think it’s particularly controversial to think that people with a history of domestic violence who’ve previously lost their ability to wield a deadly weapon should get more access to deadly weapons. Either we care about public safety or we don’t.”
Isaacsohn said Ohio lawmakers have refused to pass common sense gun laws and have prioritized extreme legislation, leading to communities that are less safe.
“People are tired of violence in their neighborhoods. People are tired of guns flooding their streets,” said Isaacsohn. “When we say common sense gun laws, I mean the things that the vast majority of people agree on. Things like background checks, waiting periods, and keeping guns out of the hands of people who have committed domestic violence. The things that law enforcement say are helpful and would keep us safer.”
Women Helping Women, which supports domestic violence victims, said in a statement that while the ruling answers a legal question, the decision is “deeply concerning.”
The statement added: “We know from decades of experience and extensive research that access to a firearm in a domestic violence situation increases the risk of homicide by 500%. Survivors deserve to know that their safety remains the highest priority in our communities and justice system.”
Under the process for restoring gun rights, one requirement a judge must find is that the applicant has led a law-abiding life since release and appears likely to continue doing so.
Ohio
Ohio AG Yost sues ambulance company over alleged out-of-network disclosure failures
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WSYX) — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has filed a lawsuit against an ambulance company accused of leaving patients with unexpected medical transport bills by failing to disclose that it was out of network.
The lawsuit alleges Superior Air-Ground Ambulance Service of Ohio did not inform patients before transporting them between medical facilities that it is out of network for all private health insurers, as required by state law.
“Patients being transferred between hospitals have enough to worry about without getting hit with unexpected bills weeks later,” Yost said. “Consumers deserve to know when a company is out of network and what costs they may face before services are provided.”
The lawsuit alleges four violations of Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act: failing to inform consumers of the right to receive an estimate; billing for out-of-network care after insurance reimbursement; making false or misleading statements regarding cost; and requiring consumers to enter a transaction on terms that the company knew were substantially one-sided.
Yost’s office said it has received complaints from more than 20 people transported by Superior between July 2024 and June 2026 who were billed hundreds or thousands of dollars for the transportation.
According to the lawsuit, people received treatment at hospitals within their insurance networks when physicians ordered ambulance transportation to another in-network facility. The hospitals arranged the transportation with Superior, but patients were not informed of Superior’s out-of-network status.
The Ohio Attorney General’s Office also alleges Superior failed to provide consumers with estimated transportation costs before service, as required in Ohio, and instead presented payment authorization forms after the transports.
The lawsuit seeks restitution for affected consumers, along with civil penalties and injunctive relief.
ABC 6 has reached out to Superior and is awaiting a reply.
ABC 6 has reached out to XXX and is awaiting a reply.ABC 6 has reached out to XXX and is awaiting a reply.
JOIN THE CONVERSATION (1)
AB
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 hour agoPasadena motorist knocked unconscious in unprovoked assault after other driver flashes high beams at him
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoDetroit Tigers tally only 2 hits in 4-0 loss to Seattle Mariners
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoBogen Untouchable at T100 San Francisco as Wilde Takes Third – Slowtwitch News
-
Dallas, TX2 hours ago1 dead, 1 critically injured in multi-vehicle Dallas crash; suspect arrested
-
Miami, FL2 hours ago‘Won’t tolerate it’: Officials warn of trafficking risks as World Cup crowds head to Miami
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoRed Sox Reject Trade Offers for Three Key Pitchers
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoMy Morning Jacket, Death Cab For Cutie, Tash Sultana Elevate Denver’s Outside Days Festival
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoSeahawks’ Russell Wilson Trade Recognized Among NFL’s Biggest Ever