Connect with us

Ohio

Report: Ramaswamy tax plan would gut Ohio schools, Medicaid

Published

on

Report: Ramaswamy tax plan would gut Ohio schools, Medicaid


A policy report released Monday by Innovation Ohio concludes that GOP gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s proposal to eliminate Ohio’s personal income tax would create a $9.8 billion annual gap in the state budget, threatening deep cuts to public schools, Medicaid, and local government services.

The report, published in February 2026, draws on data from the Ohio Legislative Services Commission, the Thomas Fordham Institute, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Center for Community Solutions.

Ohio’s personal income tax is projected to generate $9.82 billion in fiscal year 2027, representing 21% of the state’s General Revenue Fund and 33% of all state-source tax revenue, according to the Ohio Legislative Services Commission’s Budget in Brief. The General Revenue Fund finances K–12 education, Medicaid, public universities, human services, and the state’s criminal justice system.

Ramaswamy has argued that eliminating the income tax would attract and retain wealthy residents — particularly those who currently split time between Ohio and lower-tax states like Florida or Texas — and projected the policy could grow Ohio’s population from approximately 11 million to as many as 15 million residents. Innovation Ohio’s report disputes whether growth at that scale is plausible, noting that Ohio has not experienced sustained revenue expansion of that magnitude in modern budget history outside of temporary post-recession rebounds.

Advertisement

Schools

K–12 education receives $12.0 billion from the General Revenue Fund each year. If spending were reduced proportionally to offset the lost income tax revenue, public schools would face a $2.44 billion cut — equal to approximately 21% of all state support for schools, according to the Thomas Fordham Institute’s “Ohio Education by the Numbers” data for the 2023–24 school year.

To replace that loss through local property taxes alone, collections would need to increase by approximately 20% statewide. The report states that cuts of that magnitude could not be absorbed without consequences including larger class sizes, reduced services for students with disabilities, fewer bus routes, and diminished access to meals.

Medicaid

Medicaid is the largest single program in Ohio’s budget, covering approximately 3 million Ohioans, according to the Center for Community Solutions. The state-funded share of the program totals roughly $8.0 billion per year. The report notes that the proposed $9.8 billion revenue loss would exceed the entire state-funded share of Medicaid.

Advertisement

Because Medicaid is jointly funded with the federal government, state-level reductions also reduce federal matching dollars. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, each $1 in Ohio state Medicaid spending draws down roughly $1.87 in federal support, amplifying the effect of any state-level cuts.

Who pays

For a typical full-time Ohio worker earning $60,000 annually, eliminating the income tax would reduce their tax bill by approximately $100 per month, based on rates published by the Ohio Department of Taxation. The report argues the financial benefit would flow disproportionately to high-income earners and those selling businesses or appreciated assets — transactions most wage earners do not make.

Replacing the $9.8 billion in lost revenue would require some combination of deep spending cuts, higher property taxes, or greater reliance on the sales tax. If the lost revenue were replaced entirely through the sales tax, statewide collections would need to increase by approximately 65%.

The Kansas comparison

Advertisement

Innovation Ohio’s report draws on the experience of Kansas, which enacted aggressive income tax cuts beginning in 2012 with an eventual goal of eliminating the tax. Between 2012 and 2017, Kansas population growth reached just 1.2%, compared with 3.9% nationally, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Private-sector job growth lagged the national average and trailed several neighboring states. Repeated budget shortfalls led to education funding reductions, transfers from highway funds, delayed pension payments, and multiple credit rating downgrades. In 2017, a Republican-led legislature substantially reversed the cuts, citing fiscal instability, according to analyses from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Brookings Institution.

“Vivek Ramaswamy’s plan is simple: cut taxes for wealthy people like him, while gutting schools, cutting healthcare, and raising taxes on the rest of us,” said Innovation Ohio President Michael McGovern. “Ohio families once again get screwed while rich Wall Street vultures like Vivek Ramaswamy get another tax handout.”

The full Innovation Ohio report is available at innovationohio.org.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Can Ohio State Survive Its Own Schedule? Inside the Buckeyes’ 2026 Playoff Math

Published

on

Can Ohio State Survive Its Own Schedule? Inside the Buckeyes’ 2026 Playoff Math


Ohio State enters the 2026 season as the reigning national champion’s chief rival for preseason hype — ranked No. 1 in ESPN’s initial Football Power Index and the trendy pick in several outlets’ way-too-early bracket projections. But before any of that matters, the Buckeyes have to get through a schedule that their own athletic department has openly called one of the toughest in the country. The question worth asking isn’t whether Ohio State is talented enough to win a title. It’s whether this slate is rugged enough that even a very good Buckeyes team could stumble to 9-3 — and if it does, whether that’s still good enough for the College Football Playoff.

By the school’s own count, nine of the Buckeyes’ 12 regular-season opponents either reached the CFP or played in a bowl game in 2025, and seven of them won at least nine games that season. Add up the 2025 records of Ohio State’s nine Big Ten opponents and you get a combined winning percentage north of .600 — a brutal number for a conference slate.

A few things stand out immediately:

Advertisement

Five true road games, including trips to two teams that made the 2025 CFP semifinals. The season opens with a Week 2 rematch at Texas, closing out the home-and-home series after Ohio State’s narrow 14-7 win in Columbus last year, followed later by a trip to Indiana on October 17th, the reigning national champion, and a first visit to USC since 2008 on October 31st. The Buckeyes will also make their first trip to Iowa’s Kinnick Stadium since 2017. Road trips to Texas, Iowa, Indiana, USC and Nebraska leave almost no margin for error away from the Horseshoe.

Advertisement

A CFP semifinalist at home, too. Oregon comes to Columbus on November 7th. Only two Big Ten teams have posted winning records against Ohio State this decade — Michigan and Oregon — and the Buckeyes will host both within the final four weeks of the regular season.

The Michigan game closes the regular season again, on Nov. 28, with a trip to Indiana and a home date with Oregon both looming in the weeks before it. A closing stretch of Indiana (road), Oregon (home) and Michigan (home), separated only by Northwestern and Nebraska, is about as demanding a finish as any team in the country will face.

Advertisement

Why 9-3 Is a Real Possibility, Not a Doomsday Scenario

Ohio State’s roster is loaded. Quarterback Julian Sayin returns after a Heisman-finalist redshirt freshman campaign, and Jeremiah Smith — already the most productive receiver in program history through two seasons — is back for one more year in Columbus. Ohio State ranks among the national leaders in returning offensive production, bringing back roughly seven in ten snaps’ worth of output from a year ago.

Advertisement

But the defense that carried Ohio State to the 2024 national title and a Big Ten title game appearance in 2025 was gutted by the NFL Draft. The Buckeyes had four players go in the first 11 picks of the 2026 draft, three of them defenders — receiver Carnell Tate plus linebackers Arvell Reese and Sonny Styles, and safety Caleb Downs. As a result, the defense returns only about half of last season’s production, a figure that ranks in the bottom third nationally. That’s a real question mark heading into a schedule with almost no easy weeks after October.

There’s also a late-season track record worth noting. Through 12 games in 2025, Ohio State looked nearly unbeatable, winning everything but the Texas opener by an average score of roughly 39-8. But when it came time to close, the offense stalled — the Buckeyes managed a combined 24 points in losses to Indiana in the Big Ten title game and Miami in the CFP quarterfinals, both defeats built around an overly conservative approach late in games. If a similarly cautious style resurfaces against this year’s closing gauntlet of Indiana, Oregon and Michigan, three losses in that stretch alone isn’t far-fetched.

Put it together — a true road loss at Texas, Indiana or USC, a slip-up somewhere in the Oregon-Michigan stretch, maybe an upset bid from Iowa or Nebraska — and 9-3 isn’t a pessimistic outcome. It’s a very plausible one for a team replacing this much defensive production while playing this schedule.

So Would 9-3 Be Enough for the Playoff?

Advertisement

Here’s where the format matters as much as the record. The CFP is staying at 12 teams in 2026, but the automatic-qualifier rules changed after realignment talks between the Big Ten and SEC broke down without a deal on expansion. Each Power Four conference champion — from the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and SEC — is now guaranteed a spot regardless of final ranking. The highest-ranked Group of Six team also earns an automatic bid, and Notre Dame can qualify as an independent if it finishes in the top 12. Everyone else fills out the field as at-large selections, seeded purely by the committee’s final rankings, with only the top four teams overall earning first-round byes.

That structure gives a 9-3 Ohio State two realistic paths in:

Path 1: Win the Big Ten. If the Buckeyes go 9-3 but that includes a Big Ten Championship Game win, they’re in automatically — no ranking required, no committee debate. Given the schedule, a 9-3 team that beats Indiana, Oregon and/or Michigan somewhere along the way to Lucas Oil Stadium and wins there would carry more than enough quality wins to make that plausible.

Path 2: An at-large bid on the strength of schedule. If Ohio State doesn’t reach the title game, a 9-3 at-large case becomes a resume argument — and here the Buckeyes’ brutal slate actually works in their favor. A 9-3 record built on wins over the likes of Texas, Indiana, USC, Oregon or Michigan, with all three losses coming against genuinely strong opponents, is a very different case than a 9-3 team that padded its record against a soft schedule and lost to mediocre teams. The selection committee has rewarded strength of schedule and a “best three losses” argument over a cleaner record built on a weaker slate; in 2025, an 8-5 Duke team with no marquee wins was left out entirely, while 10-3 Alabama got in on the strength of who they played and beat.

Advertisement

The math gets tighter, though, if other Big Ten contenders also finish with strong resumes. Analysts already project this could be a three-bid year for the conference, with Oregon, Ohio State and Indiana viewed as the league’s strongest playoff bets and several others given outside chances. If Indiana, Oregon and Ohio State all finish somewhere in the 9-3 to 11-1 range, seeding — and head-to-head results — will matter enormously. An Ohio State team that lost directly to one of its direct competitors could find itself squeezed out if the at-large math gets crowded near the bottom of the field.

The Bottom Line

Ohio State’s 2026 schedule is genuinely one of the hardest in the country — five true road games, two CFP semifinalists on the slate, and a closing stretch of Indiana-Oregon-Michigan that would stress-test any roster, let alone one replacing three defensive first-round picks. A 9-3 finish wouldn’t reflect a team underachieving; it would reflect a team that played one of the nation’s toughest schedules and lost a few close ones to elite competition.

Under the current 12-team format, that record should still be good enough for the Playoff in most realistic scenarios — either by winning the Big Ten outright, which comes with an automatic bid regardless of ranking, or by leaning on strength of schedule to win the at-large argument. The one situation where it gets dicey is if Ohio State’s three losses include head-to-head defeats to the same Big Ten teams — Indiana, Oregon — it’s competing against for playoff positioning, and the conference ends up sending three or four teams that all finish with similar records. In that crowded scenario, being 9-3 with the wrong losses could matter more than being 9-3 at all.

Advertisement

For a program that’s made the field in three of the first three years of the expanded Playoff, the safer bet is still that 9-3 gets Ohio State in. But this schedule means the Buckeyes will have to earn every bit of that resume.

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Yosteria opens its enoteca

Published

on

Yosteria opens its enoteca


YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – A downtown Youngstown business is expanding.

Yosteria celebrated the grand opening of its new space–the enoteca at Yosteria.

The owners modeled the space after a traditional wine bar in Italy, which is known as an “enoteca.”

The space located in the backyard of the property features an expanded wine list–their own in-house made wine and full bar options.

Advertisement

The owners say the expansion helps bring their original vision to life, showcasing a wide variety of Italian cuisine.

“We have strong southern Italian roots here,” co-owner Alex Zordich said. “We have a lot of southern Italian food, but we also have a lot of central northern. It’s fine introducing those fruits even to the Southern Italians here. So we’re excited about the wine aspect of that to just continue to educate.”

“There are so many Indigenous grapes in Italy, hundreds and hundreds, and we want to show you the different expressions of wine and how they, you know, they pair with food and just all the different wines that Italy has to offer,” co-owner Frank Tuscano added.

The owners say if you would like to check the new space out, reservations are highly recommended.

You can make those over on their website or by calling the restaurant.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Car flipped, police investigating scene in Boardman

Published

on

Car flipped, police investigating scene in Boardman


BOARDMAN, Ohio (WKBN) — A heavy police presence could be seen near Meadowbrook Avenue and Market Street in Boardman after one vehicle flipped on its roof Saturday evening

It happened a little before 7:30 p.m. on Market Street, right at the Meadowbrook Avenue intersection.

According to the Ohio State Highway Patrol, multiple people involved have been taken into custody.

Large police presences were also at the corner of Southern Boulevard and Meadowbrook Avenue, and at the intersection of Indianola Avenue and Market Street.

Advertisement

Our crew is on the scene, but right now we’re unsure if there are any injuries or how the crash happened.

The intersection is currently blocked off while crews work.

The crash is under investigation.

No other information has been given at this time.

Dominic O’Brien contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending