Connect with us

Ohio

Iowa basketball: Instant takeaways from Hawkeyes’ 82-65 road loss to Ohio State

Published

on

Iowa basketball: Instant takeaways from Hawkeyes’ 82-65 road loss to Ohio State


Iowa basketball entered Monday’s men’s contest at Ohio State shooting 51% from the field and 39.1% from deep. 

But the Hawkeyes’ high-octane offense did not show up in Columbus. On Monday, Iowa shot just 39% from the field and 28% from 3-point range.

Iowa was doomed by shooting struggles in the 82-65 loss.

Advertisement

Ohio State was mostly able to hold Payton Sandfort and Josh Dix in check. Sandfort had 13 points but was just 5-of-16 from the field. Meanwhile, Josh Dix didn’t score at all and was 0-of-7 from the field.

Monday had shades of Iowa’s offensive performance in last week’s loss to Minnesota. The Hawkeyes shot just 14.3% from deep against the Golden Gophers.

Iowa’s offense is what carries the team, and when the Hawkeyes have nights like these it’s very difficult to compete.

Iowa collapses in the second half

Iowa trailed by as many as 10 points in the first half but trimmed that deficit down to four at the break.

The Hawkeyes remained in the fight going into intermission.

Advertisement

But things started to unravel quickly after the break.

After an encouraging defensive performance in the first half, Ohio State shot 57% from the field after the break. Ohio State hammered Iowa on the boards in the second half, holding a 23-11 advantage, though that was in part due to the shooting discrepancy. Iowa wasn’t able to find a stable rhythm offensively.

The Buckeyes’ lead ballooned to as many as 25 points in what has become a familiar sight on the road for Iowa. The Hawkeyes were not able to sustain the level of offensive and defensive activity needed to win on the road. Ohio State looked comfortable and was in clear command of the game.

Ohio State outscored Iowa 52-39 in the second half.

Iowa’s road woes continue

The Hawkeyes still have not won a true road game this season.

Advertisement

Iowa is now 0-5. Only one of those games was decided by single digits. Other than that near-takedown of Michigan in December, Iowa has mostly not been very competitive. The Hawkeyes were clobbered by Wisconsin and UCLA. Monday fit right in with that narrative.

There are still more opportunities out there, but it’s not an encouraging development. Iowa goes on the road to Rutgers, Maryland, Illinois, Northwestern and Nebraska. Iowa’s troubles on the road makes the path the NCAA Tournament even more difficult.

Free throw issues still unsolved

The Hawkeyes again didn’t shoot well from the free throw line. Iowa finished Monday’s game just 10-of-17 from the charity stripe.

Seydou Traore was 7-of-10, Owen Freeman was 2-of-5 and Drew Thelwell was 1-of-2.

Had Iowa converted on every free throw, it still wouldn’t have been enough to turn the tide. But not taking care of the more controllable aspects like free throws makes winning an uphill battle.

Advertisement

The fleeting bright spots

Iowa stayed alive in the first half in part due to Freeman and Thelwell, who combined for 22 of Iowa’s 26 first-half points. That gave Iowa at least a chance.

Thelwell finished with a team-high 20 points on 8-of-10 from the field and 3-of-4 from deep.

Freeman slowed significantly in the second half, scoring just three points after the break. He finished the contest with 14 points.

Seydou Traore provided a boost in the second half, scoring 11 of his 13 points after the break.

But there were not nearly enough positive developments for Iowa to give Ohio State trouble, much less win the game.

Advertisement

Follow Tyler Tachman on X @Tyler_T15, contact via email at ttachman@gannett.com





Source link

Ohio

Lorain woman killed, three children injured in Ohio Turnpike crash in Elyria (UPDATED)

Published

on

Lorain woman killed, three children injured in Ohio Turnpike crash in Elyria (UPDATED)


Advertisement

`
const PAYWALL_HTML2 = `

Subscribe For Unlimited Access

Advertisement

You have exceeded the number of free articles available each month.

Thank you for supporting quality local journalism

Our award-winning coverage would not be possible without you.

Sign in here

Advertisement


if you are already a subscriber for unlimited access to breaking news, sports, photos, videos and our e-edition on your phone, tablet or desktop.

Click here
 for our new subscriber specials.

`.trim();
const PAYWALL_HTML3 = `

Advertisement
To continue reading SUBSCRIBE.
Already a subscriber? LOG IN.

`
const PAYWALL_HTML4 = “
function ensureCss() {
if (!document.head) return;

const existing = document.querySelector(‘link[data-paywall-css=”1″]’);
if (existing) return;

const link = document.createElement(‘link’);
link.rel=”stylesheet”;
link.type=”text/css”;
link.href = CSS_HREF;
link.setAttribute(‘data-paywall-css’, ‘1’);
document.head.appendChild(link);
}

function hasSubInfo(el) {
// Only replace once the widget already contains .subInfo
return !!(el && el.querySelector(‘.subInfo’));
}

function applyTo(el) {
if (!el || el.dataset.paywallReplaced === ‘1’) return;
if (!hasSubInfo(el)) return; //



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit $865,000

Published

on

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit 5,000



Real estate transfers in Licking County, Ohio, range from $85,000 to $865,000

The following are property transfers recorded in Licking County from June 1-5, 2026.

Advertisement

First name indicates the seller; second name represents the buyer

Buckeye Lake

  • 502 Providence Lane; Cohagen, Christopher C and Lori A; Adams, Jeffrey L and Boyce-Adams, Jo Anna; 6/1/2026; $511,000
  • 131 Cranberry Lane; Smart, Amy and Kidwell, Kevin K; Sew and Minor, Christian; 6/1/2026; $262,000

Etna Township

  • 116 Cameron Drive SW; Ray, Erica L; Darjee, Sanjay and Laxmi and Dil; 6/2/2026; $412,000  
  • 119 Kraner St. SW; Adkins, Zane and Amy; Culbertson, Brenton Howard; 6/1/2026; $368,500
  • 160 Dusky Willow Drive; Willow Reserve LLC; Martin, Alaina K; 6/2/2026; $290,940

Granville

  • 119 Derwyn Del Way; Lifer, David C and Julia H; Martin, Michael and Lisa; 6/1/2026; $865,000
  • 39 Victoria Drive; Acton, Wendy S and Paul J; Cannon, Matthew Evan and Zywica, Natalie Nicole; 6/2/2026; $835,000

Granville Township

  • 49 Alberry Drive; Halliday, Lucas and Breayne; Howe, Jason and Kathryn; 6/2/2026; $570,000

Harrison Township

  • 102 Whirlaway Loop; Rice, Dawn (Trustee); Bope, Maria and Shane; 6/2/2026; $420,000

Heath

  • 1306 Kacey Court; Fischer Homes Columbus II LLC; Owens, Blake Andrew and Taylor Marie; 6/2/2026; $437,779
  • 805 Fieldson Drive; Flowers, Ingrit; Harder, Noah C; 6/2/2026; $250,000

Hebron

  • 802 Cumberland Meadows Circle; Lines, Marlene S; Gerhart, Jamie A and Ralph W Jr; 6/2/2026; $232,000

Johnstown

  • 101 Bigelow Drive; McGovern, Matthew S and Jennifer L; Sanford, Jessica; 6/2/2026; $442,500

Liberty Township

  • 5844 Nichols Lane Road NW; La Jeunesse, Garth E and Debra; Nesselroad, William Heath and Annie; 6/1/2026; $629,000
  • 7211 Northridge Road NW; Devault, Robert E Jr and Joann; Esbenshade, Travis M and Lowe, Shelby M; 6/1/2026; $495,000

Newark

  • 2110 Overlook Way; D.R. Horton-Indiana LLC; Tarsha, Michele A; 6/1/2026; $433,335
  • 1162 Taylor Ave.; Heath Fluid LLC; Anglada, Gabriel P and Salina T; 6/1/2026; $200,000
  • 32 Postal Ave. W.; Palmisano, Phil; Moore, Dominic Michael and Miksich, Paige Elizabeth; 6/1/2026; $198,900
  • 75 Gay St.; Velez, Marcos A; Camell, Campbell; 6/1/2026; $155,000
  • 655 Evans St.; TNL; McRada Properties LLC; 6/1/2026; $145,000
  • 63 Wallace St.; FDA Peachtree LLC; Burns, Amber L; 6/2/2026; $86,500
  • 404 10th St.; Synergy Group Properties LLC; Busy Boys Restoration LLC; 6/2/2026; $85,000

Reynoldsburg

  • 8447 Rodebaugh Road; Collins, Carol J; Thorpe, Kimberley Lynn and Henry, Steven; 6/2/2026; $340,000



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored

Published

on

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored


COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s law requiring children under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps must be restored, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The decision comes as a blow to NetChoice, which has won court victories against identical digital identification laws in other states, including Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia. The trade group representing TikTok, Snapchat, Meta and other major tech companies said the Ohio decision went against “clear national consensus” and that it intended to keep fighting.

“An unconstitutional law protects no one, and we remain focused on ensuring the First Amendment rights of Ohioans are protected,” said Paul Taske, director of the NetChoice Litigation Center.

Netchoice brought suit against Ohio’s law in 2024, arguing that it was overly broad, vague and represented an unconstitutional impediment to free speech.

Advertisement

The Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit’s panel disagreed. In a 2-1 decision, it found that the law was not unconstitutional and sent it back to a lower court to have a block on the law’s enforcement vacated.

“At bottom, the Act imposes a parental consent requirement,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the lead opinion. “That requirement constitutes a marginal burden that precisely targets the multi-faceted problem that Ohio has identified: Children’s unsupervised assent to terms and conditions for use of platforms that take advantage of and harm them.”

Judge Alice Batchelder concurred, writing that “a statute is not vague just because it has a wide berth.”

Known as the Social Media Parental Notification Act, the Ohio law was part of an $86.1 billion state budget bill that Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law in July 2023.

The administration pushed the measure as a way to protect children’s mental health, with then-Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, now a U.S. senator, saying at the time that social media was “intentionally addictive” and harmful to kids.

Advertisement

The law requires companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.

Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Advertisement

Republican Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson called Thursday’s ruling “a win for Ohio families.”

“The court agreed that parents –- not social media companies –- should get a say in what kids see online,” he said in a statement. “We have an obligation to keep our children safe, and today, the most dangerous place for our kids is the internet. This decision gives parents the tools to be involved and provide oversight.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending