Connect with us

North Dakota

Verizon debuts 5G Ultra Wideband coverage in North Dakota

Published

on

Verizon debuts 5G Ultra Wideband coverage in North Dakota


FARGO — Verizon customers throughout North Dakota may have noticed their cell phones running a bit faster Tuesday morning, June 27.

That uptick in speed is because Verizon has begun to roll out its 5G Ultra Wideband service across North Dakota, the company announced via press release Tuesday.

The release stated that the

5G Ultra Wideband coverage

Advertisement

“brings power and performance comparable to a wired broadband internet connection to customers’ pockets.” Among the tasks made possible by 5G Ultra Wideband, the release said, are “downloading huge documents and streaming movies in high definition audio and video, … playing console quality games and conducting video chats, video conferencing and FaceTime calls with clear sound and video.”

According to

Verizon’s website, the company was the first in the world to roll out 5G connectivity on April 3, 2019, when service began in Chicago and Minneapolis. The company has steadily rolled out 5G and 5G Ultra Wideband since then.

On March 7, Verizon announced that its 5G Ultra Wideband network was available to 200 million Americans. In

announcing

Advertisement

the milestone, Verizon promised to continue expanding coverage in suburban and rural areas as well. Since then, the company has expanded 5G Ultra Wideband coverage in Iowa, Nebraska, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Indiana, South Dakota and Texas.

“Our engineers are working tirelessly to bring an exceptionally reliable 5G network experience to more areas in North Dakota,” Dean Brauer, Vice President of Engineering and Operations for Verizon, stated via release. “This technology will not only bring faster speeds and more reliable connectivity, but expanding 5G service into more areas of North Dakota will unlock new opportunities for innovation and economic growth.”

Cities and towns that now have access to 5G Ultra Wideband include Jamestown, Williston, Valley City, Wahpeton, Devils Lake, Crosby, Columbus, Flaxton, Sherwood, Mohall, Westhope, Willow City, Belcourt, Rolla, Starkweather, Anamoose, Velva, New Town, Killdeer, Beach, Center, New Rockford, Gackle, Ashley, Grafton, Wahpeton, Drayton, Buxton, Oriska, Forman and Ludden.

The release did not indicate that Fargo, Bismarck, Grand Forks and Minot were included in the debut. However, a service coverage map on Verizon’s website showed that some areas of Fargo, Bismarck, Grand Forks and West Fargo have 5G Ultra Wideband coverage. Minot was not shown to have any 5G Ultra Wideband coverage.

Advertisement
A screenshot depicts Verizon’s wireless coverage map for North Dakota as of Tuesday morning, June 27, 2023 with the pin marking Fargo’s location. The dark red areas represent where 5G Ultra Wideband is available. The light red represents 5G service, while the predominant pink color represents 4G LTE service. White areas do not have Verizon coverage.

Contributed / Verizon

Verizon is using a C-Band spectrum which it recently acquired to deliver the 5G Ultra Wideband. The service will use 100 megahertz of the C-Band spectrum in “multiple North Dakota markets,” with additional bandwidth to be available by the end of the year. To accommodate the “exponential increases” in data usage, Verizon has increased the fiber connections at many cell sites to carry 10 times more data than before.

CATCH UP ON THE INFORUM BUSINESS BEAT PODCAST

Advertisement

Thomas Evanella

Thomas Evanella is a reporter for The Forum. He’s worked for The Forum for over three years, primarily reporting on business news. He’s also the host of the InForum Business Beat podcast, which can be streamed at InForum.com/podcasts or wherever you listen to your podcasts. Reach him at tevanella@forumcomm.com or by calling 701-241-5518. Follow him on Twitter @ThomasEvanella.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support

Published

on

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

Advertisement

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Port: Make families great again

Published

on

Port: Make families great again


MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.

It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.

The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.

North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.

Advertisement

How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,

House Bill 1491

would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.

Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.

State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed

Advertisement

a $66 million child care package

focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.

Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?

The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.

According to data from the state Department of Health,

Advertisement

the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.

Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.

This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.

When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.

These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN


LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.

Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.

The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.

North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.

Advertisement

——

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending