Connect with us

North Dakota

The story of North Dakota's youngest 'vagrants' in 1923

Published

on

The story of North Dakota's youngest 'vagrants' in 1923


Stutsman County officials faced an unusual challenge with some young vagrants wandering the area in 1923.

The problem started on a Sunday when residents of the Windsor area brought two boys to Jamestown. The boys, ages 11 and 8, were found in the area and claimed they had been traveling alone for a “fortnight,” according to newspaper reports.

A fortnight is two weeks, in case you are not familiar with the time reference.

The children said they had been sleeping in hay and straw stacks in the fields and eating food begged at farmhouses along their route or snitched from vegetable garden plots.

Advertisement

Officials brought them to juvenile court, where Judge Coffey asked them how they had come to be traveling on their own.

According to the boys, they were traveling with their parents and five siblings by wagon across North Dakota headed toward Dickinson. Somewhere along the way, they had grown tired and stopped for a little nap. When they awoke, the wagon and their family were nowhere to be seen.

I suppose a family of seven children is difficult to keep track of, but it is no excuse to lose two of them along the way.

The children claimed they had tried to track the wagon but were never able to gain sight of their family.

According to newspaper articles, the children were placed under the Stutsman County sheriff’s authority while officials made attempts to locate their parents.

Advertisement

The newspaper coverage referred to the children as “North Dakota’s youngest vagrants” but also included some skepticism about their story. The article used the term “they said” often and presented no other information about the story.

It appears there were no follow-up articles about the children in any of the regional newspapers.

They may have been runaways, or they might have gotten lost by inattentive parents on a wagon trip across North Dakota

No matter how they came to be traveling along across North Dakota, they managed to spend a fortnight living off the land and surviving.

Author Keith Norman can be reached at

Advertisement

www.KeithNormanBooks.com





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Sex crimes case against Dakota Prairie school counselor dismissed

Published

on

Sex crimes case against Dakota Prairie school counselor dismissed


GRAND FORKS — At the conclusion of a Friday morning, June 21, preliminary hearing in Nelson County court, Judge Kristi Venhuizen dismissed the case against a former Dakota Prairie School counselor alleging that he solicited, lured and sexually assaulted students.

Brendon Thomas Parsley, 48,

was charged with three Class C felonies in February

for crimes he allegedly committed against two students to whom he provided counseling services.

Advertisement

The purpose of a preliminary hearing is to determine if there’s probable cause to support criminal charges being filed. Preliminary hearings can be waived by the defense. If the hearing is held, the state must provide evidence that probable cause exists to continue prosecuting the defendant.

The defense can question any of the state’s witnesses and also may, but is not required to, bring in its own.

North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigations Special Agent Derek Madson testified for the state. He testified about interviews with the two alleged victims in the case, during which they spoke about Parsley’s alleged inappropriate conduct.

The crime of solicitation of a minor was filed due to allegations that, when one of the alleged victims was in Parsley’s house, he asked her if she was going to get on the bed and instructed her to leave after she hesitated.

The crime of luring a minor by electronic means was filed due to allegations that Parsley sent Facebook messages that were sexual in nature to the aforementioned minor.

Advertisement

The crime of sexual assault was filed due to allegations that Parsley made sexual contact with a minor as she was leaving a counseling session.

The charge of solicitation was dismissed without prejudice during the hearing, because it had incorrectly been filed as taking place when the alleged victim was under 15 years old. Madson, and the alleged victim herself, testified she was 17 at the time of the offense.

Jayme Tenneson, representing the state, requested that the charge be amended to solicitation of a minor older than 15, which would be a misdemeanor rather than a felony, according to his court statement.

However, the defense argued, and the judge agreed, that it was inappropriate to amend a charge during a preliminary hearing — it should have been done beforehand, when there was time for both parties to present arguments of probable cause for that charge.

It would have to be recharged accurately later.

Advertisement

Mark Friese, representing Parsley, called a private investigator to testify, as well as both the alleged victims.

Tenneson argued that calling the alleged victims to testify was undue harassment. However, by the end of the hearing, Venhuizen said if anyone was at fault for harassing the women, it was the state.

Tenneson failed to amend the information document prior to the hearing after Friese contacted him about the following errors: the luring charge was documented as occurring in 2014, however, the alleged victim testified it happened between 2015 and 2016; the sexual assault charge was documented as occurring in 2008, however, the alleged victim said it happened in 2009.

Amendments can be made to information documents as long as it doesn’t materially affect the criminal allegations, however, failing to do so before the preliminary hearing resulted in an inability to establish probable cause for any of the charges as they were presented.

The case was dismissed entirely, though charges may be refiled.

Advertisement
Sav Kelly joined the Grand Forks Herald in August 2022.

Kelly covers public safety, including regional crime and the courts system.

Readers can reach Kelly at (701) 780-1102 or skelly@gfherald.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Obituary for Philip George Freeman at Gregory J. Norman Funeral Chapel

Published

on

Obituary for Philip George Freeman at Gregory J. Norman Funeral Chapel


Philip G. Freeman, 92, of Grand Forks, ND passed away Thursday, June 20, 2024, at his home in Grand Forks. Mass of Christian Burial 1100 a.m. Monday, June 24, 2024, in St. Marys Catholic Church, Grand Forks, ND. Visitation 300 p.m. to 500 p.m. Sunday, June 23, 2024, with a



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota AG Wrigley makes first public comments about Epic Companies investigation

Published

on

North Dakota AG Wrigley makes first public comments about Epic Companies investigation


Attorney General Drew Wrigley (R-ND)

BISMARCK, N.D. (KFGO Prairie Public Radio) – More than a month after KFGO News reported that West Fargo-based Epic Companies closed and is under investigation, Attorney General Drew Wrigley has made his first public comments.  

Wrigley was asked about Epic during a news conference in Bismarck where he released 2023 state crime statistics.

Advertisement

“It’s obviously a very concerning matter,” Wrigley said. “There’s not always criminal wrongdoing, but if there is evidence of that, we pursue those investigations. Sometimes, they’re civil in nature, but whatever category it falls under, it’s concerning in nature. It’s being monitored, and it’s being evaluated, and it’s being investigated.”

Epic owns or manages commercial and residential buildings across the region and was hired to run “Norsk Hostfest” in Minot, which is back under local control for this fall’s event.  

Epic has laid off employees and a number of contractors and suppliers say they’re owed significant amounts of money.  

No one from the company will comment. Several sources say the company is under both state and federal investigation.  

Among the agencies investigating is the state securities department.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending