Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota higher ed board removes standardized testing requirements for university admission

Published

on

North Dakota higher ed board removes standardized testing requirements for university admission


GRAND FORKS — Members of the North Dakota State Board of Larger Training voted to take away the requirement of standardized exams, just like the ACT and SAT, for folks in search of admission to the state’s schools and universities.

Board members voted unanimously in favor of eradicating the testing requirement for admission at their common month-to-month assembly on Thursday, Might 26. The coverage will go into impact on Aug. 1, 2023. One of many fundamental causes for the removing of the requirement is to make state increased training establishments extra aggressive with testing-optional establishments in surrounding states.

“If accredited, your proposed adjustments as we speak would scale back limitations to entry and allow our North Dakota College System establishments, and notably these in japanese North Dakota with giant numbers of Minnesota college students, to be as aggressive as their counterparts who’ve already adopted test-optional insurance policies of their establishment, their state or their system,” mentioned Lisa Johnson, vice chancellor for educational and scholar affairs.

Thursday’s transfer noticed NDUS colleges be a part of about 2,000 accredited, four-year schools throughout the nation that now not require the submission of check scores. The brand new coverage means a larger weight for consideration of admission will likely be positioned on a scholar’s grade level common.

Advertisement

Johnson famous that submitting standardized check scores will nonetheless be part of figuring out state educational scholarships for individuals who apply for them. She inspired folks to take the exams anyway, on the possibility they withdraw from an NDUS faculty to go to an out-of-state faculty.

Board members took an abbreviated method in eradicating the requirement, by, at Johnson’s request, passing it on its first studying and waiving the second studying. Johnson mentioned colleges within the state system want time to replace their advertising supplies, and have to extra broadly talk the change.

“By approving the coverage as we speak with the efficient date, the NDUS recruitment workers can start revising their recruitment, outreach supplies (and start) reaching out to their contacts, the Ok- 12 counselors, college students, dad and mom and others of this pending change,” she mentioned.

Earlier within the coronavirus pandemic, board members issued a waiver to NDUS establishments that put a pause on requiring check scores for admission.

Board members can rethink the coverage change at a later date, ought to they so want.

Advertisement

The brand new coverage largely is expounded to undergraduates. College students shifting on the graduate or skilled ranges of training, regulation faculty at UND, for instance, will nonetheless have to take the related check for admission.

Gracie Lian, the outgoing scholar member of the board, praised the choice saying some college students merely don’t check nicely, or don’t have entry to expensive examine guides or programs that put together a scholar to take the SAT or ACT exams.

UND President Andrew Armacost known as the transfer an essential step in remaining aggressive.

“If our neighboring states are providing the identical test-optional coverage, we’d be at an enormous admissions drawback if we did not do the identical,” Armacost mentioned.

Not everybody was thrilled about eradicating the check requirement. President Stephen Easton, of Dickinson State College mentioned there was not unanimity throughout state establishments in regards to the coverage. Of specific concern could be the migration of scholars to the bigger universities, from the smaller schools.

Advertisement

In different SBHE information, members:

  • Elected board member Tim Mihalick to take over as vice chair of the board. The place was open following

    the resignation of Jill Louters, on Might 13.

    Mihalick will serve the rest of Louters’ time period as vice chair which runs till the top of June. He’ll then serve one other one-year time period as vice chair.

  • Reelected Casey Ryan to function board chair.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Death Investigation: North Dakota Person Died After Consuming Recalled Microdosing Candies – KVRR Local News

Published

on

Death Investigation: North Dakota Person Died After Consuming Recalled Microdosing Candies – KVRR Local News


BISMARCK, N.D. (KVRR/NorthDakotaMonitor) — A person in North Dakota died after consuming recalled microdosing candies.

The death is under investigation by state agencies, the poison control center and FDA.

The FDA published a recall on June 28 of some Prophet Premium Blends Diamond Shruumz products.

They are marketed as containing a proprietary blend of mushrooms.

Advertisement

As of July 1, 48 illnesses, including 27 hospitalizations, have been reported in 24 states.

North Dakota is the only state where a death is being investigated.

North Dakota officials are warning the public because the recalled products could still be available for sale online, in stores that sell hemp-derived products, or in smoke and vape shops, said Michelle Dethloff, director of the infectious diseases and epidemiology unit.

The products are not illegal but they are not licensed or regulated by the state.

State officials would not provide specifics about when or where in North Dakota the death occurred or the person’s age, citing privacy reasons. The person who died is an adult, Dethloff said. The exact cause of death remains under investigation.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota Residents Speak Out: 15 Things To Outlaw Forever

Published

on

North Dakota Residents Speak Out: 15 Things To Outlaw Forever


There’s really not much I don’t like about North Dakota.

Yeah, the weather can be annoying at times.  Mostly the wind, but other than that I personally love the 4 changes of seasons even though sometimes we miss out on one or two of them  Some years we don’t get much of a spring or in other years fall is very short and we go right into winter.

Besides the weather what’s not to like right?  Well, there are some things according to our listeners that should be “outlawed” in the state of North Dakota.

Wouldn’t be nice if you could make one law in the state of North Dakota?

Advertisement

I recently asked my listeners on our Facebook page, app, and on-air if they could outlaw one thing in North Dakota what would it be?  Some of the answers were of course comic genius.  Like, “STDs”, “Mothers in Laws”, “White Claw Drinkers”, “South Dakotans” and my favorite “Mondays”.  Yes, we should definitely go to a 4-day work week in this country.

Some more serious answers like “Texting and Driving”, “Vaping”, “Smoking”, and “The Enforcement of Littering Fines” were also given.

I had over 1,000 answers to my question to add up. 

Those are just some of the honorable mentions that didn’t quite make the top 15 answers to my very scientific poll that encompassed over 1,000 answers.  I’m actually starting to get pretty good at math thanks to this job.

So, without further ado, here are “The Top 15 Things We Would Like to Outlaw in North Dakota.”  Hopefully, some of these will become illegal in the future.

Advertisement

These Are The 15 Things North Dakotans Would Like To Outlaw

Beautiful North Dakota home found full of dead animals.

Gallery Credit: John Seil

LOOK: Baby names that are illegal around the world

Stacker scoured hundreds of baby name databases and news releases to curate a list of baby names that are illegal somewhere in the world, along with explanations for why they’re banned.

Gallery Credit: Annalise Mantz





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Minnesota, North Dakota prep for busy roads this holiday weekend

Published

on

Minnesota, North Dakota prep for busy roads this holiday weekend


FARGO, N.D. (Valley News Live) – According to AAA, nearly 71 million people are expected to travel this week. Chances are, many of you will be if you haven’t already.

It’s all hands on deck for law enforcement in Minnesota. They’re keeping an extra eye out for impaired and distracted drivers.

“We hope when we go out, we don’t find anybody. You know, making those poor choices because we want everybody to hear the conversations here than along the roadside. Really the 4th of July holiday should be about making memories and we don’t want to involve bad crashes or anything like that,” said Sgt. Jesse Grabow with the Minnesota State Patrol.

State Patrol says over the last five years, there have been 25 traffic-related deaths on the 4th. That’s more compared to other holidays including the winter ones like Christmas and New Year’s.

Advertisement

”Clear, sunny days, dry roads, it’s one of those things that again, just because the road conditions are in good conditions doesn’t mean you can get laxed on your behaviors when it comes to traffic safety.”

While different states, safety is also the main goal in North Dakota.

“We have a speeding grant that’s going on right now. So we’ll definitely be enforcing speeding but as always, we definitely do whatever we can to deter DUIs and we will be enforcing DUIs whenever we can,” Sgt. Matt Ysteboe with Fargo Police tells Valley News Live.

In North Dakota, a first-offense DUI is considered a Class B misdemeanor. It can lead to a $500 fine if your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is below .16. The higher the BAC, the higher the penalty. Drinking and driving can be more than a penalty to your wallet.

“Making sure that you have a designated driver. We don’t want to see anybody out there getting hurt or getting involved in with some terrible accident from drinking and driving,” added Ysteboe.

Advertisement

For Minnesota, punishment for one’s first DWI can vary. The Department of Public Safety says a typical penalty for a first-time offender is potential jail time and the loss of a license for a minimum of up to 30 days to a year. When factoring costs and legal fees, you could be looking at a price tag as high as $20,000.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending