Connect with us

North Dakota

Late North Dakota attorney general’s email account deleted days after his death

Published

on

Late North Dakota attorney general’s email account deleted days after his death


Late North Dakota Legal professional Normal Wayne Stenehjem’s state electronic mail account was deleted shortly after his demise earlier this yr with the approval of his former deputy, in line with his successor.

Moreover, former Chief Deputy Legal professional Normal Troy Seibel’s electronic mail account additionally was deleted in Might. He had resigned in March when new Legal professional Normal Drew Wrigley made clear his intentions to nominate his personal deputy.

The deleted electronic mail accounts got here to mild Friday in response to a Bismarck Tribune open information request.

Seibel instructed the Tribune Friday he would not recall a dialog about Stenehjem’s electronic mail account. Seibel additionally stated he had no management over how his electronic mail account was dealt with after he resigned.

Advertisement

Wrigley took workplace Feb. 9 upon Gov. Doug Burgum’s appointment of him to fill the remaining months of Stenehjem’s time period after the longtime officeholder died Jan. 28 at age 68 from cardiac arrest. Wrigley should win election in November to proceed serving past 2022.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

A press release from Wrigley’s workplace Friday stated he and Deputy Legal professional Normal Claire Ness discovered of the account deletions in early July whereas fulfilling the Tribune’s information request, and “directed that each one potential makes an attempt be made to retrieve the e-mail accounts.”

The Tribune sought electronic mail correspondence from Stenehjem and Seibel associated to a $1.8 million development price overrun for a constructing leased in south Bismarck. Wrigley had notified lawmakers of the price overrun final month in a public assembly; two interim legislative panels are probing the price overrun. The state auditor’s workplace is helping.

Seibel beforehand has disputed a lot of Wrigley’s narrative concerning the price overrun, notably of when he was first conscious of the difficulty.

Stenehjem’s “total state electronic mail account” was deleted Jan. 31 — days earlier than his Feb. 3 funeral — “on the instruction of a nonsupervisory, non-attorney worker of the Legal professional Normal’s Workplace who said the motion was accredited by then-Deputy Legal professional Normal Seibel,” in line with Wrigley’s workplace.

Wrigley stated Seibel gave verbal approval to the worker, who relayed it to IT workers. 

Advertisement

Seibel’s total electronic mail account was deleted Might 23 “on the instruction of the identical nonsupervisory, non-attorney worker of the Legal professional Normal’s Workplace,” in line with the workplace. 

Wrigley stated the deletion was accomplished “with out authorization.”

Seibel’s emails had been “culled by extensively to see whether or not there have been free ends, some work, some follow-up that wanted to be accomplished,” a type of “triaging” that ended after two weeks, concluding with the account’s deletion, Wrigley stated.

Wrigley declined to call the worker or say whether or not she or he had been disciplined, citing an “inner personnel matter,” however stated he’ll disclose these particulars “ultimately.” 

He stated he and Ness did categorical their “shock and disappointment” to the worker. 

Advertisement

Wrigley stated the deleted accounts carry no “authorized implications” for any pending information requests and no violations of workplace coverage. He stated his workplace will formalize a coverage for preserving the emails of the lawyer common, deputy and workplace division administrators. 

“They are going to by no means be deleted,” Wrigley stated. 

He stated he “noticed no proof of what I’d name a nasty intent or a nefarious intent” within the accounts’ deletion. He stated he sees “no indication of something that may lead me to conclude that there would have to be an outdoor legal investigation.”

The prevalence of deleted electronic mail accounts “is way more widespread in state authorities than I ever knew was potential,” Wrigley stated.

“I’d hope this is able to lead everybody to guage these insurance policies of their places of work as a result of I believe there’s an expectation that it will be in any other case,” he stated.

Advertisement

The timing of the deletion of Stenehjem’s electronic mail account — the Monday after his Friday demise — “does strike me. It was fast,” Wrigley stated.

Ness and different workers labored with the lawyer common’s Data Know-how Division and the state IT Division “to make sure each effort was made to retrieve the emails,” however “regrettably, this workplace has now been knowledgeable the accounts are unretrievable,” in line with the assertion.

Some emails obtained by different workers from Stenehjem’s and Seibel’s accounts do exist, and IT workers discovered some emails from Seibel’s account in a cached file on his former laptop computer. 

Ness stated it is unknown what number of emails had been deleted.

“We do not know what the scale of these accounts had been, at the very least that I have been capable of uncover,” she stated.

Advertisement

Seibel stated the e-mail accounts might have been deleted as commonplace process for when folks go away the workplace. Sustaining each workplace report would pile up extra paperwork to sift by for answering open information requests, he added. 

Emails are deleted in 30 days after a state authorities electronic mail account is disabled, in line with IT Division spokeswoman Jecca Geffre, who stated, “It’s a (Microsoft) Outlook coverage, not an inner setting, we are able to’t change it.”

Seibel stated he is undecided why Wrigley is bringing these points to mild, however, “I believe what he is indicated publicly is he simply desires to carry transparency to the method, which I recognize that, and I assume I by no means actually thought there wasn’t transparency.”

Wrigley stated transparency guided his selections round disclosing the price overrun to state lawmakers and detailing the circumstances of the deleted electronic mail accounts in response to the Tribune’s information request. 

Wrigley faces Democrat Tim Lamb in November.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use

Published

on

Concerns over local control pop up in hearing on North Dakota bill to restrict student cellphone use


BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers heard testimony for and against a bill to ban cellphone use by public school students during instructional time Wednesday, Jan. 15.

House Bill 1160,

sponsored by Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo,

would prohibit students from using cellphones during classes or any educational activity but allow such use during lunch, recess, between classes and open class periods.

Advertisement

Jonas said approximately 11 states have either total bans or restrictions on student cellphone use and another 10 are considering them.

“Let’s see if we can get better behavior, academic scores up, math, reading and better mental health,” Jonas told the House Education

C

ommittee on Wednesday.

A modified version of the bill makes exceptions for students who must use their cellphone to manage a medical condition or are on an individualized education program, plan or 504 plan who use their phone as an assistive device.

Advertisement

In addition, a school district or school may temporarily suspend the cellphone ban in the case of an emergency.

West Fargo High School Principal Rachel Bachmeier, who spoke in favor of the bill, said her school, along with others in the district, implemented a policy in the fall of 2022 to restrict cellphone use.

In effect, the cellphone policy is “out of sight, out of use from bell to bell,” she said, but students may use them during non-instructional time.

Consequences for violating the policy range from a classroom warning to surrender of the cellphone to the main office for a day or more to family meetings and behavior plans.

“We very, very rarely move beyond the first main office consequence. It is an incredibly effective policy in that way,” Bachmeier said.

Advertisement

Teachers have also noticed less “drama” in the classroom when students aren’t distracted by their phones, she added, and students themselves have reflected on how the policy improved their own behaviors.

Several school administrators and other stakeholders expressed concerns with aspects of the bill.

Steve Madler, principal of Bismarck Century High School, said they follow an “out of sight, out of mind during instruction” policy after attempting an all-out cellphone ban a few years back, which led to too many arguments from students and families.

However, he said, some students and teachers use cellphones in the classroom for research, surveys and language translation, adding that the Bismarck district distributes Google Chromebooks to students, which aren’t as efficient as Apple iPads for those tasks.

“It’s important for us to have policies, but I think it’s also important that we have pieces in the bill that allow us to use it for an educational purpose,” Madler said.

Advertisement

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, in-house legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, expressed concern about a blanket ban on cellphone use. She said local control should be maintained, and a large majority of school districts already handle this issue.

Norby-Jahner suggested a change in the bill’s language simply requiring all school districts to come up with their own cellphone policies.

In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature passed a law requiring school districts and charter schools to adopt student cellphone policies by March 15, 2025.

Bachmeier said there is an argument for local control, but action is needed if lawmakers believe excessive cellphone use and social media access during classes is a public health crisis.

“If we do, what is our responsibility as a state to step in and take the first action in helping protect our kids?” she asked.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say

Published

on

School phone policies needed, but not a state ban, bill opponents say


Mactrunk / Depositphotos.com

BISMARCK (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota public education groups said Wednesday they recognize the need for a policy on student use of cellphones but mostly resisted a call for a state-mandated ban.

Rep. Jim Jonas, R-West Fargo, introduced House Bill 1160 that would ban students from using cellphones during class time.

Advertisement

A proposed amendment to the bill would add some exemptions, like using a smartphone to monitor health conditions, such as diabetes, and in some cases where students are on a learning plan crafted for the student.

The House Education Committee did not act on the bill or the amendment but indicated that there would be more discussion next week.

KrisAnn Norby-Jahner, legal counsel for the North Dakota School Boards Association, testified that the cellphone use issue should be handled at the local level, but added she would not be opposed to a bill requiring that school districts have a cellphone policy.

Mike Heilman, executive director of the North Dakota Small Organized Schools, testified that the group’s board members did not support the bill.

He said some teachers have students use their phone during class and designate a spot on the desk where the phone should be when not being used.

Advertisement

He also said some schools may want to make exceptions for juniors and seniors to have more access to their phones

But he also said schools might like the state’s support on the need for a cellphone policy.

Cellphone use among students was described during testimony as a mental health issue in addition to being a distraction.

Rachel Bachmeier, principal at West Fargo High School, said there has been “less drama” since the school restricted phone use to breaks between classes.

She said parents generally support that policy, with little support for an overall ban during the school day.

Advertisement

Steve Madler, principal at Bismarck Century High School, said his experience with a ban during the school day turned out to be unworkable for many students and parents.

The U.S. Department of Education in December called on every state and school district to adopt a policy on phone use in schools.

Jonas, a former West Fargo teacher, said the goal of the bill is improved test scores and mental health. He said he received some calls from principals for an all-out ban during the school day.

When asked what the penalty would be for a school that did not enforce the state policy, he did not give specifics.

“The hope is that they would abide by the law,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Two Grand Forks residents among finalists for state Board of Higher Education

Published

on

Two Grand Forks residents among finalists for state Board of Higher Education


GRAND FORKS — Two Grand Forks residents are among six finalists to fill two seats on the state Board of Higher Education, State School Superintendent Kirsten Baesler announced this week.

A nominating committee selected the six finalists, and the names will next go before Gov. Kelly Armstrong to make the final two appointments, which then must be confirmed by the North Dakota Senate.

The selected nominees will fill the board seats currently held by Casey Ryan, a Grand Forks physician who is finishing his second four-year term on the board and is not eligible for reappointment, and Jeffry Volk, a retired Fargo consulting engineer, who is eligible for a second term.

The finalists for Ryan’s seat are:

Advertisement
  • Levi Bachmeier, business manager of the West Fargo school district and education adviser to former Gov. Doug Burgum,
  • Russel Crary, a Grand Forks real estate developer, and
  • Rich Wardner, of Dickinson, a former North Dakota Senate majority leader and retired K-12 teacher and coach.

The finalists for Volk’s seat are:

  • Beverly Johnson, of Grand Forks, a retired physical therapy professor and clinical education director at the UND medical school,
  • Warren Sogard, owner and chairman of American State Bank and Trust Co., of Williston, and
  • Volk, the incumbent.

The nominating committee met Tuesday to review a dozen applicants for the two openings, according to a release. Baesler is chairwoman of the nominating committee, and other members are Jon Jensen, chief justice of the North Dakota Supreme Court; Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, which represents teachers and state employees; House Speaker Robin Weisz, R-Hurdsfield; and Senate President Pro Tempore Brad Bekkedahl, R-Williston, the release said.

The Board of Higher Education has eight voting members and two nonvoting members who represent the system’s faculty and staff. It oversees the North Dakota University System’s 11 colleges and universities.

Our newsroom occasionally reports stories under a byline of “staff.” Often, the “staff” byline is used when rewriting basic news briefs that originate from official sources, such as a city press release about a road closure, and which require little or no reporting. At times, this byline is used when a news story includes numerous authors or when the story is formed by aggregating previously reported news from various sources. If outside sources are used, it is noted within the story.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending